Categories
Business

Why adverts might be a discount amid Covid-19

The Kansas City Chiefs celebrate with the Vince Lombardi Trophy after defeating the San Francisco 49ers 31-20 in Super Bowl LIV at Hard Rock Stadium on February 2, 2020 in Miami, Florida.

Ronald Martinez | Getty Images

There’s no better commercial on TV than the National Football League Super Bowl Sunday. Companies are using the NFL’s title game to launch new products and campaigns and raise consumer awareness.

But with the pandemic affecting NFL planning, advertisers who are not yet committed could get last-minute discounts on Super Bowl slots.

Kevin Krim, founder and CEO of advertising data company EDO, said advertisers had raised concerns about the NFL’s postponement of some regular season games when players with Covid-19 went out. They want security around the February 7th game.

“The marketers put a lot of emphasis on predictability,” Krim said in an interview with CNBC. “They don’t want things to keep changing and the NFL knows it. The playoffs are too valuable to be disturbed.”

“Nothing would be more devastating than a postponement,” added Dave Morgan of advertising data analytics company Simulmedia. The company uses its metrics to help advertisers measure the impact of national ad slots on network programming.

New York Giants wide receiver Sterling Shepard (87) caught a pass in the first half at MetLife Stadium in front of Pittsburgh Steelers strong security Terrell Edmunds (34) and linebacker Devin Bush (55).

Vincent Carchietta | USA TODAY Sports

NFL’s nightmare

The NFL’s most recent Covid-19 outbreak hit Baltimore Ravens, causing their contest three times in week 12 with the Pittsburgh Steelers postponed.

That hurt NBC. Advertising paid top dollar for the game originally scheduled for Thanksgiving – when everyone is home and enjoys watching football – but was eventually moved to the following Wednesday at 3:40 p.m. CET. Raven’s star quarterback LaMar Jackson was out due to Covid-19, which further dulled interest in the game.

Crimea estimates that advertisers have lost value for the game. His firm estimated that the NFL’s 2019 Thanksgiving night game generated $ 62.8 million for the network, and Morgan added that the 2020 competition would have been worth $ 70 million.

The Wednesday game drew 10.8 million viewers on NBC, compared to last year’s regular Thanksgiving game, which drew around 21 million viewers. When companies don’t get their negotiated audience value for the commercials, networks usually compensate for this with “make goods” – free commercials elsewhere.

Tony Ponturo, longtime sports marketing manager, said advertisers shouldn’t settle for the free commercials because “it’s an easy way for the network to pay off – with more units,” said Ponturo. “Yeah, it’s weight, but it’s not exactly the pressure you wanted it to be.”

Ponturo, the former vice president of global media sports and entertainment marketing for Anheuser-Busch, noted that advertisers want safe dates for NFL games because they too have plans for promotions. Should NFL games continue to be postponed, it will affect their marketing.

“You have to plan and put the weekly goals under pressure,” said Ponturo. “You can do promotions, you can have retail displays, you can have all sorts of things. And when games are moving, it’s not what you bought.”

“It’s a big problem,” added Morgan. “Corporations are planning to bring automobiles to market. They are planning pizza specials. You can’t postpone this for a week. You must already have your thousands of franchises out of sign and supplies. You must have trained teams, and they must. ” ahead. “

To combat more post-season postponements, the NFL hovered to keep teams in market-friendly hotels and considered a training camp model. But on Wednesday, League Commissioner Roger Goodell said the idea had been discarded.

Instead, the NFL will seek to combat further outbreaks by providing household members of players and team staff with Covid-19 tests that lead to the Super Bowl. Morgan said the training camp model could have reassured potential advertisers looking to do deals with CBS before the Super Bowl.

“The NFL needs to make sure it hits that date,” Morgan said. “I have to believe they are on top of it. They will control the environment for the players going to the Super Bowl.”

CBS ready to close a deal?

On the broadcast side, CBS may have to get creative with the remaining Super Bowl slots.

The ads are valued at $ 5 million to $ 6 million. According to Bloomberg, Fox raised more than $ 400 million last year and sold around 77 paid ads at around $ 5.6 million each. According to sources familiar with the network’s NFL pricing, CBS is charging roughly $ 5.5 million for 2021 spots.

The network has sold nearly 80% of its package, according to the Sports Business Journal, and national companies like Toyota have already secured spots. However, marketers estimated that most of the slots sold consist of pre-negotiated packages.

To keep the ad price on the remaining slots, media pundits said CBS would likely package the Super Bowl with other NFL or sports programming packages to make it attractive to companies that are still on the fence.

Ponturo said the move protects CPM (cost per thousand impressions) and CBS “can and will maintain credibility about the Super Bowl award.” [companies] was given different inventory to make all CPM work. Nobody knows what the secret sauce is to keep this unit price going, but they are all packages to some extent. “

But with Covid-19 intercepting portions of the NFL’s schedule, Krim says he isn’t “surprised that CBS didn’t sell as much of the game as Fox or NBC in the past”. He predicted that CBS could generate less than $ 600 million in revenue for the game’s commercials if the uncertainty surrounding the NFL persists.

“Nobody is going to try to close the last 20% until you’re sure,” added Morgan.

Lamar Jackson # 8 of the stiff arms of the Baltimore Ravens Juan Thornhill # 22 of the Kansas City Chiefs at M&T Bank Stadium on September 28, 2020 in Baltimore, Maryland.

Todd Olszewski | Getty Images

Morgan anticipates the ads will be sold out, but it could be up to the last few days. He said the move could also help CBS, as the network could pack in too much content to secure Super Bowl deals.

“They won’t negotiate until the days before,” said Morgan. “With alternative pricing models, money is always available – available the day before [the Super Bowl]literally. “

Crimea said the 2021 Super Bowl ads could also be influenced by movie studios holding back movies. Studios tend to be last minute buyers who wait to know the movies are complete. As theaters are either closed or could close again due to the recent surge in Covid-19, this may have an impact on buyers.

Crimea said non-tied businesses should “stay close” as discounts may be available too late.

“At the right price, especially if you can get a discount, you will get great results with an NFL ad,” said Krim. “The only thing you know about the NFL is the most exciting thing on TV, followed by the NBA.”

Categories
Business

The Week in Enterprise: We’ve Been Hacked

It’s going to be another bizarre holiday week. Here’s what you need to know to be sure for the days ahead in business and tech. – Charlotte Cowles

In one of the largest and most sophisticated cyberattacks in years, hackers breached the networks of a wide variety of government agencies, including treasury and commerce, as well as a number of large private companies. What’s worse is that the hacks took place last spring but went undetected until the last few weeks. The perpetrator, who is widely believed to be a Russian intelligence agency, has been lurking in government networks for most of 2020. The Trump administration said little about the attack or what information was compromised?

It’s raining antitrust lawsuits in Silicon Valley, and now it’s up to Google to grab an umbrella. Ten states (and counts) on Wednesday accused the company of illegally monopolizing the digital advertising business and using its ubiquity to overwhelm certain publishers with their ads. “If the free market were a baseball game, Google would position itself as a pitcher, batsman and referee,” said Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general who led the case. A day later, more than 30 states accused Google of illegally manipulating search results to drive users away from their competitors and towards companies it was comfortable with. Google denied the claims and says it will defend itself.

Legislators ran to iron out the last few wrinkles in a much-needed pandemic relief bill and avoid a government shutdown. The latest bill of $ 900 billion (a third the size of what the Democrats originally proposed last May) includes $ 600 in payments for individuals, $ 300 a week in additional unemployment benefits, and help for small businesses. However, there is a lack of significant aid to state and local governments (a key item on the wish list for Democrats), as well as legal protections for businesses (which Republicans wanted) worried about liability for the virus spreading.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome H. Powell is not known to offer overly rosy economic forecasts. But he sounded almost optimistic last week when he said that a “light at the end of the tunnel” was visible – despite warning that the next few months would be difficult. He predicted the economy will recover in the second half of 2021, provided enough people are vaccinated and can safely resume normal activities. (Such an outcome became even more possible when a second Moderna vaccine received a thumbs up from the Food and Drug Administration.) To bolster growth and calm markets, Powell said the Fed would keep rates near zero and continue Purchase of government debt. He also reiterated his call for more federal incentives to create a financial “bridge” for those in desperate need this winter.

Robinhood, a finance app that allows users to easily trade stocks for free, may sound too good to be true and has raised a number of red flags with regulators. Last Thursday, the Securities and Exchange Commission said Robinhood had misled its users about how it was paid by Wall Street firms to pass business and that it had benefited at the expense of its customers. Robinhood agreed to pay a $ 65 million fine to pay the SEC’s fees without admitting or denying guilt. In another case the day before, a Massachusetts securities regulator accused Robinhood of having “unscrupulous” encouraged undemanding clients to make risky investments.

As the coronavirus picked up pace this fall, it accelerated employment growth, travel plans and vacation spending. (Except for Christmas trees, which are selling at a record high.) Retail sales fell in both October and November, marking a shift from months ago when Americans continued to spend money, especially online, despite economic turmoil. Of course, Americans were empowered earlier this year by the federal government’s pandemic aid, including stimulus checks and additional unemployment benefits. Now that these funds have been used up, people’s Christmas trees may not have much to themselves this season.

Categories
Business

COVAX international Covid vaccine program secures almost 2 billion doses for UNICEF distribution

A pharmacist prepares a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine on Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at the UCI Medical Center in Orange, California, United States.

