Categories
Politics

Xavier Becerra Brings Environmental Justice to Forefront

Esther Portillo, interim executive director of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, one of the groups involved in the fight against San Bernardino, said winning would not mean stopping development. Instead, she said, it would be “to look closely at the environmental impact we are going to have and minimize that impact as much as possible”.

Although jobs are usually the biggest selling point for new developments, a union chapter, Teamsters local 1932, has joined the fight against airport expansion. Randy Korgan, the local’s secretary and treasurer, said, “Well, bring the jobs with you, but make sure you deal with the environmental and community impacts – make sure these people have good benefits that they will be able to live and buy houses in the area. “

The court of appeal for the ninth circuit will hear the airport’s case as early as February.

The attorney general’s involvement in local disputes can upset those who firmly support the development. Steve Brandau, a Fresno district manager, served on the Fresno City Council during some heated dispute over camp expansion plans. “It’s crazy that the AG’s office, Attorney General Becerra, is stepping in and coming down even harder than the local lawyers,” he said. Citing a long-standing conservative refrain, he said that in the long run, such activities “result in business being completely out of state”.

Mr. Mataka acknowledged the friction in Fresno. “They thought we weren’t on our trail,” he said. “Unfortunately, the attorney general is responsible for enforcing California’s Environmental Quality Act. We were on our track. “

Mr Becerra said his office was working carefully with the local government before ever filing a pleading on a case and was looking for ways to compromise. Some churches, he said, don’t understand that their old ways of doing business leave churches underserved. They say, “We did this 20 years ago, why can’t we do it now?” he said.

He cited his experience as a 12-year-old congressman when he argued that he saw the role as a negotiator rather than a fighter. “They’re always looking for voices,” he said, “even across the aisle. I don’t want people to be blind. “

Categories
Health

The UK Simply Accepted the Pfizer Covid Vaccine. What Occurs Subsequent?

LONDON – The first rigorously tested coronavirus vaccine was given the green light for use in the UK on Wednesday. The vaccine doses of the American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and a small German company, BioNTech, will be injected from next week, the government said.

When the UK jumped before the United States to allow mass vaccination, it put pressure on American drug regulators, who were called to the White House by President Trump’s chief of staff on Tuesday to explain why they were unwilling to do the same.

The two countries study vaccines differently.

Rather than accepting the vaccine manufacturers’ results, American regulators are carefully re-analyzing the raw data from the studies to validate the results, considering what regulators described as thousands of pages of documents. Dr. Stephen Hahn, the commissioner for the Food and Drug Administration, said Tuesday that the FDA is “one of the few regulators in the world actually looking at the raw data.”

Regulators in the UK and other European countries rely more on in-house analysis. Instead of sifting through the raw study data and figuring out the numbers themselves, regulators often examine a drug manufacturer’s reports and, if there are no anomalies, justify their decisions in company-provided documents.

Whether the UK was rushing to approve a vaccine or whether the US was wasting valuable time as the virus kills around 1,500 Americans a day sparked a lively debate among scientists and industry experts on Wednesday. European regulators said UK approval is so limited that it only applies to certain lots of the vaccine, a claim Pfizer denied and which UK officials failed to address.

Dr. Paul Offit, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a member of the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory Council, said in an interview Wednesday that regulators’ success in getting vaccines approved while minimizing unforeseen errors justifies a rigorous approach.

“It is remarkable that we were able to access viruses with so few casualties,” he said, adding that American regulators were only days away from completing their own review.

The FDA has scheduled a meeting of an independent panel of experts on December 10th to review Pfizer’s vaccine. UK regulators also seek opinions from a technical committee, but this group has the flexibility to review and meet data as needed so that it can be implemented more quickly.

“In the UK, they could just say, ‘We have the data, we have the meeting,” said Stephen Evans, Professor of Pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

To speed up the process, the UK Medicines and Health Products regulator had their experts review vaccine dates as soon as they were available, and separate teams worked in parallel on different parts of the process rather than waiting for another to complete.

“If you are climbing a mountain, prepare,” said Dr. June Raine, executive director of the agency, on Wednesday. “We started this in June.”

When the first results came in on November 10, she said, “We were in base camp.” And later she said, “When we got the final analysis, we were ready for the final sprint.”

The UK has left the European Union’s regulatory orbit to get early approval for a vaccine as the bloc gives countries emergency powers in the event of a pandemic. Once the UK separates from the European Union on December 31, those vaccine-only powers will become permanent.

The countries remaining in the European Union are waiting for their regulator, the European Medicines Agency, to approve a vaccine. Like the FDA, the European regulator has scheduled a meeting on December 29th to consult outside experts and provide an opinion on the Pfizer vaccine.

The agency’s task is made more difficult by its obligation to seek the views of all 27 EU countries. This process was sped up during the pandemic, but it will be a few more days for countries to weigh in after the meeting, which will likely delay vaccinations until early January.

Pfizer plans to ship 800,000 cans to the UK in the coming days. As of Tuesday evening, these cans were being prepared for shipment at a factory in Puurs, Belgium, BioNTech said.

The cans are packaged in cardboard boxes, using dry ice to keep them at the south pole-like temperatures they need, before being placed on trucks or planes and taken to the UK. They will arrive at state distribution warehouses over the weekend, Pfizer said on Wednesday.

UK hospitals have already started emailing staff to inform them of vaccination schedules. A London hospital system states that the first doses are given on Monday at 7 a.m. The UK has placed pre-orders for 40 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine, but most of them are expected to be administered over the next year. Each patient needs two, one month apart.

