Categories
Health

Pregnant Girls Get Conflicting Recommendation on Covid-19 Vaccines

Schwangere, die nach Leitlinien für Covid-19-Impfstoffe suchen, sind mit der Art von Verwirrung konfrontiert, die die Pandemie von Anfang an verfolgt hat: Die weltweit führenden Organisationen für öffentliche Gesundheit – die US-amerikanischen Zentren für die Kontrolle und Prävention von Krankheiten und die Weltgesundheitsorganisation – bieten widersprüchliche Angebote Rat.

Keine der Organisationen verbietet oder fördert ausdrücklich die Immunisierung schwangerer Frauen. Sie wägen jedoch dieselben begrenzten Studien ab und geben unterschiedliche Empfehlungen.

Das Beratungsgremium der CDC forderte schwangere Frauen auf, sich vor dem Hochkrempeln mit ihren Ärzten zu beraten – eine Entscheidung, die von mehreren Frauengesundheitsorganisationen begrüßt wurde, da die Entscheidungsfindung weiterhin in den Händen der werdenden Mütter lag.

Die WHO empfahl schwangeren Frauen, den Impfstoff nicht zu erhalten, es sei denn, sie hatten aufgrund von Arbeitsexpositionen oder chronischen Erkrankungen ein hohes Risiko für Covid. Am Dienstag gab es Leitlinien zum Moderna-Impfstoff heraus, die bei Frauen und Ärzten in den sozialen Medien für Unsicherheit sorgten. (Anfang dieses Monats wurden ähnliche Leitlinien zum Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoff veröffentlicht.)

Mehrere Experten äußerten sich bestürzt über die Haltung der WHO und sagten, die Risiken für schwangere Frauen aus Covid seien weitaus größer als jeder theoretische Schaden durch die Impfstoffe.

“Es gibt keine dokumentierten Risiken für den Fötus, es gibt keine theoretischen Risiken, es gibt kein Risiko in Tierstudien”, sagte Dr. Anne Lyerly, Bioethikerin an der Universität von North Carolina, Chapel Hill. “Je mehr ich darüber nachdenke, desto enttäuschter und trauriger fühle ich mich darüber.”

Die Meinungsverschiedenheit zwischen der CDC und der WHO beruht nicht auf wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen, sondern auf deren Fehlen: Schwangeren wurde die Teilnahme an klinischen Studien mit den Impfstoffen verwehrt, eine Entscheidung, die einer langen Tradition des Ausschlusses schwangerer Frauen entspricht biomedizinische Forschung, aber eine, die jetzt in Frage gestellt wird.

Während das Ziel angeblich darin besteht, Frauen und ihre ungeborenen Kinder zu schützen, drängt das Ausschließen schwangerer Frauen von Studien das Risiko aus dem sorgfältig kontrollierten Umfeld einer klinischen Studie in die reale Welt. Die Praxis hat Patienten und Anbieter gezwungen, sensible, besorgniserregende Probleme mit wenig harten Daten über Sicherheit oder Wirksamkeit abzuwägen.

Impfstoffe gelten im Allgemeinen als sicher, und schwangere Frauen werden seit den 1960er Jahren aufgefordert, sich gegen Influenza und andere Krankheiten immunisieren zu lassen, auch wenn keine strengen klinischen Studien durchgeführt wurden, um sie zu testen.

“Als Geburtshelfer stehen wir häufig vor schwierigen Entscheidungen über die Verwendung von Interventionen in der Schwangerschaft, die in der Schwangerschaft nicht ordnungsgemäß getestet wurden”, sagte Dr. Denise Jamieson, Geburtshelferin an der Emory University in Atlanta und Mitglied der Covid-Expertengruppe am American College für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologen. Das College befürwortete nachdrücklich die Einbeziehung schwangerer und stillender Frauen in die Impfstoffstudien.

“Was viele Menschen vermissen, ist, dass es Risiken gibt, nichts zu tun”, sagte Dr. Jamieson. “Es ist keine kluge Strategie, schwangeren Frauen die Möglichkeit zu bieten, sich impfen zu lassen und sich selbst zu schützen, wenn bekannte und schwerwiegende Risiken für Covid durch die Schwangerschaft bestehen.”

Die Unsicherheit ist nicht auf Covid-Impfstoffe beschränkt: Viele, wenn nicht die meisten Medikamente, einschließlich weit verbreiteter Medikamente, wurden noch nie bei schwangeren Frauen getestet. Es kann Jahre oder Jahrzehnte dauern, bis unerwünschte Nebenwirkungen auftreten, wenn keine Studie mit einer Kontrollgruppe zum Vergleich vorliegt.

“Dies ist keine Geschichte über die WHO oder andere Personen, die von einer Impfung in der Schwangerschaft abraten”, sagte Carleigh Krubiner, Policy Fellow am Center for Global Development und Hauptforscher für das Projekt “Schwangerschaftsforschungsethik für Impfstoffe, Epidemien und neue Technologien” (VERHINDERN). “Es ist eine Geschichte über das Versäumnis, schwangere Frauen rechtzeitig und angemessen in Impfstudien einzubeziehen.”

