Categories
Business

Supreme Courtroom Appears to be like for Slim Path in Traders’ Swimsuit Towards Goldman Sachs

A split three-judge panel of the appeals court said its decision was based on a presumption based on a 1988 Supreme Court ruling, Basic v. Levinson, was based on the statements. Instead, they could rely on the assumption that all of the key publicly available information about a company is reflected in its share price.

The theory allowed investors to skip a step that is required in ordinary fraud lawsuits: direct evidence that they were relying on the contested statement. This also allowed investors to avoid the requirement of class actions: proof that their claims had enough in common to partner with one another.

Sopan Joshi, a federal government attorney, said it was possible that generic statements might well have relevance in the case discussed Monday, an argument that had been reiterated in the pleadings filed by the pension funds and their supporters.

“Goldman Sachs looked at many financial instruments where conflict was critical both to the company and to the” reputational advantage it enjoyed over its competitors and peers and the industry in general, “he said.” In this case even very general statements about conflicts actually have an impact on prices. “

Mr. Joshi, who did not speak for both sides, added that the government had not given an opinion on whether this analysis was correct and asked the judges to order the appeals court to deal with it.

While all three attorneys agreed that the courts could examine whether general statements could affect stock prices, they differed in what should be done in the case, Goldman Sachs Group v Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, No. 20-222.

Mr. Shanmugam, Goldman’s attorney, said the court should overturn the appeals court’s decision confirming the class. Pension Fund attorney Mr. Goldstein said the judges should uphold the verdict; and Mr. Joshi, the government attorney, said the court should overturn the appeal court’s decision and order it to reconsider the case.

Categories
Business

Financial institution and cyclical shares are price shopping for on a dip

The weakness seen in banks and cyclical stocks on Monday will be short-lived and investors should buy them right now, CNBC’s Jim Cramer said.

“If you look at the stocks that hit today, I don’t think they’re going to stay down,” said the Mad Money host, noting the “counter-trend rally” on behalf of Monday’s stay-at-home session “won’t have legs.”

Darden restaurants and Norwegian Cruise Lines – names hit hard by Covid restrictions – fell 3.5% and 2.3%, respectively. Bank stocks like JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup each fell more than 1%. Shares in Clorox and Procter & Gamble – two companies that outperformed at the start of the pandemic – rose 2.6% and 1.6%, respectively.

“The main lesson today is that this market is volatile, so don’t throw it away … [these] Shares when they fall, “said Cramer.

Cramer said he expected the bank to move higher and cyclical stocks to pull back during the session. He also recommended investors buy shares in Disney and Boeing, two companies linked to travel and reopening the economy.

Cramer added that such days can be used by investors to reduce holdings in lockdown games and switch to stocks that can benefit from an economic recovery.

“Sooner or later the rotation is going to change direction, which means money is flowing back to the big reopening stocks – the banks and the cyclicals – so you want to use days like today and maybe tomorrow,” Cramer said, “to get them in the weakness to buy. ” while you trim your positions in the lockdown stocks. “

Disclosure: Cramer’s charitable foundation owns shares in Disney and Boeing.

Disclaimer of liability

Questions for Cramer?
Call Cramer at 1-800-743-CNBC

Would you like to dive deep into Cramer’s world? Open it up!
Mad Money Twitter – Jim Cramer Twitter – Facebook – Instagram

Questions, comments, suggestions for the Mad Money website? madcap@cnbc.com

Categories
Business

Firms, Vocal About Racial Justice, Go Quiet on Voting Rights

This time around, however, the entertainment industry has taken a more cautious approach.

When asked for comment, Disney, Netflix, NBCUniversal, Sony Pictures Entertainment and ViacomCBS said either they did not have a public comment or did not respond to inquiries. The Motion Picture Association, Hollywood’s lobby group, declined to comment, as did Amazon Studios, which six months ago released “All In: The Fight For Democracy,” a documentary about the efforts of Ms. Abrams and other activists to break down electoral barriers in Georgia and elsewhere. WarnerMedia, owned by AT&T, said its parent company is working with local chambers of commerce to promote “accessible and secure voting”.

The fight in Georgia is likely a preview of things to come. Legislators in dozens of states have proposed similar electoral laws, and activists plan to put pressure on American businesses as the struggle for the right to vote becomes national.

Meanwhile, companies are trying to maintain a delicate balancing act. Although the Georgian law passed on Thursday was less stringent than originally proposed, it introduced stricter requirements on voter identification for postal voting, limited dropboxing, and expanded legislature’s power over elections.

After it was passed, Delta and Coca-Cola seemed to gain some credit for helping to ease the bill’s restrictions. Delta said it had “been dealing extensively with state-elected officials” over the past few weeks and “the laws signed this week have improved significantly during the legislative process.”

Coca-Cola made a similar statement, stating that it had sought “improvements” to the law and “continued to identify opportunities for engagement and improvements to promote and protect the right to vote in our home state and elsewhere”.

Those words were cold comfort to activists who had worked against efforts to restrict voting rights.

“They made gentle statements instead of getting out,” said Ms. Groh-Wargo of Fair Fight. “It is ridiculous.”

Categories
Business

Biden says states ought to reinstate masks mandates and wait to reopen companies as Covid instances rise

President Joe Biden speaks about Covid-19 reactions and vaccinations in the South Court Auditorium of the White House in Washington DC on March 29, 2021.

Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images

President Joe Biden on Monday called on governors and local leaders dropping full masked mandates in order to reinstate their orders. Some states should wait to reopen their economies while condemning “reckless behavior” that is likely to cause further infections.

“Our work is far from over. The war against Covid-19 is far from won,” Biden said at a press conference in which he announced a number of plans to significantly expand access to vaccines in the coming weeks. “This is dead serious.”

