Categories
Health

WHO holds press convention on the coronavirus outbreak

[The stream is slated to start at 11:00 a.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

World Health Organization officials hold a press conference on Friday to inform the public about the coronavirus outbreak that has infected more than 69.7 million people around the world as governments around the world begin rolling out the first vaccines.

The briefing comes as U.S. regulators say approval of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine is imminent. On Thursday evening, an advisory group to the Food and Drug Administration overwhelmingly approved the emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine for use in anyone over the age of 15. The UK, Canada and Bahrain have already approved the vaccine for most adults.

It couldn’t be more urgent. More Americans are now dying from the disease than at any other time in the pandemic. The country reported more than 224,400 new cases of the virus on Thursday and more than 2,700 people in the country died of Covid-19, according to Johns Hopkins University.

WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus last week expressed concern about the “growing awareness that the pandemic is over”.

Tedros said the positive news about vaccine development “gets us all going,” but the public must continue to adhere to public health guidelines.

Read CNBC’s live updates for the latest news on the Covid-19 outbreak.

Categories
Politics

Biden will journey to Georgia to spice up Democrats in Senate runoffs

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign stop in Atlanta, Georgia on October 27, 2020.

Brian Snyder | Reuters

WASHINGTON – President-elect Joe Biden will travel to Atlanta, Georgia on Tuesday to blunt for Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, his first campaign trip since he was elected president in November.

The stakes could hardly be higher: Ossoff and Warnock challenge incumbent Republican Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler in runoff elections on January 5th, the results of which determine which party controls the US Senate.

After the November elections, the Senate will initially consist of 50 Republicans, 46 Democrats and two independents who will meet with the Democrats. If Warnock and Ossoff both win their races, the Democrats will have 50 reliable votes, with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris casting a groundbreaking 51st vote.

With 51 votes in the Senate, Biden could realistically hope to pass some of his most comprehensive (and expensive) domestic policy proposals, including a massive green jobs program. He would also receive carte blanche endorsement for his candidates, which would greatly accelerate the pace at which a Biden government could take over the reins of federal bureaucracy.

Despite decades of Republican dominance in Georgian politics, Democrats have reason to be optimistic this year: Biden narrowly won Georgia’s referendum, a surprising victory that made him the first Democrat in more than 20 years to win the state in a presidential race .

However, there is no guarantee that Biden’s luck will repeat itself in the Senate races.

The poll averages currently show both races neck to neck. But Loeffler and Perdue benefit from the tenure and a historic advantage: Georgia has not sent a Democratic senator to Washington in a generation.

Democrats repeat the 2020 game book

With just under a month to go, the Democrats are repeating many of the tactics that worked to their advantage in November, emphasizing early voting, public health, and grassroots outreach.

Biden’s trip coincides with the start of the early voting, which begins Monday in Georgia. Democrats invest heavily in getting their voters down early instead of expecting people to queue at crowded polling stations on January 5th. These efforts are particularly urgent given the current surge in coronavirus, which is expected to peak early next year.

The Biden campaign hasn’t released the details of the event on Tuesday, but in the final weeks of the presidential campaign, Biden held drive-in rallies that attracted large crowds and kept people a safe distance from one another.

U.S. Senate Democratic nominees Jon Ossoff (R) and Raphael Warnock (L) wave at supporters during a rally in Marietta, Georgia on November 15, 2020.

Jessica McGowan | Getty Images

So far, the Democrats have not personally sent their party’s stars to Georgia in the runoff game, but have preferred to hold virtual events.

Former President Barack Obama, arguably the party’s biggest star, led a virtual rally with Ossoff and Warnock on Dec. 4, where he spoke openly to supporters that Biden’s national agenda was at stake.

The January results, Obama said, will “determine the course of the Biden presidency and whether Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can legally honor all of their commitments.”

“If you don’t have a majority when the Senate is controlled by Republicans who are more interested in disability and stagnation than progress and helping people, they can block almost anything,” Obama said.

Republicans flood the zone

While Democrats give priority to public health and early voting in the runoff elections, Republicans are taking a radically different approach: they flood the state with high-profile surrogate motherships while also cheering their grassroots voters by promoting false conspiracies, which President Donald Trump and not Biden was the rightful winner of the state’s referendum.

In the past few weeks, several popular Republican Senators have visited Georgia to promote Loeffler and Perdue: Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott from Florida, Tom Cotton from Arkansas, Joni Ernst from Iowa and Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee, and Senator-elect Bill Hagerty from Tennessee.

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Senator Steve Daines of Montana, and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, all Republicans, are also reportedly planning to swing across the state in the coming days.

But no one embodies the Republican Party’s two-part strategy in Georgia more than Trump, who made the state a core part of his conspiracy theories about the presidential election – and his efforts to reverse the legitimate results.

Last weekend, Trump led a massive rally in Valdosta, Georgia that was allegedly a campaign event to empower Loeffler and Perdue. But the president spent much more time on the stage making his own grievances than he did about the two Republican senators. The participants were close together, hardly a mask in sight.

US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and US Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler arrive for a rally on December 5, 2020 in Valdosta, Georgia, USA.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

For nearly two hours, Trump vacillated insisting that fraud and corruption constituted a “stolen” victory in Georgia in the presidential election, begging his supporters to fight for him by voting in the state’s runoff on January 5 .

“You know, you’re angry because so many votes were stolen. It was taken away. And you say, ‘Well, we won’t [vote]”Said Trump.” We can’t do that. We have to do just the opposite. If you don’t vote, the socialists win and the communists win. The Georgia patriots must show up and vote for these two incredible people. “

Trump also fueled his ongoing battle with his former ally, Brian Kemp, Republican governor of Georgia, who has so far refused to take steps Trump is asking him to take to overthrow the referendum.

US President Donald Trump hosts a campaign event with US Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler at Valdosta Regional Airport in Valdosta, Georgia, United States on December 5, 2020.

Dustin Chambers | Reuters

“Your governor could very easily stop it if he knew what the hell he was doing,” Trump told the crowd in Valdosta. “Quit very easily.”

Since election day, Kemp has approved several handcounts in the state, all of which have confirmed Biden’s victory.

Categories
World News

Vote to Legalize Abortion Passes Decrease Home of Argentine Congress

BUENOS AIRES – Argentine lawmakers took an important step on Friday to legalize abortion and fulfill a promise made by President Alberto Fernández that made women’s rights a central tenet of his government.

The approval of the law in the Argentine lower house of Congress by 131 votes to 117 after more than 20 hours of debate was a legislative victory for Mr Fernández, who has provided funds and political capital to improve conditions for women as well as for gays and transgender people, even if Argentina grappling with the greatest financial crisis of a generation. The law would have to go through the Senate to officially legalize abortion in the country.

“It’s a wrong dilemma to say it’s one way or the other,” said Elizabeth Gómez Alcorta, Argentina’s Minister for Women, Gender and Diversity. “It’s not like stopping renegotiating the debt to pursue this policy.”

Argentina would be only the fourth nation – and by far the most populous – to legalize abortion in Latin America, where strict abortion laws are the norm and Catholic doctrine has long guided politics.