Dr. Krubiner erklärte, sie verstehe die Verpflichtung der WHO und anderer Beratungsgremien, sich auf wissenschaftliche Studien zu stützen, und fügte hinzu: „Die Realität ist, dass wir noch keine Daten zu diesen Impfungen in der Schwangerschaft haben und es ohne diese Daten sehr schwierig ist Komm raus und gib eine umfassende Empfehlung zur Unterstützung ab. “

Die CDC und die WHO haben im Verlauf der Pandemie viele Male dissonante Ratschläge gegeben – insbesondere zur Nützlichkeit von Masken und zur Möglichkeit, dass das Virus in Innenräumen mit dem Flugzeug fliegt.

In einer Erklärung sagte die CDC am Donnerstag, dass aufgrund der Wirkungsweise der Impfstoffe Pfizer-BioNTech und Moderna „es unwahrscheinlich ist, dass sie ein spezifisches Risiko für schwangere Frauen darstellen“.

Die Empfehlung der CDC könnte für die USA sinnvoll sein, wo Frauen möglicherweise leicht ihre Gesundheitsdienstleister konsultieren können, sagte Joachim Hombach, ein Gesundheitsberater der WHO zu Impfungen. Die WHO berät jedoch viele Länder mit niedrigem und mittlerem Einkommen, in denen Frauen keinen Zugang zu Ärzten oder Krankenschwestern haben.

Die Empfehlung der WHO wurde auch “im Zusammenhang mit der begrenzten Versorgung” der Impfstoffe abgegeben, sagte Dr. Hombach. “Ich denke nicht, dass die Sprache entmutigend ist, aber die Sprache gibt die Fakten an.”

Pfizer bezog schwangere Frauen nicht in seine ersten klinischen Studien ein, da es die von der Food and Drug Administration festgelegten Richtlinien befolgte, um zunächst Studien zur Entwicklungstoxizität und Reproduktionstoxizität durchzuführen, sagte Jerica Pitts, eine Sprecherin des Unternehmens. Pfizer und Moderna übermittelten der FDA im Dezember Ergebnisse aus Toxizitätsstudien an trächtigen Ratten.

Pfizer plant, im ersten Halbjahr 2021 eine klinische Studie an schwangeren Frauen zu beginnen, sagte Frau Pitts. Laut Colleen Hussey, einer Sprecherin des Unternehmens, richtet Moderna ein Register ein, um die Ergebnisse schwangerer Frauen zu erfassen, die den Impfstoff erhalten.

Kritiker der Entscheidung der Unternehmen, schwangere Frauen von Studien auszuschließen, sagen, dass die Studien zur Reproduktionstoxizität viel früher hätten durchgeführt werden können – sobald vielversprechende Impfstoffkandidaten identifiziert wurden. Die Unternehmen hätten ein Protokoll zur Registrierung schwangerer Frauen hinzufügen sollen, sobald klar war, dass die Vorteile der Impfstoffe den potenziellen Schaden überwogen, sagte Dr. Krubiner.

“Es ist schwer zu verstehen, warum diese Verzögerung auftritt und warum sie nicht früher eingeleitet wurde”, sagte sie. “Das größere Problem ist, dass wir Monate verloren haben, wenn sie anfangen.”

Akiko Iwasaki, ein Immunologe an der Yale University, der Impfungen für schwangere Frauen befürwortet hat, stellte das zugrunde liegende Problem in Frage, das zur Entscheidung der WHO führte.

“Was auch immer es ist, ich wünschte, die WHO wäre transparenter in ihren Gründen für diese Empfehlung”, sagte sie. “Das Leben von Frauen hängt davon ab.”

Covid19 Impfungen >

Antworten auf Ihre Impfstofffragen

Bin ich in meinem Bundesstaat für den Covid-Impfstoff berechtigt?

Derzeit können mehr als 150 Millionen Menschen – fast die Hälfte der Bevölkerung – geimpft werden. Aber jeder Staat trifft die endgültige Entscheidung darüber, wer zuerst geht. Die 21 Millionen Beschäftigten im Gesundheitswesen des Landes und drei Millionen Einwohner von Langzeitpflegeeinrichtungen waren die ersten, die sich qualifizierten. Mitte Januar forderten Bundesbeamte alle Bundesstaaten auf, die Berechtigung für alle über 65-Jährigen und für Erwachsene jeden Alters mit Erkrankungen zu öffnen, bei denen ein hohes Risiko besteht, dass sie schwer krank werden oder an Covid-19 sterben. Erwachsene in der Allgemeinbevölkerung stehen am Ende der Reihe. Wenn Gesundheitsbehörden von Bund und Ländern Engpässe bei der Verteilung von Impfstoffen beseitigen können, sind alle ab 16 Jahren bereits im Frühjahr oder Frühsommer förderfähig. Der Impfstoff wurde bei Kindern nicht zugelassen, obwohl derzeit Studien durchgeführt werden. Es kann Monate dauern, bis ein Impfstoff für Personen unter 16 Jahren verfügbar ist. Aktuelle Informationen zu den Impfrichtlinien in Ihrer Region finden Sie auf Ihrer staatlichen Gesundheitswebsite

Ist der Impfstoff frei?