The President said he supported Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who said earlier Monday that the US is facing “impending doom” as daily Covid-19 cases begin to rebound. Biden also said he believes some states should pause their reopening plans in light of the recent surge in cases.

Walensky said earlier in the day during a press conference that many states are reopening their economies even though virus transmission levels remain too high. Walensky said she would ask governors on Tuesday “not to open too quickly”.

“I’m going to pause here, I’m going to lose the script, and I’m going to think about the reoccurring feeling I have before the impending doom,” Walensky told reporters. “We can look forward to so much, so much promise and potential where we are and so much reason to hope, but right now I’m scared.”

According to a CNBC analysis of data compiled by Johns Hopkins University, the US saw an average of 63,239 new Covid-19 cases per day over the past week, up 16% from the previous week. In 30 states and the District of Columbia, daily cases are increasing by at least 5%.

While hospital stays and coronavirus deaths tend to lag behind infection, the daily death toll has hit a plateau. The U.S. reports a weekly average of 970 coronavirus deaths per day, a 3% decrease from the previous week, according to Johns Hopkins.

“We’re giving up hard-fought, hard-won wins,” said Biden. “And as much as we do in America, it’s time to do more.”

Urging states and corporations to maintain or reintroduce widespread mask mandates, the president said failure to take the virus seriously “is exactly what got us into this chaos in the first place” and could lead to more infections and deaths .

Senior public health officials have urged states to proceed with caution for weeks, warning that highly transmittable virus variants – particularly B.1.1.7, which were first identified in the UK – threaten to jeopardize the country’s progress after the infections are almost have receded for three months.

Despite these requests, a handful of governors have decided to lift capacity restrictions on businesses like restaurants and gyms. Some states, like Texas and Mississippi, have dropped requirements for statewide masks, while others, like Alabama, announced it in early April.

“We’re making progress on vaccinations, but cases are rising and the virus is still spreading in too many places,” Biden said.

He announced that 90% of adults in the US will be eligible for Covid-19 shots by April 19 and can get it within five miles of their home under the government’s expanded vaccination schedule.

Categories
Business

How China’s Outrage Machine Kicked Up a Storm Over H&M

When Swedish fast fashion giant H&M announced in September that it was ending its relationship with a Chinese supplier accused of forced labor, some Chinese social media accounts dedicated to the textile industry took note. But on the whole the moment passed without fanfare.

Six months later, Beijing’s online outrage machine went into action. This time his anger was ruthless.

The Communist Party’s youth wing condemned H&M on social media and posted an archive photo of slaves at a Mississippi cotton plantation. Official news outlets piled up with their own outraged memes and hashtags. Patriotic web users carried the message across far and wide corners of the Chinese Internet.

In a matter of hours, a tsunami of nationalist anger hit H&M, Nike, Uniqlo and other international apparel brands and became the latest outbreak of Chinese politics in the western region of Xinjiang, a major cotton producer.

The crisis that apparel brands are now facing is well known to many overseas companies in China. The Communist Party has been using the country’s vast consumer market for years to force international corporations to march in line with their political sensibilities, or at least not to openly deny them.

However, the latest episode has shown that the Chinese government is increasingly able to unleash storms of patriotic anger to punish companies that violate this pact.

In the case of H&M, the timing of the uproar seemed to be dictated not by anything the retailer had done, but by sanctions imposed on Chinese officials last week by the United States, the European Union, the UK and Canada related to Xinjiang were imposed. China has taken hundreds of thousands of Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in the region to indoctrination camps and harshly pushed them into jobs at factories and other employers.

“The part of the hate festival is not subtle. It’s the same logic they’ve followed for decades, ”said Xiao Qiang, a researcher at the University of California’s School of Information at Berkeley and founder of the China Digital Times, a website that tracks Chinese internet controls. But “their ability to control it is getting better,” he said.

“They know how to make these pro-government, nationalist users shine,” Xiao continued. “You will be very good at it. You know exactly what to do. “

On Monday, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian rejected the idea that Beijing had led the boycott campaign against H&M and the other brands.

“These foreign companies refuse to use Xinjiang cotton just because of lies,” Zhao said at a press conference. “Of course, this will spark the resentment and anger of the Chinese people. Does the government even have to encourage and guide this? “

After the Communist Youth League sparked outrage on Wednesday, other government-backed groups and state news outlets lit the flames.

They posted memes suggesting new meanings after the letters H and M: mian hua (cotton), huang miu (ridiculous), mo hei (smears). Official Xinhua News Agency released an illustration of the Better Cotton Initiative, a group raising concerns about forced labor in Xinjiang, as a blindfolded puppet controlled by two hands patterned like an American flag.

The enthusiasm quickly caught the attention of Beijing’s highest levels. A State Department spokeswoman held up a photo of slaves in American cotton fields during a press conference Thursday.

The messages were reinforced by people with a large fan base but largely apolitical presence on social media.

Squirrel Video, a Weibo account devoted to silly videos, shared the Communist Youth League’s original post on H&M with its 10 million followers. A gadget blogger in Chengdu with 1.4 million followers shared a clip in which a worker removes an H&M sign from a mall. A user in Beijing who writes about TV stars highlighted entertainers who had terminated their contracts with Adidas and other target brands.

“Today’s China cannot bully everyone!” He wrote to his nearly seven million followers. “We don’t ask for trouble, but we are not afraid of trouble either.”

A fashion influencer named Wei Ya hosted a live video event on Friday trading products made from Xinjiang cotton. In her Weibo post announcing the event, she made sure to tag the Communist Youth League.

By Monday, news sites circulated a rap video combining the cotton issue with some popular recent lines of attack on Western powers: “How can a country where 500,000 have died of Covid-19 claim the hill?”

A Weibo user posted a lush animated video that he’d been working on all night. It shows men with white hoods pointing guns at black cotton pickers and ending with a lynching.