Bing Guan | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The global alliance, which aims to provide coronavirus vaccines to poor nations, announced Friday that it has supply agreements to provide nearly 2 billion doses and could ship them in the first quarter of its approval.

There are 190 countries and territories participating in COVAX, which is jointly managed by the World Health Organization Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation. The facility said it could secure the cans through additional supply agreements with AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.

COVAX plans to begin first shipments in the first quarter of 2021, when the drugs are approved. Enough doses should be given in the first half of next year to protect health and social workers in participating economies, the Alliance said. COVAX plans to ship at least 1.3 billion doses to 92 low and middle-income countries that will participate in the facility sometime next year.

“The arrival of vaccines gives us all a glimpse into the light at the end of the tunnel,” said Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director general of the World Health Organization, in a statement. “But we will only really end the pandemic if we end it everywhere at the same time. That means that it is important to vaccinate some people in all countries, rather than all people in some countries.”

UNICEF announced on Friday that up to 850 tons of Covid-19 vaccines per month could be shipped to middle- to low-income countries over the next year. Commercial airlines will be able to deliver the vaccines to almost all of the 92 countries participating in COVAX, a UNICEF statement said.

The United Nations Children’s Fund is a United Nations agency that provides humanitarian aid to children around the world. UNICEF will work with the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) to coordinate vaccine procurement and support dispensing of the doses, said Gavi.

The humanitarian organization said the shots will likely be shipped primarily via existing passenger and cargo flights, although some charter flights or alternative modes of transportation will be required for hard-to-reach countries.

However, the world’s poorest countries are still facing a budget gap of $ 133 million for the distribution and storage of the cans, UNICEF said. According to the organization, which assesses global air cargo capacity and routes, the airline’s deliveries would cost the airline up to an estimated $ 70 million.

Countries will face additional challenges once the cans arrive, UNICEF said.

The temperature requirements for the vaccines being developed are range and require cold chain supply lines, trained medical staff and stronger contact efforts, said Henrietta Fore, executive director at UNICEF, in a statement released Friday.

“This is a mammoth and historic endeavor,” Fore said in a statement. “The scale of the task is huge and the stakes have never been higher, but we are ready to take on this.”

UNICEF said it would take $ 410 million to help countries deliver the vaccines and purchase therapeutic drugs and diagnostic tools over the next year. Funding has been a problem for the COVAX facility, which according to a Reuters report on Wednesday, citing internal documents, faces a “very high” risk of default due to lack of funds, delivery risks and complex contractual arrangements.

Categories
Business

How China Censored Covid-19 – The New York Occasions

This article is copublished with ProPublica, the nonprofit investigative newsroom.

In the early hours of Feb. 7, China’s powerful internet censors experienced an unfamiliar and deeply unsettling sensation. They felt they were losing control.

The news was spreading quickly that Li Wenliang, a doctor who had warned about a strange new viral outbreak only to be threatened by the police and accused of peddling rumors, had died of Covid-19. Grief and fury coursed through social media. To people at home and abroad, Dr. Li’s death showed the terrible cost of the Chinese government’s instinct to suppress inconvenient information.

Yet China’s censors decided to double down. Warning of the “unprecedented challenge” Dr. Li’s passing had posed and the “butterfly effect” it may have set off, officials got to work suppressing the inconvenient news and reclaiming the narrative, according to confidential directives sent to local propaganda workers and news outlets.

They ordered news websites not to issue push notifications alerting readers to his death. They told social platforms to gradually remove his name from trending topics pages. And they activated legions of fake online commenters to flood social sites with distracting chatter, stressing the need for discretion: “As commenters fight to guide public opinion, they must conceal their identity, avoid crude patriotism and sarcastic praise, and be sleek and silent in achieving results.”

The orders were among thousands of secret government directives and other documents that were reviewed by The New York Times and ProPublica. They lay bare in extraordinary detail the systems that helped the Chinese authorities shape online opinion during the pandemic.

At a time when digital media is deepening social divides in Western democracies, China is manipulating online discourse to enforce the Communist Party’s consensus. To stage-manage what appeared on the Chinese internet early this year, the authorities issued strict commands on the content and tone of news coverage, directed paid trolls to inundate social media with party-line blather and deployed security forces to muzzle unsanctioned voices.

Though China makes no secret of its belief in rigid internet controls, the documents convey just how much behind-the-scenes effort is involved in maintaining a tight grip. It takes an enormous bureaucracy, armies of people, specialized technology made by private contractors, the constant monitoring of digital news outlets and social media platforms — and, presumably, lots of money.

It is much more than simply flipping a switch to block certain unwelcome ideas, images or pieces of news.

China’s curbs on information about the outbreak started in early January, before the novel coronavirus had even been identified definitively, the documents show. When infections started spreading rapidly a few weeks later, the authorities clamped down on anything that cast China’s response in too “negative” a light.

The United States and other countries have for months accused China of trying to hide the extent of the outbreak in its early stages. It may never be clear whether a freer flow of information from China would have prevented the outbreak from morphing into a raging global health calamity. But the documents indicate that Chinese officials tried to steer the narrative not only to prevent panic and debunk damaging falsehoods domestically. They also wanted to make the virus look less severe — and the authorities more capable — as the rest of the world was watching.

The documents include more than 3,200 directives and 1,800 memos and other files from the offices of the country’s internet regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China, in the eastern city of Hangzhou. They also include internal files and computer code from a Chinese company, Urun Big Data Services, that makes software used by local governments to monitor internet discussion and manage armies of online commenters.

The documents were shared with The Times and ProPublica by a hacker group that calls itself C.C.P. Unmasked, referring to the Chinese Communist Party. The Times and ProPublica independently verified the authenticity of many of the documents, some of which had been obtained separately by China Digital Times, a website that tracks Chinese internet controls.

The C.A.C. and Urun did not respond to requests for comment.

“China has a politically weaponized system of censorship; it is refined, organized, coordinated and supported by the state’s resources,” said Xiao Qiang, a research scientist at the School of Information at the University of California, Berkeley, and the founder of China Digital Times. “It’s not just for deleting something. They also have a powerful apparatus to construct a narrative and aim it at any target with huge scale.”

“This is a huge thing,” he added. “No other country has that.”

China’s top leader, Xi Jinping, created the Cyberspace Administration of China in 2014 to centralize the management of internet censorship and propaganda as well as other aspects of digital policy. Today, the agency reports to the Communist Party’s powerful Central Committee, a sign of its importance to the leadership.

The C.A.C.’s coronavirus controls began in the first week of January. An agency directive ordered news websites to use only government-published material and not to draw any parallels with the deadly SARS outbreak in China and elsewhere that began in 2002, even as the World Health Organization was noting the similarities.

At the start of February, a high-level meeting led by Mr. Xi called for tighter management of digital media, and the C.A.C.’s offices across the country swung into action. A directive in Zhejiang Province, whose capital is Hangzhou, said the agency should not only control the message within China, but also seek to “actively influence international opinion.”

Agency workers began receiving links to virus-related articles that they were to promote on local news aggregators and social media. Directives specified which links should be featured on news sites’ home screens, how many hours they should remain online and even which headlines should appear in boldface.

Online reports should play up the heroic efforts by local medical workers dispatched to Wuhan, the Chinese city where the virus was first reported, as well as the vital contributions of Communist Party members, the agency’s orders said.

Headlines should steer clear of the words “incurable” and “fatal,” one directive said, “to avoid causing societal panic.” When covering restrictions on movement and travel, the word “lockdown” should not be used, said another. Multiple directives emphasized that “negative” news about the virus was not to be promoted.

When a prison officer in Zhejiang who lied about his travels caused an outbreak among the inmates, the C.A.C. asked local offices to monitor the case closely because it “could easily attract attention from overseas.”

News outlets were told not to play up reports on donations and purchases of medical supplies from abroad. The concern, according to agency directives, was that such reports could cause a backlash overseas and disrupt China’s procurement efforts, which were pulling in vast amounts of personal protective equipment as the virus spread abroad.

“Avoid giving the false impression that our fight against the epidemic relies on foreign donations,” one directive said.

C.A.C. workers flagged some on-the-ground videos for purging, including several that appear to show bodies exposed in public places. Other clips that were flagged appear to show people yelling angrily inside a hospital, workers hauling a corpse out of an apartment and a quarantined child crying for her mother. The videos’ authenticity could not be confirmed.

The agency asked local branches to craft ideas for “fun at home” content to “ease the anxieties of web users.” In one Hangzhou district, workers described a “witty and humorous” guitar ditty they had promoted. It went, “I never thought it would be true to say: To support your country, just sleep all day.”

Then came a bigger test.

Dr. Li’s death in Wuhan loosed a geyser of emotion that threatened to tear Chinese social media out from under the C.A.C.’s control.

It did not help when the agency’s gag order leaked onto Weibo, a popular Twitter-like platform, fueling further anger. Thousands of people flooded Dr. Li’s Weibo account with comments.

The agency had little choice but to permit expressions of grief, though only to a point. If anyone was sensationalizing the story to generate online traffic, their account should be dealt with “severely,” one directive said.

The day after Dr. Li’s death, a directive included a sample of material that was deemed to be “taking advantage of this incident to stir up public opinion”: It was a video interview in which Dr. Li’s mother reminisces tearfully about her son.