Sie sollten nichts aus eigener Tasche bezahlen müssen, um den Impfstoff zu erhalten, obwohl Sie nach Versicherungsinformationen gefragt werden. Wenn Sie nicht versichert sind, sollten Sie den Impfstoff trotzdem kostenlos erhalten. Der Kongress hat in diesem Frühjahr ein Gesetz verabschiedet, das es Versicherern verbietet, eine Kostenteilung wie eine Zuzahlung oder einen Selbstbehalt anzuwenden. Es bestand aus zusätzlichen Schutzmaßnahmen, die es Apotheken, Ärzten und Krankenhäusern untersagten, Patienten, einschließlich nicht versicherter Patienten, in Rechnung zu stellen. Trotzdem befürchten Gesundheitsexperten, dass Patienten in Schlupflöcher geraten, die sie für Überraschungsrechnungen anfällig machen. Dies kann bei Personen der Fall sein, denen zusammen mit ihrem Impfstoff eine Arztbesuchsgebühr berechnet wird, oder bei Amerikanern, die bestimmte Arten der Krankenversicherung haben, die nicht unter die neuen Vorschriften fallen. Wenn Sie Ihren Impfstoff von einer Arztpraxis oder einer Notfallklinik erhalten, sprechen Sie mit ihnen über mögliche versteckte Kosten. Um sicherzugehen, dass Sie keine Überraschungsrechnung erhalten, ist es am besten, wenn Sie Ihren Impfstoff an einer Impfstelle des Gesundheitsministeriums oder in einer örtlichen Apotheke erhalten, sobald die Aufnahmen breiter verfügbar sind.

Kann ich wählen, welchen Impfstoff ich bekomme?Wie lange hält der Impfstoff? Brauche ich nächstes Jahr noch einen?

Das ist zu bestimmen. Es ist möglich, dass Covid-19-Impfungen genau wie die Grippeimpfung zu einem jährlichen Ereignis werden. Oder es kann sein, dass der Nutzen des Impfstoffs länger als ein Jahr anhält. Wir müssen abwarten, wie dauerhaft der Schutz vor den Impfstoffen ist. Um dies festzustellen, werden Forscher geimpfte Menschen aufspüren, um nach „Durchbruchsfällen“ zu suchen – jenen Menschen, die trotz Impfung an Covid-19 erkranken. Dies ist ein Zeichen für eine Schwächung des Schutzes und gibt Forschern Hinweise darauf, wie lange der Impfstoff hält. Sie werden auch die Spiegel von Antikörpern und T-Zellen im Blut geimpfter Personen überwachen, um festzustellen, ob und wann ein Auffrischungsschuss erforderlich sein könnte. Es ist denkbar, dass Menschen alle paar Monate, einmal im Jahr oder nur alle paar Jahre Booster benötigen. Es geht nur darum, auf die Daten zu warten.

Benötigt mein Arbeitgeber Impfungen?Wo kann ich mehr erfahren?

Die von Pfizer und Moderna im Dezember veröffentlichten Toxizitätsdaten ergaben keine schädlichen Auswirkungen der Impfstoffe auf trächtige Ratten – Beweise, die von der WHO in ihren Leitlinien angeführt wurden.

Eine extreme Folge eines konservativen Ansatzes für Impfstoffe während der Ebola-Epidemie in der Demokratischen Republik Kongo, als Gesundheitspersonal allen Mitarbeitern an vorderster Front einen Impfstoff gegen die Krankheit anbot und Kontakte von Personen bestätigten, dass sie diese hatten – außer wenn sie schwanger waren oder Stillen. Ohne den Impfstoff starben 98 Prozent der schwangeren Frauen, die mit dem Ebola-Virus infiziert waren.

Die Regeln wurden nach einem öffentlichen Aufschrei geändert, aber bis dahin waren viele schwangere Frauen gestorben, sagte Dr. Lyerly.

Covid-19 hat sich auch für schwangere Frauen als gefährlich erwiesen. Eine große CDC-Studie, die im November veröffentlicht wurde, ergab, dass schwangere Frauen mit Covid, die symptomatisch waren, signifikant häufiger ins Krankenhaus eingeliefert wurden oder starben als nicht schwangere Frauen, die ebenfalls Covid-Symptome hatten.

Die Beweise veranlassten Beamte der Behörde, eine Schwangerschaft in die Liste der Erkrankungen aufzunehmen, die das Risiko schwerer Krankheiten und des Todes durch Covid erhöhen.

Die CDC hat eine Smartphone-Anwendung namens v-safe eingerichtet, um Berichte über Nebenwirkungen von immunisierten Personen zu erhalten. Bislang haben sich rund 15.000 schwangere Frauen in das Register eingetragen, berichtete das Impfkomitee der Agentur am Mittwoch.

“Ich denke, das ist unsere beste Chance, schnell Sicherheitsdaten zu erhalten”, sagte Dr. Jamieson.

Großbritannien empfahl zunächst dringend, Covid-Impfstoffe für schwangere Frauen zu verwenden, hat jedoch seitdem seine Leitlinien überarbeitet, um die Impfung schwangerer Frauen zuzulassen, die an vorderster Front arbeiten oder anderweitig einem hohen Risiko ausgesetzt sind. “Ich hoffe, die WHO wird es auch noch einmal überdenken”, sagte Dr. Jamieson.

