Categories
World News

Newest Russia-Ukraine Battle Information: Reside Updates

Recognition…Eleonore Dermy/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

He wrote a book describing a Russian military that was so ill-prepared when invading Ukraine that he didn’t know until he did that his unit had entered the country Awoke to artillery fire.

Now 34-year-old Pavel Filatiev, who says he is a paratrooper in the Russian military, is seeking political asylum in France after arriving there last weekend. He was hailed as a hero by some in the West, his book embraced by Kremlin opponents as evidence of what he called a “terrible war”.

But Mr. Filatiev remains a scourge and a traitor in his native Russia, at least among pro-war advocates who know of its existence, as opponents of the invasion are aggressively censored. Some critics also say his book ignores the strong support for President Vladimir V. Putin and the war among many Russians and Russian soldiers. And some Ukrainians and Russian opponents of the war say he is an unreliable narrator and an accomplice to the violence.

The book has attracted a great deal of attention, partly because of the rarity of a Russian soldier speaking about his experiences. Mr. Filatiev’s account of his time in Ukraine has not been independently verified by the New York Times. Kamalia Mehtiyeva, his lawyer, said he awaits a decision in the coming days on whether he can remain in France as a refugee.

“He fears persecution by the Russian Federation,” she said by phone from Paris.

According to his book, Mr. Filatiev spent about two months as a paratrooper stationed in the southern Ukrainian cities of Kherson and Mykolaiv and contracted an eye infection in a ditch. He then tried to leave the army after being taken to a military hospital in Sevastopol for health reasons. But he writes that he was threatened with prosecution if he didn’t return.

He fled Russia in August after publishing his book ZOV, which refers to the symbols painted on Russian military vehicles, and fled to France via Tunisia.

“We had no moral right to attack another country, especially the people closest to us,” he writes in the book, which he himself published on VKontakte, a Russian social media network, in August. “We have begun a terrible war,” he writes, “a war in which cities are being destroyed and which is resulting in the deaths of children, women and the elderly.”

“ZOV” describes a chaotic Russian army in which demoralized recruits were outfitted with rusty weapons and ill-fitting uniforms. On February 24, the day the invasion began, Mr. Filatiev writes that he and other soldiers were shocked to learn they were invading Ukraine.

“I woke up around 2am,” he writes. “The column was somewhere in the wilderness, and everyone had turned off their engines and headlights,” he continues. “I couldn’t understand: are we shooting at advancing Ukrainians? Or maybe at NATO? Or do we attack? Who is this infernal shelling aimed at?”

He later characterizes the Russian army as lacking in basic services. During a military operation in occupied Kherson in March, he writes, desperate Russian soldiers searched buildings for food, water, showers and a place to sleep and looted everything they could find of value, including computers and clothing.

Mr Filatiev’s report was widely reported by independent Russian media, most of which were based outside the country. But state media have conspicuously ignored him. And even some Ukrainians on social media have resisted attempts to glorify or praise him for fighting in Ukraine.

Ivan Zhdanov, a Russian opposition figure and ally of jailed dissident Aleksei A. Navalny, said Mr Filatiev had blood on his hands.

“Honestly, I’m skeptical about his decision because he went there and fought there,” he said on his show on YouTube.

In an interview with the Agence France-Presse news agency, Mr Filatiev said he believes he has a moral imperative to say what is happening in Ukraine.

“I want people in Russia and in the world to know how this war came about,” he told the news agency.

Constant Méheut contributed the coverage from Paris.

And Bilefsky and

Categories
Politics

Trump attorneys once more push for particular grasp in FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago

Attorneys for former President Donald Trump on Wednesday again urged a federal judge to appoint an independent “special master” to review documents seized by the FBI at Trump’s Florida home.

The tightly focused filing in US District Court in West Palm Beach came a day after the Justice Department argued that appointing a special master could harm the government’s national security interests.

The Justice Department filing also said that “efforts were likely made to obstruct the government’s investigation” regarding the records that were sent out after the end of his presidency at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.

And the DOJ announced that the FBI had seized more than 100 classified documents from the Palm Beach resort during its search of the property earlier this month. The agency also shared a redacted FBI photo of documents with classification marks recovered from a container at Trump’s “45 Office.”