The scrutiny did not let up in the days that followed. “Pay particular attention to posts with pictures of candles, people wearing masks, an entirely black image or other efforts to escalate or hype the incident,” read an agency directive to local offices.

Larger numbers of online memorials began to disappear. The police detained several people who formed groups to archive deleted posts.

In Hangzhou, propaganda workers on round-the-clock shifts wrote up reports describing how they were ensuring people saw nothing that contradicted the soothing message from the Communist Party: that it had the virus firmly under control.

Officials in one district reported that workers in their employ had posted online comments that were read more than 40,000 times, “effectively eliminating city residents’ panic.” Workers in another county boasted of their “severe crackdown” on what they called rumors: 16 people had been investigated by the police, 14 given warnings and two detained. One district said it had 1,500 “cybersoldiers” monitoring closed chat groups on WeChat, the popular social app.

Researchers have estimated that hundreds of thousands of people in China work part-time to post comments and share content that reinforces state ideology. Many of them are low-level employees at government departments and party organizations. Universities have recruited students and teachers for the task. Local governments have held training sessions for them.

Government departments in China have a variety of specialized software at their disposal to shape what the public sees online.

One maker of such software, Urun, has won at least two dozen contracts with local agencies and state-owned enterprises since 2016, government procurement records show. According to an analysis of computer code and documents from Urun, the company’s products can track online trends, coordinate censorship activity and manage fake social media accounts for posting comments.

One Urun software system gives government workers a slick, easy-to-use interface for quickly adding likes to posts. Managers can use the system to assign specific tasks to commenters. The software can also track how many tasks a commenter has completed and how much that person should be paid.

According to one document describing the software, commenters in the southern city of Guangzhou are paid $25 for an original post longer than 400 characters. Flagging a negative comment for deletion earns them 40 cents. Reposts are worth one cent apiece.

Urun makes a smartphone app that streamlines their work. They receive tasks within the app, post the requisite comments from their personal social media accounts, then upload a screenshot, ostensibly to certify that the task was completed.

The company also makes video game-like software that helps train commenters, documents show. The software splits a group of users into two teams, one red and one blue, and pits them against each other to see which can produce more popular posts.

Other Urun code is designed to monitor Chinese social media for “harmful information.” Workers can use keywords to find posts that mention sensitive topics, such as “incidents involving leadership” or “national political affairs.” They can also manually tag posts for further review.

In Hangzhou, officials appear to have used Urun software to scan the Chinese internet for keywords like “virus” and “pneumonia” in conjunction with place names, according to company data.

By the end of February, the emotional wallop of Dr. Li’s death seemed to be fading. C.A.C. workers around Hangzhou continued to scan the internet for anything that might perturb the great sea of placidity.

One city district noted that web users were worried about how their neighborhoods were handling the trash left by people who were returning from out of town and potentially carrying the virus. Another district observed concerns about whether schools were taking adequate safety measures as students returned.

On March 12, the agency’s Hangzhou office issued a memo to all branches about new national rules for internet platforms. Local offices should set up special teams for conducting daily inspections of local websites, the memo said. Those found to have violations should be “promptly supervised and rectified.”

The Hangzhou C.A.C. had already been keeping a quarterly scorecard for evaluating how well local platforms were managing their content. Each site started the quarter with 100 points. Points were deducted for failing to adequately police posts or comments. Points might also be added for standout performances.

In the first quarter of 2020, two local websites lost 10 points each for “publishing illegal information related to the epidemic,” that quarter’s score report said. A government portal received an extra two points for “participating actively in opinion guidance” during the outbreak.

Over time, the C.A.C. offices’ reports returned to monitoring topics unrelated to the virus: noisy construction projects keeping people awake at night, heavy rains causing flooding in a train station.

Then, in late May, the offices received startling news: Confidential public-opinion analysis reports had somehow been published online. The agency ordered offices to purge internal reports — particularly, it said, those analyzing sentiment surrounding the epidemic.

The offices wrote back in their usual dry bureaucratese, vowing to “prevent such data from leaking out on the internet and causing a serious adverse impact to society.”

Categories
Business

Utah Jazz proprietor Ryan Smith: CNBC interview

Gail Miller, owner and chairman of the Larry H. Miller group of companies and Utah Jazz, announced today that they have reached definitive agreements to sell a controlling stake in Utah Jazz and other sports to technology entrepreneur Ryan Smith.

Melissa Majchrzak | National Basketball Association | Getty Images

Subscribe to CNBC Pro to Read the full Q&A with Qualtrics CEO and new owner of the Utah Jazz, Ryan Smith.

Ryan Smith, the new owner of Utah Jazz, says he’s still not sure what kind of owner he’ll be, but he already knows his focus will be on improving the fan and gaming experiences.

Smith, 42, officially joined the Sports Brotherhood after the National Basketball Association approved his $ 1.6 billion purchase of Jazz on Friday. Qualtrics Co-Founder and CEO will provide final decision-making for the team’s business and basketball operations.

The new group of owners also adds Atlassian co-founders Mike Cannon-Brookes and Ryan Sweeney of venture capital firm Accel as minority partners.

In an interview with CNBC Pro’s “A View from the Top,” Smith said he had no plans to go behind the scenes. Unlike other NBA owners, however, running jazz won’t be his full-time occupation. Qualtrics will be spun off from SAP early next year, less than two years after the German software giant took over the company. Smith says he expects it to be “a big company”.

“I think I’ll be practical,” Smith told CNBC’s Alex Sherman. “But we have phenomenal leadership. We have Dennis Lindsey, a world class general manager, and Quin Snyder, who is one of the best coaches in the league. There are some owners who do everything they do full time. And that am not me. ” I’m still very, very deeply involved with Qualtrics. “

Prior to buying the Jazz, Smith said he was researching the purchase of several NBA franchises, including Minnesota Timberwolves. The chatter among sports bankers familiar with the process suggests Timberwolves owner Glenn Taylor is considering keeping the team for the time being.

“There are still a few minority pieces,” Smith said of minor NBA team involvements. “You will see them come around.”

Smith said he had a chat with fellow NBA owners with a tech background, including Mark Cuban, owner of Dallas Mavericks and Steve Ballmer, owner of Los Angeles Clippers, formerly CEO of Microsoft, prior to the purchase. Both are among the most visible team owners at NBA games. Like Cubans and Ballmer, Smith said he planned to continue sitting at court.

“I’ve had a unique view because I’ve spoken to Mark about it five or a few times over the years,” said Smith. “And I’ve met a lot of other owners in the league just because this was my passion. But they gave me different advice. Nobody ever said that you have to do it that way.” Everyone has their own style. “

Smith said he believes his basketball insights will help jazz align better with a technology and social media league.

“I understand basketball,” he said. “I get basketball. I play basketball three days a week. There is the basketball side and the business side. Each one is equally interesting to me. One from an experience standpoint and one from an understanding standpoint.”

When asked what jazz fans can expect from his property, Smith replied, “You will see it. You are already seeing it. You know me – many of them do.”

“I’m just swapping places,” said Smith of the seats in the yard next to previous owner Gail Miller. “But I have to do a paycheck now.”

read this entire CNBC Pro interview with Ryan Smith.

WATCH: That inspired Ryan Smith to own Utah Jazz

Categories
Business

Cyberpunk 2077 Was Imagined to Be the Largest Video Sport of the Yr. What Occurred?

The hype around Cyberpunk 2077 had been building for nearly a decade.

When CD Projekt Red, the Polish studio behind the video game, announced the title in 2012, it was billed as a gripping, free-flowing saga that would immerse players in a lifelike sci-fi universe. Since then, fans have been treated to impressive teaser trailers, buy-in from celebrities including Keanu Reeves, Grimes and ASAP Rocky, and headlines heralding it as the most anticipated title of the year, if not the century.

The game is set in a dystopian future where digital nomads navigate a high-stakes world of corporate espionage (with Mr. Reeves as their guide) and augment their bodies with high-tech weaponry. Players, especially those using next-generation consoles from Sony and Microsoft, were promised a revolutionary experience, with extensive character customization options and an expansive world to explore. Eight million people pre-ordered copies, sight unseen, ahead of its December release.

In July 2018, as anticipation for the game neared a crescendo across Twitter, one user tweeted at the official Cyberpunk 2077 account: “Will there be memes in the game?” The account responded: “Whole game is going to be a meme.”

The tweet was somewhat prescient — but not in the way developers had hoped.

Since the release of Cyberpunk 2077 on Dec. 10, thousands of gamers have created viral videos featuring a multitude of glitches and bugs — many hilarious — that mar the game. They include tiny trees covering the floors of buildings, tanks falling from the sky and characters standing up, inexplicably pantless, while riding motorcycles.

These videos depict a game that is virtually unplayable: rife with errors, populated by characters running on barely functional artificial intelligence, and largely incompatible with the older gaming consoles meant to support it. Fans are livid.

So many gamers demanded refunds from distributors this week that they overwhelmed Sony’s customer service representatives and even briefly took down one of its corporate sites. In response, Sony and Microsoft said they would offer full refunds to anyone who purchased Cyberpunk 2077 through their online stores; Sony even pulled the title.

Cyberpunk’s rollout is one of the most visible disasters in the history of video games — a high-profile flameout in the midst of the holiday shopping season by a studio widely considered an industry darling. It shows the pitfalls gaming studios can face when building so-called Triple-A games, titles backed by years of development and hundreds of millions of dollars.

