Categories
Health

Biden Vows Sufficient Vaccine ‘for Each Grownup American’ by Finish of Could

However, Johnson & Johnson and its partners lagged behind making them. The company was supposed to be dropping off its first 37 million cans by the end of March, but said it could only drop 20 million cans up to that date, making Biden’s aides nervous.

In late January, Jeffrey D. Zients, Mr. Biden’s coronavirus response coordinator, and Dr. David Kessler, who manages vaccine distribution for the White House, to senior company officials including Alex Gorsky, whose executive director sent blunt message: This is unacceptable.

This resulted in a series of negotiations in February during which administration officials repeatedly pressured Johnson & Johnson to accept that they needed help and, according to two administration officials involved in the discussions, called on Merck to be part of the solution.

In a statement on Tuesday, Merck said the federal government would pay up to $ 269 million to customize and provision existing facilities to manufacture coronavirus vaccines. Michael T. Nally, executive vice president of human health at Merck, said in an interview that the company has had discussions with several companies and governments, including representatives of the former Trump administration.

“I think we all realize that every day counts,” he said.

Mr Nally declined to provide an estimate of the number of doses of vaccine the company could ultimately produce, saying only that it would be “significant”. However, the expanded range from Merck will probably only be available after months.

A federal official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said other steps the administration was taking would extend Johnson & Johnson’s production schedule.

These steps included providing a team of experts to oversee manufacturing and logistical support from the Department of Defense, according to White House press secretary Jen Psaki. In addition, the President will use the Defense Production Act, a law dating back to the Korean War, to give Johnson & Johnson access to supplies needed to manufacture and package vaccines.

Categories
Health

Detroit expands Covid vaccine eligibility to auto staff

Chrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant in Detroit, Michigan

Bill Pugliano | Getty Images

DETROIT – production workers in the city, such as B. Auto workers, can now receive the Covid-19 vaccine without restrictions such as age or proof of pre-existing conditions.

The expanded manufacturing worker eligibility in Detroit represents a significant expansion of the eligibility of auto workers to vaccinate after municipalities such as Boone County, Illinois adopted similar measures. It should help to ensure the safety of employees and to put the car systems into operation.

The United Auto Workers Union estimates that at least 10,000 of its members work in Detroit. A total number of the manufacturing workers living in the city were not immediately available.

Detroit’s rollout of the two-dose vaccines Moderna and Pfizer will be carried out in a conference center and clinics for key manufacturing operations, starting with two SUV plants for Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler). Production workers who live or work in the city are eligible, Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan announced Tuesday.

“The auto companies and the UAW have done a great job so far, but nothing is as good as a vaccination,” Duggan said during a press conference at which UAW Vice President Cindy Estrada received a vaccination.

Detroit automakers put extensive safety measures and social distancing guidelines in place during a two-month shutdown of their plants last year to help reduce the spread of Covid-19. Security measures implemented included plastic barriers, masks and other things like temperature controls and logs when entering and exiting the facilities.

“Manufacturing workers, whether they are unions or not, have really been there during this whole pandemic and it has not been easy,” Estrada said. “We have had disease in our plans and deaths, so this is incredibly important.”

According to union spokesman Brian Rothenberg, fewer than 30 of the approximately 400,000 members of the UAW have died of Covid-19. He said the union was “working with the White House, governors and all of our partners on vaccine distribution plans.”

Stellantis employees in Boone County, Illinois were among the first auto workers to receive Covid-19 vaccinations. The company looks forward to “working with other health departments to provide vaccines to the rest of Stellantis employees according to local sales plans.”

“Today’s announcement is an important step in protecting our employees and our communities so that we can return to the life we ​​all want to live,” Stellantis said in a statement.

The Stellantis facility in Detroit, including a new facility that is not yet fully operational, is one of the largest manufacturing operations in the city. The company expects to have 8,000 people vaccinated initially.

General Motors also has a large plant in the city, but that plant will temporarily not produce vehicles until later this year due to construction.

Detroit has administered 90,170 doses (70.7% of the doses received) and scheduled more than 52,800 appointments, according to its website.

UAW Vice President Cindy Estrada will receive a Covid-19 shot during a press conference with Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan on March 2, 2021.

Screenshot

Categories
Health

Why Do Virus Variants Have Such Bizarre Names?

20H / 501Y.V2.

VOC 202012/02.

B.1.351.

Those were the charming names that scientists had suggested for a new variant of the coronavirus identified in South Africa. The intertwined sequences of letters, numbers, and dots are of great importance to the scientists who developed them, but how is anyone else going to keep them straight? Even the easiest to remember B.1.351 refers to a completely different lineage of the virus if a single point is overlooked or misplaced.