Thousands of activists on both sides of the issue surrounded Congress on giant screens from Thursday evening to Friday morning after the debate.

They have been divided into clearly identified areas depending on their position. On the one hand, abortion lawyers turned their area into an open air party that danced through much of the hot summer night.

“I have goosebumps,” said Stefanía Gras, a 22-year-old psychology student who stayed overnight, after the vote. “I feel like we’re making history.”

Another, particularly smaller, group opposed to legalization held open-air prayers all night, though most realized that the bill would likely be passed when the morning light crept across the sky.

“I’m deeply saddened,” said Paloma Guevara, a 24-year-old nutritionist who had a megaphone and gathered all night with anti-abortion activists. “Our hope now is the Senate, and the good thing is we’re better prepared than we were two years ago.”

Center-left professor of law, Mr Fernández, stood up as an advocate of marginalized communities, contrasting with his wealthy mid-right predecessor Mauricio Macri. He placed the inequality between gender and sexual orientation alongside social, economic and racial inequality and promised to eliminate them.

But he took office a year ago during a deep recession, and the coronavirus epidemic hit Argentina within three months of he was sworn in. The country imposed one of the longest and strictest lockdowns in the world, but the virus was still spreading, leaving it among the nations with the highest per capita death rates.

Despite these difficulties, 61-year-old Fernandez considered gender and sexual orientation to be a priority in his government and even surprised some activists who had joined his initiatives.

Earlier this year the government put in place a quota system that reserves at least one percent of federal public jobs for transgender Argentines.

“It was really something that surprised us all,” said Maryanne Lettieri, an English teacher who runs an organization that helps other transgender people find work. “I hope one day we don’t need quotas, but now we need them.”

Fernández’s 2021 budget foresees more than 15 percent of planned spending on initiatives that promote gender equality, including funding violence prevention programs, the inclusion of women who were not part of the formal workforce in the pension system and combating the Human trafficking.

Mr. Fernández has also asked his team not to schedule meetings that only include straight men. As of August, an audience of more than four people with the President should have women or members of the LGBTQ community making up a third of the attendees.

The emphasis on making Argentina fairer while the nation grapples with inflation, rising poverty, and oppressive debt may seem like a diversion or a populist ploy from Mr Fernández to some. Some critics, such as Patricia Bullrich, a former security minister who now heads Mr Macri’s PRO party, have argued that at least “it is not the right time” to discuss issues such as abortion.

“I would work a lot more on economics and people’s realities,” she said on CNN Radio Argentina. “I would have other priorities.”

However, government officials say they see investing in creating a more equitable country in Argentina as part of the path to a more prosperous future.

Updated

Dec. 11, 2020 at 9:29 am ET

“More equality and access to opportunities are part of the vision we are pursuing in this government,” said Economics Minister Martín Guzmán.

The abortion law, which would make it legal to terminate pregnancies up to 14 weeks, is the most famous and controversial part of this plan.

Abortion in Argentina is only allowed in the event of rape or if the pregnancy poses a risk to the mother’s health. In practice, doctors, especially in rural areas, are often reluctant to perform legal abortions for fear of legal repercussions.

According to a report by the Argentine Network for Access to Safe Abortion, at least 65 women died as a result of abortions between 2016 and 2018. During the same period, 7,262 girls between 10 and 14 years of age gave birth.

Argentina would have legalized abortion in 2018, despite loud protests from the churches and the Argentine Pope Francis. Mr Macri, who was president at the time, said he was against the measure but urged Allied lawmakers to choose their conscience.

Fernández contrasted sharply with his predecessor and conspicuously submitted the bill to Congress last month. He wore a striking green tie, the color representing efforts to legalize abortion.

“I am convinced that it is the responsibility of the state to look after the life and health of those who decide to terminate their pregnancy,” Fernández said in a video posted on Twitter.

In doing so, he fulfilled an election promise that some reproductive rights activists feared they would be lost in the face of the heavy toll the coronavirus and economic crisis have wreaked on Argentina. The bill was revealed when Mr. Fernández’s team struggled to renegotiate the $ 44 billion debt with the International Monetary Fund and reopen a paralyzed economy.

Political analysts saw the approval of the abortion law in the Argentine lower house of Congress, where most lawmakers clarified their position before the debate began, as a concluded agreement. The biggest hurdle for abortion lawyers will be in the Senate, where the measure narrowly failed in 2018 after strong resistance from the senators of the rural provinces, where the Roman Catholic and Protestant churches have a greater influence.

Despite the loss, massive mobilization ahead of the 2018 vote, especially by young women, has spurred a new generation of feminists in Argentina, who have taken to the streets in large numbers to advocate legal abortion and wider representation to use.

Legalizing abortion would meet one of the main demands of this movement and would bring Mr Fernández his biggest legislative victory, which would give further impetus to a national project that has already begun to transform Argentina.

Because the pandemic hit women particularly hard, making them the majority of the newly unemployed, Argentina led the way as the country that has taken the most gender-based measures to respond to the crisis, according to a United Nations Development Database.

“In Argentina, the pandemic has fully exposed the inequality between men and women,” said Mercedes D’Alessandro, who heads the gender equality department at the Ministry of Economic Affairs. “Even in such an unfavorable context, this agenda has evolved.”

Argentina’s increased focus on gender equality comes at a time when other countries in the region are also ensuring that women have a voice in government decisions.

In neighboring Chile, for example, voters approved a referendum in November to draft a new constitution, which also called for gender equality among delegates to the constitutional convention. This makes the country the first in the world to have a charter drawn up by equal numbers of men and women.

Yet few measures are likely to have such a regional impact as if Argentina legalized abortion together with Cuba, Uruguay and Guyana.

Categories
Business

British Pound Tumbles as Prospects Dim in Brexit Talks: Dwell Enterprise Updates

Folgendes müssen Sie wissen:

Anerkennung…Frank Augstein / Associated Press

Als sich Großbritannien einer weiteren neuen Frist nähert, um am Sonntag ein Handelsabkommen mit der Europäischen Union abzuschließen, schließt das Pfund seine schlechteste Woche seit drei Monaten ab. Gegenüber dem Euro ging es am Donnerstag deutlich tiefer und am Freitag weiter zurück, als die Händler mit der Aussicht zu kämpfen hatten, dass die britischen Handelsgespräche mit der Europäischen Union wirklich scheitern könnten.

„Die Märkte neigen dazu zu denken, solange sie reden, gibt es Hoffnung. Da war ich sehr vorsichtig “, sagte Jane Foley, Strategin bei der Rabobank. „Es gibt vielleicht keinen Deal, aber es wird Störungen geben, selbst wenn es einen Deal gibt. Und es wird politische Auseinandersetzungen geben. “

All das ist schlecht für die Währung.

In knapp drei Wochen endet die Brexit-Übergangsfrist, und wenn keine Einigung erzielt wird, wird Großbritannien gezwungen sein, Geschäfte mit seinem größten Handelspartner zu Bedingungen der Welthandelsorganisation zu tätigen, was bedeutet, dass Zölle auf Waren eingeführt werden und es weniger gibt Chance auf zukünftige Zusammenarbeit zwischen Dienstleistungsunternehmen. Bisher haben drei Themen – Fischereirechte, Wettbewerbsregeln für Unternehmen und die Durchsetzung eines Abkommens – die Gespräche zum Stillstand gebracht.