Trump’s legal team, in its Wednesday night response, accused the DOJ of “converting the scope of responding to a request for a special master into an all-encompassing challenge to any judicial review, present or future, of any aspect of his unprecedented conduct in this investigation.”

The government’s “extraordinary document” suggests “that the DOJ, and only the DOJ, should be charged with the responsibility of evaluating its unwarranted pursuit of criminalizing the possession of a former president’s personal and presidential records in a secure environment,” Trump’s attorneys wrote .

They also accused the DOJ of making several “misleading or incomplete statements.”[s] the alleged ‘fact'”, but offered few details.

Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, has scheduled a hearing at a West Palm Beach courthouse for Thursday at 1 p.m. ET.

Trump had sued to prevent the Justice Department from further examining materials stolen in the Mar-a-Lago raid until a special foreman is able to analyze them. This step is typically taken when there is a possibility that evidence should be withheld from prosecutors due to various legal privileges.

The DOJ told the judge Monday that its review of the seized materials was complete and that a law enforcement team had identified a “limited number” of materials that may be protected by attorney-client privilege. This privilege often relates to jurisprudence that protects the confidentiality of communications between an attorney and his client.

Trump’s lawyers responded Wednesday that the so-called Privilege Review Team was “utterly inadequate” in identifying all potentially privileged documents and separating them from the rest of the seized materials.

Trump and his office have publicly claimed that he declassified all documents seized by the FBI. But Trump’s legal team did not make that explicit argument in the civil suit before Cannon.

The DOJ said in Tuesday’s late night filing that when 15 boxes from Mar-a-Lago were picked up by the National Archives in January, Trump “never asserted executive privilege over any of the documents and claimed that any of the documents in the boxes contain classification marks have been released.”

The administration also said no claims of declassification were made when FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago on June 3, pursuant to a grand jury subpoena, to collect additional records in Trump’s possession that bore classification markings.

The DOJ said it received that subpoena in May after the FBI developed evidence that dozens of boxes of classified information — aside from the 15 boxes found in January — were still at Trump’s home.

“Upon submitting the documents, neither the attorney nor the administrator alleged that the former president had released the documents or made any claims for executive privileges. Instead, the attorney treated them in a manner that suggested the attorney believed the documents were classified: The submission included a single Redweld envelope, double-wrapped with tape, containing the documents,” the DOJ wrote.

At the same time, Trump’s records clerk had also produced an affidavit alleging that “any and all” documents were turned over in response to a grand jury subpoena, the DOJ wrote.

But the FBI “later discovered multiple sources of evidence,” indicating other classified documents remained at Mar-a-Lago, according to the DOJ’s filing.

“The government has also developed evidence that government records were likely hidden and removed from storage and that efforts were likely made to obstruct the government investigation,” the DOJ wrote.

This and other information prompted the government to request a search warrant for Mar-a-Lago, which was finally carried out on August 8.

In their Wednesday response, Trump’s attorneys wrote that the DOJ’s report of the June 3 meeting was “materially mischaracterized.”

“If the government made the same untrue statement in the affidavit in support of the search warrant, then they misled the magistrate judge,” the former president’s attorneys wrote.

Trump also accused the DOJ of being “very fraudulent” in a social media post earlier Wednesday night, sharing a photo that appears to show numerous classified papers strewn on a carpeted floor.

Trump clarified that the FBI “took them out of boxes and scattered them on the carpet so it looked like a big ‘find’ to them.”

“They dropped them, not me – very deceptive… And remember, we were unable to have ANY representative, including lawyers, present during the raid. They were told to wait outside,” Trump wrote.

Categories
Health

A Child’s Blood Sodium Ranges Had been Dangerously Excessive. What Was the Trigger?

The couple sat in silence as they drove home from Blank Children’s Hospital in Des Moines. Her 5-month-old appeared to be dwarfed by the baby carrier strapped to the back seat. He was tiny. He hadn’t grown since he was 2 months old. He weighed just 10 pounds – barely three pounds more than when he was born.

The baby was breastfed from birth, but his mother immediately noticed that he struggled with it more than his three older brothers. She tried putting her breast milk in a bottle to see if that would be easier for her baby to handle. When that didn’t help, she tried adding baby food. He often spat; sometimes it seemed as if more was coming out than was going in. His pediatrician prescribed him an acid-reducing medication. It didn’t seem to do much either.