“These are your foolish deeds; we would never, ”reads a caption.

Less than two hours after the user shared the video, it was republished by Global Times, a party-controlled newspaper known for its nationalist tone.

Many web users who speak out during such campaigns are motivated by genuine patriotism, even if the Chinese government pays some people to post comments on party lines. Others, like the traffic-hungry blog accounts ridiculed as “marketing accounts” in China, are likely to be more pragmatic. You just want the clicks.

In these moments of mass glow, it can be difficult to tell where official propaganda ends and the search for opportunistic gains begins.

“I think the line between the two is becoming increasingly blurred,” said Chenchen Zhang, assistant professor of politics at Queen’s University in Belfast who studies Chinese Internet discourse.

“Nationalist issues are selling; They bring a lot of traffic, ”said Professor Zhang. “Official accounts and marketing accounts come together and everyone participates in this ‘market nationalism’.”

Chinese officials are making sure the anger doesn’t get out of hand. According to tests by the China Digital Times, Internet platforms have been carefully monitoring search results and comments on Xinjiang and H&M since last week.

An article in the Global Times urged readers “to be firm in criticizing those like H&M who intentionally provoke, but at the same time remain rational and beware of pretend patriots joining the crowd to incite hatred.” “.

The Communist Youth League has been at the forefront of optimizing party messages for viral engagement. Its influence is growing as more voices in society seek ways to show loyalty to Beijing, said Fang Kecheng, assistant professor at the School of Journalism and Communication at Hong Kong University of China.

“They have more and more fans,” said Professor Fang. “And whether it’s other government departments, marketing accounts, or those nationalist influencers, they all pay closer attention to their positions and follow immediately.”

The H&M riot had the presumably unintended effect that more Chinese internet users discussed the situation in Xinjiang. For many years, people generally avoided the topic, knowing that comments dealing with the harsh aspects of Chinese rule could get them into trouble. In order to avoid detection by censors, many Internet users did not designate the region with its Chinese name, but with the Roman letter “xj”.

But in the past few days, some have found out firsthand why it is still worth being careful when talking about Xinjiang.

A beauty blogger told her nearly 100,000 Weibo followers that she was contacted by a woman who said she was in Xinjiang. The nameless woman said that her father and other relatives were imprisoned and that the foreign news about mass internment was all true.

Within a few hours, the blogger apologized for the “bad effects” her post had made.

“Support not only Xinjiang cotton, but also Xinjiang people!” Another Weibo user wrote. “Support Xinjiang people who walk the streets without having their phones and IDs checked.”

The post later disappeared. The author declined to comment, citing concerns about its safety. Weibo did not respond to a request for comment.

Lin Qiqing contributed to the research.

Categories
Business

CDC examine reveals single dose of Pfizer or Moderna Covid vaccines was 80% efficient

According to a new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of vaccinated health care workers, a single dose of the Covid-19 vaccine from Pfizer or Moderna was 80% effective in preventing coronavirus infections.

The effectiveness of the partial immunization was noted two weeks after the first dose, according to the CDC, which studied nearly 4,000 health care workers, first responders and frontline workers between December 14 and March 13, according to other key study staff, which began on Monday had no prior laboratory documentation of the Covid-19 infection.

Two doses are better than one, federal health officials said, adding that the vaccines’ effectiveness rose to 90% two weeks after the second dose.

“These results show that approved mRNA-COVID-19 vaccines in adults of working age effectively prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection under real conditions, regardless of symptom status,” wrote the US agency in the study. “The COVID-19 vaccination is recommended to all entitled persons.”

The new CDC results should back up arguments by some health experts and health officials that the US should give Americans only one dose of vaccines as a priority before moving on to a second dose, accelerating the pace of vaccination across the country.

The CDC results were released just minutes before the press conference by the agency’s director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the hospital also released as vaccinations nationwide expedite.

Unlike the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which requires one dose, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two vaccinations three to four weeks apart. The Chief Medical Officer of the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has said repeatedly over the past few months that the US should stick to the two-dose regime.

Dr. Paul Offit, a voting member of the FDA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Related Biological Products who reviewed both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines for emergency approval, said the CDC study was overall “good news” .

However, he said he feared people would now think a dose of the vaccines was “good enough” and would not return for a second shot. He said studies have shown that immunity actually appears to be “more permanent” after the second dose, meaning protection may last longer.

“The reason these are two-dose vaccines is because the second dose provides a titer of neutralizing antibodies, virus-specific neutralizing antibodies, that is nearly ten times greater than the first dose,” he told CNBC. Neutralizing antibodies play an important role in the defense of cells against the virus.

Second, and more importantly, scientists have also discovered what are known as T cells, another important part of the immune response that usually lasts longer Immunity, he said.

There are also still questions about the highly contagious variants and whether the vaccines protect mild to moderate forms of the disease, he said.

Of the 3,950 participants in the study, 2,479, or 62.8%, received both recommended doses, and 477, or 12.1%, received only one dose, according to the CDC. The infection rate among the vaccinated participants was 0.04 compared to 1.38 among the non-vaccinated participants.

The study was conducted in eight locations in the United States: Phoenix, Tucson, and other areas in Arizona; Miami, Florida; Duluth, Minnesota; Portland, Oregon; Temple, Texas; and Salt Lake City, Utah. The majority of the participants were female, white, and had no chronic illnesses, according to the CDC.

The study had limitations, the CDC said, adding that delays in deliveries could reduce virus detection sensitivity of Covid-19 tests.

Preliminary real-world vaccine efficacy results for both vaccines complement and expand on estimates of vaccine efficacy from other recent studies, the CDC said. A large study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in February found that Pfizer’s vaccine was 94% effective against symptomatic Covid.