A government advisory council released its list of vaccine priority groups on Wednesday. At the top of the list are residents and workers of nursing homes, followed by people over the age of 80 and health and social care workers.

In practice, however, government officials said Wednesday that they would initially limit vaccinations to a network of 50 hospitals due to the difficulty of storing and shipping the Pfizer vaccine. As a result, nurses, doctors, nursing home staff, and people 80+ who had made appointments would come first for the vaccine before residents of the nursing home.

Pfizer has said the vaccine can survive for five days in a regular refrigerator. However, the UK’s National Health Service has yet to consider issues such as staffing at locations outside the hospital and transportation difficulties within the country to decide how to administer the vaccine.

The National Health Service has around 150,000 doctors and more than 330,000 nurses and midwives.

The British decision will not in itself bring vaccinations any closer. However, Pfizer executives said Wednesday they had heard from other countries that they wanted to speed up their own approval processes in the face of UK approval.

American regulators, despite months of pressure from Mr. Trump, have claimed that they will follow their plan and review Pfizer’s vaccine to FDA standards.

The US has pre-ordered 100 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine. Most of the supply will come from a separate factory in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Still, many questions remain unanswered as to how vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer will fulfill the orders of wealthier nations that have pre-sourced supplies.

Categories
Health

Shares shut 55% increased on market debut

A woman stands next to signage with the JD.com logo and the company’s mascot “Joy” at the company’s headquarters in Beijing, China.

Qilai Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

GUANGZHOU, China – JD Health, the health division of Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com, rose on its debut in Hong Kong.

JD Health issued 381.9 million shares at a price of Hong Kong $ 70.58 each. These stocks traded at Hong Kong $ 94.5 at launch. That was 34% more than the offer price.

Shares rebounded during the day, hitting a daily high of $ 123.3 Hong Kong, up nearly 75% from the offer price. The stock closed at $ 110 Hong Kong.

The company said the net proceeds from the IPO were Hong Kong dollars 26.46 billion ($ 3.41 billion).

JD Health’s shares were valued at the high end of the Hong Kong dollar 62.8 to Hong Kong dollar 70.58 marketed to investors, CNBC previously reported.

The investment banks could decide to exercise the so-called over-allotment option, in which 57,285,000 additional shares would be issued. That would result in raising another $ 3.98 billion in Hong Kong through the IPO. The over-allotment must be exercised by December 31st.

Business growth plans

JD Health said 40% of net sales will be used for business expansion over the next 3 to 5 years, 30% will be used for research and development over the next 2 to 3 years, while the remaining money will be spent on potential investments. Acquisitions and General Corporate Purposes.

The company’s business is focused on online health services such as consultations with doctors, as well as the online pharmacy. JD Health posted sales of 8.78 billion yuan ($ 1.34 billion) for the six months ended June 30, compared to 4.99 billion yuan for the same period last year.

Citing a Frost & Sullivan report, the company claimed in its prospectus that it was the top-selling online health platform in China in 2019.

CEO Xin Lijun declined on Tuesday to say whether the company could keep that position. He stressed that the company’s focus is on improving the user experience, which of course would generate revenue.

“The Chinese health and medicine industry is playing like ‘go,'” Xin said, according to a CNBC translation of his Mandarin-language remarks made during a briefing with reporters in Beijing. He was referring to an ancient board game in which two players fight for most of the territory.

China’s healthcare industry is difficult for startups to navigate. The government is heavily involved in medical care and runs mass insurance programs to reimburse patients.

“It’s not a market-based scenario,” Xin said, noting that it limits the areas startups can do and that each line of business has its own challenges. “In theory, of course, our biggest challenge is to educate more customers about JD Health’s services and better integrate online healthcare with offline services.”

Xin said JD Health could invest in offline drug stores and work more with overseas health organizations.

JD Health’s listing is another big win for the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where big Chinese companies have gone there to raise money. JD Health’s parent company, JD.com, conducted a secondary listing in Hong Kong in June. Another Chinese internet company, NetEase, also made a secondary listing in Hong Kong that month.

China’s tech giants have stepped up their focus on digital health care following the coronavirus outbreak earlier this year. Internet search giant Baidu is in talks with investors to raise up to $ 2 billion for a new biotech company within three years, CNBC reported in September.

JD.com will remain the majority shareholder of JD Health even after the IPO. A number of so-called cornerstone investors have been brought on board, including Hillhouse, Tiger Global, Lake Bleu Prime, the China Structural Reform Fund, Blackrock and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC.

Categories
Business

Italy coronavirus outbreak: What’s taking place there now

Healthcare workers transfer a COVID-19 patient to a biocontainment stretcher in the Covid emergency room of the San Filippo Neri Hospital during lockdown measures to contain the spread of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) on October 29, 2020 in Rome, Italy.

Antonio Masiello | Getty Images

Italy became Europe’s first coronavirus hotspot earlier this year after cases occurred in the northern regions of Lombardy and Veneto in February.

It imposed the first lockdown outside of China after the virus spread across the country and across the continent.

In the summer, as elsewhere, there was a lull in infections in Italy before a second wave of coronavirus infections set in.

Now the daily number of infections remains high and a record number of daily deaths were reported last week. Here is a snapshot of the current developments in Italy.

What is the virus situation like?

Italy currently has the second highest number of coronavirus infections in Europe after France with 1,728,878 confirmed cases. This is based on data from Johns Hopkins University. Over 60,000 people have died of the disease in the country.