Virus naming conventions were fine as long as variants remained esoteric research topics. But they are now the source of fear for billions of people. They need names that roll off the tongue without stigmatizing the people or places associated with them.

“What is challenging is to develop names that are unique, informative, without geographical references, and pronounced and memorable,” said Emma Hodcroft, molecular epidemiologist at the University of Bern in Switzerland. “It sounds a bit simple, but it really is a big question to convey all of this information.”

She and other experts said the solution was to develop a single system that anyone could use, but link it to the more technical ones that scientists rely on. The World Health Organization has set up a working group of a few dozen experts to find an easy and scalable way to achieve this.

“This new system will give worrying variants a name that is easy to pronounce and retrieve, and will minimize unnecessary negative effects on nations, economies and people,” the WHO said in a statement. “The proposal for this mechanism is currently undergoing internal and external partner review prior to its completion.”

The WHO’s leading candidate to date is disarmingly simple, according to two members of the working group: numbering the variants in the order in which they were identified – V1, V2, V3, etc.

“There are thousands and thousands of variants and we need a way to label them,” said Trevor Bedford, evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and a member of the research group.

Naming diseases has not always been that complicated. Syphilis, for example, comes from a poem from 1530 in which a shepherd, Syphilus, is cursed by the god Apollo. However, the compound microscope, invented around 1600, opened up a hidden world of microbes that allowed scientists to name them by their shapes, said Richard Barnett, a science historian in the UK.

Nevertheless, racism and imperialism infiltrated disease names. In the 1800s, as cholera spread from the Indian subcontinent to Europe, British newspapers called it “Indian Cholera” and depicted the disease as a figure in a turban and robes.

“Naming can very often reflect and expand a stigma,” said Dr. Barnett.

In 2015, WHO published best practices for disease naming: avoidance of geographic locations or names of people, animal or food species, and terms that create inappropriate fear, such as “fatal” and “epidemic”.

Scientists rely on at least three competing systems of nomenclature – Gisaid, Pango, and Nextstrain – each of which makes sense in its own world.

“You can’t track anything you can’t name,” said Oliver Pybus, an Oxford evolutionary biologist who helped design the Pango system.

Scientists name variants when changes in the genome coincide with new outbreaks, but they only draw attention to them when their behavior changes – for example if they are more easily transmitted (B.1.1.7, the variant first observed in the UK)) or if they at least partially bypass the immune response (B.1.351, the variant proven in South Africa).

Indications of the origin of the variant are coded in the mixed up letters and numbers: For example, the “B.1” indicates that these variants are related to the outbreak in Italy last spring. (As soon as the hierarchy of variants becomes too deep to accommodate another number and point, newer variants are given the next letter available alphabetically.)

Updated

March 2, 2021, 3:28 p.m. ET

However, when scientists announced that a variant called B.1.315 – two digits away from the variant first seen in South Africa – was spreading in the US, the South African Minister of Health was “quite confused between this and B.1.351 “Said Tulio de Oliveira, geneticist at the Nelson Mandela School of Medicine in Durban and a member of the WHO working group.

“We have to develop a system that not only evolutionary biologists can understand,” he said.

Since there are no easy alternatives, people have referred to B.1.351 as “the South African variant”. But Dr. de Oliveira asked his colleagues to avoid the term. (Look no further than the origins of this virus: call it the “China Virus” or the “Wuhan Virus”, which is causing xenophobia and aggression against people of East Asian origin worldwide.)

So serious is the potential harm that some countries have been discouraged from reporting if a new pathogen is discovered within their borders. Geographical names are also quickly becoming obsolete: B.1.351 is now represented in 48 countries, so calling it a South African variant is absurd, added Dr. de Oliveira added.

And practice could distort science. It’s not entirely clear that the variant originated in South Africa: it was identified there in large part thanks to the diligence of South African scientists, but if it is classified as a variant of that country, it could mislead other researchers, their possible route to South Africa from one another from overlooked country that sequenced fewer coronavirus genomes.

In the past few weeks, proposing a new system has become a kind of spectator sport. Some suggestions for name inspiration: hurricanes, Greek letters, birds, other animal names like squirrels or aardvarks, and local monsters.

Áine O’Toole, a graduate student at the University of Edinburgh who is part of the Pango team, suggested colors to indicate how different constellations of mutations are related.

“You could end up in dusty pink or magenta or fuchsia,” she said.

Sometimes it can be enough to identify a new variant by its characteristic mutation, especially if the mutations are given bizarre names. Last spring, Ms. O’Toole and her coworkers named D614G, one of the earliest known mutations, “Doug”.