But it is also a tale that insiders said they saw coming for months, based on CD Projekt Red’s history of game development and warning signs that Cyberpunk 2077 might not live up to its sky-high expectations.

CD Projekt Red was founded in Warsaw in the 1990s by two high school friends, Marcin Iwiński and Michał Kiciński, during a time of transformation and growth in the gaming industry. (CD-ROM discs were a novel innovation back then.) The two began importing games from the United States, and essentially repackaging and republishing them in Poland.

“By the time school was out we had both become truants, skipping classes to play games,” Mr. Iwiński said in an oral history of the studio.

Early employees who spoke to The New York Times described the company’s leaders as deft marketers, storytellers and artistic visionaries. They said that their enthusiasm for their games often ran ahead of their engineering and technical prowess. The employees spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.

The company’s ambitions were astronomical early on, as were some of its failures. In the early aughts, CD Projekt Red made a play to develop The Witcher, a popular series of books by the Polish writer Andrzej Sapkowski, into an immersive video game franchise.

But the first Witcher game, released in 2007, was buggy and stuffed with more features than it could support. Former employees who worked on the game said it would take three to five minutes to load basic screens.

Employees said that often, much of the game development took place in-house, bucking the common industry practice of contracting out such tasks to other, more experienced studios. As a result, the developers created worse versions of features that had been perfected by other companies.

Still, the Witcher series gained the studio an early following and fan base. The studio received the most acclaim for The Witcher 3, which won awards for its detailed universe and rich storytelling. Like earlier titles, it was buggy from the outset, frustrating players. But most fans accepted what they saw as a kind of test-and-release culture around CD Projekt Red games: a willingness to put out projects that were not yet problem-free.

Then came Cyberpunk 2077. First announced in 2012 and based loosely on a tabletop role-playing game created in 1988, the title was CD Projekt Red’s first attempt at creating a new, futuristic world.

It was to be set in Night City, a darkly dystopian megacity where humans and machines were fused together and repackaged as mercenaries, carrying out sabotage missions against evil corporations. The game would combine elements from some of sci-fi’s greatest hits: Strange Days meets Blade Runner meshed with The Matrix.

To hammer that point home, CD Projekt Red cast a familiar famous face in the game: Keanu Reeves. At a development conference in 2019, the actor burst onto the stage in a cloud of smoke after a video revealed his character.

“Let me tell you, the feeling of being there, of walking the streets of the future, is really going to be breathtaking,” Mr. Reeves said at the event. (A spokeswoman for Mr. Reeves did not respond to a request for comment.)

Inside CD Projekt Red, it was a very different story. Developers were increasingly concerned with some of the grand promises being made by management on the promotional marketing tour. Far into the game’s development, former employees said, the hyper-customizable and endlessly explorable world being sold to players was nowhere close to manifesting.

By 2019, chatter began to circulate in Polish game development circles that CD Projekt Red was way behind schedule with Cyberpunk 2077, even with a release date set for the following April. Some saw the departure of top executives — including key board members — as major warning signs.

On Glassdoor, a site where people can rate their previous employers, current and former CD Projekt Red workers said there was chaos behind the scenes: Office rumors spreading on Discord servers, misleading deadlines set by managers, infighting among the company’s top brass, and incompetence and poor planning leading to unnecessary “crunch,” a term for overworking employees to produce games under a tight deadline. Longtime engineering staff left the company as a result of overwork.

“The owners treat the company as a machine to earn money, and do not see employees as people but more like data in the table,” one former employee wrote on the site.

This January, CD Projekt Red tweeted that the game’s release had been delayed until Sept. 17, because there was “still work to be done.” Then, in March, the coronavirus pandemic caused CD Projekt Red to send its work force home.

Though the company said remote work would not hurt Cyberpunk’s chances of a September release, executives eventually announced further delays. The game was pushed to Nov. 19 in order to “fix a lot of bugs.” It was the same story in October, when the game’s release date was pushed to Dec. 10, at the height of the holiday shopping season.

Inside CD Projekt Red, as executives and communications staff geared up for a wide release, the problems were evident. While developers had created a functioning game for PC users, Cyberpunk was glitchy and crashed frequently on next-generation consoles like the PlayStation 5 and the new Xbox devices. Even worse, the game barely ran on older consoles like the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One.

Typically, game developers send early copies of new titles to reviewers with ample lead time. But CD Projekt Red kept Cyberpunk 2077 under wraps for as long as it could. The company only shared advance copies of the PC version with gaming publications and news organizations, previewing the best possible version of Cyberpunk to reviewers who would post their ratings online just days before the game’s release.

For months, reviewers, including those at The New York Times, tried to obtain review copies for the new game consoles released by Sony and Microsoft this year. Stephanie Bayer, a spokeswoman for CD Projekt Red, said in a previous email correspondence that the company would “hold off sending our console codes until close to launch” so that they could “send them securely.” That never happened.

Early reviews mentioned some issues with bugs, but the impressions were largely positive. Excitement continued to build until the game was released on Thursday, Dec. 10.

Eager fans were thrilled to finally be playing the game for the first time. Ashley Shoate, a D.J. in Northville, Mich., said she was amazed at the detail on her PlayStation 5, and loved the ability to customize her character, literally, to the teeth.

Then came the bugs. Ms. Shoate said it was impossible for her character to complete basic tasks like running, dodging and picking up weapons. Steering a car was so challenging that she felt like she was “drunk driving.” On one mission, Ms. Shoate had to sneak up and kill an enemy with a katana sword.

“I’m bringing a knife to a gunfight, so I’ve got to be on my P’s and Q’s. I can’t even do that,” she said. “It’s almost unplayable.” For the time being, she’s shelved the game.

“I really thought it was going to be to that level of top-three game ever on a new console,” she said. “It’s very disappointing.”

Billy Marte, an account executive at a software company in Austin, Texas, said he bought into the high expectations and the commercials with Mr. Reeves. Playing on his PC, he loved the story line and missions, but was often frustrated by glitches that made his character stand up while riding a motorcycle, or forced him to backtrack to an earlier saved game. Some of his friends, he said, had decided to return Cyberpunk.

“There was so much there, but they just didn’t pay attention to the details,” he said. “It’s evident that this game was rushed.”

Almost as soon as the game arrived, players began posting screenshots of the most glaring glitches on social media. Entire subreddits are now devoted to the frequent, nonsensical bugs users observed as they traversed deeper into Night City.

One frequent glitch includes characters going into “T-Pose” — standing with their arms raised to either side — and suddenly losing their pants. Users on Reddit described the phenomenon as “straight Donald Duckin’ it.”

Other bloopers include characters being flung through buildings seemingly out of nowhere and cars exploding for no reason. The non-player characters, or N.P.C.s, act so unnaturally that they can ruin the gaming experience.

One Reddit user posted a video of him throwing a grenade into the middle of a freeway at rush hour, only to see every N.P.C. open their car doors, leave their vehicles and crouch for cover simultaneously, as if choreographed by a professional dance troupe. (Someone else quickly edited the video to mimic the opening scene from “La La Land,” in which drivers abandon their vehicles to dance in the middle of the freeway.)

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen a game have this many gaffes, this often, this early into a release,” said Chris Person, a video producer who runs Highlight Reel, a YouTube show dedicated to video game bloopers and glitches. “Broken games can be super charming when they’re funny, like you’re seeing the strings on a puppet in a bad movie.” Two of Mr. Person’s most recent shows have been dedicated almost entirely to Cyberpunk glitches.

Most players, though, are pretty unhappy. On Thursday, Sony said it would refund players who wanted to return the game and pulled Cyberpunk from the company’s digital storefront. A PlayStation spokesman said the company had nothing further to add beyond its decision. Microsoft also said on Friday that it would issue refunds, but did not remove the game from its online store.

CD Projekt Red said Friday that it would refund disappointed players “out of our own pocket if necessary.” The company’s stock has dropped 41 percent since early December. Ms. Bayer, the company spokeswoman, declined to comment on a detailed list of questions provided by The Times.

Inside the studio, there has been infighting and finger-pointing. In a contentious meeting with board members on Thursday, CD Projekt Red staffers pressed executives on the game’s unrealistic deadlines and false promises. Management was tight-lipped about its tense discussions with Sony, Bloomberg reported on Friday, though people at Sony are upset at CD Projekt Red’s initial handling of the situation, people close to the company said.

The immediate future looks dark for Cyberpunk’s makers — perhaps even darker than the future they built in Night City. Refund requests are pouring in by the thousands. Lawyers and investors in Warsaw are circling the situation, contemplating a class-action lawsuit against the company for what one attorney described as potential criminal “misrepresentation in order to receive financial benefits.” Many gamers are swearing off playing Cyberpunk entirely until the company fixes all of the problems.

The coming weeks will determine whether CD Projekt Red can make good on a promise it made back in 2017, when players wondered whether the title would ever come out. “Worry not,” the company tweeted, assuring fans that Cyberpunk 2077 would be “huge” and “story-driven.”

“No hidden catch, you get what you pay for.”

Categories
Business

‘Surprise Lady 1984’ evaluations: What critics are saying

Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman in “Wonder Woman 1984”.

Warner Bros.

“Wonder Woman 1984 is not great and it is not terrible,” writes Stephanie Zacharek of Time Magazine.