13,720 new Covid cases and 528 more deaths were recorded on Monday, with the numbers likely to be lower due to the delay over the weekend. It comes after 18,887 new cases on Sunday and 21,052 on Saturday. On Friday, 24,099 new infections were counted, as data from the Ministry of Health show – a number that points more to the current virus trend in Italy.

993 deaths were recorded last Thursday, surpassing an earlier record of 919 daily deaths during the first wave of the virus.

Italy’s health department, the Higher Health Institute, said Monday that nearly 40% of Italy’s 60,000 deaths have occurred in the hardest-hit region, Lombardy.

What about the vacation?

Last week the Italian government passed another package of tough restrictions, which are seen as a crucial way to avoid further hikes in certain cases.

This includes the ban on travel between Italian regions between December 21 and January 6, which means families across Italy cannot get together for Christmas unless they travel before the rules come into force.

Measures put online by the Italian Ministry of Health include a ban on leaving your hometown on Christmas Day, St. Stephen’s Day (Boxing Day, December 26) and New Year’s Day.

The government has maintained the current curfew. People are not allowed out of their homes between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. (and until 7 a.m. on New Year’s Day), except for work or health reasons. That rules out a midnight mass for millions of Catholics in Italy.

Italian tourists traveling abroad from December 21 to January 6 will have to undergo quarantine upon their return, the ministry said. Foreign tourists who come to Italy during the same period must also be quarantined.

Red zones

As in other countries, Italy has applied a tiered system to differentiate parts of the country according to their risk profile, with different rules applying in these areas.

The areas with the highest risk are classified as “red zones” and are subject to the strictest restrictions. This is followed by “orange zones” with medium to high risk and increased restrictions, and yellow zones of medium risk with baseline restrictions.

Currently, the yellow area includes the regions: Emilia Romagna, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Lazio, Liguria, Marche, Molise, Trento, Apulia, Sardinia, Sicily, Umbria and Veneto.

The orange areas include: Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Lombardy, Piedmont, Bolzano, Tuscany and Aosta Valley.

The only red zone at the moment is the central region of Abruzzo. In a red area, only stores selling essential goods can remain open and restaurants and bars can only offer take-away service.

Red zone residents are not allowed to move around their own area (whether by public or private transport) unless there is a vital reason to do so. Anyone who has to leave the house for work, study, health or emergency reasons must fill out a form. In a red zone, visiting or meeting relatives or friends with whom you do not live together in an open or closed place is prohibited.

Bans and continued restrictions clearly affect some Italians more than others; A story about an Italian went viral after an argument with his wife who took a walk to cool off and ran 450 km after an argument with his wife. Italians called the man, who was fined 400 euros by the police for violating the curfew, “Forrest Gump” after the character who walks thousands of kilometers across America.

Categories
Business

Pope Francis and Companies Discovered Group Selling ‘Inclusive Capitalism’

It may seem unusual: big corporations and Pope Francis, a Pope who has repeatedly and devastatingly criticized capitalism. But they announced a new partnership today, the latest sign of the growing influence of environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices in the economy.

Meet the Inclusive Capitalism Council with the Vatican, a group of corporations, investors, and other groups with a market cap of $ 2.1 trillion and 200 million employees. The group, with Francis’ blessing, announced commitments to environmental and sustainable business goals that fit into the ESG movement.

The council’s 27 leaders are known as guardians of inclusive capitalism. These include Ajay Banga from Mastercard, Marc Benioff from Salesforce and Brian Moynihan from Bank of America. You will meet every year with Francis and Cardinal Peter Turkson, who heads the Vatican Department that deals with many social issues.

  • “An economic system that is fair, trustworthy and able to meet the most profound challenges facing humanity and our planet is urgently needed,” Francis said in a statement.

The group is the brainchild of Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the businesswoman who campaigned for the promotion of so-called inclusive capitalism after the financial crisis of 2008. Among them is Inclusive Capital Partners, an ESG-focused activist hedge fund co-founded with Jeff Ubben.

There are reasons to be both hopeful and skeptical about the initiative. The companies’ commitments are meaningful, but some are not new: for example, BP reiterates its commitment announced in February to achieve net carbon-free emissions by 2050. And while the council made the pledges public, there isn’t much to hold the companies accountable (other than the risk of disappointing the Pope).

But it is remarkable to open a new front in the ESG movement. The Pope, whose time in the Church focused on caring for the poor, has long criticized capitalism for its sins and excesses. (Five years ago he called it “the devil’s crap.”) In an encyclical – the most definitive doctrine a Pope can teach – he published in October, Francis rebuked market capitalism for failing humanity during the pandemic .

UK starts Covid-19 vaccinations. A 90-year-old woman became the first patient in the western world to receive a fully tested and approved vaccine as the country distributes images from Pfizer and BioNTech. The US ordered 100 million cans, but it turns out the Trump administration turned down an offer from Pfizer in July.

Boris Johnson travels to Brussels and faces a dead end with Brexit. The UK Prime Minister said he would negotiate personally with the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen to reach a trade deal between the UK and the EU. There are still some areas of disagreement and the current trading conditions will expire on December 31st.

Nielsen is revising the way ratings are measured. The company announced that it would add digital television and streaming to its widespread television audience metrics, which could transform the way around $ 100 billion worth of ads are sold and valued. Speaking of which, Japanese advertising giant Dentsu is planning to cut 6,000 jobs as the pandemic is upsetting the industry.