“We kind of didn’t have a lot of human interaction,” she said. “That was our idea of ​​humor in Lockdown # 1.”

Other nicknames followed: “Nelly” for N501Y, a common thread in many new variants, and “Eeek” for E484K, a mutation that is said to make the virus less susceptible to vaccines.

But Eeek has appeared in multiple flavors around the world, underscoring the need for flavors to have different names.

The numbering system considered by the WHO is straightforward. However, new names must overcome the ease and simplicity of geographical designations for the general public. And scientists need to strike a balance between labeling a variant fast enough to forestall geographic names and being careful not to name insignificant variants.

“What I don’t want is a system where we have this long list of variants that all have WHO names, but really only three of them are important and the other 17 are not important,” said Dr. Bedford.

Whatever the final system, it must also be accepted by various groups of scientists as well as the public.

“If you don’t really become a lingua franca, things get more confusing,” said Dr. Hodcroft. “If you can’t come up with something that people can easily say, type, and remember, they’ll just go back to using the geographic name.”

Categories
Health

Biden to announce Merck will assist make Johnson & Johnson’s shot

President Joe Biden will announce Tuesday that pharmaceutical company Merck will help manufacture the Covid-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, a senior administrative official who has been confirmed to NBC News.

The decision is made as the administration is working to ramp up production of J & J’s single-shot vaccine. Senior government officials said Sunday the US government will ship J & J’s entire inventory of 3.9 million cans this week, adding that supply would be “uneven” over the following weeks. Another 16 million doses are expected by the end of the month.

Under the agreement, Merck will deploy two facilities in the US for J & J’s vaccine, the Washington Post previously reported. One will make the vaccine and the other will provide “fill-finish” services when the vaccine is put into vials.

Officials began scouring the country for additional manufacturing capacity after discovering in the early days of the government that J&J had fallen behind in vaccine production, according to NBC. They soon sought a deal with Merck, which abandoned plans to develop its own Covid vaccine in January after a clinical study showed its shots were ineffective.

J&J declined to comment on the deal with CNBC. In a statement, Merck said it was “unwavering in our commitment to contribute to the global response to the pandemic and prepare us to deal with future pandemics”.

The Washington Post reported the news earlier.

Biden is expected to make the announcement from the White House on Tuesday afternoon.

The Food and Drug Administration on Saturday approved J & J’s vaccine for use in people aged 18 and over. Unlike Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, patients with the single dose of J&J do not need to take a second dose and can be stored at refrigerator temperature for months.

In comparison, Pfizer’s vaccine must be stored in ultra-cold freezers that keep between minus 112 and minus 76 degrees Fahrenheit. However, the FDA recently allowed the company to store its vaccine for two weeks at temperatures commonly found in pharmaceutical freezers. Moderna vaccine must be shipped at 13 to 5 degrees above zero Fahrenheit.

The New York Times first reported in January that unexpected delays in manufacturing would result in decreased primary care of J & J’s medication if it were given emergency approval.

The Chief Medical Officer of the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci said last month he was “disappointed” with the number of doses J&J originally expected, adding that the federal government had assumed there would be “significantly more”. The New Jersey-based company has signed a contract with the United States to supply 100 million cans by the end of June.

“It can take June, July and August to get everyone vaccinated,” Fauci told CNN on February 16. I don’t think anyone will disagree that this will be good by the end of summer and we’ll get into early fall. “

At the time, Bidens Covid Tsar Jeff Zients said the federal government was “doing everything it can to work with the company to expedite the delivery schedule”.

This is not the first partnership between two drugmakers to help improve vaccine supply.

In late January, French drug maker Sanofi announced it would help fill and package millions of doses of Pfizer’s two-shot vaccine to meet demand. Moderna has a partnership with the Swiss company Lonza, which makes most of the medicines for the company’s vaccine.

The Biden government has also announced that it is using the Defense Equipment Act to improve supplies of Pfizer’s vaccine.

Categories
Health

In Their Personal Phrases: Why Specialists Say Elementary Faculties Ought to Open

Scientists and doctors studying infectious diseases in children broadly agreed in a recent New York Times survey of school openings that elementary school students should now be able to attend personal school. With security measures like covering and opening windows, the benefits outweigh the risks, said a majority of 175 respondents.

The following is a representative selection of her comments on key issues, including the risks to out-of-school children. the risks for teachers to be in school; whether vaccines are required before schools open; how to distance yourself in crowded classrooms; What type of ventilation is required? and whether their own children’s school districts got it right.

In addition to their daily work on Covid-19, most experts had school-age children themselves, half of whom attended personal school.