Categories
Business

Fallout From Hedge Fund’s Defaults Spreads By Markets: Dwell Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Arnd Wiegmann/Reuters

The fallout from a series of defaults at a New York hedge fund reverberated through markets for a second day on Monday, as global banks tried to size up their exposure to one firm’s string of bad bets.

Shares in Credit Suisse, the Swiss bank, dropped 14 percent on Monday and the Japanese bank Nomura closed 16 percent lower, after the banks said they could face significant losses because of defaults by an American investment firm.

U.S. stocks fell on Monday, with the S&P 500 opening 0.2 percent weaker. European stock indexes were mixed but an index of European banks was 0.6 percent lower.

Neither Credit Suisse nor Nomura named the investment firm whose default could lead to big losses, but Bloomberg identified it as Archegos Capital Management, a New York-based family office that manages the wealth of Bill Hwang, a former hedge fund manager at Tiger Asia Management who was found guilty of wire fraud in 2012.

Investment banks that provided services to Archegos, such as Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, dumped huge quantities of stocks including ViacomCBS and Chinese tech companies on Friday.

Archegos was forced into the stock sales, worth about $20 billion, after bets the fund made moved the wrong way, Bloomberg reported. Shares in ViacomCBS, one of Archegos’s positions, dropped 23 percent on Wednesday last week. On Friday, the share price plummeted a further 27 percent as the investment banks liquidated positions. ViacomCBS shares fell about 3 percent in early trading on Monday.

Shares in Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley opened about 2-3 percent lower on Monday. Shares in Deutsche Bank fell more than 3 percent, after it was said to also have some exposure to Archegos.

Credit Suisse has already been roiled this month by the collapse of Greensill Capital, a London-based financial firm it sold funds for, and to whom it extended loans of $140 million. The Swiss bank told investors it would probably report some losses on the loan.

“A significant U.S.-based hedge fund defaulted on margin calls made last week by Credit Suisse and certain other banks,” the Swiss bank said on Monday. It did not yet know the exact size of the loss from exiting its positions but “it could be highly significant and material to our first quarter results,” the statement said.

  • Oil prices bounced around on Monday following news about the fate of the container ship that had been blocking the Suez Canal for nearly week. The ship was finally freed on Monday, raising the prospect that trade flows would be restored, but authorities said more work was needed before maritime traffic could restart.

  • Yields on 10-year Treasury notes fell 2 basis points, or 0.02 percentage point, to 1.65 percent.

Bill Hwang, right, with his lawyer in 2012. Archegos Capital Management manages the personal fortune of the former hedge fund mogul.Credit…Emile Wamsteker/Bloomberg

The fallout from risky investments made by Archegos Capital Management continued to spread through the global markets on Monday, and it could spur more attention from regulators on the murky world of swaps and investor borrowing, the DealBook newsletter reports.

But how did one firm’s bad bets cascade to become a multibillion-dollar fire sale of stocks by banks around the world? Here’s what we know so far:

Archegos manages the personal fortune of the former hedge fund mogul Bill Hwang, who won Wall Street’s business despite having pleaded guilty to insider trading years ago. It amassed huge positions in media giants like ViacomCBS and in several Chinese tech companies — largely with borrowed money.

The Archegos strategy included using swaps, contracts that gave Mr. Hwang financial exposure to companies’ shares while hiding both his identity and how big his positions really were. (It is also becoming increasingly apparent that several Wall Street banks lent Archegos money without knowing that others were doing the same thing for the same trades.)

Trouble for Mr. Hwang, and his banks, arose when the prices of those stocks started to fall. That prompted some of his lenders to demand cash to cover his bets. When they began to question his ability to do so, some of them, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, seized some of his holdings and kicked off the sale $20 billion worth in huge block trades.

That forced selling led to even bigger drops in the prices of those stocks, starting a vicious circle.

Goldman Sachs has told investors that its potential losses are “immaterial,” having covered its exposure, but other investment banks faced a reckoning:

  • Credit Suisse told investors that a “U.S.-based hedge fund” had defaulted on its margin calls, which could lead to losses that were “highly significant and material to our first-quarter results.”

  • Nomura said that one of its U.S. arms could suffer “a significant loss” because of the forced sales.

One person who is surely paying attention is Gary Gensler: President Biden’s pick to lead the S.E.C. has been an advocate for market transparency, having argued that unregulated dark pools could cause a broader risk to the U.S. economy.

Southwest Airlines, the largest buyer of Boeing’s 737 Max jet, said that it had ordered a total of the planes over the next decade.Credit…Jim Watson/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Southwest Airlines is doubling down on Boeing’s troubled 737 Max jet, adding 100 new orders for the plane just months after regulators began allowing it to fly again.

The airline, already the largest customer of the Max, said on Monday that it had ordered a total of 349 Max jets over the next decade. Southwest, which resumed flights aboard the Max this month, also said it had more than doubled the number of planes it had options to buy, to 270.

“Southwest Airlines has been operating the Boeing 737 series for nearly 50 years, and the aircraft has made significant contributions to our unparalleled success,” Gary Kelly, Southwest’s chief executive, said in a statement. “Today’s commitment to the 737 Max solidifies our continued appreciation for the aircraft.”

Regulators around the world grounded the Max, which is quieter and more fuel-efficient than its predecessors, in March 2019 following fatal crashes in Ethiopia and Indonesia that killed 346 people. The Federal Aviation Administration lifted its ban on the plane in November, requiring various changes and upgrades. It was soon followed by other aviation regulators and the plane has been used on thousands of flights since.

The expanded Southwest order comes as more passengers start flying again. More than 1.5 million people were screened at airport security checkpoints on Sunday, according to the Transportation Security Administration, the most since the coronavirus pandemic began. Still, that was about 37 percent fewer people than the agency had screened on the same day in 2019.

Southwest did not say how much it will pay for its new Max order. The airline is spending more than $10 billion in new and existing airplane orders. The airline expects to receive 28 Max planes this year and at least 30 each year after through 2025.