This seems to be the general consensus of the critics, as the follow-up film will be released in international theaters this weekend.

The much-anticipated follow-up to “Wonder Woman” from 2017 was due to be released in June, but the ongoing global pandemic has postponed the film until Christmas Day in the US. The outbreak also resulted in Warner Bros. parent company AT&T will be showing the film in theaters and on streaming service HBO Max that same day.

“Wonder Woman 1984” takes place seven decades after the events of the first film. Diana Prince, the Wonder Woman of the same name, played by Gal Gadot, lives in Washington, DC and works at the Smithsonian. In her spare time, Diana dons her Amazonian armor and plays the role of a superhero to save the people of the city.

Diana’s life is interrupted when the would-be oil magnate Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal) receives a magical stone called the Dream Stone. The artifact grants wishes, but there is a cost.

For Diana, the stone brings back Steve Trevor (Chris Pine), her love interest from the first movie, who died and sacrificed his life to save others. Unfortunately, in order to keep Steve in her life, Diana will eventually lose her powers.

Diana’s friend and colleague Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig), a wallflower who envies Diana for her self-confidence and beauty, receives these characteristics and, as seen in the trailer, transforms into the vicious cheetah. Lord absorbs the magic of the stone and gives himself the ability to grant other people’s wishes, something he uses to gain power and prestige.

When Barbara and Lord team up, Diana must fight the two villains to save the world.

“Woman Woman 1984” currently holds an 88% “Fresh” rating from Rotten Tomatoes out of 92 reviews. If more reviews are received, this review may change.

Critics praised Gadot for this role. Once again, Gadot portrays Diana with effortless grace and cool confidence as he adds depth to an immortal woman who drifted and drifted in a mortal world.

However, reviewers called the plot “chaotic” and “confused” and were disappointed with the CGI creature form “Cheetah” that appears in the film’s third act.

Here’s a rundown of what critics said about Wonder Woman 1984 before her Christmas debut:

Peter Debruge, diversity

“Almost two hours of its 151-minute running time, ‘Wonder Woman 1984′ does what we expect from Hollywood tent poles: it takes our worries away and erases them with sheer escape,” said Peter Debruge, author of Variety in his review of the Films. “For those old enough to remember the 80s, it’s like going home for Christmas and discovering a box of children’s toys in your parents’ attic.”

Where the film falls short are its special effects, he said.

“A lot of the effects are hokey,” wrote Debruge. “Some are downright embarrassing (like Wonder Woman interrupting a well-choreographed desert chase to dangerously save two children).”

Debruge was one of many critics to mention the disappointing computer-generated rendering of Cheetah in its final form. The creature design is a “lame cat-level misjudgment,” he said.

Read the full review from Variety.

Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman in “Wonder Woman 1984”.

Warner Bros.

Angelica Jade Bastien, vulture

For Angelica Jade Bastien, a vulture writer, Diana Prince’s attraction is her femininity and maternal instinct. Her strength shows not only in fight scenes, but also in subtle emotional moments.

Bastien believed that Diana’s character was “poorly developed in this utter jumble of conspiracy”.

She said the dream stone was “trite” and found faults in Diana’s longing for the late lover Steve decades after his death.

“Sure, Gadot and Pine have charming chemistry again, but his character’s return from the dead – in which he basically takes over the body of a poor man – raises more questions about the loopholes in logic,” she wrote in hers Review. “And then there’s their total lack of sex, a particularly damned reminder of how this genre ignores one of the most beautiful aspects of being human.”

Bastien wondered why this longing for Steve had become central to Diana’s identity almost 70 years later.

“Why? She no longer misses her Amazon sisters, whom she can never see again?” She asked. “It’s been about 70 years and she still hasn’t moved away from Steve? It’s deeply sad and predictable when a superhero becomes so attached to a single man that she’s ready to lose her powers for him.”

Bastien called the romance “claustrophobic” with an ending “ripped out of a Hallmark movie”.

Read the full review from Vulture.

Stephanie Zacharek, time

For Zacharek, Gadot shines when she is Diana Prince, a woman with human weaknesses and complexities.

“But being just one woman is not enough for anyone,” she wrote. “Diana-as-Wonder Woman not only saves the world, but is also often tasked with saving little girls from danger. She brings them to safety with a wink, and they beam her appreciatively, so grateful that she finally has one Superheroes have their own. “

“Why do we always need to be reminded of the purpose of Wonder Woman? Why can’t it just be?” Asked Zacharek.

She noted that when Wonder Woman arrived in 2017, there was a promise that Hollywood would see a new generation of superhero films made by women, starring women who may be less formulaic than such that revolve around men.

“Wonder Woman 1984 is perfect as a treat to distract the world from its problems for a few hours,” she wrote. “But it’s also okay to wish for less noise and more amazement, especially in a world filled with the former and in dire need of the latter.”

Read the full report from Time.

Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman in Warner Bros. “Wonder Woman 1984”.

Warner Bros.

Esther Zuckerman, thrillist

“Wonder Woman 1984” is “a fun but chaotic sequel to the 2017 reintroduction of the Amazon superhero,” wrote Esther Zuckerman in her review of the film for Thrillist. “There’s a lot to love in” WW84 “: bold performances by a delightful cast, fantastic costumes, [Patty] Jenkins’ rapid direction. But it serves a plot that loses sight of what makes the character so great in the first place. “

Zuckerman noted that filmmakers had a hard time replicating the success of the first film. After all, so much of it focused on Diana’s naivete and her wonder of discovering a whole new world.

Decades later, Diana is exhausted and isolated, her mind numbed, wrote Zuckerman.

“What makes up for that in Act One is Barbara Minerva,” she said. “Wiig is hilarious yet grounded, both as the ignored nerd she starts out as and the butterfly suddenly able to walk in heels and take off a mini dress.”

Read the full review from Thrillist.

Disclosure: Comcast, the parent company of CNBC, owns Rotten Tomatoes.

Categories
Business

C.D.C. Panel Endorses Moderna Vaccine for Individuals

Als das Coronavirus in den Vereinigten Staaten weiter anstieg, stimmte eine unabhängige Expertengruppe, die die Zentren für die Kontrolle und Prävention von Krankheiten beriet, am Samstag dafür, einen zweiten Coronavirus-Impfstoff für die Verwendung in den Vereinigten Staaten zu unterstützen.

Die Empfehlung des Ausschusses folgt einer am Freitag von der Food and Drug Administration erteilten Notfallgenehmigung. Die Bestätigung des Komitees wartet nun auf die endgültige Genehmigung durch Dr. Robert R. Redfield, Direktor der CDC, die in Kürze erwartet wird.

Etwa 5,9 Millionen Dosen des Moderna-Impfstoffs sollen ab Sonntag verteilt werden, und die ersten Impfungen werden voraussichtlich irgendwann am Montag beginnen.

Im Gegensatz zum Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoff, der zur Anwendung bei Personen ab 16 Jahren zugelassen wurde, ist der Impfstoff von Moderna nur für Personen ab 18 Jahren zugelassen. Während Pfizer im Oktober mit klinischen Studien zu seinem Impfstoff bei Kindern im Alter von 12 Jahren begann, begann Moderna erst in diesem Monat mit seinen pädiatrischen Studien und erwartet erst im nächsten Jahr vollständige Daten zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit.

Ein Großteil der Beratungen des Ausschusses konzentrierte sich auf die schweren allergischen Reaktionen, die in mehreren Fällen nach Injektionen des Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoffs gemeldet wurden, der ähnliche Inhaltsstoffe wie das Rezept von Moderna enthält.

Sechs Fälle von Anaphylaxie wurden inzwischen in den USA und zwei in Großbritannien dokumentiert. Es sind auch mehrere mildere allergische Reaktionen aufgetreten. Laut CDC wurden bereits am Samstag landesweit mehr als 272.000 Dosen des Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoffs verteilt

Allergische Reaktionen auf Impfstoffe treten typischerweise mit einer Rate von etwa einer von einer Million auf. Dr. Grace Lee, Kinderärztin und Impfstoffexpertin an der Stanford University, stellte auf der Ausschusssitzung fest, dass die bisherigen Schätzungen darauf hindeuten, dass das Risiko dieser mit dem Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoff verbundenen Ereignisse „qualitativ höher zu sein scheint als bei den meisten typischen Impfstoffen . ”

Dennoch fügte sie hinzu: “Für mich persönlich ändert dies nicht unbedingt das Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis des Covid-19-Impfstoffs zu diesem Zeitpunkt.”

Dr. Thomas Clark, Epidemiologe am CDC, stellte fest, dass Personen, bei denen nach einem Schuss eine Anaphylaxie auftritt, keine zweite Dosis erhalten sollten. Es ist immer noch unklar, ob ein Inhaltsstoff in Pfizers Impfstoff die direkte Ursache für die Reaktionen war.

Einige Experten haben auf Polyethylenglykol oder PEG hingewiesen, eine Chemikalie, die in vielen pharmazeutischen Produkten, einschließlich Abführmitteln wie Miralax, enthalten ist und die sehr selten allergische Reaktionen hervorruft. Sowohl die Pfizer-BioNTech- als auch die Moderna-Impfstoffe enthalten PEG, allerdings in leicht unterschiedlichen Formulierungen.