They also discussed whether the new variants could change even the best plans for the school opening. “There will be a lot of unknowns with novel variants,” said Pia MacDonald, an infectious disease epidemiologist at RTI International, a research group. “We need to plan for what they expect and develop strategies to deal with the school with these new threats.”

Most of the respondents work in academic research and around a quarter work as healthcare providers. We asked what their expertise taught them that they felt others should understand. Overall, the data suggest that with precautionary measures, especially masks, the risk of transmission in school is low for both children and adults.

About 85 percent of experts who lived in places where schools were open all day said their district made the right call. Only a third of those in places where schools were still closed said it was the right choice.

The group expressed great concern that other aspects of children’s health and wellbeing were neglected during the pandemic, which could have potentially serious long-term consequences.

The experts firmly believed that while vaccines are important, no population should be required to open schools while other precautions are taken to ensure the safety of teachers and students. (This, along with much of what the panel said, is in line with the federal government’s new recommendations for school opening. There are stricter standards for community transmission for middle and high school opening.) Many recommended teachers Prioritize vaccines, along with frontline staff.

Many experts agreed that ventilation of school buildings – along with masks and distancing – is important in order to minimize the spread of the virus. However, they stated that good airflow doesn’t require major renovations or expensive air filters. This could be achieved with open windows, box fans and outdoor courses.

Many school districts have split the classes in half and brought each half back part-time to minimize exposure to the virus. The experts said such strategies could be helpful in situations where keeping your distance was impossible and for contact tracing. But many pushed for other solutions instead.

Although most respondents said it wasn’t critical that classes be split in half, most preferred a standard of six feet between children in classrooms – which can be impossible to achieve with full classes. This is an example of how opening schools requires creativity and the weighing of risks: many said the 6-foot standard could be relaxed in situations with good ventilation, especially in younger children who are more likely to spread Covid-19 is lower.

The emergence of Covid-19 variants around the world has raised concerns that current knowledge about school safety may no longer apply. Overall, the experts in our survey said that the variants could affect the plans for the school opening. But few believed that they would certainly cause significant problems, also due to the current adoption of effective vaccines.

Categories
Health

Russia’s Sputnik vaccine is luring Jap Europe, worrying the EU

A medical worker holds a syringe with the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) Covid-19 vaccine in his hand.

Alexander Reka | TASS | Getty Images

While the European Union struggles to push coronavirus vaccine rollout in the block of 27, Russia’s Covid shot is proving enticing to its friends in Eastern Europe, creating yet another potential rift in the region.

The Czech Republic, Austria, Hungary and Slovakia have all expressed an interest in the procurement and use of the Russian vaccine “Sputnik V”, which could undermine an EU-wide approach to the approval and administration of coronavirus vaccines.

Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis said on Sunday that his country could use the Sputnik V vaccine without the approval of the EU Medicines Agency, the European Medicines Agency.

It comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin and Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz received a call last Friday in which they discussed “possible deliveries of the Russian Sputnik-V vaccine to Austria and its possible joint production,” the Kremlin said and found that Austria had initiated the call. Austria has so far stated that it would not bypass the EMA when approving the vaccine.

Hungary, a country within the EU that has close ties to Brussels and whose leader Viktor Orban is considered a close ally of Putin, has shown no such hesitation. It was the first European country to bypass the EMA to approve and purchase the Sputnik V vaccine in January.

According to the Moscow Times, the country expects 2 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine to be administered over the next three months. Hungary also approved China’s Sinopharm vaccine last month, which again goes against the grain when it comes to EU vaccine approval.

On Monday, Slovakia became the second European country to announce that it had purchased the Sputnik V vaccine, which secured 2 million doses of the shot. However, the Slovak Minister of Health said it will not be given immediately as it still needs the green light from the country’s national drug regulator.

A Slovak Army plane carrying doses of the Sputnik V vaccine against the coronavirus (Covid-19) stands on the tarmac when it arrives from Moscow at Kosice International Airport, Slovakia, on March 1, 2021.

PETER LAZAR | AFP | Getty Images

What’s happening?

The linchpin for the Russian vaccine is widespread frustration with the slow adoption of EU vaccines. The bloc’s decision to jointly buy vaccines has hampered it, and its orders came later than in other countries, including the UK and US

Manufacturing problems and bureaucracy – and hesitation in some countries about vaccines – were also stumbling blocks to adoption.

Nonetheless, the move by some Eastern European countries to unilaterally support Russia’s vaccine will exacerbate problems in Brussels as it undermines the EU’s desire for a unified approach and a sense of equity in the distribution of vaccines.

There were also concerns specifically about Sputnik V, although subsequent data have confirmed the vaccine’s effectiveness and credibility.