Premierminister Boris Johnson ging am Mittwochabend nach Brüssel, um zu speisen mit der Präsidentin der Europäischen Kommission, Ursula von der Leyen, um zu versuchen, die Sackgasse zu durchbrechen. Als das Fischdinner vorbei war, gab es Berichte, dass die Aussichten für einen Deal noch düsterer waren. Für Sonntag wurde eine neue Frist festgelegt.

Am Donnerstag legte die Europäische Kommission dann ihre Pläne vor, was sie tun würde, wenn es keine Einigung gäbe. Und Herr Johnson sagte, eine Vereinbarung sei “noch gar nicht da” und es bestehe die “starke Möglichkeit”, keine Einigung zu erzielen.

Der anhaltende Optimismus der Finanzmärkte wurde schon oft getestet. Unzählige Brexit-Fristen sind gekommen und gegangen. Diesmal besteht jedoch ernsthafte Besorgnis darüber, wie eine Einigung, falls eine Einigung erzielt wird, vor dem 1. Januar in das Gesetz ratifiziert werden könnte. Das britische Parlament bereitet Pläne für eine Arbeit bis Weihnachten vor, aber die Europäische Union wird es schwerer haben, 27 zu sammeln Nationen während der Ferienzeit.

Diese Woche war die schlimmste für das Pfund seit Anfang September, als Händler erschreckt wurden, dass Boris Johnson ein Handelsabkommen vereiteln würde, indem er ein neues Gesetz einführte, das mit dem EU-Rückzugsabkommen kollidierte und gegen internationales Recht verstieß.

Noch vor dem Ende der Übergangszeit erhielt Großbritannien einen Einblick in die Art der Störung, die auftritt, wenn der Handel nicht reibungslos läuft, als Honda diese Woche sein Montagewerk in England stilllegte, weil Teile während des Transports feststeckten.

Die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen weiterer Handelsstörungen im neuen Jahr nach Beginn der Zollkontrollen werden die britische Wirtschaft belasten Versuch, eine Erholung während einer zweiten Welle der Pandemie herauszukratzen. Daten vom Donnerstag zeigten, dass das Bruttoinlandsprodukt im Oktober um 0,4 Prozent stieg, eine Verlangsamung, bevor England im November eine monatelange Sperrung durchführte.

Die Berater von Mitch McConnell, dem Mehrheitsführer des Senats, sagten, ein parteiübergreifendes Pandemie-Hilfspaket habe bei vielen republikanischen Gesetzgebern keine Unterstützung gefunden. Anerkennung…Anna Moneymaker für die New York Times

  • Die Aktien fielen am Freitag weltweit und Futures deuteten darauf hin, dass der S & P 500-Index um 1 Prozent niedriger öffnen würde, da sich die Anleger von riskanten Vermögenswerten fernhielten, obwohl bekannt wurde, dass die USA den Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoff wahrscheinlich innerhalb weniger Tage genehmigen würden. Stattdessen stehen Händler vor der Aussicht auf einen Brexit ohne Deal und monatelange wirtschaftliche Schwierigkeiten, da die Länder immer noch Schwierigkeiten haben, das Virus einzudämmen.

  • Der Stoxx Europe 600 Index fiel um 1,3 Prozent. Der FTSE 100-Index in Großbritannien fiel um 1,1 Prozent, der CAC in Frankreich um 1,3 Prozent und der DAX in Deutschland um 2 Prozent. In Asien schloss der Shanghai Composite Index um 0,8 Prozent und der Nikkei 225 in Japan um 0,4 Prozent.

  • Der S & P 500 Index ist auf dem richtigen Weg, um zwei Wochen lang Gewinne zu erzielen. Als die Märkte am Donnerstag schlossen, war der US-Referenzindex diese Woche bisher um 0,8 Prozent gefallen.

  • Die Ölpreise fielen am Freitag ebenfalls und zogen sich von einer Rallye am Vortag zurück, als die Preise auf den höchsten Stand seit März stiegen. Die Futures von West Texas Intermediate, der US-Benchmark, gingen um 0,5 Prozent auf 46,57 USD pro Barrel zurück.

  • Stattdessen kauften Händler traditionell sichere Vermögenswerte wie Staatsanleihen. Die Rendite 10-jähriger US-Staatsanleihen fiel diese Woche um 8 Basispunkte oder 0,08 Prozentpunkte, am stärksten seit Juni. Die Renditen bewegen sich umgekehrt zu den Preisen.

  • Der britische Premierminister Boris Johnson und die Präsidentin der Europäischen Kommission, Ursula von der Leyen, sagten beide, es sei wahrscheinlicher, dass Großbritannien und die Europäische Union bis Ende des Jahres keine Einigung über den Freihandel erzielen würden. Die Gespräche werden voraussichtlich über das Wochenende fortgesetzt.

  • In den Vereinigten Staaten wurden die Hoffnungen auf eine Einigung über neue fiskalische Anreize vor den Kongresspausen verringert. Am Donnerstag gaben Berater des republikanischen Mehrheitsführers Senator Mitch McConnell an, dass viele Republikaner einem überparteilichen Paket, das sich herausgebildet hatte, nicht zustimmen würden. Am selben Tag zeigten Daten, dass letzte Woche mehr als 947.000 Menschen Arbeitslosengeld beantragt haben, ein Sprung gegenüber der Vorwoche.

Da die wirtschaftliche Erholung ins Stocken gerät und die Bundeshilfe in Washington ins Stocken gerät, versuchen die Regierungen der Bundesstaaten, kleinen Unternehmen zu helfen, den Pandemiewinter zu überstehen.

Der Gesetzgeber von Colorado hat letzte Woche eine Sondersitzung abgehalten, um ein wirtschaftliches Hilfspaket zu verabschieden. Ohio bietet eine neue Runde von Zuschüssen für Restaurants, Bars und andere von der Pandemie betroffene Unternehmen an. Und in Kalifornien wird ein neuer Fonds staatliche Gelder verwenden, um private Kredite in Höhe von Hunderten von Millionen Dollar zu stoppen. Andere Staaten, angeführt von Republikanern und Demokraten, haben ähnliche Maßnahmen angekündigt oder erwägen diese.

Die Bemühungen kommen, da sich viele Unternehmen in einer zunehmend schwierigen Situation befinden, berichtet Ben Casselman von der New York Times.

Eine Umfrage der National Federation of Independent Business am Dienstag ergab, dass der Optimismus sinkt und die Unsicherheit steigt, da der landesweite Anstieg der Coronavirus-Fälle die Regierungen dazu veranlasst, Beschränkungen wieder einzuführen, und die Verbraucher, ihre Ausgaben zu reduzieren. Separate Daten des Census Bureau zeigen, dass immer mehr kleine Unternehmen Arbeitsplätze abbauen, und andere Umfragen haben ergeben, dass eine große Anzahl von Unternehmen vom Scheitern bedroht ist.