By acquiring Houghton Mifflin, HarperCollins, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, will be better able to compete as publishing has come to be dominated by the biggest players.Credit…Richard Drew/Associated Press

HarperCollins, one of the five largest publishing companies in the United States, has made a deal to acquire Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Books and Media, the trade publishing division of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, for $349 million.

The acquisition will help HarperCollins expand its catalog of backlist titles at a moment of growing consolidation in the book business. Houghton Mifflin publishes perennial sellers by well-known authors such as J.R.R. Tolkien, George Orwell, Philip Roth and Lois Lowry, as well as children’s classics and best-selling cookbooks and lifestyle guides.

News of the sale was reported earlier by The Wall Street Journal.

By acquiring Houghton Mifflin, HarperCollins, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, will be better able to compete as publishing has come to be dominated by the biggest players.

The book business has been transformed by consolidation in the past decade, with the merger of Penguin and Random House in 2013, News Corp’s purchase of the romance publisher Harlequin, and Hachette Book Group’s acquisition of Perseus Books. Last fall, ViacomCBS agreed to sell Simon & Schuster to Penguin Random House for more than $2 billion, in a deal that has drawn scrutiny from antitrust regulators and has raised concerns among booksellers, authors and agents.

Book sales across the industry have remained strong during the pandemic, but Houghton Mifflin saw its revenue fall sharply last year because of a steep drop in sales in its education division. Its revenue fell by more than 46 percent in the nine months that ended on Sept. 30 of last year, compared with the same period in 2019. The company put its trade publishing division up for sale last fall, as it aims to focus on its core business of K-12 educational publishing, and to pay down its debt.

“There is incredible demand for our expertise as schools across the country plan for post-pandemic learning and recovery,” Houghton Mifflin’s president and chief executive, Jack Lynch, said in a news release. “This is an inflection moment for K-12 education in our country and for HMH as a trusted partner to schools and teachers in advancing learning for every student.”

Tankers and freight ships near the entrance of the Suez Canal.Credit…Ahmed Hasan/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Oil prices fell on Monday as word spread that the giant cargo ship blocking the Suez Canal had been set free, raising hopes that hundreds of vessels, many carrying oil and petroleum products, could soon proceed through the critical waterway.

Oil prices had swirled earlier in the day, as prospects of an end to the logjam brightened, and then dimmed. But following the announcement that the containership Ever Given had been freed, the price of Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell about 2.5 percent, to $63.90 a barrel.

Since the vessel got stuck early last week, tankers have been lining up at the entrances to the canal waiting to deliver their cargoes to Europe and Asia.

The Suez Canal is a crucial choke point for oil shipping, but so far the impact on the oil market of this major interruption of trade flows has been relatively muted. Though prices jumped after shipping on the canal was halted, oil prices still remain below their nearly two-year highs of about $70 a barrel reached earlier this month.

Traders are now expected to focus on broader threats to the oil market, including whether the imposition of new lockdowns in Europe may hold back the recovery of oil demand from the pandemic.

From a global perspective, oil supplies are considered adequate, and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Russia and other producers, the group known as OPEC Plus, are withholding an estimated eight million barrels a day, or about 9 percent of current consumption, from the market. Officials from OPEC Plus are expected to meet by video conference on Thursday to discuss whether to ease output cuts.

Goldman Sachs’s headquarters in New York. A group of investors is suing the Wall Street bank over claims of fraud. Credit…Johannes Eisele/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Monday from Goldman Sachs and pension funds over a claim that the Wall Street giant misled investors about its work selling complex debt investments in the prelude to the 2008 financial crisis.

In its latest brief, Goldman makes an interesting argument, the DealBook newsletter reports: Investors shouldn’t rely on statements such as “honesty is at the heart of our business” or “our clients’ interests always come first” that appear in Securities and Exchange Commission filings and annual reports.

The case is a test of shareholders’ ability to sue over claims of investment fraud. The pension funds sought to sue as a class over Goldman’s statements, saying they belied those statements of honesty, and lower courts agreed to let them proceed. Goldman has argued that the investors are engaged in “guerrilla warfare” and aren’t providing “serious legal arguments,” relying on support from the federal government instead.

However, the Biden administration isn’t taking sides, technically. It will argue as a “friend of the court” on Monday that “meritorious private securities-fraud suits” are “an essential complement” to enforcing securities laws.

“I expect the court to be troubled by the claim that companies cannot be held accountable for saying that clients come first and then acting otherwise,” Robert Jackson Jr., who served on the S.E.C. from 2018 to 2020 and is now an N.Y.U. law professor, told DealBook.

The justices probably won’t agree with the claim that making a company “mean what it says” will lead to a tsunami of meritless lawsuits,” he added. Regardless, Goldman is right that the stakes are high, because the case is likely to decide whether shareholders can “hold corporate insiders accountable when they tell investors one thing and do another,” Mr. Jackson said.

President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela promoted an unproven remedy for Covid-19 on Facebook, which prompted the company to freeze his page. Credit…Manaure Quintero/Reuters

The Facebook page of Venezuela’s president, Nicolás Maduro, was frozen for “repeated” violations of its misinformation policies, including a post about an unproven remedy for Covid-19, the company said on Sunday, the latest example of the social media giant cracking down on political figures who violate its content policies.

Mr. Maduro’s Facebook page will be frozen for 30 days in a “read-only” mode, the company said, “due to repeated violations of our rules.”

“We removed a video posted to President Nicolas Maduro’s Page for violating our policies against misinformation about Covid-19 that is likely to put people at risk for harm,” a Facebook spokesman said. “We follow guidance from the W.H.O. that says there is currently no medication to cure the virus.” The spokesman was referring to the World Health Organization.