The vaccine was approved by the Russian health authority in August last year, ahead of the completion of clinical trials, causing skepticism among experts that it may not meet strict safety and efficacy standards. Some experts argued that the Kremlin is keen to win the race to develop a Covid vaccine.

However, an interim analysis of the Phase 3 clinical trials with 20 participants published in The Lancet in early February found the vaccine to be 91.6% effective against symptomatic Covid-19 infections.

In a companion article in the Lancet, Ian Jones, Professor of Virology at the University of Reading, England noted that “the development of the Sputnik V vaccine has been criticized for undue urgency. However, the result reported here is clear and scientific. The principle of vaccination is demonstrated which means another vaccine can now join the fight to reduce the incidence of Covid-19. “

However, the Gamaleya National Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology in Moscow, which developed the vaccine, has not yet submitted an application to the EMA for marketing authorization for the vaccine, the EU Medicines Agency said in early February.

A woman receives the second component of the Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) COVID-19 vaccine.

Valentin Sprinchak | TASS | Getty Images

RDIF, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund that backed the development of Sputnik V, announced to CNBC on Monday that it had requested the EU Drugs Agency for an ongoing vaccine review in mid-February. However, the EMA has not confirmed this and CNBC has asked the EMA for a comment.

Political theater

The European Commission already warned Hungary, albeit indirectly, against the use of the Russian vaccine before the EMA approved it. As early as November, a spokesman for the Commission told Reuters: “The question is whether a Member State would like to give its citizens a vaccine that has not been tested by the EMA.” Public confidence in vaccination could be damaged.

“This is where the approval process and confidence in vaccines meet. When our citizens start questioning the safety of a vaccine, it will be much more difficult to get a sufficient proportion of vaccines if it has not undergone rigorous scientific evaluation. to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness to the population, “said the spokesman, reported Reuters.

However, the decision of Hungary to proceed alone with the vaccine against Sputnik V does not surprise the EU observers. The country’s right-wing leader, Viktor Orban – a “strong man” like Russia’s Putin – has had several disputes with the EU executive in recent years, particularly over signs of the government’s increasing authoritarianism. The erosion of the independence of the judiciary and freedom of the press in Hungary is of particular concern to the EU. However, the Hungarian government rejects such criticism.

Gustav Gressel, Senior Policy Fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told CNBC on Monday that Hungary’s actions were “part of Orban’s campaign to promote a” decadent, declining EU “and the future of Hungary in the east with Russia and China.” said it had been going on for some time.

Daragh McDowell, head of Europe and chief analyst for Russia at Verisk Maplecroft, described the geopolitics surrounding Sputnik V and the EU as “political theater more than anything”.

“For Hungary and Austria there is an element of foreign policy signaling here, as both Kurz and Orban generally had a closer relationship with Putin than their European counterparts. In the case of the Czech Republic, the impetus seems to have been more towards the government “Take action” in the face of a rapid surge in the number of cases in February, “he said.

There are also doubts as to whether Russia will be able to mass-produce and ship its Sputnik V vaccine to Europe.

“While the Sputnik vaccine appears to be an effective vaccine in principle, Russia is having great difficulty getting mass production right … enough Sputnik vaccine is still not being made,” Gressel said. McDowell noted that “the question is whether Sputnik V can make a noticeable difference, given regulatory issues and existing logistical issues, and whether the vaccine can be made in sufficient numbers either by Russian manufacturers or under license.”

Categories
Health

Virus Variant in Brazil Contaminated Many Who Had Already Recovered From Covid-19

Within a few weeks, two variants of the coronavirus have become so popular that you can regularly hear their unfathomable alphanumeric names on the television news.

B.1.1.7, first identified in the UK, has demonstrated the ability to spread widely and quickly. In South Africa, a mutant called B.1.351 can evade human antibodies and affect the effectiveness of some vaccines.

Scientists have also kept an eye on a third variant that originated in Brazil and is called P.1. Research on P.1 had been slower since its discovery in late December, so scientists weren’t sure how much to worry about it.

“I held my breath,” said Bronwyn MacInnis, an epidemiologist at the Broad Institute.

Now three studies offer a sobering story of P.1’s meteoric rise in the Amazonian city of Manaus. It most likely occurred there in November and then led to a record spike in coronavirus cases. It came to dominate the city in part because of an increased risk of contagion, research found.

However, the ability to infect some people who had immunity to previous attacks from Covid-19 was also gained. And laboratory experiments suggest that P.1 could weaken the protective effects of a Chinese vaccine currently used in Brazil.