Goldman Sachs will take full control of its securities joint venture in China. It has agreed to buy its local partner’s 49 percent stake. Beijing said it would allow such moves earlier this year, and other Western financial firms are preparing to follow suit.

“Davos” will be in Singapore. The World Economic Forum will hold its 2021 annual meeting, traditionally held in January in the Swiss Alps, in May in Singapore, citing Covid-19 concerns. The focus of the gathering will be – what else? – Recovery from the pandemic.

Years ago, Uber co-founder Travis Kalanick described the company’s Advanced Technologies Group as “existential” for the company. Now Uber is paying a start-up to take over the division.

The department becomes part of Aurora, A Pittsburgh-based company focused on long distance autonomous transportation. Aurora had previously agreed to deliver self-driving technology to Volkswagen and Hyundai, although both are now working with other partners. As part of the deal, Uber will invest $ 400 million for a 26 percent stake in Aurora and take a seat on Aurora’s board of directors.

It’s about losses and headaches. Looking at autonomous driving as a possible means of reducing human driver costs, Mr Kalanick built the business by acquiring Otto, a trucking start-up founded by a former Google engineer. But Uber ran into a thicket of problems:

  • Google’s self-driving car partner Waymo accused Otto founder Anthony Levandowski of stealing trade secrets. Uber and Waymo eventually settled their legal battle, and Mr Levandowski admitted to stealing.

  • An Uber self-driving car hit and killed a woman in Arizona in 2018, creating legal and regulatory chaos for the company.

  • Uber’s investors have long called for ties to the project to be severed in hopes of containing heavy losses. (In 2018, Uber accepted a $ 500 million investment from Toyota to keep the unit alive.) Those demands grew louder as the pandemic hit the company’s finances.

The deal raises questions about the future of Silicon Valley’s self-driving obsession. Investors have poured billions into the technology but have yet to produce an armada of self-driving vehicles.

– Christopher Nolan, the film director, isn’t happy with WarnerMedia’s plan to simultaneously release films in theaters and stream them on HBO Max at the same time, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

Etsy is known as a place where artisans and small businesses sell goods like handcrafted face masks. But there’s something else too, write Matt Phillips and Gillian Friedman of The Times: The best performer in the S&P 500 this year. This is a remarkable turnaround for a company that struggled shortly after going public in 2015 and was forced to abide by Wall Street rules.

Engine No. 1, a new ESG-focused investment firm founded by former activist investors, has adopted an ambitious goal for its first campaign: Exxon Mobil. It believes that by combining the traditional activist-investor book – which advocates actions that increase shareholder returns – with long-term social and environmental concerns, success can be achieved when social activists, environmentalists and others fall short .

Exxon’s shares are down around 40 percent this year. The pandemic hit oil prices as the industry grappled with the long-term move to cleaner energy sources. This leaves the company more vulnerable to activists looking to change their strategy.

  • Under its current CEO, Darren Woods, Exxon has continued to expand its exploration and production activities, responding to erroneous assumptions about the price and availability of oil made in a letter to Engine’s directors. (European competitors have shifted to renewables much more aggressively.) Exxon’s announcement last month that it would cut spending didn’t go far enough, Engine said, offering “little reason to hope that this change will mark a new era” . An Exxon spokesperson told DealBook that the company was reviewing Engine’s letter.

The fund is pushing for changes to Exxon’s board of directors, a common tactic used by activist investors (although unusual at the start of a campaign). It has been proposed to add four leaders, including clean energy specialists, who will be vital to the future of the company.

  • Engine needs powerful allies. Exxon is valued at $ 172 billion and the fund only has a $ 40 million stake. It is said to have the backing of CalSTRS, the country’s second largest pension fund, which has an additional $ 300 million.

It’s a great test for a new breed of activist. Funds like Engine, which were launched this month, aim to give ESG investing a sharper edge through “active ownership,” as founder Chris James put it. “In the long run, shareholders and stakeholders have the same interests, and companies that invest in their stakeholders are better and stronger companies,” he said when announcing the creation of Engine. Other new funds like Inclusive Capital Partners (mentioned above) are taking a similar, as yet untested, approach. The transformation of Exxon would be very substantial evidence.

deals

  • Online lender SoFi has reportedly held talks to go public through the merger with a SPAC. (Reuters)

  • Bob Dylan agreed to sell the rights to his songwriting catalog to Universal Music Group for potentially more than $ 300 million. This is a single songwriter’s biggest deal. (NYT)

  • A new investment firm is planning a fund to bet against privately held startups. (WSJ)

Politics and politics

  • President-elect Joe Biden plans to appoint General Lloyd Austin as Secretary of Defense. He would be the first black man in the role. (NYT)

  • The District of Columbia Attorney General is investigating whether President Trump’s family has improperly benefited from his Washington hotel. (NYT)

  • A Senate battle over Mr. Trump’s appointment of Nathan Simington to the FCC under the control of the commission is on. (Bloomberg)

technology

  • A second federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s move to ban TikTok downloading in the US (WSJ).

  • Palantir’s shares rose after the data mining company won a three-year contract from the Food and Drug Administration to help get drug approvals. (Bloomberg)

  • European tech companies will raise $ 41 billion this year despite the pandemic, a record. (Atomico)

The best of the rest

  • Paul Sarbanes, the former Maryland Senator who co-authored the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a major accounting revision after scandals like Enron, died Sunday. He was 87. (NYT)

  • MSNBC named Rashida Jones the next president, making her the highest-ranking black woman on American television news. (NYT)

  • Chuck Yeager, the first test pilot to break the sound barrier and immortalized in Tom Wolfe’s book The Right Stuff, died yesterday. He was 97. (NYT)

We appreciate your feedback! Please email your thoughts and suggestions to dealbook@nytimes.com.