In diesem Fall könnte dies sowohl für die Volkswirtschaften als auch für die Staatshaushalte eine Katastrophe sein. Lokale Unternehmen sind wichtige Steuereinnahmequellen – sowohl direkt als auch über ihre Mitarbeiter – und wichtige Triebkräfte für die Wirtschaftstätigkeit. Wenn sie in großer Zahl scheitern, wird dies die wirtschaftliche Erholung verlangsamen, sobald die Pandemie vorbei ist.

  • Lululemon meldete am Donnerstag für das dritte Quartal einen Umsatz von 1,1 Milliarden US-Dollar, ein Plus von 22 Prozent gegenüber dem Vorjahr, da Käufer Leggings und andere Trainingsgeräte kauften, um bei der Arbeit von zu Hause aus bequem und in Form zu bleiben. In Nordamerika stieg der Nettoumsatz um 19 Prozent. Der direkte Umsatz mit Verbrauchern – einschließlich Online-Verkäufen – stieg um 94 Prozent.

  • Walmart bereitet mehr als 5.000 seiner Geschäfte darauf vor, Impfstoffdosen zu erhalten, damit sie bereit sind, die Aufnahmen zu verteilen, sobald sie die behördliche Genehmigung erhalten und verfügbar sind. Der Einzelhändler sagte in einer Erklärung am Donnerstag, dass er sicherstellen würde, dass genügend Gefrierschränke und Trockeneis vorhanden sind, um den Impfstoff zu lagern, und sich darauf vorbereite, den Impfstoff über seine Walmart- und Sam’s Club-Geschäfte sowie in Langzeitpflegeeinrichtungen wie Pflegeheimen zu verteilen. Das Unternehmen wird sich bei der Ausrichtung seiner Vertriebsanstrengungen auf die Regierungen der Bundesstaaten verlassen.

Die New Yorker Generalstaatsanwältin Letitia James hat am Mittwoch die Klagen gegen Facebook angekündigt.  Einige Rechtsexperten sagten, die Fälle seien weit entfernt von einem Slam Dunk.Anerkennung…über die Generalstaatsanwaltschaft von New York

Die US-Regierung und mehr als 40 Staaten verklagten Facebook am Mittwoch wegen illegaler Vernichtung von Wettbewerbern und forderten das Unternehmen auf, die Akquisitionen von Instagram und WhatsApp rückgängig zu machen.

Hier sind fünf wichtige Fragen zum Fall beantwortet:

Es gibt einen rechtlichen Grund, warum Instagram und WhatsApp im Mittelpunkt der staatlichen und bundesstaatlichen Klagen stehen. Der Versuch, den Wettbewerb durch den Kauf von Konkurrenten zu verringern, verstößt ausdrücklich gegen die amerikanischen Kartellgesetze. Genau das sagen Regierungsanwälte, Facebook habe es getan und werde es auch weiterhin tun.

Das Schwierige ist jedoch, dass die Regierung Facebook in den Jahren 2012 und 2014 die Erlaubnis zum Kauf von Instagram und WhatsApp erteilt hat. Facebook argumentiert, dass es für Regierungsbeamte unfair ist, jetzt eine Überarbeitung zu versuchen, und dass Facebook Instagram und WhatsApp besser gemacht hat als Sie hätten alleine sein können.

Die Beilegung solcher Klagen kann Jahre dauern. Ihre Erfahrung mit Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp oder Messenger wird morgen nicht plötzlich anders sein.

Die unmittelbareren Auswirkungen dieses Rechtsstreits könnten subtile Änderungen an diesen sozialen Apps sein, da Facebook ein Auge auf seine Gerichtsverfahren hat.

Facebook arbeitet bereits daran, dass Messaging-Funktionen in mehreren Apps hinter den Kulissen nahtloser miteinander verschmelzen, was eine Trennung erschweren könnte. Es ist auch möglich, dass Facebook Neuerwerbungen zurückhält oder Funktionen in der Entwicklung ändert, um die rechtlichen Argumente des Unternehmens nicht zu verletzen.

In einem Interview im vergangenen Jahr sagte Bill Gates, dass das Windows seines Unternehmens – und nicht Googles Android – das beliebteste Smartphone-System der Welt gewesen sein könnte, wenn Microsoft nicht von den 1998 eingeleiteten Kartellverfahren der Regierung „abgelenkt“ worden wäre. Gates spiegelte eine gemeinsame Ansicht der Unternehmensleiter der Zeit wider, dass die Klagen Microsoft vorsichtiger machten und das Unternehmen infolgedessen die Chance verpasste, neue Wege zu gehen.

Es ist möglich, dass Facebook sein Verhalten ändert, weil es durch Gerichtsverfahren festgefahren ist oder sich Sorgen macht, wie Mobber auszusehen.

Die Regierung verklagt Facebook nach Jahren, in denen sie ihre Macht nicht eingeschränkt hat und weil es jetzt einen politischen Willen dazu gibt.

Die Federal Trade Commission ist dieselbe Regierungsbehörde, die im vergangenen Jahr angeprangert wurde, weil sie eine überschaubare Geldbuße von Facebook abgezogen hatte und Änderungen der Datenschutzrichtlinien im Unternehmen mit ungewissen Vorteilen für diejenigen von uns forderte, die die Apps des Unternehmens nutzen. Dieselbe Agentur genehmigte die Akquisitionen von Instagram und WhatsApp.

Was sich jetzt ändert, ist, dass gewählte Beamte und andere Regierungsmitglieder in ihrer Frustration über Amerikas Tech-Supermächte vereint sind und eher bereit sind, umfassende Änderungen zu fordern.

Menschen, die diese Unternehmen, das Internet und die amerikanische Wirtschaft verändern wollen, sehen Kartellklagen manchmal als allgemeine Lösung an. Aber Kartellfälle werden, selbst wenn sie erfolgreich sind, nicht unbedingt all die verschiedenen und manchmal inkonsistenten Beschwerden behandeln, die viele Menschen haben.

Egal, was mit dem Facebook-Fall passiert, es gibt kein Zurück zu unbeschwerteren Zeiten für die Technologiegiganten. In Hauptstädten der Welt, in Gerichtssälen und in der Öffentlichkeit kämpfen wir mit dem, was es für eine Handvoll reicher Technologieunternehmen bedeutet, unser Leben, unsere Wahlen, unsere Wirtschaft und unseren Geist zu beeinflussen.

Categories
Health

It’s Not Simply You: Selecting a Well being Insurance coverage Plan Is Actually Exhausting

“People want advice, they want leadership,” said Lang. “And it’s pretty hard.”

The people who are most likely to make bad decisions seem to be the least likely to be able to afford them. A recent study in the Netherlands, which offers insurance to everyone through an Obamacare-like market, found that only 5 percent of Dutch customers did a better job choosing an ideal plan than choosing a plan randomly. And the people in that top 5 percent usually had college degrees and jobs in technical fields. People with lower education and incomes, who tend to be in poorer health, are very likely to opt for a plan that costs them more to cover their health care – a situation where they may save on the drugs or procedures they need.

But well-trained Dutch specialists also had problems. People who worked in the insurance industry with an advanced degree made good choices about 30 percent of the time. And only about 40 percent of trained statisticians – the best performing group – chose good plans for their needs.