Einige Experten sagten, die Empfehlungen seien nicht so unterschiedlich, wie sie auf den ersten Blick erscheinen könnten. “Die CDC ist eher geneigt zu sagen, dass schwangere Frauen Zugang zum Impfstoff haben sollten, aber ihre Umstände mit ihren Anbietern besprechen sollten”, sagte Dr. Ana Langer, eine Expertin für reproduktive Gesundheit, die die Frauen- und Gesundheitsinitiative an der TH Chan School in Harvard leitet der öffentlichen Gesundheit. „Die vorläufige Empfehlung der WHO besagt, dass Frauen, bei denen ein besonders hohes Risiko besteht, exponiert zu werden oder Covid zu bekommen, den Impfstoff erhalten sollten. Wo ist hier der große Unterschied? “

Denise Grady trug zur Berichterstattung bei.

Categories
Health

New Covid variants are going to ‘hit us fairly onerous,’ says Dr. Peter Hotez

Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children’s Hospital, says the US is “facing a tough journey” as new variants of Covid spread across the country.

“Because they are more transmissible, it means more Americans will be infected. Although the number of new cases has decreased slightly … the expectation now is that it will rise again because of these new variants.” “Hotez said in an interview on Thursday evening of” The News with Shepard Smith. “” More people will become infected, overwhelm hospital systems again, and possibly the death rate will rise, both from a combination of more new cases in general and one. ” slightly higher mortality rate, solely due to the variant by the type of variant. “

Health officials in South Carolina have confirmed two cases of the dangerous, highly communicable South African tribe of Covid. Officials said the cases appear unrelated and unrelated to a recent trip. Dr. Zeke Emanuel, a member of President Joe Biden’s Covid Advisory Board, said that is why the South African exposure is so worrying.

“This is worrying because these two people have no evidence of travel, and it means that the South African variant, which is more worrying than even the British variant, is about and in the community,” said Emanuel.

Hotez told host Shep Smith that the new strains were even more problematic because “we weren’t looking”.

“We’ve done so poorly on genome sequencing that we’re picking up these British, South African, and Brazilian variants. So we know they’re in South Carolina, but they could be elsewhere,” said the dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine on Baylor College of Medicine.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned that the British variant, also known as B117, could dominate the US by spring. Hotez said the key to protecting the population is to vaccinate people faster.

“The bottom line is that we need to find a way to vaccinate the American people faster than current projections,” Hotez said. “First, to reduce hospital stays and deaths, but also to stay one step ahead of these variants. If we can vaccinate three-quarters of the American population, we could potentially interrupt transmission and prevent some of these new variants from becoming dominant.”

Categories
Health

Novavax’s Vaccine Works Properly — Besides on Variant First Present in South Africa

“This is really worrying,” said Dr. Peter Hotez, vaccine expert at Baylor College of Medicine and inventor of a coronavirus vaccine. “We need to vaccinate the American people by late spring or early summer to prevent the South African and British variants from adopting.”

Drug manufacturers could update their vaccines and offer new ones on a regular basis, similar to the flu vaccine.

Covid19 vaccinations>

Answers to your vaccine questions

Am I eligible for the Covid vaccine in my state?

Currently more than 150 million people – almost half of the population – can be vaccinated. But each state makes the final decision on who goes first. The country’s 21 million healthcare workers and three million long-term care residents were the first to qualify. In mid-January, federal officials asked all states to open eligibility to anyone over the age of 65 and adults of any age with medical conditions that are at high risk of becoming seriously ill or dying of Covid-19. Adults in the general population are at the end of the line. If federal and state health authorities can remove bottlenecks in the distribution of vaccines, everyone over the age of 16 is eligible as early as spring or early summer. The vaccine has not been approved in children, although studies are ongoing. It can take months before a vaccine is available to anyone under the age of 16. For the latest information on vaccination guidelines in your area, see your state health website

Is the Vaccine Free?

You shouldn’t have to pay anything out of pocket to get the vaccine, despite being asked for insurance information. If you don’t have insurance, you should still get the vaccine for free. Congress passed law this spring banning insurers from applying cost-sharing such as a co-payment or deductible. It consisted of additional safeguards prohibiting pharmacies, doctors, and hospitals from charging patients, including uninsured patients. Even so, health experts fear that patients will end up in loopholes that make them prone to surprise bills. This could be the case for people who are charged a doctor’s visit fee with their vaccine or for Americans who have certain types of health insurance that are not covered by the new regulations. If you received your vaccine from a doctor’s office or emergency clinic, talk to them about possible hidden costs. To make sure you don’t get a surprise invoice, it is best to get your vaccine at a Department of Health vaccination center or local pharmacy as soon as the shots become more widely available.

Can I choose which vaccine to get?How long does the vaccine last? Do I need another next year?

That is to be determined. It is possible that Covid-19 vaccinations will become an annual event just like the flu vaccination. Or the vaccine may last longer than a year. We’ll have to wait and see how durable the protection from the vaccines is. To determine this, researchers will track down vaccinated people to look for “breakthrough cases” – those people who get Covid-19 despite being vaccinated. This is a sign of a weakening of protection and gives researchers an indication of how long the vaccine will last. They will also monitor the levels of antibodies and T cells in the blood of people who have been vaccinated to see if and when a booster shot might be needed. It is conceivable that people might need boosters every few months, once a year, or just every few years. It’s just a matter of waiting for the data.

Does my employer need vaccinations?Where can I find out more?