Categories
Business

U.S. ought to be a Covid catastrophe mindset for 2 months

The intensive care unit and the pulmonologist Dr. Vin Gupta told CNBC that for the next two months in the US, everyone should be in a “disaster mindset” as Covid-19 cases explode across the country.

“Doctors in the reserves, US Air Force reserves, we haven’t used all of our skills, we should use those resources – military, National Guard, as you call them, emergency ID cards for anyone properly trained in critical care,” Professor at the institute for University of Washington health metrics and assessment said Monday evening. “We need all hands on deck here.”

According to the Covid Tracking Project, there were 102,148 people in hospitals across the country with coronavirus as of Monday. New Mexico hospitals have reached the point where they may need to start rationing care. The state is likely to be the first to fill all beds in the intensive care unit during the pandemic. Now they are overloaded. Per Covid, the fourth highest in the nation, there are more than 43 people per 100,000 in the hospital, according to the Covid Tracking Project.

Gupta told The News with Shepard Smith that care rationing was actually spreading to other regions across the country. “This is a fact of life, and one of the reasons we believe that by the end of February about 500,000 Americans will lose their lives because we take care of the care and people can’t get the care they need.” the magnitude they need considering how out of control this pandemic is. “

The Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation modeling projects project 538,893 deaths from Covid-19 by April 1.

To save life, governors are using hospitalization and ICU capacity as key metrics to set new restrictions.

On Monday, Democratic New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced that parts of the state would close when hospitals are 90% full. He also said indoor dining in New York City may close soon.

At least 33 million people in California are regionally locked after ICU capacity fell below 15% in some regions. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said the appointment would take at least three weeks.

Gupta, an NBC medical worker, described what he called “common sense” of encouraging people not to travel by bus or plane, minimizing gatherings and stopping eating indoors. “Unfortunately, I think these are the parameters that we have to adhere to,” he said. “Do I think they are draconian? I think they are common sense and I think if we can stick with these things we will be able to mitigate the transmission until vaccines are used in the near future.”

Pleading with Americans to wear three-layer masks everywhere in public, Gupta added that there was “compelling data” for people 55 and older that suggest wearing the extra layer of face shield with a three-layer blue mask be safer.

Categories
Uncategorized

Many Cancer Therapies Suppress T Cell Immune Responses

Sugar seems to have developed a reputation as the big bad wolf in relation to health. We have reported on numerous studies associating sugar intake with increased aging, cardiovascular disease, obesity and even cancer. Such research has led to many health experts around the globe calling for reductions in recommended sugar intake, with some saying we should cut out sugar completely. But is it really that bad for our health?

“sugar is a crystalline carbohydrate that makes foods taste sweet”

There are many different types, including glucose, fructose, lactose, maltose and sucrose. Some of these sugars, such as glucose, fructose and lactose, occur naturally in fruits, vegetables and other foods. But many of the foods we consume contain “added” sugars – sugar that we add to a product ourselves to enhance the flavor or sugar that has been added to a product by a manufacturer.

Healty Low Sugar Shake

The most common sources of added sugars include soft drinks, cakes, pies, chocolate, fruit drinks and desserts. Just a single can of cola can contain up to 7 tsps of added sugar, while an average-sized chocolate bar can contain up to 6 tsps.

It is added sugars that have been cited as a contributor to many health problems. In December 2014, MNT reported on a study in the journal Open Heart claiming added sugars may increase the risk of high blood pressure, even more so than sodium. And in February 2014, a study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) associated high added sugar intake with increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD).

“Perhaps most strongly, added sugars have been associated with the significant increase in obesity”

In the US, more than a third of adults are obese, while the rate of childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents over the past 30 years.

A 2013 study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition suggested that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases weight gain in both children and adults, while a review paper from the World Health Organization (WHO) notes an increase in the consumption of such beverages correlates with the increase in obesity.
Are we becoming addicted to sugar?

High Sugar Chocolate Cookies

In support of these associations is Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California-San Francisco and author of the book Fat Chance: The Hidden Truth About Sugar, who claims sugar is a “toxic” substance that we are becoming addicted to.

A 2008 study by researchers from Princeton University, NJ, found rats used to consuming a high-sugar diet displayed signs of binging, craving and withdrawal when their sugar intake was reduced.
A woman tempted by chocolate
Dr. Lustig: “We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives. We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple.”We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives.”

“We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple”

Dr. Lustig told The Guardian in 2013. “The food industry has made it into a diet staple because they know when they do you buy more,” he added. “This is their hook. If some unscrupulous cereal manufacturer went out and laced your breakfast cereal with morphine to get you to buy more, what would you think of that? They do it with sugar instead.”

In her popular blog, Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow cites sugar addiction as one of the reasons she decided to quit sugar completely.

“The bottom line is that sugar works the addiction and reward pathways in the brain in much the same way as many illegal drugs,” she writes. “Sugar is basically a socially acceptable, legal, recreational drug with deadly consequences.”

Bowl of Cereal and Forrest Fruits

Statistics show that we are certainly a nation of added-sugar lovers. According to a report from the CDC, adults in the US consumed around 13% of their total daily calorie intake from added sugars between 2005-2010, while 16% of children’s and adolescents’ total calorie intake came from added sugars between 2005-2008.