Dr. Sarah Mbaeyi, eine Ärztin bei der CDC, sagte, die Agentur empfehle Menschen, die wissen, dass sie schwere Allergien gegen einen der Inhaltsstoffe der Impfstoffe haben, vorerst auf die Aufnahme zu verzichten.

Personen mit einer Anaphylaxie in der Vorgeschichte gegenüber anderen Impfstoffen oder injizierbaren Therapien sollten ihren Arzt konsultieren und nach der Inokulation 30 Minuten vor Ort bleiben, um sich zu überwachen, falls sie sich krank fühlen. (Alle anderen – einschließlich Personen, die stark auf andere Substanzen wie Lebensmittel, Pollen oder Hautschuppen reagieren, und Personen mit leichten Allergien jeglicher Art – können nach 15 Minuten gehen.)

In den klinischen Studien von Moderna wurden drei schwere allergische Reaktionen berichtet, an denen mehr als 30.000 Erwachsene teilnahmen, von denen die Hälfte anstelle des Impfstoffs ein Placebo erhielt. Es wurde angenommen, dass keiner mit dem Impfstoff in Verbindung steht.

Covid19 Impfungen >

Antworten auf Ihre Impfstofffragen

Mit der Verbreitung eines Coronavirus-Impfstoffs ab den USA finden Sie hier Antworten auf einige Fragen, über die Sie sich möglicherweise wundern:

    • Wenn ich in den USA lebe, wann kann ich den Impfstoff bekommen? Während die genaue Reihenfolge der Impfstoffempfänger von Staat zu Staat unterschiedlich sein kann, werden die meisten Ärzte und Bewohner von Langzeitpflegeeinrichtungen an erster Stelle stehen. Wenn Sie verstehen möchten, wie diese Entscheidung getroffen wird, hilft dieser Artikel.
    • Wann kann ich nach der Impfung wieder zum normalen Leben zurückkehren? Das Leben wird erst wieder normal, wenn die Gesellschaft als Ganzes ausreichend Schutz gegen das Coronavirus erhält. Sobald die Länder einen Impfstoff zugelassen haben, können sie in den ersten Monaten höchstens einige Prozent ihrer Bürger impfen. Die nicht geimpfte Mehrheit bleibt weiterhin anfällig für Infektionen. Eine wachsende Anzahl von Coronavirus-Impfstoffen zeigt einen robusten Schutz vor Krankheit. Es ist aber auch möglich, dass Menschen das Virus verbreiten, ohne zu wissen, dass sie infiziert sind, weil sie nur leichte oder gar keine Symptome haben. Wissenschaftler wissen noch nicht, ob die Impfstoffe auch die Übertragung des Coronavirus blockieren. Selbst geimpfte Menschen müssen vorerst Masken tragen, Menschenmassen in Innenräumen meiden und so weiter. Sobald genügend Menschen geimpft sind, wird es für das Coronavirus sehr schwierig, gefährdete Personen zu finden, die infiziert werden können. Je nachdem, wie schnell wir als Gesellschaft dieses Ziel erreichen, könnte sich das Leben im Herbst 2021 einem normalen Zustand nähern.
    • Muss ich nach der Impfung noch eine Maske tragen? Ja, aber nicht für immer. Hier ist der Grund. Die Coronavirus-Impfstoffe werden tief in die Muskeln injiziert und stimulieren das Immunsystem zur Produktion von Antikörpern. Dies scheint ein ausreichender Schutz zu sein, um die geimpfte Person vor einer Krankheit zu bewahren. Was jedoch nicht klar ist, ist, ob es möglich ist, dass das Virus in der Nase blüht – und geniest oder ausgeatmet wird, um andere zu infizieren -, selbst wenn Antikörper an anderer Stelle im Körper mobilisiert wurden, um zu verhindern, dass die geimpfte Person krank wird. Die klinischen Impfstoffstudien sollten feststellen, ob geimpfte Menschen vor Krankheiten geschützt sind – und nicht herausfinden, ob sie das Coronavirus noch verbreiten können. Basierend auf Studien zu Grippeimpfstoffen und sogar mit Covid-19 infizierten Patienten haben Forscher Grund zu der Hoffnung, dass geimpfte Menschen das Virus nicht verbreiten, aber weitere Forschung ist erforderlich. In der Zwischenzeit müssen sich alle – auch geimpfte Menschen – als mögliche stille Streuer vorstellen und weiterhin eine Maske tragen. Lesen Sie hier mehr.
    • Wird es wehtun? Was sind die Nebenwirkungen? Der Impfstoff gegen Pfizer und BioNTech wird wie andere typische Impfstoffe als Schuss in den Arm abgegeben. Die Injektion in Ihren Arm fühlt sich nicht anders an als bei jedem anderen Impfstoff, aber die Rate kurzlebiger Nebenwirkungen scheint höher zu sein als bei einer Grippeschutzimpfung. Zehntausende Menschen haben die Impfstoffe bereits erhalten, und keiner von ihnen hat ernsthafte gesundheitliche Probleme gemeldet. Die Nebenwirkungen, die den Symptomen von Covid-19 ähneln können, dauern etwa einen Tag und treten nach der zweiten Dosis wahrscheinlicher auf. Frühe Berichte aus Impfstoffversuchen deuten darauf hin, dass einige Menschen möglicherweise einen Tag frei nehmen müssen, weil sie sich nach Erhalt der zweiten Dosis mies fühlen. In der Pfizer-Studie entwickelte etwa die Hälfte Müdigkeit. Andere Nebenwirkungen traten bei mindestens 25 bis 33 Prozent der Patienten auf, manchmal mehr, einschließlich Kopfschmerzen, Schüttelfrost und Muskelschmerzen. Obwohl diese Erfahrungen nicht angenehm sind, sind sie ein gutes Zeichen dafür, dass Ihr eigenes Immunsystem eine starke Reaktion auf den Impfstoff zeigt, die eine dauerhafte Immunität bietet.
    • Werden mRNA-Impfstoffe meine Gene verändern? Nein. Die Impfstoffe von Moderna und Pfizer verwenden ein genetisches Molekül, um das Immunsystem zu stärken. Dieses als mRNA bekannte Molekül wird schließlich vom Körper zerstört. Die mRNA ist in einer öligen Blase verpackt, die mit einer Zelle verschmelzen kann, so dass das Molekül hineinrutschen kann. Die Zelle verwendet die mRNA, um Proteine ​​aus dem Coronavirus herzustellen, die das Immunsystem stimulieren können. Zu jedem Zeitpunkt kann jede unserer Zellen Hunderttausende von mRNA-Molekülen enthalten, die sie produzieren, um eigene Proteine ​​herzustellen. Sobald diese Proteine ​​hergestellt sind, zerkleinern unsere Zellen die mRNA mit speziellen Enzymen. Die mRNA-Moleküle, die unsere Zellen herstellen, können nur wenige Minuten überleben. Die mRNA in Impfstoffen ist so konstruiert, dass sie den Enzymen der Zelle etwas länger standhält, sodass die Zellen zusätzliche Virusproteine ​​bilden und eine stärkere Immunantwort auslösen können. Die mRNA kann jedoch höchstens einige Tage halten, bevor sie zerstört wird.

Während des Treffens äußerten Experten auch Bedenken hinsichtlich vier Fällen einer vorübergehenden Gesichtslähmung namens Bell-Lähmung, von denen drei in der Impfstoffgruppe in der Moderna-Studie auftraten. (Vier Fälle von Bell-Lähmung traten auch in Pfizers Studien auf, alle in der Impfstoffgruppe.)

Es gibt noch keine Beweise, die die Lähmung direkt mit einem der beiden Impfstoffe in Verbindung bringen, und Dr. Jacqueline Miller, Senior Vice President bei Moderna, sagte, ihr Unternehmen habe die Impfstoffempfänger weiterhin auf Nebenwirkungen überwacht.

Mehr als die Hälfte der Personen, die den Moderna-Impfstoff in klinischen Studien erhielten, berichteten nach ihrem zweiten Schuss, der etwa vier Wochen nach dem ersten gegeben wurde, über unangenehme Symptome wie Müdigkeit, Kopfschmerzen und Schmerzen. Einige Freiwillige entwickelten auch Fieber oder Hautausschlag an der Injektionsstelle.

Vorfälle wie diese scheinen bei Modernas Impfstoff weitaus häufiger zu sein als bei Pfizer, der eine geringere Dosis der Wirkstoffe enthält. Die meisten Nebenwirkungen verschwanden jedoch innerhalb eines Tages nach der Impfung.

Vorübergehende Symptome nach der Impfung sind relativ häufig. Oft sind sie die äußeren Anzeichen eines hart arbeitenden Immunsystems, das den Körper darauf vorbereitet, Krankheiten in Zukunft abzuwehren.

Weder Moderna noch Pfizer haben bisher Daten zu schwangeren oder stillenden Personen erhoben. Aber keine der 13 Freiwilligen, die während der Teilnahme an den klinischen Studien von Moderna schwanger wurden, von denen sechs den Impfstoff erhielten, berichtete über schädliche Wirkungen.

Mehr als 500 Amerikaner, die eine Dosis Pfizers Impfstoff erhalten haben, waren zum Zeitpunkt ihrer Injektion schwanger.