The new studies have yet to be published in scientific journals. Their authors warn that findings from cells in laboratories do not always translate into the real world, and they have only just begun to understand how P.1 behaves.

“The results apply to Manaus, but I don’t know if they apply to other locations,” said Nuno Faria, a virologist at Imperial College London who led much of the new research.

But even with the puzzles that existed around P.1, experts said it was a variant that should be taken seriously. “It is right to be concerned about P.1, and this data gives us the reason why,” said William Hanage, epidemiologist at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.

P.1 is now spreading across the rest of Brazil and has been found in 24 other countries. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has registered six cases in five states: Alaska, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, and Oklahoma.

To reduce the risk of P.1 outbreaks and reinfections, Dr. Faria, it is important to double up on any measure to slow the spread of the coronavirus. Masks and social distancing can work against P.1. And vaccinations can help reduce transmission and protect those who become infected from serious illnesses.

“The ultimate message is that you need to step up all vaccination efforts as soon as possible,” he said. “You have to be one step ahead of the virus.”

Dr. Faria and his colleagues began tracking down the coronavirus when it exploded in Brazil last spring. Manaus, a city of two million people in the Brazilian Amazon, was particularly hard hit. At the height of spring, the Manaus cemeteries were overwhelmed by the corpses of the dead.

But after a peak in late April, Manaus appeared to have overcome the worst of the pandemic. Some scientists believed the decline meant Manaus had gained herd immunity.

Dr. Faria and his colleagues looked for coronavirus antibodies in samples from a Manaus blood bank in June and October. They found that roughly three-quarters of Manaus residents were infected.

However, towards the end of 2020, the number of new cases increased again. “There were actually far more cases than the previous peak of cases, which was in late April,” said Dr. Faria. “And that was very puzzling to us.”

To look for variants, Dr. Faria and his colleagues launched a new genome sequencing effort in town. While B.1.1.7 had arrived in other parts of Brazil, they did not find it in Manaus. Instead, they found a variant that no one had seen before.

Updated

March 1, 2021, 9:49 p.m. ET

Many variants in their samples shared a set of 21 mutations that were not seen in other viruses circulating in Brazil. Dr. Faria texted a colleague, “I think I’m seeing something really strange and I’m pretty worried about it.”

Some mutations in particular worried him, as scientists had already found them in B.1.1.7 or B.1.351. Experiments suggested that some of the mutations might make the variants better able to infect cells. Other mutations allow them to evade antibodies from previous infections or to be produced by vaccines.

While Dr. Faria and his colleagues analyzed their results, researchers in Japan made a similar discovery. Four tourists who returned home from a trip to the Amazon on Jan. 4 tested positive for the coronavirus. Genome sequencing revealed the same mutations that Dr. Faria and his colleagues in Brazil saw.

Dr. Faria and his colleagues posted a description of P.1 on an online virology forum on January 12th. Then they investigated why P.1 is so common. Its mutations could have made it more contagious, or it could have been lucky. Coincidentally, the variant might have surfaced in Manaus when the city became more relaxed about public health policies.

It was also possible that P.1 became common because it could re-infect people. Usually, coronavirus reinfections are rare as the antibodies produced by the body after infection are effective for months. However, it was possible that P.1 had mutations that made it difficult for these antibodies to attach to it, allowing them to slip into cells and cause new infections.

The researchers tested these possibilities by tracking P.1 from its earliest samples in December. At the beginning of January it was 87 percent of the samples. By February it had completely taken over.

The researchers combined the data from genomes, antibodies and medical records in Manaus and came to the conclusion that P.1 conquered the city thanks to biology rather than luck: its mutations contributed to its spread. Like B.1.1.7, it can infect more people on average than other variants. They estimate that it is between 1.4 and 2.2 times more transmissible than other coronavirus lineages.

But it also gets a benefit from mutations that allow antibodies from other coronaviruses to escape. They estimate that out of 100 people who were infected in Manaus last year, between 25 and 61 were re-infected by P.1.

The researchers found support for this conclusion in an experiment in which they mixed P.1 virus with antibodies from Brazilians who had Covid-19 last year. They found that the effectiveness of their antibodies against P.1 decreased six-fold compared to other coronaviruses. This decline could mean that at least some people are susceptible to new infections from P.1.

“There seems to be a growing body of evidence to suggest that most of the second wave-related cases are actually some kind of reinfection,” said Dr. Faria.

Dr. Faria and other researchers are now looking across Brazil to observe the spread of P.1. Dr. Ester Sabino, an infectious disease expert at the University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine, said one of the new outbreaks has occurred in Araraquara, a Brazilian city of 223,000 that did not have high rates of Covid-19 before P.1 arrived.