These levels are well above those currently recommended by WHO, which state we should consume no more than 10% of total daily calories from “free” sugars – both naturally occurring sugars and those that are added to products by the manufacturer.

In 2013, however, MNT reported on a study by Prof. Wayne Potts and colleagues from the University of Utah, claiming that even consuming added sugars at recommended levels may be harmful to health, after finding that such levels reduced lifespan in mice.

Is eliminating sugar from our diet THE healthy THING TO DO?

Healthy Low Carb Diet

The array of studies reporting the negative implications of added sugar led to WHO making a proposal to revise their added sugar recommendations in 2014. The organization issued a draft guideline stating they would like to halve their recommended daily free sugar intake from 10% to 5%.

“The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the consumption of free sugars to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases in adults and children,” WHO explained, “with a particular focus on the prevention and control of weight gain and dental caries.”

In addition, it seems many health experts, nutritionists and even celebrities like Gwyneth have jumped on a “no sugar” bandwagon.

But is it even possible to completely eliminate sugar from a diet? And is it safe? Biochemist Leah Fitzsimmons, of the University of Birmingham in the UK, told The Daily Mail:

“Cutting all sugar from your diet would be very difficult to achieve. Fruits, vegetables, dairy products and dairy replacements, eggs, alcohol and nuts all contain sugar, which would leave you with little other than meat and fats to eat – definitely not very healthy.”

Many people turn to artificial sweeteners as a sugar alternative, but according to studies, these sweeteners may still drive diabetes and obesity.

“Together with other major shifts that occurred in human nutrition, this increase in artificial sweetener consumption coincides with the dramatic increase in the obesity and diabetes epidemics,” the authors note. “Our findings suggest that artificial sweeteners may have directly contributed to enhancing the exact epidemic that they themselves were intended to fight.”

Categories
Uncategorized

How Cells Are Wired to Survive Radiation Therapy

Sugar seems to have developed a reputation as the big bad wolf in relation to health. We have reported on numerous studies associating sugar intake with increased aging, cardiovascular disease, obesity and even cancer. Such research has led to many health experts around the globe calling for reductions in recommended sugar intake, with some saying we should cut out sugar completely. But is it really that bad for our health?

“sugar is a crystalline carbohydrate that makes foods taste sweet”

There are many different types, including glucose, fructose, lactose, maltose and sucrose. Some of these sugars, such as glucose, fructose and lactose, occur naturally in fruits, vegetables and other foods. But many of the foods we consume contain “added” sugars – sugar that we add to a product ourselves to enhance the flavor or sugar that has been added to a product by a manufacturer.

Healty Low Sugar Shake

The most common sources of added sugars include soft drinks, cakes, pies, chocolate, fruit drinks and desserts. Just a single can of cola can contain up to 7 tsps of added sugar, while an average-sized chocolate bar can contain up to 6 tsps.

It is added sugars that have been cited as a contributor to many health problems. In December 2014, MNT reported on a study in the journal Open Heart claiming added sugars may increase the risk of high blood pressure, even more so than sodium. And in February 2014, a study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) associated high added sugar intake with increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD).

“Perhaps most strongly, added sugars have been associated with the significant increase in obesity”

In the US, more than a third of adults are obese, while the rate of childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents over the past 30 years.

A 2013 study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition suggested that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases weight gain in both children and adults, while a review paper from the World Health Organization (WHO) notes an increase in the consumption of such beverages correlates with the increase in obesity.
Are we becoming addicted to sugar?

High Sugar Chocolate Cookies

In support of these associations is Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California-San Francisco and author of the book Fat Chance: The Hidden Truth About Sugar, who claims sugar is a “toxic” substance that we are becoming addicted to.

A 2008 study by researchers from Princeton University, NJ, found rats used to consuming a high-sugar diet displayed signs of binging, craving and withdrawal when their sugar intake was reduced.
A woman tempted by chocolate
Dr. Lustig: “We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives. We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple.”We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives.”

“We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple”

Dr. Lustig told The Guardian in 2013. “The food industry has made it into a diet staple because they know when they do you buy more,” he added. “This is their hook. If some unscrupulous cereal manufacturer went out and laced your breakfast cereal with morphine to get you to buy more, what would you think of that? They do it with sugar instead.”

In her popular blog, Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow cites sugar addiction as one of the reasons she decided to quit sugar completely.

“The bottom line is that sugar works the addiction and reward pathways in the brain in much the same way as many illegal drugs,” she writes. “Sugar is basically a socially acceptable, legal, recreational drug with deadly consequences.”

Bowl of Cereal and Forrest Fruits

Statistics show that we are certainly a nation of added-sugar lovers. According to a report from the CDC, adults in the US consumed around 13% of their total daily calorie intake from added sugars between 2005-2010, while 16% of children’s and adolescents’ total calorie intake came from added sugars between 2005-2008.

These levels are well above those currently recommended by WHO, which state we should consume no more than 10% of total daily calories from “free” sugars – both naturally occurring sugars and those that are added to products by the manufacturer.

In 2013, however, MNT reported on a study by Prof. Wayne Potts and colleagues from the University of Utah, claiming that even consuming added sugars at recommended levels may be harmful to health, after finding that such levels reduced lifespan in mice.

Is eliminating sugar from our diet THE healthy THING TO DO?

Healthy Low Carb Diet

The array of studies reporting the negative implications of added sugar led to WHO making a proposal to revise their added sugar recommendations in 2014. The organization issued a draft guideline stating they would like to halve their recommended daily free sugar intake from 10% to 5%.