Viele Wissenschaftler glauben, dass das Coronavirus ein weitaus größeres Risiko für schwangere oder stillende Menschen darstellt als der Impfstoff. Stephanie Langel, eine Immunologin und Virologin an der Duke University, die seit Juli ihren neugeborenen Sohn stillt, sagte am Donnerstag, dass sie beabsichtige, so bald wie möglich geimpft zu werden.

Sie wurde priorisiert, um den Schuss zu erhalten, weil sie das Coronavirus erforscht. Wenn es darum geht, sich impfen zu lassen, “ist es für mich nur ein Kinderspiel”, sagte sie, weil sie häufig dem Virus ausgesetzt war. “Es geht um Ihre Risikobewertung.”

Während des Treffens unterstrichen Wissenschaftler und Kliniker, wie wichtig es ist, Impfungen in Gemeinden zu bringen, die von der Pandemie überproportional betroffen sind, einschließlich Menschen in Justizvollzugsanstalten.

Experten haben wiederholt darauf hingewiesen, wie wichtig es ist, mit Vertretern von Farbgemeinschaften zusammenzuarbeiten, um die Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit des Impfstoffs für Menschen zu bestätigen, die zögern oder skeptisch gegenüber den Aufnahmen sind. (Überaus wenige Personen, die sich als Indianer, Ureinwohner Alaskas, Ureinwohner Hawaiis oder Inselbewohner im Pazifik identifizierten, nahmen an Modernas Versuchen teil.)

Dionne Brown, die Leiterin der Krankenpflege bei Summit Rehabilitation and Care Community in Aurora, Colorado, sagte der New York Times, sie sei “ein wenig besorgt über die Nebenwirkungen” gewesen. Nach langwierigen Gesprächen mit ihren Kollegen darüber, wie sicher und wirksam die Impfstoffe sind, sagte sie: „Ich fühle mich wohl mit der Einnahme“.

Frau Brown, Mutter von sechs Kindern, hofft, ein Vorbild für ihre Familie und Gemeinde sowie für die anderen Mitarbeiter und älteren Bewohner ihrer Langzeitpflegeeinrichtung sein zu können.

“Das ist mein Ziel”, sagte sie. “Dass sie sehen, wie ich es bekomme und mich hoffentlich wohl fühle.”

In einer zweiten Sitzung am Sonntag werden CDC-Beamte und Wissenschaftler mehr Leitlinien für die Zuteilung der neu zugelassenen Impfstoffe liefern und über die Priorisierung von Personen abstimmen, die Impfungen erhalten sollen.

Categories
Business

The U.Okay. has recognized a brand new Covid-19 pressure that spreads extra shortly. This is what they know

England’s top medical officer announced Saturday that the UK had identified a new variant of the coronavirus that “can spread faster” than previous strains of the virus, prompting Prime Minister Boris Johnson to impose new restrictions on parts of the nation to control its spread.

“We learn from this over time, but we already know enough, more than enough, to be sure that we need to act now,” Johnson said during a press conference on Saturday setting new restrictions on London and other parts of England before the Christmas holidays.

“If the virus changes its method of attack, we’ll have to change our method of defense,” said Johnson.

The UK government announced the new strain of coronavirus on Monday after cases increased in the south and east of England. According to a statement from Public Health England, just over 1,100 Covid-19 cases had been identified with the new variant by Sunday.

Now it is believed the new strain could be up to 70% more communicable than the original strain of the disease, Johnson said on Saturday, adding that it appears to be fueling the rapid spread of infections. Johnson urged residents not to travel and “stay on-site” to keep the new strain from moving around the country and abroad.

The UK reports around 24,061 new Covid-19 cases daily based on a weekly average, an increase of more than 40% from the previous week, according to a CNBC analysis of data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

“This is early data that needs to be verified, but it is the best we have right now and we need to respond to information as we have it because it is now spreading very quickly,” said Johnson.

Professor Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, said at the press conference that “viruses are constantly mutating”. Seasonal influenza mutates every year, and other new variants of the coronavirus have already been identified in countries like Spain, according to Public Health England.

What needs to be answered is whether the new strain will transmit more easily, make people sick, and whether it will change the way a person’s immune system responds to the virus if they are already infected or vaccinated, Whitty said.

So far, a body of evidence from genetic studies, frequency studies, and laboratory studies suggests that the new strain “has a significant, substantial increase in transmissibility,” Whitty said. So far, however, there is no evidence that the new strain causes a higher mortality rate.

Health officials believe the new variant first appeared in London or Kent in mid-September, and by mid-November it is believed to have caused about 28% of cases in London and other parts of south-east England, Whitty said.

Now those numbers are much higher, he said. In London last week, data suggests the new variant accounts for more than 60% of new cases, Whitty said.

“So that tells us that this new variant is not only moving fast, it also transmits better, it also becomes the dominant variant. It beats everyone else in terms of transmission,” he said.

However, there is “no evidence” that it causes more severe illness, more hospitalizations, or “more problems than the other virus,” Whitty said. While there are reasons to suspect the new variant might alter a person’s immune response to the disease, nothing suggests that it has so far, he said.

“We are currently assuming by all scientists that the vaccine response for this virus should be appropriate,” he said. “Obviously this has to be checked in the future, and we have to remain vigilant in this regard.”

The UK has alerted the World Health Organization and will continue to analyze data on the new strain.

Categories
Business

Mattress Bathtub and Past’s Large, Ubiquitous Coupon: An Oral Historical past

The F.B.I. found one in the junk drawer at the Santa Monica hide-out of the notorious mobster Whitey Bulger, which goes to show that gangsters are just like everybody else.

There’s probably one or two clipped to your car’s visor, and there could be a pile in the lobby of your building right at this moment. God knows your mother-in-law has a folder full of them.

The 20 percent off coupon from Bed Bath & Beyond — a homely and oversize mailer known as Big Blue — is omnipresent, unmistakable and a joy to deploy in the chain’s endless aisles. It’s also an oddball marketing achievement where the promotion became a stand-in for the brand itself.

At the postcard’s height, hundreds of millions of them found their way into mailboxes each year, an enormous logistical challenge that could go wrong up to the moment they arrived at your door. But that made Big Blue a bona fide cultural phenomenon, so familiar it became a basic-cable plot point.

Between its humble beginnings as a one-off promotion and its partial transition into digital distribution, Big Blue birthed an underground market for bargain hunters and pointed questions from Wall Street.

But it’s still a good enough deal that even the company that created it might not be able to kill it off. And it might not want to, either.

This is the history of Big Blue, in lightly condensed excerpts from the people who were there.

Bed Bath & Beyond started simply in 1971 as Bed ‘n Bath, a single store in New Jersey with lots of sheets and towels — and prices low enough that people didn’t have to wait around for a semiannual department store sale.

WARREN EISENBERG (co-founder, Bed Bath & Beyond) I’m standing here talking to my first saleslady.

MITZI EISENBERG (his wife, in the background) Your first good one!

WARREN EISENBERG Len [Feinstein, his co-founder] and I talked about it, and we said that we’re not going to do advertising. No advertising of items, really. We were not going to change prices and run sales. That’s a very costly way of doing business.

And plus, why not just tell the customer that we’ll give you a discount on the item you want — and not the one that we want to put on sale? We’ll mail a coupon, and it will be a lot cheaper.

BETH GROSSFELD (senior marketing manager, 2006-19) The thing I remember being so intrigued by was that the company had not spent a dime on a branding campaign, ever. There was no big television commercial, no big splash in the newspaper saying we were a cool place to be. There was only the big, blue coupon. The big, blue coupon was our brand.

But not yet. In the early years, the coupons were infrequent, attached to circulars and for offers like $5 off a purchase of at least $15. But then Rita Little, who had gone through the executive training program at the now defunct Abraham & Straus department store chain, came along.

RITA LITTLE (vice president, marketing, 1997-2013) They had probably 60 stores. My mission was to help them get to 100. Saying it out loud is pretty funny.

There was a need for a Fourth of July-type promotion. It was going to be a postcard, probably with some outdoor-living kinds of things on it. And we needed something with a little extra zing. We decided to try 20 percent off one item. I’ll just say that we knew people reacted. It moved the needle.

We had an outside agency, Berenter Greenhouse & Webster. Bill Berenter, he saw the postcard for what it could be, I believe. We went to them and said that we were playing with this little postcard, and they are getting buried in the mail. The agency did all these markups, and they came up with this big, blue thing.

It was big enough that when you put it into a pile of business letters and bills, you can see it behind all the other letters. They came in with a stack of mail, and had it tucked right behind, and sure enough, he was right.

We tried all the hot colors, red, yellow. They were just too harsh. We went with Pantone 2735c.

GROSSFELD I came to know it as blurple. That was my technical term. It’s not a blue-blue, it’s a purple-blue.

LITTLE Twenty percent is a thread that comes through retail discounting, from the beginning of time. Macy’s had it. It’s enough to make you get off the couch if you’re waiting to shop for the pricey item.

WARREN EISENBERG Ten percent, we felt like it was nothing. Thirty percent we couldn’t afford. All decisions in those days were made without having head of marketing talk to head of advertising talking to committees and so forth and so on.

It was the late 1990s. Surely, there was a more sophisticated way to market than a discount printed in a circular? But it was still the early days for the internet, and the company was slow to embrace email marketing. And coupons had proved their worth for many decades.

AMY LASKIN (director of content, 2012-17): If you leave out all the questions of margins and inventory and all of the painful ways it can hurt a business or the brand or train the customer, a coupon straight up drives traffic to get people to buy things.