Facebook’s move came after Mr. Maduro posted a video on his page that promoted Carvativir, a drug derived from thyme. He said in January that the medicine was a “miracle,” but did not provide evidence of its effectiveness — and declined to release the name of the “brilliant Venezuelan mind” that created the drug. In the video, Mr. Maduro falsely claimed that Carvativir can be used preventively and therapeutically against the coronavirus.

In the past, Facebook has been criticized for its inaction against political figures who test the boundaries of the company’s content policies by spreading misinformation. Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and chief executive of Facebook, has said he does not want to be the “arbiter of truth” in public discourse.

But in recent months, Facebook has cracked down on certain types of misinformation across the network. The company has banned posts containing false or misleading information regarding the coronavirus, and has shown willingness to take action against some political figures. And in the past, it has removed at least one post by Jair Bolsonaro, the president of Brazil, for false coronavirus remedy claims regarding the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine.

In January, after insurgents stormed the United States Capitol, President Donald J. Trump’s account was banned indefinitely for inciting his supporters to violent action using the social network.

In response to his account restriction, Mr. Maduro has said Facebook is practicing a form of “digital totalitarianism,” according to Reuters, which first reported Mr. Maduro’s suspension.

Mr. Maduro said on Twitter on Sunday that he would continue to broadcast his regular coronavirus briefing from his other digital accounts, including Instagram, YouTube and Twitter. And to circumvent his suspension, he said he would use the Facebook account belonging to his wife, Cilia Flores, to broadcast Covid-19 information. Facebook would not comment on whether it would suspend Ms. Flores’s account.

A rally on Friday in support of the Amazon workers outside the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union’s building in Birmingham, Ala.Credit…Charity Rachelle for The New York Times

One of the most closely watched union elections in recent history is wrapping up on Monday, one that could alter the shape of the labor movement and one of America’s largest employers.

Almost 6,000 workers at an Amazon warehouse near Birmingham, Ala., one of the company’s largest, are eligible to vote in this election. After years of fierce resistance from the company, they could form the first union at an Amazon operation in the United States.

The outcome of the vote may not be known for days, but the union drive has already succeeded in roiling the world’s biggest e-commerce company and spotlighting complaints about its labor practices, The New York Times’s Karen Weise and Michael Corkery write. If the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union succeeds, it would be a huge victory for the labor movement, whose membership has declined for decades. A victory would also give it a foothold inside one of the country’s largest private employers. The company now has 950,000 workers in the United States, after adding more than 400,000 in the last year alone.

If the union loses, particularly by a large margin, Amazon will have turned the tide on a unionization drive that seemed to have many winds at its back. A loss could force labor organizers to rethink their overall strategy and give Amazon confidence that its approach is working.

Hansjörg Wyss, the former chief executive of the medical device manufacturer Synthes, said he had agreed to join a bid for Tribune Publishing.Credit…Ruben Sprich/Reuters

A Swiss billionaire who has donated hundreds of millions to environmental causes is a surprise new player in the bidding for Tribune Publishing, the major newspaper chain that until recently seemed destined to end up in the hands of a New York hedge fund.

Hansjörg Wyss (pronounced Hans-yorg Vees), the former chief executive of the medical device manufacturer Synthes, said he had agreed to join with the Maryland hotelier Stewart W. Bainum Jr. in a bid for Tribune, an offer that could upend Alden Global Capital’s plan to take full ownership of the company, Marc Tracy of The New York Times writes.

Mr. Wyss, who has given away some of his fortune to help preserve wildlife habitats in Wyoming, Montana and Maine, said he was motivated to join the Tribune bid by his belief in the need for a robust press. “I have an opportunity to do 500 times more than what I’m doing now,” he said.

Alden, which already owns roughly 32 percent of Tribune Publishing shares, is known for drastically cutting costs at the newspapers it controls through its MediaNews Group subsidiary. Last month, the hedge fund reached an agreement with Tribune, whose papers include The Daily News, The Baltimore Sun and The Chicago Tribune, to buy the rest of the company’s shares.

The sale of Tribune, which the newspaper company hopes to conclude by July, requires regulatory approval and yes votes from company shareholders representing two-thirds of the non-Alden stock.

“We are in a hyper-growth industry,” said Dhivya Suryadevara, Stripe’s chief financial officer.Credit…Richard Drew/Associated Press

Thousands of financial technology start-ups are riding an investor frenzy driven by a growing realization that the industry is ripe for a tech makeover, writes Erin Griffith of The New York Times.

When the pandemic forced businesses to speed up their usage of digital tools, including e-commerce and online banking, the demand for what is known as fintech exploded.

Now start-ups with names like Blend, Brex and Dave that provide decidedly unglamorous banking, lending and payment processing offerings are hot tickets. That was punctuated this month when Stripe, a payments company, raised $600 million in a financing that valued it at $95 billion, the highest ever for a private start-up in the United States.

Financial technology companies are also making a splash on the stock market. On Tuesday, Robinhood, a stock trading app popular with young adults, filed for an initial public offering. And Coinbase, a cryptocurrency start-up, is scheduled to go public in the next few weeks in what could be a $100 billion listing.

In total, venture capital investors poured $44.4 billion into financial technology start-ups last year, up from $1.1 billion in 2009, according to PitchBook, which tracks private financing. Many investors are now making bold predictions that these start-ups will upend big banks, established credit card providers — and in some cases, the entire financial system.

Categories
Business

5 issues to know earlier than the inventory market opens Monday, March 29

Here are the top news, trends, and analysis that investors need to get their trading day started:

1. US futures tumble after Friday’s records for the Dow, S & P 500

Traders on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

Source: NYSE

US stock futures fell Monday after a late Friday rally the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 rose over 1.4% and nearly 1.7%, respectively, as stocks reopened from a successful reopening benefited from Covid, achieved an outperformance. The Dow and S&P 500, both closing at record highs, posted weekly gains roughly in line with Friday’s progress. Dow’s Boeing stock rose 3% in the pre-market on Monday after Southwest Airlines placed a huge aircraft order. Southwest’s shares rose slightly.