“The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the consumption of free sugars to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases in adults and children,” WHO explained, “with a particular focus on the prevention and control of weight gain and dental caries.”

In addition, it seems many health experts, nutritionists and even celebrities like Gwyneth have jumped on a “no sugar” bandwagon.

But is it even possible to completely eliminate sugar from a diet? And is it safe? Biochemist Leah Fitzsimmons, of the University of Birmingham in the UK, told The Daily Mail:

“Cutting all sugar from your diet would be very difficult to achieve. Fruits, vegetables, dairy products and dairy replacements, eggs, alcohol and nuts all contain sugar, which would leave you with little other than meat and fats to eat – definitely not very healthy.”

Many people turn to artificial sweeteners as a sugar alternative, but according to studies, these sweeteners may still drive diabetes and obesity.

“Together with other major shifts that occurred in human nutrition, this increase in artificial sweetener consumption coincides with the dramatic increase in the obesity and diabetes epidemics,” the authors note. “Our findings suggest that artificial sweeteners may have directly contributed to enhancing the exact epidemic that they themselves were intended to fight.”

Categories
Uncategorized

Chemists Develop an Ultra-sensitive Test for Cancers

Sugar seems to have developed a reputation as the big bad wolf in relation to health. We have reported on numerous studies associating sugar intake with increased aging, cardiovascular disease, obesity and even cancer. Such research has led to many health experts around the globe calling for reductions in recommended sugar intake, with some saying we should cut out sugar completely. But is it really that bad for our health?

“sugar is a crystalline carbohydrate that makes foods taste sweet”

There are many different types, including glucose, fructose, lactose, maltose and sucrose. Some of these sugars, such as glucose, fructose and lactose, occur naturally in fruits, vegetables and other foods. But many of the foods we consume contain “added” sugars – sugar that we add to a product ourselves to enhance the flavor or sugar that has been added to a product by a manufacturer.

Healty Low Sugar Shake

The most common sources of added sugars include soft drinks, cakes, pies, chocolate, fruit drinks and desserts. Just a single can of cola can contain up to 7 tsps of added sugar, while an average-sized chocolate bar can contain up to 6 tsps.

It is added sugars that have been cited as a contributor to many health problems. In December 2014, MNT reported on a study in the journal Open Heart claiming added sugars may increase the risk of high blood pressure, even more so than sodium. And in February 2014, a study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) associated high added sugar intake with increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD).

“Perhaps most strongly, added sugars have been associated with the significant increase in obesity”

In the US, more than a third of adults are obese, while the rate of childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents over the past 30 years.

A 2013 study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition suggested that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases weight gain in both children and adults, while a review paper from the World Health Organization (WHO) notes an increase in the consumption of such beverages correlates with the increase in obesity.
Are we becoming addicted to sugar?

High Sugar Chocolate Cookies

In support of these associations is Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California-San Francisco and author of the book Fat Chance: The Hidden Truth About Sugar, who claims sugar is a “toxic” substance that we are becoming addicted to.

A 2008 study by researchers from Princeton University, NJ, found rats used to consuming a high-sugar diet displayed signs of binging, craving and withdrawal when their sugar intake was reduced.
A woman tempted by chocolate
Dr. Lustig: “We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives. We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple.”We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives.”

“We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple”

Dr. Lustig told The Guardian in 2013. “The food industry has made it into a diet staple because they know when they do you buy more,” he added. “This is their hook. If some unscrupulous cereal manufacturer went out and laced your breakfast cereal with morphine to get you to buy more, what would you think of that? They do it with sugar instead.”

In her popular blog, Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow cites sugar addiction as one of the reasons she decided to quit sugar completely.

“The bottom line is that sugar works the addiction and reward pathways in the brain in much the same way as many illegal drugs,” she writes. “Sugar is basically a socially acceptable, legal, recreational drug with deadly consequences.”

Bowl of Cereal and Forrest Fruits

Statistics show that we are certainly a nation of added-sugar lovers. According to a report from the CDC, adults in the US consumed around 13% of their total daily calorie intake from added sugars between 2005-2010, while 16% of children’s and adolescents’ total calorie intake came from added sugars between 2005-2008.

These levels are well above those currently recommended by WHO, which state we should consume no more than 10% of total daily calories from “free” sugars – both naturally occurring sugars and those that are added to products by the manufacturer.

In 2013, however, MNT reported on a study by Prof. Wayne Potts and colleagues from the University of Utah, claiming that even consuming added sugars at recommended levels may be harmful to health, after finding that such levels reduced lifespan in mice.

Is eliminating sugar from our diet THE healthy THING TO DO?

Healthy Low Carb Diet

The array of studies reporting the negative implications of added sugar led to WHO making a proposal to revise their added sugar recommendations in 2014. The organization issued a draft guideline stating they would like to halve their recommended daily free sugar intake from 10% to 5%.

“The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the consumption of free sugars to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases in adults and children,” WHO explained, “with a particular focus on the prevention and control of weight gain and dental caries.”

In addition, it seems many health experts, nutritionists and even celebrities like Gwyneth have jumped on a “no sugar” bandwagon.

But is it even possible to completely eliminate sugar from a diet? And is it safe? Biochemist Leah Fitzsimmons, of the University of Birmingham in the UK, told The Daily Mail:

“Cutting all sugar from your diet would be very difficult to achieve. Fruits, vegetables, dairy products and dairy replacements, eggs, alcohol and nuts all contain sugar, which would leave you with little other than meat and fats to eat – definitely not very healthy.”