In the United States, a working paper found that many professionals who help people choose health insurance are also poor at choosing plans and far worse than a computer algorithm.

“These people who are supposed to get the market going can’t do that at all,” said Jonathan Kolstad, associate professor of economics at the University of California at Berkeley, who co-authored both studies. Professor Kolstad said the work made him rethink why we value the health insurance markets so highly when they are so difficult to use.

Choosing a plan is difficult, but a few simple guidelines can help a little. It is helpful to know if a particular plan covers the doctors and hospitals you use, for example. And if you’re willing to take more financial risks, you may prefer a plan with a higher deductible and lower premiums. As you evaluate more predictable expenses, a lower deductible plan may work better. However, actual health needs and insurance fine print vary so widely that these guides can mislead you. The literature shows that it is not uncommon for people to choose a plan during the year that costs them $ 1,000 more than the best plan.

Most plan selection research deals with the financial design of the plan. Researchers can look at the options, see what health services people end up using, and see the total cost of various decisions. This approach leaves out some other elements of health plans, such as the choice of doctors or whether the company provides good customer service. The study of brokers found that people whose plan selection was aided by the computer program were less likely to switch plans over the next year than people who followed the broker’s advice unaided, a sign that they were more satisfied with the overall package .

But what is the alternative to choosing? Amanda Starc, a professor of management at Northwestern University, said there was evidence that people really wanted things other than health insurance. About a third of those 65 and over are currently enrolled on Medicare Advantage private plans. That proportion is large enough to indicate that many would just be less satisfied with their choice of state Medicare.

Categories
Business

AstraZeneca to work on vaccine with Russia’s Gamaleya

A laboratory technician oversees the filling and packaging tests for the large-scale manufacture and delivery of the Oxford University’s COVID-19 vaccine candidate AZD1222, which was conducted on a high-capacity aseptic vial filling line in Catalent, Anagni, Italy on September 11, 2020.

Vincenzo Pinto | AFP | Getty Images

LONDON – British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca said Friday it would soon be working with Russia’s Gamaleya Institute to investigate whether the two coronavirus vaccine candidates could be successfully combined.

After the developers of the Sputnik V Covid-19 vaccine reached out to AstraZeneca on Twitter late last month, they asked if they should try combining the two cold virus-based vaccines to increase effectiveness.

“The ability to combine different COVID-19 vaccines can be helpful to improve protection and / or accessibility of vaccines. Therefore, it is important to study different vaccine combinations to make vaccination programs more flexible and to allow doctors more choice at the time of vaccine administration, “AstraZeneca said in a statement Friday.

“It is also likely that combining vaccines over a longer period of time will result in improved immunity,” he added.

AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine, made in partnership with Oxford University, is one of several looking to seek drug regulatory approval as hopes of a mass vaccination campaign to end the pandemic grow.

To date, more than 69 million people worldwide have contracted the coronavirus, with 1.58 million deaths, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.

Data published this week in The Lancet Medical Journal showed AstraZeneca’s vaccine had an average efficacy of 70.4%, based on the summary of interim data from late-stage clinical trials. The vaccine was also found to be safe and effective.

Russia has claimed Sputnik V is over 90% effective in preventing people from contracting the virus, citing preliminary results from ongoing studies.

“New level of cooperation”

The Russian direct investment fund, Russia’s sovereign wealth fund that financed the development of Sputnik V, said clinical trials of AstraZeneca’s vaccine, combined with its own, would begin by the end of the month.

“AstraZeneca’s decision to conduct clinical trials with one of two Sputnik V vectors to increase the effectiveness of its own vaccine is an important step in uniting efforts to combat the pandemic,” said Kirill Dmitriev, CEO of Russian direct investment fund said in a statement.

“We welcome the start of this new phase of collaboration between vaccine manufacturers. We are determined to expand this partnership in the future and begin joint production after the new vaccine has proven its effectiveness in clinical trials,” said Dmitriev.

The Editor in Chief of The Lancet, Dr. Richard Horton told CNBC on Wednesday that AstraZeneca’s vaccine had “a marked comparative advantage” over other leading candidates. He also claimed it was the one who could immunize the world “more effectively” and “faster” than their counterparts.

AstraZeneca’s vaccine is a viral vector vaccine based on a weakened version of the common cold virus that causes infections in chimpanzees. It is designed to prepare the immune system to attack the coronavirus known as SARS-CoV-2 when it later infects the body.

Categories
Entertainment

Piano Bars and Jazz Golf equipment Reopen, Calling Reside Music ‘Incidental’

Although most indoor live performances in New York have been banned since the deadly spread of the coronavirus began in March, about a dozen people showed up at Birdland, the jazz club near Times Square, for a 7 p.m. performance on Wednesday night Live jazz was billed for dinner. They had reservations.

Among them was Tricia Tait, 63, from Manhattan, who came for the band, led by tuba player David Ostwald, who plays the music of Louis Armstrong. Until the pandemic, it had played on Birdland most Wednesdays. She admitted having health concerns “in the back of your mind” but said, “Sometimes you just have to take risks and enjoy things.”

As the daily number of new coronavirus cases in New York City has risen to levels not seen since April, face-to-face learning in public middle and high schools has been suspended, and Governor Andrew M. Cuomo warned this week not to allow indoors dine It could soon be banned in the city. Birdland and a number of other well-known jazz clubs and piano bars across town are once again offering quietly live performances, arguing that the music they are presenting is “random” and therefore will be allowed by the pandemic. Era guidelines set by the State Liquor Authority.

These guidelines state that “only random music is allowed at this time” and that “advertised and / or ticket shows are not allowed”. They continue: “Music should be part of the culinary experience, not the draw.”

That hasn’t stopped a number of New York City venues better known for their performances than their cuisine – including Birdland, the Blue Note, and Marie’s Crisis Cafe, a West Village piano bar that reopened on Monday with a show tune after she declared herself to be the establishment – from offering live music again.

“We think it’s coincidental,” said Ryan Paternite, Birdland’s program and media director, of its calendar of events, which includes a marching band and a jazz quartet. “It’s background music. That’s the rule. “

The rules have been challenged in court. After Michael Hund, a guitarist from Buffalo, filed a lawsuit against her in August, a US District Court judge in New York’s western district issued an injunction last month preventing the state from enforcing its ban on advertised and ticketed Enforce shows. “The minor music rule prohibits one type of live music and allows another,” wrote Judge John L. Sinatra Jr. in his November 13 ruling. “This distinction is arbitrary.”

The state appeals the judgment.

“Science recognizes that mass gatherings can easily become super-spreader events, and it cannot be overlooked that companies would seek to undermine tried and tested public health rules like these as infections, hospitalizations and deaths continue to rise “said William Crowley, a spokesman for the alcohol authority, said Thursday. He noted that a federal judge in New York City had ruled in another case that the restrictions were constitutional. He said the state will “continue to vigorously defend our ability to fight this pandemic if it is challenged”.