“This virus is throwing us curve balls every day. I think we just need to be prepared and realize that the first generation of vaccines may need to be updated,” said Dr. Jesse L. Goodman, professor of medicine and infectious diseases medicine at Georgetown University.

The Novavax study in the UK tested how many volunteers developed symptoms of Covid-19 a week after receiving a second dose. The company said Thursday that its initial analysis found that of 62 participants who got the disease, 56 had received a placebo and 6 had received the vaccine. According to Novavax, the newer, more contagious variant, first identified in the UK, caused about 50 percent of the cases in the study.

If these results were reflected in the larger clinical trial in the United States and Mexico, which involved approximately 16,000 out of 30,000 people, it would equate the vaccine with the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, which were shown to be about 95 percent are effective.

But the news in South Africa was not that encouraging. Novavax’s smaller study found the vaccine to have an overall effectiveness of 49.4 percent. (The company reported that about 6 percent of the study participants were HIV positive, and for those who weren’t HIV positive, the vaccine had an effectiveness of 60 percent.) The company said the study was conducted from September through September The recording of cases of Covid-19 began midway through this month when the more contagious variant was widespread. According to Novavax, 44 study participants developed Covid-19 and sequenced the genetic lineage of 27 cases. Of these, 25 cases were caused by the more contagious version of the virus.

The company also said that about a third of study participants in South Africa had previously developed Covid-19 after being infected with the original form of the virus, and that their results showed that these previous infections did not protect them from the new variant. The company said its vaccine offered some protection for those who had previously contracted the disease, but did not include that group in its analysis.

Categories
Health

Cuomo administration underreported Covid deaths in nursing houses, report says

A view of a patient being rolled out of a nursing home in Flushing Queens New York USA during the coronavirus pandemic on April 22, 2020.

John Nacion | NurPhoto | Getty Images

The New York Department of Health reported Covid-19 deaths in nursing homes by up to 50%, according to a new report released Thursday by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The 76-page report comes from a month-long investigation by the Attorney General’s office into allegations that nursing homes have failed to follow coronavirus safety protocols. Her office also investigated discrepancies between the number of deaths reported by the state Department of Health in nursing homes and the number of deaths reported by the facilities themselves.

The investigation found that the number of Covid deaths among nursing home residents in some facilities has increased by more than 50% after counting residents who died in the hospital. The official Covid-19 state death toll in nursing homes excludes patients who have died after being transported to hospital.

Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo has been criticized for failing to disclose the total number of nursing home residents who have died from Covid-19. In her comprehensive report, James, also a Democrat, noted that “many nursing home residents in hospitals died of Covid-19 after being transferred from their nursing homes, which is not reflected in the overall data on nursing home deaths published by DOH . “

Cuomo representatives did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request to comment on the results. Representatives from the state Department of Health also did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The attorney general’s findings put them directly in conflict with the governor, who often boasted of the state’s response to the coronavirus. Cuomo has also dismissed criticism of a policy by the Ministry of Health that directed nursing homes to accept residents who tested positive for the coronavirus. The governor has repeatedly defended his government’s response to the pandemic, stating that the state was poorly supported by an inept federal government that was caught by surprise by importing the virus.

In May, the federal government asked nursing homes to provide weekly data on deaths from the coronavirus, including those who died at the facility and in hospitals. However, that guideline came after the first peak of the New York outbreak, making the data available from the state nursing homes barely available. An Associated Press analysis of federal data released in August found the state could underestimate deaths by up to 65%.

James’ results are based on a survey of 62 nursing homes, or approximately 10% of nursing homes in the state. She said her law firm is continuing to investigate inconsistencies in the data reported by the Ministry of Health and the numbers reported to the Attorney General.

The investigation also found that a number of nursing homes did not adhere to “Critical Infection Control Guidelines”; B. Failing to isolate residents who test positive for the virus.

“As the pandemic and our investigation continue, it is imperative that we understand why New York nursing home residents have suffered needlessly so alarmingly,” James said in a statement. “While we cannot bring back the people we lost to this crisis, this report aims to provide transparency the public deserves and encourage increased action to protect our most vulnerable residents.”

Categories
Health

As Pandemic Rages, Well being Care Unions Discover a Voice

Despite the decade-long decline of the labor movement and the low number of unionized nurses, labor officials have used the effects of the pandemic to organize new chapters and contract negotiations for better terms and benefits. National Nurses organized seven new negotiating units last year, compared to four in 2019. The SEIU also said interest has increased.

Nurses from various unions across the country have participated in dozens of strikes and protests. National Nurses held a “day of action” Wednesday, with demonstrations in more than a dozen states and in Washington, DC, as negotiations began in hospitals owned by major systems like HCA, Sutter Health and CommonSpirit Health.

Hospitals claim that unions make public health policy during a public health emergency, saying they have no choice but to ask more of their workers. “We are in a moment of crisis that we have never seen before and we need flexibility to care for patients,” said Jan Emerson-Shea, a spokeswoman for the California Hospital Association.

At the University of Illinois Hospital in Chicago, the death of two nurses from the virus helped staff strike for the first time last fall, said Paul Pater, emergency room nurse and union representative for the Illinois Nurses Association. “People really took it to heart, and it really despised the current administration at the hospital.”