Many people turn to artificial sweeteners as a sugar alternative, but according to studies, these sweeteners may still drive diabetes and obesity.

“Together with other major shifts that occurred in human nutrition, this increase in artificial sweetener consumption coincides with the dramatic increase in the obesity and diabetes epidemics,” the authors note. “Our findings suggest that artificial sweeteners may have directly contributed to enhancing the exact epidemic that they themselves were intended to fight.”

Categories
Uncategorized

Treatment for Chronic Lymphatic Leukaemia to Replace Chemo

Sugar seems to have developed a reputation as the big bad wolf in relation to health. We have reported on numerous studies associating sugar intake with increased aging, cardiovascular disease, obesity and even cancer. Such research has led to many health experts around the globe calling for reductions in recommended sugar intake, with some saying we should cut out sugar completely. But is it really that bad for our health?

“sugar is a crystalline carbohydrate that makes foods taste sweet”

There are many different types, including glucose, fructose, lactose, maltose and sucrose. Some of these sugars, such as glucose, fructose and lactose, occur naturally in fruits, vegetables and other foods. But many of the foods we consume contain “added” sugars – sugar that we add to a product ourselves to enhance the flavor or sugar that has been added to a product by a manufacturer.

Healty Low Sugar Shake

The most common sources of added sugars include soft drinks, cakes, pies, chocolate, fruit drinks and desserts. Just a single can of cola can contain up to 7 tsps of added sugar, while an average-sized chocolate bar can contain up to 6 tsps.

It is added sugars that have been cited as a contributor to many health problems. In December 2014, MNT reported on a study in the journal Open Heart claiming added sugars may increase the risk of high blood pressure, even more so than sodium. And in February 2014, a study led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) associated high added sugar intake with increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease (CVD).

“Perhaps most strongly, added sugars have been associated with the significant increase in obesity”

In the US, more than a third of adults are obese, while the rate of childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents over the past 30 years.

A 2013 study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition suggested that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases weight gain in both children and adults, while a review paper from the World Health Organization (WHO) notes an increase in the consumption of such beverages correlates with the increase in obesity.
Are we becoming addicted to sugar?

High Sugar Chocolate Cookies

In support of these associations is Dr. Robert Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of California-San Francisco and author of the book Fat Chance: The Hidden Truth About Sugar, who claims sugar is a “toxic” substance that we are becoming addicted to.

A 2008 study by researchers from Princeton University, NJ, found rats used to consuming a high-sugar diet displayed signs of binging, craving and withdrawal when their sugar intake was reduced.
A woman tempted by chocolate
Dr. Lustig: “We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives. We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple.”We need to wean ourselves off. We need to de-sweeten our lives.”

“We need to make sugar a treat, not a diet staple”

Dr. Lustig told The Guardian in 2013. “The food industry has made it into a diet staple because they know when they do you buy more,” he added. “This is their hook. If some unscrupulous cereal manufacturer went out and laced your breakfast cereal with morphine to get you to buy more, what would you think of that? They do it with sugar instead.”

In her popular blog, Goop, Gwyneth Paltrow cites sugar addiction as one of the reasons she decided to quit sugar completely.

“The bottom line is that sugar works the addiction and reward pathways in the brain in much the same way as many illegal drugs,” she writes. “Sugar is basically a socially acceptable, legal, recreational drug with deadly consequences.”

Bowl of Cereal and Forrest Fruits

Statistics show that we are certainly a nation of added-sugar lovers. According to a report from the CDC, adults in the US consumed around 13% of their total daily calorie intake from added sugars between 2005-2010, while 16% of children’s and adolescents’ total calorie intake came from added sugars between 2005-2008.

These levels are well above those currently recommended by WHO, which state we should consume no more than 10% of total daily calories from “free” sugars – both naturally occurring sugars and those that are added to products by the manufacturer.

In 2013, however, MNT reported on a study by Prof. Wayne Potts and colleagues from the University of Utah, claiming that even consuming added sugars at recommended levels may be harmful to health, after finding that such levels reduced lifespan in mice.

Is eliminating sugar from our diet THE healthy THING TO DO?

Healthy Low Carb Diet

The array of studies reporting the negative implications of added sugar led to WHO making a proposal to revise their added sugar recommendations in 2014. The organization issued a draft guideline stating they would like to halve their recommended daily free sugar intake from 10% to 5%.

“The objective of this guideline is to provide recommendations on the consumption of free sugars to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases in adults and children,” WHO explained, “with a particular focus on the prevention and control of weight gain and dental caries.”

In addition, it seems many health experts, nutritionists and even celebrities like Gwyneth have jumped on a “no sugar” bandwagon.

But is it even possible to completely eliminate sugar from a diet? And is it safe? Biochemist Leah Fitzsimmons, of the University of Birmingham in the UK, told The Daily Mail:

“Cutting all sugar from your diet would be very difficult to achieve. Fruits, vegetables, dairy products and dairy replacements, eggs, alcohol and nuts all contain sugar, which would leave you with little other than meat and fats to eat – definitely not very healthy.”

Many people turn to artificial sweeteners as a sugar alternative, but according to studies, these sweeteners may still drive diabetes and obesity.

“Together with other major shifts that occurred in human nutrition, this increase in artificial sweetener consumption coincides with the dramatic increase in the obesity and diabetes epidemics,” the authors note. “Our findings suggest that artificial sweeteners may have directly contributed to enhancing the exact epidemic that they themselves were intended to fight.”