However, it is unclear what exactly “random” music means. Does that mean a guitarist in the corner? A six-piece jazz band like the one that played at Birdland on Wednesday night? The Harlem Gospel Choir, who will perform at Blue Note on Christmas Day? Mr Crowley on Thursday did not respond to questions seeking clarity or what enforcement action the state has taken.

Robert Bookman, an attorney who represents a number of New York City’s live music venues, said the venues interpreted the judgment as allowing them to advertise and sell tickets to occasional music performances during dinner.

Hence, the venues have carefully chosen their words. They take dinner reservations and announce line-up calendars for what Mr. Paternite of Birdland calls “background music during dinner.” Unlike Mac’s public house, the Staten Island Bar, which declared itself an autonomous zone and was recently ridiculed on Saturday Night Live, they have no interest in openly disregarding regulations.

Mr Paternite said that after laying off nearly all 60 employees in March, Birdland is now returning to what he calls the “skeletal staff” of about 10 people.

“It is a big risk for us to be open,” he said. “And it only pays in a cent. But it helps us with our arrangement with our landlord because in order to pay our rent over time and keep our utilities and taxes updated we need to stay open. But we lose huge amounts every day. “

If the venues don’t reopen now, he fears they may never do so. Jazz Standard, a popular 130-seat club on East 27th Street in Manhattan, announced last week that it would be permanently closed due to the pandemic. Arlene’s Grocery, a club in the Lower East Side where the Strokes took place before they became known, said it was “life sustaining” and had to close on February 1 without assistance.

Randy Taylor, the bartender and manager of Marie’s Crisis Cafe, said the last time the piano bar served food was likely in the 1970s – or maybe earlier. “There is a very old kitchen that is completely disconnected upstairs,” he said. Dining options are extremely limited: there are currently $ 4 bowls of chips and salsa on offer. “We have to sell them,” he said. “We can’t just give them away.”

Steven Bensusan, the president of Blue Note Entertainment Group, said he hoped the state doesn’t move to stop eating indoors.

“I know the cases are sharp,” he said. “But we’re doing our best to keep people safe, and I hope we can stay open. We won’t be profitable, but we have the opportunity to give work to some people who have been with us for a long time. “

The clubs said they are taking precautions. In the Blue Note, which reopened on November 27th, the tables that were previously divided are now two meters apart and separated from one another by plexiglass barriers. The two nightly seats for dinner are each limited to 25 percent or about 50 people. At Marie’s Crisis Cafe, where masked pianist Alexander Barylski sat behind a clear screen on Wednesday night as he led a cheering group choir from “Frosty the Snowman,” Taylor said the tables were separated by plastic barriers and that the venue conducted temperature tests and collected contact tracking information at the door.

Marie’s Crisis Cafe had streamed live on Instagram and his Facebook group page, but Mr. Taylor said it wasn’t the same. On Wednesday night, 10 customers strapped Christmas music through masks, some having had their first drinks at a venue since March.

“There were some tears,” said Mr. Taylor. “People really missed us. We can’t see their smiles through their masks, but their eyes say it all. “

Categories
Politics

States Overpaid Unemployment Advantages and Need Cash Again

Unemployment payments that looked like a lifeline could now become their ruin for many.

Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federal program that covers gig workers, part-time workers, seasonal workers, and others who are not eligible for traditional unemployment benefits, has kept millions afloat. Established by Congress in March under the CARES bill, the program has provided over $ 70 billion in aid.

In implementing the hastily designed program, states overpaid hundreds of thousands of workers – often due to administrative errors. Now the states are demanding this money back.

The notices come out of the blue and contain instructions on how to repay thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars. Those who are billed and already living on the fringes are told that their benefits will be cut to make up for the errors – or that the state can even put a lien on their home, come after future wages, or withhold tax refunds.

Many who have collected payments are still unemployed and may have little chance of getting one. Most of them had no idea they were being overpaid.

“When someone receives a bill like this, it terrifies them,” said Michele Evermore, senior policy analyst for the National Employment Law Project, a not-for-profit labor rights group. Sometimes the letters themselves are flawed – citing overpayments when the benefits are properly paid – but either way, she said, the stress will “cost people’s lives”.

The hastily designed Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program has raised other issues, including widespread fraud programs and processing challenges. As a result, states only recently had sufficient resources to send out overpayment notifications. In the meantime, people have sometimes raised thousands of dollars and spent what they have understood to be legitimate benefits.

Olive Stewart, a 56-year-old immigrant from Jamaica, worked part-time as a sous-chef in a cafeteria at a Jewish school in Philadelphia, earning about $ 16 an hour for about 25 hours a week. But when the pandemic hit and schools closed, she was fired.

Ms. Stewart applied for pandemic unemployment benefits and was paid $ 234 per week. It wasn’t enough to cover the rent of $ 650, utility bill of $ 200, and internet bill of $ 200 for the house she shares with her 12-year-old daughter, retired mother, and sister who has a disability that prevents them from working. To make ends meet, Ms. Stewart began delving into her savings.

Then on October 6, she received a message that Pennsylvania unemployment insurance company Geographic Solutions had accidentally overpaid her. The overpayment included funds from the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance and a $ 600 grant to unemployment insurance. In total, she was told, she would have to repay nearly $ 8,000.

To collect the debt, the state began withholding more than half of her unemployment benefits, leaving her with only $ 105 a week. In early November, the state began to take all of her unemployment benefits so she had no income. She has not yet paid her December rent.

“The state should be careful about what they send out,” Ms. Stewart said. “It was her mistake, and I’ve already spent all the money on food and rent. How am I supposed to pay it back? “

Geographic Solutions made double payments for 30,000 claims in Pennsylvania because of a system problem, a $ 280 million error, the State Department of Labor and Industry said. (The company states the problem was due to a one-day error that was reported immediately.) Overpayments can also occur when a claimant makes a mistake on a form, as reported by ProPublica, or when a state determines that a recipient is shouldn’t be justified.

By September 30, approximately 27 percent of those eligible for Ohio Pandemic Unemployment Assistance had been overpaid, approximately 162,000 claims. In mid-November there were about 29,000 in Colorado; in Texas there were over 41,000.

Many states forego regular unemployment insurance overpayments if there is no fraud or if someone would have significant difficulty paying back the money. However, federal regulations on pandemic unemployment assistance prohibit forgiveness. Even if the status is incorrect, the recipient is on the hook.

States often automatically begin collecting the overpayment by withholding a portion – from 30 to 100 percent – of future unemployment benefit payments.

Many overpayments have arisen because state unemployment schemes are designed to calculate benefits using W-2 forms, employer records, pay slips, and other documents related to traditional jobs. With gig workers and part-time workers having different documentation, states had to quickly adapt to a new way of processing and approving claims.

Adoption errors are inevitable, said Behnaz Mansouri, senior attorney for the Unemployment Law Project, a nonprofit legal aid organization in Seattle.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Apr. 10, 2020, 4:09 pm ET

“For a new system to have such a punitive reaction when the system itself fails seems too harsh and draconian,” said Ms. Mansouri.

29-year-old Gina Jones was on leave in March from her part-time job at a breakfast bar at a Quality Inn in Spokane, Washington, and was paid $ 750 a week from the pandemic program, which allowed her to pay rent, food, and necessities for her two daughters Ages 1 and 5. She was called back to work in July and now works about 28 hours a week for $ 13.50 an hour.