In their most recent contract, the nurses there have been given provisions to ensure the hospital hires more staff and provides adequate protective equipment, Father said. “To be honest, we have only made great strides in protecting our employees.”

The hospital did not respond to requests for comment.

Some nurses remain very skeptical of union efforts, and even those who advocate an organization recognize that their options have serious limits. “I’m not sure the union is enough to get us this far,” said Mrs. McIntosh, the riverside nurse.

Many healthcare workers view vaccines as the beginning of the end of the pandemic. But large numbers – especially those who work in nursing homes and outside hospitals and tend to be more reluctant to give vaccines – refuse to be vaccinated. During a crisis that disproportionately threatens health workers with color, a recent analysis found they are receiving vaccinations well below those of their white counterparts.

Categories
Health

EU suggests AstraZeneca diverts Covid-19 vaccines from UK

An AstraZeneca vaccine production line.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

LONDON – The European Union has proposed that drug maker AstraZeneca reroute supplies of its coronavirus vaccine from the UK to mainland Europe as the battle over production delays and supplies continues.

It comes after AstraZeneca told the EU last week that it would initially deliver far fewer doses of its Covid vaccine to the block of 27 than initially thought.

The European Medicines Agency is expected to make a decision on Friday on whether the AstraZeneca vaccine will actually be approved for use.

In Germany, doubts have been expressed about the effectiveness of the vaccine in those over 65 years of age. On Thursday, the German vaccine committee recommended that the AstraZeneca vaccine only be offered to people between the ages of 18 and 64.

This is due to the fact that there is insufficient data to assess the effectiveness in people over 65 years of age.

Older study participants were later admitted to Phase 3 clinical trials of the AstraZeneca vaccine, which took place in the UK and Brazil, and earlier in South Africa. Therefore, there is less data on the effectiveness of the shot in those over 65.

Germany’s position casts doubt on the approval of the AstraZeneca vaccine at a time when a violent turmoil has broken out between the drug manufacturer and the EU over the delivery of the sting. The EU on Wednesday called for the pharmaceutical company to deliver on its agreement to supply millions of coronavirus vaccines by whatever means necessary.

“Constructive” discussions

Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides said talks with the company, which continued on Wednesday, were “constructive”. But she also tweeted that “contractual obligations must be met, vaccines must be delivered to EU citizens”.

She said in a statement that the EU rejected the “first come, first served” logic after AstraZeneca’s CEO attributed delays in delivery to teething troubles at European manufacturing sites and ironing out similar issues in the UK. because they had ordered his vaccine dose three months earlier than the EU.

In a press conference, Kyriakides said there was “no hierarchy” in the manufacturing facilities identified in his pre-purchase agreement with AstraZeneca and no provision as to which EU would or would not supply.

“There are four factories in the contract, but there is no distinction between the UK and Europe. The UK factories are part of our pre-purchase agreement so they must deliver,” she said. There was no clause in the contract stating that the drug manufacturer would give priority to the UK, she added.

Slaughter brows

It is the latest development in the very public confrontation between the EU and AstraZeneca, as the latter is facing problems in two of their European plants.

The British-Swedish company’s CEO, Pascal Soriot, further fueled tensions on Tuesday when he said in an interview with the Italian newspaper La Repubblica that the deal with the EU was a “best possible” rather than a “contractual obligation”.

The EU hit back and asked the drug manufacturer to provide detailed plans for its delivery schedule. An official urged AstraZeneca to redirect cans made in the UK to the EU, despite the company’s failure to respond to the problem, according to a Reuters report.

In an interview on Tuesday, Soriot said: “The UK government said that delivery from the UK supply chain would go to the UK first. Basically it is. The EU agreement mentions that UK production facilities were an option for Europe, but later. “

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson did not comment directly on the matter on Wednesday but said: “We are very confident in our deliveries, we are very confident in our contracts and we are proceeding on that basis.”

Vaccination drives

So far, the UK has vaccinated over 7.1 million people with a first dose of vaccine and nearly half a million received their second dose, which means more vaccinations have been received than Germany, France, Italy and Spain combined data numbers, according to Our World In.

Categories
Health

Thailand Legalizes Early-Time period Abortions however Retains Different Restrictions

BANGKOK – The Thai parliament has decided to make abortion legal in the first trimester while maintaining penalties for women who undergo an abortion later in their pregnancy.

Senate lawmakers voted 166-7 Monday to amend a law providing prison sentences of up to three years for anyone who has an abortion and up to five years for those who perform an abortion. With the new version, every woman can terminate a pregnancy in the first 12 weeks.

Proponents say the measure doesn’t go far enough: anyone in Thailand who has an abortion after 12 weeks, except under the conditions set by the country’s Medical Council, is still facing fines and up to six months in prison.

“For us this law is not a real development,” said Matcha Phorn-in, the executive director of Sangsan Anakot Yawachon, a non-profit organization in Thailand that campaigns for women’s rights.

“In order to pass this type of law, the participation of women needs to be prioritized, especially women who have experience of abortion,” she added. “The consultation process gave roles to lawmakers and human rights advocates, but there are no women who have experienced abortion or activists in the process.”

According to the Medical Council, pregnancies can be terminated after 12 weeks by a qualified professional if they are the result of sexual assault or endanger the mother’s physical or emotional health. Abortion is also allowed if the fetus is known to have abnormalities.