If the people of Araraquara did not have high antibody levels prior to P.1’s arrival, it suggests that the variant may have spread to locations without Manaus’ extreme history. “This could happen in any other place,” she said.

Michael Worobey, a virologist at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the research, said it was time to pay attention to P.1 in the US. He expected it to become more common in the United States, although it would have to compete with B.1.1.7, which could soon become the predominant variant in much of the nation.

“At least it will be one of the competitors,” said Dr. Worobey.

In their experiments, Dr. Faria and his colleagues also received antibodies from eight people who received CoronaVac, a Brazilian-made vaccine that was used in Brazil. They found that the antibodies produced by the vaccine were less effective at stopping the P.1 variant than other types.

Dr. Faria warned that these results, taken from cells in test tubes, don’t necessarily mean vaccines are less effective at protecting real people from P.1. Vaccines can very well provide strong protection against P.1, even if the antibodies they produce are not quite as effective. And even if the variant manages to infect vaccinated people, they will most likely remain protected from a severe attack of Covid-19.

For Dr. Sabino is the ultimate meaning of P.1 the threat that variants pose if they can appear anywhere in the world.

“It’s just a matter of time and chance,” she said.

Categories
Health

CDC director ‘actually apprehensive’ about states rolling again Covid measures as instances seem to plateau

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday that she is “really concerned” that some states are pulling back public health measures to contain the coronavirus pandemic, as the US cases appear to be “very serious.” high “flatten.

The decline in Covid-19 cases since the beginning of January now appears to be stalling at around 70,000 new cases per day, said CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky during a press conference at the White House. “With these statistics, I’m really concerned that more states are rolling back the exact public health measures we have recommended to protect people from Covid-19.”

“Seventy thousand cases a day seem good compared to what we were a few months ago,” she said. “Please listen to me clearly: at this level of cases with expanding variation, we are completely losing the hard-earned ground we have gained.”

The U.S. has at least 67,300 new Covid-19 cases every day based on a 7-day average calculated by CNBC using data from Johns Hopkins University. The US hit a high of nearly 250,000 cases per day in early January after the winter break.

Senior U.S. health officials including Walensky and Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisory of the White House, have warned over the past few weeks that the rise in more contagious variants could reverse the current downward trend in infections in the US and delay the nation’s recovery from the pandemic.

As of Sunday, the CDC had identified 2,400 cases of variant B.1.1.7, which were first identified in the UK. The agency identified 53 cases of the B.1.351 strain from South Africa and 10 cases of P.1, a variant for the first time in Brazil.

Fauci said Monday that U.S. health officials are also closely monitoring another variant in New York that contains mutations that help evade the body’s natural immune response.

Officials say viruses cannot mutate unless they infect hosts and cannot replicate. They are also urging Americans to get vaccinated as soon as possible before potentially new and even more dangerous variants continue to take hold.

Walensky said Monday that vaccinations will help the US get out of the pandemic, noting that the Food and Drug Administration has approved Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine for emergency use. This makes it the third shot approved for distribution in the United States and the only vaccine that requires only one dose. Walensky canceled the vaccine on Sunday.

The J&J vaccine is a “much needed addition to our toolbox,” she said. By adding the permit, more people can be vaccinated.

Categories
Health

Excessive Turnover at Nursing Properties Threatens Residents’ Care

Exceptionally high turnover among nursing home workers likely contributed to the shocking number of deaths in facilities during the pandemic, the authors of a new study suggested.

The study, published Monday in Health Affairs, a health policy journal, provides a comprehensive overview of turnover rates in 15,645 nursing homes across the country, taking into account nearly all federal government certified facilities. The researchers found that the average annual rate was 128 percent, with some facilities having sales in excess of 300 percent.

“It was really breathtaking,” said David Grabowski, professor of health policy at Harvard Medical School and one of the study’s authors. Researchers pointed to the results to urge Medicare to publish staff turnover rates at individual locations in nursing homes to highlight substandard conditions and pressure owners to make improvements.

Inadequate staffing – and low wages – have long plagued nursing homes and the quality of care for the more than one million residents who live in these facilities. However, the pandemic has exposed these issues even more sharply. Investigations are ongoing by some states to monitor the facilities as cases in Covid are uncontrolled and deaths have skyrocketed.

The high turnover rate likely made it harder for nursing homes to conduct strong infection controls during the pandemic and led to widespread spread of the coronavirus, said Ashvin Gandhi, lead author and health economist and assistant professor at the University of California Los Angeles Anderson School of Management.

Nursing home owners blame Medicaid, the state’s program for the care of the skilled elderly, for the inadequate reimbursement.