Then in mid-November, she checked her unemployment portal online and saw a message that she had been overpaid by nearly $ 12,500. She fears that the state will garnish her wages to collect the debt.

“I’ve already used this money to support my family,” said Ms. Jones. “It’s all gone and I can’t afford to pay it back.”

Demanding unemployment benefits can undermine the aim of the unemployment system to stabilize the economy, said Philip Spesshardt, branch manager of benefit services for the Colorado Division of Unemployment Insurance.

When a person’s unemployment checks are reduced each week due to an overpayment, the recipient has less cash to pay bills and patronize local businesses. “Ultimately, this has a cascading effect on many of these small businesses, causing them to close permanently and further increase the unemployment rate,” said Spesshardt.

While overpayments cannot be waived under the federal program, applicants can apply for reimbursement after notification has been issued. However, the deadline for appeal can only be seven days. After that, the process can be slow, confusing, and cumbersome.

Colorado has taken steps to address the reimbursement difficulty. After discovering the large number of overpayments in October, the state found that the application form was confusing as it did not specify whether the person being submitted should be providing gross or net income. It was decided to write off cases where the recipients had submitted income and tax documents that could be used to calculate the correct benefit.

When asked how the policy was compatible with the federal ban on forgiveness, a Colorado Department of Labor and Employment spokeswoman cited “the administrative burden it would put on us to collect these overpayments on competing priorities.”

House Democrats have called for renewed pandemic aid to include a provision that will allow states to forego overpayments if workers cannot repay them without great difficulty. The provision would apply to past and future cases. A separate house bill with cross-party sponsorship provides for forgiveness if the overpayment is not the fault of the recipient and “such repayment would run counter to justice and a good conscience”.

But the possibility of a remedy is of no great comfort to those who are wondering how they are going to pay rent and put food on the table in the meantime.

William and Diana Villafana, 55 and 34, who operated a car rental company in Henderson, Nevada prior to the pandemic, learned in late October that they had been overpaid by more than $ 7,000 between them. To cover this debt, the state is taking full advantage of Mr. Villafana and giving Ms. Villafana $ 73 per week. They use credit cards for their $ 2,000 monthly rent as well as utilities, groceries, and other necessities.

“I don’t think they understand that unemployment benefits are vital,” said Villafana. “Or if they understand, they don’t care.”

Mr. Villafana is concerned about how he will continue to care for her son and daughter aged 6 and 7. When his daughter recently asked for a brush set and an easel, he didn’t know what to tell her.

“It’s pretty hard to tell them,” Look, you can’t “or” I can’t buy this for you, “he said,” I have no idea what we’re going to do with Christmas. “

Sheelagh McNeill contributed to the research.

Categories
Health

Dr. Fauci says Covid vaccine trials on pregnant ladies and younger children might start in January

Drug makers and U.S. regulators plan to start clinical trials in January testing the safety of Covid-19 vaccines in pregnant women and young children, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases.

These two groups were excluded from the initial clinical trials of Covid-19 vaccines until researchers were able to determine that the vaccine was relatively safe in healthy adults before testing in more susceptible populations.

Fauci noted on Thursday in a discussion sponsored by Columbia University on Thursday that pregnant women have not been included in clinical trials of Covid vaccines. It is not clear whether the omission means that pregnant women cannot receive an approved vaccine until further safety data are collected.

Studies on pregnant women will be done in later studies, he said.

“It won’t necessarily concern efficacy, but we will be investigating safety and immunogenicity to bridge efficacy in the adult non-pregnant population,” he said at Columbia University’s Grand Rounds 2020 event. “The same goes for the pediatric population. These studies are expected to begin in mid-to-late January.”

Doctors have noted an increased risk of complications in pregnant women who contract Covid-19, said Aron Hall, chief of Covid at the CDC.

“The first indication is that there may be a higher risk of premature delivery,” he said Thursday on the FDA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Related Biological Products.

While young children are less likely to die of Covid-19 when they get it, there is an increased risk of developing what is known as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, or MIS-C, researchers have found. It is an inflammatory disease that can affect several organ systems throughout the body, including the heart, lungs, and brain.

Fauci’s comments came as the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory Board is weighing whether to recommend Pfizer’s emergency approval of the Covid vaccine.

Data on Pfizer’s vaccine has shown it to be remarkably effective in preventing disease among study participants, and the FDA is expected to approve emergency use as early as Friday.

The UK drug and health products regulator, which last week approved Pfizer’s vaccine for wide use in adults, warned against giving it to pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Dr. Doran Fink, associate director of the FDA’s vaccines and related products division, said Thursday there was “very limited data on use in pregnancy”.

“We recognize that among the groups first prioritized for vaccine use under an EEA, there will be many women of childbearing potential, including women who are knowingly or unknowingly pregnant,” he said on the Meet on Thursday afternoon. “We really do not have any data that suggest any specific risks to pregnant women or the fetus, but neither do we have any data that would justify a contraindication to use in pregnancy at this time.”

He added that pregnant women and women of childbearing age are “free to make their own choice” under what is known as an emergency permit.

The FDA advised manufacturers, including Pfizer, to conduct DART studies or developmental and reproductive toxicity studies before including pregnant women and “women of childbearing potential who do not actively avoid pregnancy” in vaccine studies, Pfizer said – Speaker Jerica Pitts CNBC. DART studies are done in animals to assess the potential risks of a vaccine to a developing fetus.

“Pfizer recognizes that the development of a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for wide use is critical to halting the pandemic, including potential use in pregnant women,” Pitts said in a statement. “Pfizer is currently conducting DART studies and plans to provide available data to the agency.”

Pfizer admitted at the FDA’s vaccine meeting Thursday that according to a presentation there was no information about the effects of the vaccine on pregnant women. Company officials told the advisory board that they expected preliminary results from its DART studies by mid-December.

The company also noted that there is also a lack of information on the effects of the vaccine in children and adolescents under the age of 16. The FDA advisory panel will vote on its non-binding recommendation later Thursday, and the FDA is expected to do so soon.

– CNBC’s Amanda Macias contributed to this report.

Categories
Business

Midtown Is Reeling. Ought to Its Workplaces Change into Residences?

The pandemic hits New York City’s commercial real estate industry, one of its major economic engines, and threatens the future of the nation’s largest business districts as well as the city’s finances.

The damage caused by the emptying of office towers and the permanent closure of many stores is far more significant than many experts predicted at the beginning of the crisis.

The powerful real estate industry is so concerned that the changes in work culture caused by the outbreak are permanent that it is advocating a flashy proposal: convert more than a million square feet of Manhattan office space into housing.

Nearly 14 percent of Midtown Manhattan office space is empty, the highest rate since 2009. On Madison Avenue in Midtown, one of the wealthiest retail areas in the country, more than a third of all retail space is empty, twice as much as five years earlier.

The commercial real estate collapse is another major drag on New York as the industry generates a significant portion of the city’s tax revenue.

Applications for new buildings in the city, a key indicator of industry confidence, are down 22 percent this year to 1,187, the lowest number since 2010.