BRIAN NAGEL (Oppenheimer analyst who covered the company for a decade) I need to buy a blender, so I’m going to take a coupon to buy a blender. But where Bed Bath historically was extraordinarily successful was with their merchandising. While I’m at the store buying my blender, I would buy stuff that I didn’t even know existed. That was the secret sauce of the company.

LITTLE We started to realize that what customers really wanted was the darn coupon. To hell with the rest of the stuff.

We organized our marketing plan to take advantage of the fact that it was a lot less expensive to send a coupon than to produce an entire catalog that had something like a 31-week lead time from a decision to having it in hand.

Initially, we used it very carefully. But then we started to have customers who requested to be on our mailing list.

We started to get requests from stores on the back of paper napkins, scribbled on receipts, the back of fast-food paper bags. We’d get these envelopes stuffed with stray pieces of paper saying Mary Jones at this address, and some people from my office would take them home to try to transcribe them into something we could give to the mailing companies.

Big Blue’s little secret: It’s good basically forever. That expiration date is more like a suggestion.

LITTLE We were a service-oriented organization. A customer walks into a store in the Midwest, she is nine months-plus pregnant and goes into labor. We call the ambulance, hold the door open and she tells us that her coupon is about to expire that night. This actually happened.

And the manager said that of course we would accommodate her. Come back when you’re ready. That was part of the culture. But like all things with good intentions, they do kind of sometimes get out of hand.

Business & Economy

Updated 

Dec. 18, 2020, 12:25 p.m. ET

LASKIN What I know is that the company line was, “We encourage customers to use the coupons before they expire.” That was the phrase we were always told to say. Any associate would accept any coupon, regardless of date, but that was never an official policy, just so you know.

MITZI EISENBERG People used to keep stacks of them in the car all the time. Down here in Florida, nobody knows who I am, and the woman in front of me in line turns around and says, “You know, I have extra coupons, would you like one?” I love that.

WARREN EISENBERG You should have taken one and ripped it up!

SCOTT HAMES (chief marketing and analytics officer, 2000-18): Word got around, and it became a thing. It was a big issue. But it was also a blessing. If people know they never expire, they keep them. Think about the branding. People come in with five coupons, but they kept them six months. They’ve seen them every day in their purse. That is a huge branding thing.

Soon, Bed Bath & Beyond was sending out nearly a billion pieces of mail a year. The company eventually persuaded Vito Lomenzo, an employee at the ad agency, to start a company and help move all that paper around. A lot of it came from Europe.

VITO LOMENZO (founder, Print Consulting Group) Our larger rolls of paper could go right off the ship and then onto a railroad car. Four rolls could be 32,000 pounds, and some cars could only fit two rolls. The postcards usually moved by truck, but the circulars moved by train more often. The train would roll up to the side of the printing plant, and they have these custom-made trucks that can pick the rolls up and stack them.

LITTLE Behind the scenes, the supply chain became a monster. A good monster, but its own monster. Paper became something that had almost a 12-month lead time at certain times.

LOMENZO I’d take tours of the ship that it was coming in on, though Rita and I worked together on everything, so any “I” is really we. When you have eight million pounds of paper coming across the ocean, you want to know how it’s going to come.

One time, there were 46,000 pounds of our printed, inkjetted postcards that were supposed to go to the post office. Which happened to be right next to a waste disposal plant or whatever they call those things. And, they disposed of it. It was not a pleasant time.

LITTLE The driver said, “I don’t know, they put stuff in my truck and I go to the address they give me.” It was Columbus Day weekend, and I had the day off and was out sailing in the middle of Long Island Sound. And I get this call that the truck never reached the post office. It went to the recycling center, and the postcards were in the soup. Just, gone. This was in Ohio.

GROSSFELD I lived in Queens at the time. You know how apartment mailboxes are? Every so often, there would just be a stack of our coupons on the side. They were supposed to be in the mailboxes. And I would think, oh my god, those are my babies. What do I do?

So I went to my super, and he said, “What do you want me to do?” So I walked around and stuck them under people’s doors. I realized later that it was probably illegal mail tampering.

LITTLE The poor mailmen, what we did to them.

Kristen Bell extolled Big Blue’s virtues in an interview with Conan O’Brien, and Jimmy Kimmel joked that the Best Picture Award mix-up at the 2017 Oscars wasn’t a prank because he’d have put a Bed Bath & Beyond coupon in the envelope. Some TV shows might mention the chain, but “Broad City” took fandom to another level, making the store and the coupon a recurring plot point.

LASKIN Especially the episode where they go to the store. The original episode of the coupon was entirely them. We didn’t pay for it.

I went to South by Southwest. And at the end, they had the “Broad City” women speaking. At the Q. and A. at the end, I got up, with people standing in line at the mic. And I introduced myself, Amy from Bed Bath & Beyond.

The whole audience lost it. They started applauding. I know they weren’t applauding me — they were cheering the whole notion of Broad City’s relationship to Bed Bath. As the applause died down, Abbi Jacobson [co-creator and co-star, “Broad City”] just looked at me and said, “You’re welcome!”

LITTLE I think “Sex and the City” was my favorite. They had approached us before they had even gone into production, and they really stuck with us. But I will never forget having to try to explain the concept of the show to our two very senior founders.

The whiff of the illicit extended to the real world. Enterprising individuals found that the coupon had cash value — if you got your hands on a stack of them.

GROSSFELD For a long time, there were batches of Big Blues sold on eBay. I want to say that expired ones sold in batches of five for $5 to $7 and the nonexpired ones were more.

I remember laughing and being like, are you kidding me? But at that time, people didn’t know when the next one was coming and didn’t feel like they were getting them all the time.

LITTLE In Queens, at the Rego Park store, there was, let’s call them entrepreneurs. They would take them from apartment buildings, where they had “found” them. And they’d be outside the store selling them for $5 apiece.

They were shut down at least once per week. Howard, the store manager, would go out and chase them away. And they’d be back a couple of hours later doing it again.

Hand out enough coupons and open enough stores, and eventually Wall Street has some questions. On quarterly conference calls, the company started getting asked about how much those discounts might be lowering profit margins.

NAGEL It’s the same way we would ask about advertising on television, except this was one of the primary ways that this company marketed.

Because they were extraordinarily good at merchandising around the store visit, the simple math was this: The products that people were redeeming the coupons on — whatever profit was lost there was oftentimes made up elsewhere.

So the question was: To what extent was it being made up?

LITTLE At the end of the day, you’re eroding your margin every time a customer uses a coupon. That is where you had to fine-tune what you were doing.

I used to think of it as a faucet. You turn it off a little, and you turn it on a little. Because Rita had coupons sitting in the warehouse, if you need a little bit of a boost, you run the faucet and push the coupons down the pipeline.

But Rita’s faucet ran up against internet discounts, and by most accounts the company had invested too little in its website. Between 2016 and early 2020, the stock nearly bottomed out.

The founders departed, and new management arrived. In July, the company said in a quarterly earnings call that it would “both lean into store closures and leverage the significant number of lease expirations coming due.” About 200 stores (including some other merchants that the company owns) are in its sights.

HAMES Bed Bath used to be perceived as having better pricing than department stores. The perception shifted to it being overpriced unless you had a coupon.

The company used to be known for having the best selection, more than what you’d find in a department store or Target or Walmart.

Amazon took away “best assortment.” And then they said that they could get it to you in a day. Then, it just became about customer service and the shopping environment, and that might not be enough to be a compelling story.

GROSSFELD Until the day I left, the push was always to keep people going into the store. Being online is not the same as going up and down the aisles, and that is what made Bed Bath unique.

The current management has a complicated relationship with the coupon. Executives acknowledge that it is beloved by customers, but say the prior regime didn’t use it in a disciplined way. The chief executive, Mark J. Tritton, said during an investor presentation in October that the company is in the process of “honing down” its use.

Bed Bath & Beyond didn’t make any current executives available to talk about the coupon. In a statement, Joe Hartsig, the new chief merchandising officer, called it “a true icon” and “here to stay,” but that newer customers who shop online are less likely to use it. “Unlike in the past, we’re using data and analytics to offer unique deals on the items they love,” he said.

Former employees thought such criticism of their use of the coupon was overblown. They have no regrets about Big Blue and what it did for Bed Bath & Beyond.

LASKIN How does current management really feel about it? I guess ambivalent might be the best word I can come up with.

There’s so much positive brand equity from the coupon. Whatever financial struggle the company might be having, whatever trouble it’s in, consumers have love for the brand. But shareholders are asking about the coupon, and they can’t seem to get rid of it. They can’t break free of it.

WARREN EISENBERG There is nothing wrong with the coupon. That’s good if it’s in my obituary. It’s not saying anything bad about me.

If we were not using them right, that is something else — not doing a good job of knowing when and where to send them. But you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out.

LITTLE This wasn’t a fire hose. It was a well-tuned operation where you knew what you wanted, and we only turned the spigot on to give us what we wanted.

I made a clean break, and it’s always best to let the new team do what they do and not stick your fingers in because it is not yours anymore. There are fewer postcards, but they will find a place where they are comfortable.

But the secret was that this wasn’t television. That’s what set the stage and created the atmosphere for it all to happen. As Walmart and Target and Linens ‘n Things were doing things like TV, we went in our own direction.

At the end of the day, I’d do it again.