“Recruiting and retaining workers is one of the most pressing challenges facing long-term carers and we have been calling for help for years,” said Dr. David Gifford, chief medical officer of the American Health Care Association and the National Center for Assisted Living Trading Group, said in an email statement.

“It is high time providers were given the right resources to invest in our frontline caregivers to improve the quality of care,” he said.

At least 172,000 deaths from the virus had been reported among residents or employees of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities by the end of February, according to a database compiled by the New York Times. The death toll in nursing homes alone has caused more than a third of all Covid deaths in the United States, although mortality and case rates have fallen sharply as more than 70 percent of residents have received vaccinations.

Industry criticism has also centered on the decade-long ownership of nursing homes by private equity and other private investment firms, where profits for investors took precedence over residents’ welfare. These owners have long been accused of under-staffing their facilities and underpaid workers.

Updated

March 1, 2021, 9:49 p.m. ET

Labor is one of the primary costs of running a nursing home, said Dr. Gandhi. “It’s generally not a very high-margin industry,” he said. “Any institution trying to maximize its profits will think carefully about its staffing costs.”

Nursing home staff have also shown resistance to being vaccinated against the coronavirus, making it difficult for public health officials and nursing homes to provide comprehensive vaccination coverage for a single facility. If a vaccinated nurse leaves the hospital and is replaced, the facility must ensure that the new employee is vaccinated as well, especially given the reluctance of some workers to receive a coronavirus shot.

“Trying to get a single shot is not enough,” said Dr. Gandhi. “You need continuous vaccination work.”

Registered nurses, who are the most skilled workers, had the highest turnover rates, and turnover varied widely across institutions. The states with the highest rates included Oklahoma, Montana, and Kansas. Facilities with low star ratings on the Medicare website that compared nursing homes had the highest average sales and nursing homes with high ratings had the lowest sales. Revenue was also higher at for-profit organizations owned by chains that serve Medicaid beneficiaries, according to the study.

Melissa Unger, the executive director of SEIU 503, a division of the Service Employees International Union in Oregon, said nurses have difficulty working in facilities with too few employees to adequately care for residents.

“You don’t feel good about the work you do,” said Ms. Unger, noting that many of the employees are women and people of color. “They’re doing all of this for shitty benefits and low wages.”

Summer Trosko, a union member who works at a nursing home in Oregon, said she was used to colleagues leaving burnout because of under-staffing and lack of funds. “You get tired and just can’t take it anymore and stop,” she said. Many are being replaced with people who have just graduated from high school with little education, she said.

In addition to making turnover rates available to the public, the authors point out a number of steps lawmakers could take to improve retention. Medicare could include sales in its star rating system, and Medicare and Medicaid could reward nursing homes with higher rates when they had lower sales. “If we want to change nursing homes, we have to start with the staff,” said Dr. Grabowski.

Researchers used newly available payroll-based data collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, and Certified Nursing Aides to calculate turnover rates in 2017 and 2018. They looked at the percentage of hours a care worker worked in a given year and calculated higher rates if the person who left the company had done more care.

Categories
Health

Novavax expects FDA clearance as early as Might

The Food and Drug Administration could approve Novavax’s Covid-19 vaccine for emergencies as early as May, the company’s CEO Stanley Erck told CNBC on Monday.

Novavax’s Phase 3 trial in the US with 30,000 participants is ongoing, Erck said. The company hopes the FDA will allow it to use data from its UK clinical trial when it files its emergency use application later this year, he added.

The UK health authorities are likely to review the vaccine in April, followed by the FDA “probably a month after,” he said in an interview with CNBC’s “Closing Bell”.

That schedule could be postponed for a month or two while the FDA waits for the U.S. trial dates, he said.

Novavax is among several companies working to develop vaccines against the virus, which on Monday infected more than 114 million people worldwide and killed at least 2.53 million people, according to Johns Hopkins University. Three vaccines – from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson – have so far been approved for use in the United States.

In late January, Novavax released results of its Phase 3 trial data in the UK, showing that the vaccine was 89.3% overall effective, despite being used against B.1.1.7, the strain first discovered in the UK, and B.1.351 was a little less effective. the tribe first discovered in South Africa.

The company said the vaccine was well tolerated, adding that “serious, serious and medically treated adverse events occurred in low levels and were balanced between vaccine and placebo groups”.

Novavax has signed a contract with the US government to supply 110 million cans. The company could complete those shipments in June or July, Erck said.

If the company’s vaccine is approved in the US, it doesn’t worry about demand, even though three vaccines are already widely available.

“The US has a huge need for vaccines and it’s a big world,” he said, adding the company has commitments for 200 million doses elsewhere.