Many women in Thailand have found ways to get abortions under the previous restrictions, but the country still has a high teen pregnancy rate. According to government figures from the United Nations Population Fund, about 1.5 million babies were born to teenage mothers in Thailand between 2000 and 2014, and nearly 14 percent of all pregnancies in 2016 were teenagers.

Supecha Baotip, an activist with Tamtang, an abortion advocacy group in Thailand, said she was concerned that abortions would continue underground. “I don’t want women with pregnancies older than 12 weeks to fear that they will not be able to have the procedure and therefore not look for it legally,” she said.

Ms. Supecha said she will be closely monitoring the Ministry of Health to see whether the early abortion services are expanding and doctors are pressuring to comply with the new rule.

“Any hospital can offer this service, but not because of the attitudes of the doctors,” she added.

Last February, the Thai Constitutional Court ruled that the country’s previous abortion law was unconstitutional and gave the government 360 days to change it.

Two revisions were proposed, one by the cabinet and one by the opposition Move Forward Party. The House of Representatives later rejected the Move Forward version, which would have allowed abortions for up to 24 weeks.

Some elements of the Buddhist-dominated culture of Thailand are socially conservative. However, Thailand also has relatively progressive policies on gender and LGBTQ issues.

Heather Barr, interim co-director of women’s rights at Human Rights Watch, said in an email Thursday She saw progress on abortion rights in both Thailand and South Korea, where a court two years ago ruled that an anti-abortion law was unconstitutional.

But subsequent restrictions in Thailand, Ms. Barr wrote this week, still pose health risks. “When governments restrict abortion, women still have abortions – they just have more dangerous ones,” she wrote.

Ms. Matcha, the activist, said many Thai women decide to have an abortion after 12 weeks. “Most women still face the same problems despite this law: fear, stigma and breaking the law,” she said.

Muktita Suhartono reported from Bangkok and Mike Ives from Hong Kong.

Categories
Health

Tilray CEO expects U.S. federal hashish legalization inside two years

Brendan Kennedy, CEO of medical cannabis producer Tilray, poses in a greenhouse of the Canadian company’s European production site in Cantanhede on April 24, 2018.

Patricia De Melo Moreira | AFP | Getty Images

Brendan Kennedy, CEO of Canadian cannabis company Tilray, is optimistic that the US will take steps to federally legalize marijuana in the near future, which will shake the industry forever.

“I assume that the pressure from the north and the south will eventually cause the US to implement a federal program here sometime in the next 18 to 24 months,” said Kennedy in an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Wednesday.

Mexico released regulations on medical cannabis use earlier this month, and Kennedy is confident that Mexico and Canada’s positive stance on marijuana will put more pressure on the US

Tilray announced Tuesday that it has been selected by the country’s National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products as a supplier of medical cannabis for experiments in France.

The company has been selling its cannabis products in Germany since 2017. With the French program launched in the first quarter, Kennedy is optimistic that other European countries will run medical marijuana programs as well.

“While we look forward to our opportunities in Germany and France, we expect additional opportunities for our European companies in the coming quarters,” said Kennedy in an interview with CNBC.

Tilray has licenses to produce cannabis in Canada and Portugal, where the main cannabis facility is located.

Categories
Health

Christina Crosby, 67, Dies; Feminist Scholar Wrote of Turning into Disabled

Christina Crosby, an athletic woman who had just turned 50, was three miles on her cycling program near her Connecticut home when her front spokes caught a branch. The bike stopped and threw Dr. Crosby on the sidewalk. The impact hit her face and snapped at her neck. Immediately she was paralyzed for the rest of her life.

That was in 2003. She lost the use of her leg muscles and much of her upper body. But over time, she regained limited function in her arms and hands. And two years after the accident, she returned to work part-time as a professor of English literature and feminist studies, gender and sexuality studies at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Conn.

Finally – by dictating with speech recognition software – she was able to write a treatise: “One body, undone: Live on after great pain” (2016). It was an unsentimental examination of what she called the “surreal neurological wasteland” that she was poured into, and that forced her to search for her self-esteem.

In bottomless grief over everything she had lost, Dr. Crosby preserved her intellect and her ability to speak. Yet sometimes her pain was beyond the reach of language.

“I feel an unassailable loneliness,” she wrote, “because I will never be able to adequately describe the pain I am suffering, nor can anyone accompany me into the realm of pain.”

Late last month she was hospitalized in Middletown with a cystitis and learned she had pancreatic cancer, her partner Janet Jakobsen said.

Dr. Crosby died a few days later, on January 5th. She was 67 years old.

In her book, Dr. Crosby, to learn proper lessons about overcoming difficulties, or to come wiser from their disastrous injury. That made it a prominent text in disability studies and activism.

The typical disability narrative “leads the disturbed subject through painful exams to livable accommodation and lessons learned, and all too often the note sounds triumphant,” she wrote. “Don’t believe it.”

Christina Crosby was born on September 2, 1953 in Huntingdon, rural central Pennsylvania. Her father, Kenneth Ward Crosby, was a professor of history at Juniata College, where her mother, Jane (Miller) Crosby, taught home economics.

Christina was athletic as a child. She and her older brother Jefferson were age-related and physically competitive.