The Nasdaq offset a loss of nearly 1% on Friday and closed 1.2%. However, the tech-heavy index still fell 0.6% over the course of the week. With just three days left in March, the Nasdaq posted a slight monthly loss while the Dow and S&P 500 stood ready to post solid gains for the month.

The 10-year government bond yield remained stable on Monday, trading below its most recent 14-month high. The rapid surge in yields this year has been problematic for growth stocks, including many technical names, as higher interest rates undermine the value of future earnings and depress market valuations.

2. Credit Suisse and Nomura are affected by the fallout from the US hedge fund

Credit Suisse Bank.

NurPhoto | NurPhoto | Getty Images

Credit Suisse warned Monday of a “highly significant” slump in its first quarter results after the Swiss-based bank began exiting positions in a large US hedge fund that collapsed on margin calls last week. Japanese company Nomura is currently evaluating a potential loss of an estimated $ 2 billion. The shares of Nomura and Credit Suisse were added on the Monday before the IPO.

The hedge fund at the center of the fallout is Archegos Capital Management, which was forced to liquidate positions late last week. The moves of the multi-billion dollar US family office founded by former Tiger stock analyst Bill Hwang sparked a wave of selling pressure on US media stocks and Chinese Internet ADRs on Friday.

3. The cargo ship ever to block the Suez Canal is partially floating

A view shows the Ever Given container ship in the Suez Canal in this satellite image from Maxar Technologies captured on March 28, 2021.

Maxar Technologies | Reuters

The giant container ship Ever Given, which blocked the Suez Canal, was partially floated again early Monday, days after the ship got stuck and halted a major global trade route. The Suez Canal Authority said the ship’s course has been corrected by 80% and further maneuvers will continue if the water level rises later in the day. It remains unclear when the waterway will be opened to traffic again as hundreds of ships waited to enter the Suez. Maritime data showed that at least 10 tankers and container ships changed course to avoid the congestion, including U.S. ships carrying natural gas for Cheniere and Shell / BG Group.

4. Biden to advance infrastructure before health and family care

President Joe Biden will hold his first formal press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, USA on March 25, 2021.

Leah Millis | Reuters

President Joe Biden will split his sweeping plan to improve the nation’s infrastructure into two parts. Biden will unveil the first part of his plan on Wednesday, which will focus on issues such as rebuilding roads and railways. The second part – including childcare and health care reforms, aspects of infrastructure sometimes referred to as social infrastructure – will be released “in just a few weeks,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Sunday. Overall, the legislation is expected to cost more than $ 3 trillion.

5. Fauci only warns the USA “on the corner” of the Covid pandemic

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases at the NIH, speaks about the daily press conference at the White House in Washington on January 21, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

With the possibility of safe summer barbecues in just a few months and the promise of widespread supplies of Covid vaccines in the US by the end of May, many Americans may feel that the nation has finally taken action against the pandemic. The Chief Medical Officer of the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci, however, warned that America was really only “on the corner”.

According to a CNBC analysis of the Johns Hopkins University data, daily daily US cases rose 12% in the past seven days, despite being well below their January high. Almost half of people aged 65 and over have taken all the necessary recordings, according to CDC data. However, only 20% of the adult population are considered fully vaccinated.

– Get the latest on the pandemic using CNBC’s coronavirus blog.

Categories
Business

What’s Happening with China, Cotton and All of These Clothes Manufacturers?

Calls for the cancellation of H&M and other Western brands were rife on Chinese social media last week as human rights campaigns clashed with cotton procurement and political game art. Here’s what’s going on and how it can affect everything from your t-shirts to your trench coats.

What’s all I hear about fashion brands and China? Has anyone made another stupid racist ad?

No, it’s a lot more complicated than an offensive and overt cultural gaffe. The topic focuses on the Xinjiang region of China and allegations of forced labor in the cotton industry – allegations that have been denied by the Chinese government. Last summer, many Western brands made statements expressing concerns about human rights in their supply chain. Some even cut all ties to the region.

Now, months later, the chickens are coming home to settle down: Chinese internet users react with anger and accuse the allegations of being a criminal offense against the state. Leading Chinese e-commerce platforms have thrown major international labels off their websites, and a number of celebrities have denounced their former overseas employers.

Why is this such a big deal?

The problem has growing political and economic implications. On the one hand, as the pandemic continues to plague global retailers, consumers have become more attuned to who makes their clothes and how they are treated, and pressure on brands to put their values ​​where their products are. On the other hand, due to its size and the fact that there are fewer disruptions there than in other key markets such as Europe, China has become an increasingly important distribution center for the fashion industry. Even then, international politicians intervene and impose bans and sanctions. Fashion has become a diplomatic football.

This is a perfect case study of what happens when market bids clash with global morals.

Tell me more about Xinjiang and why it is so important.

Xinjiang is a region in northwest China where about a fifth of the world’s cotton is produced. It is home to many ethnic groups, particularly the Uighurs, a Muslim minority. Although it is officially the largest of China’s five autonomous regions, which theoretically means it has more legislative self-regulation, the central government is increasingly involved in the area, stating that it must exercise its authority over local conflicts with the Han Chinese (the ethnic Majority) who moved to the region. This has resulted in draconian restrictions, surveillance, criminal prosecution and forced labor camps.

OK, what about the Uyghurs?

The Uyghur population in Xinjiang is a predominantly Muslim Turkish group and, according to official information from the Chinese authorities, numbers just over 12 million. Up to a million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities have been retrained to become model workers who obeyed the Chinese Communist Party through forced labor programs.