According to a survey by the Partnership for New York City, an influential group of companies, only 10 percent of the one million office workers in Manhattan were in the office at the end of October.

And that already grim picture could get worse, said real estate experts and industry executives.

“It would probably be fair to say we haven’t bottomed out yet,” said James Whelan, president of New York’s Real Estate Board.

It doesn’t seem like the city’s major commercial landlords are facing a financial collapse, but the shares of those that are publicly traded have fallen sharply since March.

The aftermath of the crisis has been seen in an increasing number of legal disputes between landlords and tenants, even at some of New York’s best-gilded addresses.

In stores on Columbus Circle, a luxury mall overlooking Central Park, the developer has accused a group of high-end retailers, including Michael Kors and Hugo Boss, of more than $ 7 million in rents and fees to have renounced. On Fifth Avenue, Italian designer Valentino has sued his landlord to get rid of a nearly $ 1.6 million a month lease.

New York City’s finances – money to pick up trash, repair parks and police streets – depend heavily on the health of the industry.

Property taxes are the city’s largest source of income, and commercial real estate accounts for the largest portion of that total tax, at 41 percent, according to Thomas P. DiNapoli, state auditor.

Commercial property sales fell nearly 50 percent through October, according to Rahul Jain, an assistant state auditor.

A weakened commercial real estate market will “make it much harder for businesses and the economy to get back to normal,” DiNapoli said.

The labor shortage affects rents. In all of Manhattan’s retail corridors, the required commercial rents have fallen by almost 13 percent year-on-year, according to CBRE, a commercial real estate company. The largest declines have been seen in areas dominated by office buildings like Times Square and Grand Central Terminal, as well as in shopping destinations like SoHo.

The problems in the industry, originally sparked by the brain drain during state home assignments in the spring, persisted as many commuters opted for long-term or permanent remote working arrangements. The tourists have also largely disappeared.

As a result, tensions are mounting between the city’s powerful landlords and some of its equally powerful tenants. Homeowners have accused blue-chip companies of using the pandemic to withhold rent they can afford, while tenants have portrayed landlords as greedy and unwilling to acknowledge the economic reality.

“It’s not easy, but we have to make sacrifices and landlords have to make sacrifices,” said Lawrence Berger, chairman of FanzzLids Holdings, which owns Lids, a sports headwear store whose flagship store is in Times Square.

The store was sued for more than $ 511,000 in unpaid rents and fees in four other Manhattan stores that were closed for months.

“The amazing thing for us is that they are looking for times in New York when we were not allowed to be open,” said Berger. “We have contracts with our landlords across the country except New York City.”

Landlords like Related, who owns the Columbus Circle stores and sued five of their tenants there, say they have their own financial obligations and should pay renters who can afford rent.

The litigation does not capture the behind-the-scenes negotiations that resulted in resolutions without going to court, said William H. Mack, a corporate attorney at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron in New York.

Mr. Mack was hired by Hugo Boss to reduce or nullify his Columbus Circle lease. “That’s 80 to 90 percent of what I’ve been doing since March and April,” he said.

The New York Real Estate Board, whose members include almost all of New York’s major landlords and developers, has the prospect of systemic changes in work habits.

“Anyone who believes that the way people have used the workplace in the past will not change the post-pandemic is mistaking themselves,” said Scott Rechler, chairman of the Regional Plan Association and chief executive officer of RXR Realty, April 26 Millions of square meters of office space controlled by the city.

Employers have found that if there is no shared workspace, productivity does not necessarily suffer, and that smaller office space and milder work-from-home policies may make long-term economic sense.

As a result, the rental group is suggesting that the city and state allow developers to more easily convert offices in Manhattan and the boroughs into apartment buildings.

Updated

Dec. 11, 2020, 1:25 p.m. ET

According to Cushman and Wakefield, a real estate agent, around 140 million of the 400 million square feet of office space in Manhattan is of average quality or is in older and less luxurious buildings. The real estate authority estimates the city-wide supply of these buildings at around 210 million square meters.

The real estate group estimates that converting just 10 percent of that office space into residential buildings would create 14,000 homes across the city, including up to 10,000 in Manhattan – a significant amount in a city that is routinely lacking in housing, in particular affordable housing.

Changes to zoning rules required for remodeling would require some of the new housing to be classified as affordable, the board said.

Mark A. Willis, Senior Policy Fellow at New York University’s Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, said pre-pandemic employment growth outpaced housing growth in the city, causing demand to far outstrip supply and the persistent housing conditions in the city exacerbated shortages.

“Facilitating the reuse of buildings to adapt to changes in the economy is a very smart idea for me,” said Willis.

Some tenants are taking advantage of the current downturn – and the resulting lower prices per square foot – to trade in for nicer office space, the board said. This is a boon for high-end office landlords, but it could be bad for landlords of lower-rated buildings.

Converting office buildings into apartment buildings would not only provide a potential financial lifeline for landlords, but also benefit retailers, argues the real estate agency, as the presence of office users during the day and apartment residents at night would increase pedestrian traffic.

There is no reason for Midtown to maintain its status as New York’s last predominantly office district, bustling during the day and quieter at night.

They cite the success of Lower Manhattan, which has developed from an almost exclusively office district to a vibrant residential area in the last few decades.

The proposal would require changes to zoning and density rules, which would need to be approved by the city council and state legislature and adopted by the mayor and governor.

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo’s office would only say he was reviewing the idea.

A spokesman for Mayor Bill de Blasio, who is on a temporary basis and is about to enter his final year in office, welcomed the apartment proposal.

“The town hall is always looking for sensible and just ways to create more living space,” said the spokesman, Bill Neidhardt.

Converting office space into apartments is not easy, however. Landlords would have to wait until the buildings are empty, which can take years.

The landlord group says the city and state should help speed up remodeling by lifting the zoning restrictions that require manufacturing in areas like the Clothing District, changing density requirements, banning housing, and creating new tax breaks for landlords.

Whether elected city and state officials give the green light for a measure that would help real estate developers when so many tenants are having problems is an open question.

Several candidates fighting to succeed Mr de Blasio have vowed to decline campaign donations from real estate developers.

It’s also not clear how many landlords would actually take advantage of the proposed changes.

Jeff Gural, who controls a large portfolio of aging buildings in Manhattan, said he would rather stick with his current job.

“We don’t have that much free space at first,” said Gural. “And I think there will be a demand for the kind of space we have.”

Another possible source of housing expansion would be hotel remodeling, many of which have closed as the industry was decimated by a slump in tourism and business travel.

This idea is gaining traction among some developers and proponents of affordable housing. A group trying to shape the 2021 mayor debate, United for Housing, will argue in an upcoming report that the next mayor should prioritize converting hotels into permanently supportive and affordable housing.

Regarding the property agency’s proposal, some housing advocates say the pandemic is an opportunity to find a creative way to alleviate the city’s housing crisis.

“We need a comprehensive plan on how to create new residential resources and the idea of ​​converting office buildings into residential buildings has many advantages in my opinion,” said Brenda Rosen, President and CEO of Breaking Ground, who describes herself as such largest state provider of supportive housing.