Christina attended Swarthmore College, where she majored in English and graduated in 1974. She wrote a column for the student newspaper called “The Feminist Slant” and helped found Swarthmore Gay Liberation. As a strange feminist, she remained committed to social justice and sexual liberation throughout her life.

She studied at Brown University in Providence, RI, where she completed her PhD in English in 1982. There she was part of a socialist feminist caucus that dealt with issues such as domestic violence. She and the caucus set up a hotline for abused women and established a women’s shelter called Sojourner House in 1976, one of the first of its kind in the country.

During this time she met Elizabeth Weed, then director of the Sarah Doyle Women’s Center in Brown, where the feminist caucus was holding its meetings. They were partners for more than 17 years and continued their relationship long after Dr. Crosby went to Wesleyan in 1982. Dr. Crosby’s papers are said to be kept at the Pembroke Center in Brown.

Dr. Crosby’s dissertation with Brown became her first book, “The Ends of History: Victorians and ‘the Woman Question'” (1991), which examined how Victorian literature excluded women from public life and raised questions about how history is told .

Though hired by Wesleyan’s English department, Dr. Crosby became a central part of the university’s women’s studies program, which she established as a major and later redesigned as a feminist, gender and sexuality study.

“She was the heart and soul of this program for decades,” said Natasha Korda, an English professor at Wesleyan University, in an interview.

“She was also a rock star on campus,” she added. “She was charismatic and lively, she had so much energy and she cut a very dashing figure.”

The students loved her, said Dr. Korda because she could make complex theoretical arguments “crystal clear” and because “she was not only an incredible storyteller, but also a great conversationalist”.

In the early 1990s, one of her students was the writer Maggie Nelson, whom Dr. Crosby advised on her thesis on denominational poetry. Dr. Crosby initially had little regard for denominational writing, but she later credited Ms. Nelson for opening her eyes to her worth when she began writing her memoir.

In 2003 the university faculty selected Dr. Crosby as chairman of the faculty. She chaired meetings and represented her colleagues in meetings with the President and the Board of Trustees.

She had just started her year-long tenure in this position when she had her bicycle accident. “Your life was brilliant,” said Dr. Jakobsen, Professor of Women, Gender and Sexuality Studies at Barnard, who has been Dr. Crosby’s partner and is her only immediate survivor. “Christina was a person who burned very brightly.”

In an eerie parallel, Dr. Crosby’s brother Jeff, an attorney with whom she was always closely associated, was multiple sclerosis in his twenties and quadriplegic in his late 40s. She wrote in her memoir that after her accident, her childhood fantasy of being her brother’s twin – Dr. Weed had once referred to them both as “beautiful physical specimens” – “was maliciously recognized because there we were, each with seriously incapable damage to the central nervous system, each in a wheelchair. “

Mr Crosby died in 2010 at the age of 57. It was his death, seven years after her accident, that Dr. Got Crosby to begin her memoir. It was unanimously chosen by a committee of Wesleyan students, faculties, and staff as the book all incoming students would read in 2018.

Towards the end of the book she wrote about the struggle between the fear that she would stop to mourn her past life, which would mean that she would “have come to terms with my deeply changed body” and the fear that she would not stop to grieve, a sign that she refused to move on and perhaps didn’t want to live.

“To move on, I have to actively forget who I was,” she concluded. “I am no longer what I used to be – and yet I no longer think about it. All of us who continue to live are not what we were, we will, always will. “

Categories
Health

West Virginia governor claims each individual over 65 might be vaccinated by Valentine’s Day

West Virginia Governor Jim Justice praised the success of distributing coronavirus vaccines in his state, claiming that if the mountain state had the “Valentine’s Day doses,” everyone in that state, 65 years of age and older, would be vaccinated.

West Virginia has spent the past three weeks as the number one or number two state in the nation for vaccination doses per capita, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Covid-19 Vaccination Tracker. The state also has an administration rate for the first dose of 95.2% and a vaccination rate for the second dose of 46.8%. This is based on vaccine data released on West Virginia’s Covid-19 dashboard on Wednesday.

Justice broke his state’s “all-in” approach to spreading the Covid vaccine in CNBC’s “The News with Shepard Smith”.

“We didn’t necessarily take the federal approach, we took a practical approach and we took an all-in approach,” Justice said during an interview on Wednesday evening. “We brought our National Guard, our local pharmacies, our local health workers, our local health clinics and everything.”

Justice added that the West Virginia model “is not rocket science, it just moves and doesn’t sit back and plan a strategy”.

However, vaccine adoption remains slower than expected in several states in the country. Wisconsin, for example, has lagged behind, handing out only 42.5% of its Covid vaccine doses, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Governor Tony Evers described the introduction of the state vaccine as “a bit bumpy”. Evers said his state did not get enough vaccines from the federal government and those who give vaccines needed more time to prepare.

West Virginia has delivered nearly 12,000 doses, 77% of their dose coverage. The judiciary emphasized the importance of putting older Americans at the forefront of a vaccination strategy.

“We just saw it that way and it was age and age and age and we knew we had to move,” Justice said. “We didn’t want vaccines on a shelf, we needed them in people’s arms.”

January 2021 is already the worst month in the United States since the coronavirus pandemic began, with more than 79,000 deaths, according to a CNBC analysis of Johns Hopkins data. It’s a grim milestone that has broken the December record by more than a thousand deaths.