So it’s been like that for a while?

At least since 2016. According to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Axios and others published reports imprisoned Uyghurs in the supply chains of many of the world’s best-known fashion retailers, including Adidas, Lacoste, H&M, Ralph Lauren and the PVH Corporation, which includes Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, many of these brands have reassessed their relationships with Xinjiang cotton suppliers.

In January the Trump administration banned all imports of cotton from the region as well as products made from the material and declared the incident a “genocide”. At the time, the Workers Rights Consortium estimated that Xinjiang materials were involved in more than 1.5 billion pieces of clothing imported annually by American brands and retailers.

That is much! How do I know if I am wearing a Xinjiang cotton garment?

You do not do that. The supply chain is so complex and subcontracting so frequent that it is often difficult for brands to know exactly where and how each component of their garments is made.

If this has been a problem for over a year, why is everyone in China freaking out now?

It is not immediately apparent. One theory suggests that this is due to the rise in political brinkmanship between China and the West. On March 22, the UK, Canada, the European Union and the United States announced an escalating series of sanctions against Chinese officials for treating Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

Not long after, screenshots were posted on Chinese social media of a statement H&M released in September 2020, citing “deep concern” about reports of forced labor in Xinjiang and confirming that the retailer had stopped selling cotton from growers in the country Region to buy. The rainfall was quick and furious. There were calls for a boycott, and H&M products were soon missing from China’s most popular e-commerce platforms, Alibaba Group’s Tmall and JD.com. The excitement was fueled by comments from groups such as the Communist Youth League, an influential Communist Party organization, on the microblogging website Sina Weibo.

Within hours, other major western brands like Nike and Burberry started the trend for the same reason.

And it’s not just consumers who are in the arms: Influencers and celebrities have also severed ties with the brands. Even video games spawn virtual “looks” that Burberry created from their platforms.

Backtrack: What do influencers have to do with it?

Influencers in China have even more power over consumer behavior than in the West, which means they play a vital role in legitimizing brands and driving sales. For example, when Tao Liang, also known as Mr. Bags, worked with Givenchy, the bags were sold out within 12 minutes. A necklace and bracelet set he made with Qeelin reportedly sold out in a second (100 made). That’s why H&M worked with Victoria Song, Nike with Wang Yibo and Burberry with Zhou Dongyu.

However, Chinese influencers and celebrities are also sensitive to pleasing the central government and publicly affirming their national values ​​by often selecting their country in a performative manner over contracts.

In 2019, for example, Yang Mi, the Chinese actress and Versace ambassador, publicly rejected the brand when she made the mistake of creating a t-shirt that listed Hong Kong and Macau as independent countries and the “One China “Seemed to be fired. Politics and the sovereignty of the central government. Not long after, Coach was targeted after making a similar mistake and creating a t-shirt called Hong Kong and Taiwan. Liu Wen, the Chinese supermodel, immediately distanced herself from the brand.

And what about the video games?

Tencent removed two Burberry-designed “skins” – outfits of video game characters the brand had enthusiastically launched – from its popular Honor of Kings title in response to news that the brand had stopped purchasing cotton produced in the Xinjiang area . The looks had been available for less than a week.

So that applies to both fast fashion and the high end. How much of the fashion world is involved?

Maybe most of it. So far, Adidas, Nike, Converse and Burberry have been affected by the crisis. Even before the ban, other companies such as Patagonia, PVH, Marks & Spencer and The Gap announced that they would not source any material from Xinjiang and officially spoke out against human rights violations.

However, this week several brands including VF Corp., Inditex (owned by Zara) and PVH have silently removed their policies against forced labor from their websites.

That seems like a squirrel. Is that likely to escalate?

Brands seem concerned that the answer is yes, as some companies have proactively announced they will continue to buy cotton from Xinjiang, apparently in fear of offending the Chinese government. Hugo Boss, the German company whose suit is a de facto uniform for the financial world, posted a statement on Weibo: “We will continue to buy and support Xinjiang cotton” (although the company announced last fall that it would no longer be sourcing to be made from the region). Muji, the Japanese brand, like Uniqlo, proudly advertises the use of Xinjiang cotton on their Chinese websites.

Wait … I play possum, but why should a company publicly pledge its loyalty to Xinjiang cotton?

It’s about the Benjamins, buddy. China is projected to be the world’s largest luxury market by 2025, according to a report by Bain & Company released last December. Last year it was the only part of the world that saw year-on-year growth. The luxury market reached 44 billion euros ($ 52.2 billion).

Will anyone come out of this well?

One group of winners could be the Chinese fashion industry, which has long played second fiddle to Western brands, to the frustration of many companies there. Shares in Chinese apparel and textile companies linked to Xinjiang rose this week as the backlash gained momentum. And more than 20 Chinese brands made public statements announcing their support for Chinese cotton.

Categories
Business

How Texas’ robust winter uncovered U.S. energy grid issues

Texas had a rough winter in 2021.

In mid-February, when temperatures dropped in the single digits, demand for electricity hit a record high across Texas. The supply was running low, causing the state’s utility operator to introduce rolling blackouts. At the height of the crisis, more than 4.5 million customers lost electricity. The unusual winter storm caused neighboring states like Louisiana, Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Kansas to also impose rolling power outages.

Texas residents shivered from the cold as the outages lasted for days. You have lost access to water. Some turned their cars on in their garages to keep warm and then died of carbon monoxide poisoning.

The historic collapse was a wake-up call – if the Texas power grid was so fragile, what about the rest of the United States? According to Climate Central, the US has seen weather-related blackouts have increased by 67% since 2000. Part of the problem is aging infrastructure. Most of today’s power grid was built in the 1950s and 1960s with the hope that it would take 50 years.

Check out the video above to find out what happened in the Texas power outage and how it’s a warning sign on the US power grid.