Despite his size, he looked healthy. He was active. He was able to achieve all of his milestones. He could hold his head up. He could turn around. His fontanelle, the soft spot on his head, was flat—as it should be. His pediatrician advised patience, but when the boy still hadn’t gained any weight at his 4-month visit, she sent blood samples to the lab.

In the late afternoon, the parents received a call with the results. The baby had worrisome abnormalities in his blood chemistry. The salt level in his blood was very high, so high that he could trigger a seizure. In fact, it was so high that he could die if not addressed. Parents rushed the little boy to Blank Children’s Hospital.

Samples taken in the hospital’s emergency room quickly confirmed the anomaly. The child’s sodium level was 159, more than 10 points above normal. The high number not only told his doctors that he had too much sodium, but also that he didn’t have enough water in his body, that he was very dehydrated.

Normally, when there is too much sodium in the body, the brain triggers the urge to drink in order to absorb more water. The brain also tells the kidneys to retain as much water as possible.

The brain communicates all of this with a hormone called vasopressin. Problems with vasopressin can cause a condition first described in the 1700s as diabetes insipidus (DI) — a disease that produces copious and watery (rotten) urine.

The combination of the child’s high sodium levels and watery, dilute urine immediately led doctors to suspect he had DI. His high sodium levels should have caused his brain to send a vasopressin message to his kidneys to hold on to as much water as possible. And yet his urine consisted almost entirely of water. Why? Wasn’t the pituitary gland in his brain able to make the hormone? Or was there a problem on the news-receiving side in his kidneys?

No matter where the problem started, there were medications that could help. Doctors give the baby two drugs that are normally used to control high blood pressure and that cause the kidneys to excrete sodium. Almost immediately, the baby’s sodium began to drop. This indicated that the baby had DI. If so, was the problem in the brain, where the hormone is made, or in the kidneys? How the problem was handled depended on where it originated.

An MRI was done to look for signs of a problem in the pituitary gland. It looked normal. The problem, his doctors thought, was probably in his kidneys. They sent samples to look for a genetic reason for his abnormality, but those results would not be available for weeks.

In the meantime, they continued to give the baby the medicines that helped him get rid of the salt. And slowly the levels dropped. After a few days on these drugs, the baby’s chemistry was perfectly normal. His parents were told he should start gaining weight now. But he did not do it. By the day the doctors decided the baby was well enough to go home, it still hadn’t gained an ounce.

Parents were instructed to feed the child every three hours 24/7 to help him get the maximum number of calories. They should contact their pediatrician and see a genetics specialist. Then they were sent home. They had a strong feeling that their baby was not ready to leave the hospital. He was brought in with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and he’s still not doing well. He was in the zero percentile on the growth chart. Zero. They brought this argument to the boy’s doctors. He will gain weight now that his chemistry is normal they were told. Just give him time.

The child’s parents felt that he did not have time, that his life was still in danger. So early the next morning, parents and baby were back in the car. They had talked their way through to an appointment with the genetics specialists at the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital in Iowa City, two hours away. When they got there, the parents shared their concerns. Was the baby’s inability to gain weight because of his DI? Or was there something else going on?

The child had been tested for cystic fibrosis at Blank Hospital. The test was inconclusive. Dozens of other medical conditions can affect a baby’s growth. Parents and baby were sent to the lab to have blood drawn to check for other genetic abnormalities and to the cardiology department to make sure his heart was normal.

The geneticist also wanted the baby to be evaluated by a pediatric gastroenterologist. It was clear he was having trouble feeding and seemed to spit out much of what he was able to eat. The geneticist turned to Dr. Eyad Hanna, who saw the child later that day. It was only minutes before the gastroenterologist decided the child was too small to send home. Like the child’s parents, he feared that if the baby couldn’t gain weight in the hospital, he might not be able to make it at home either. The baby was taken into Hanna’s care and fed around the clock to try to help him get back on the growth curve. Hanna also turned to a pediatric kidney specialist, Dr. Pat Brophy, who recommended adding plain water to make up for the water the boy lost with his urine. Doctors usually advise mothers not to give their babies water because breast milk contains enough water. But this clearly wasn’t a normal baby. And because of the reflux and difficulty breastfeeding the baby, Brophy also recommended placing a tube in the baby’s stomach — a gastrostomy, or G-tube — to ensure it could get enough calories, medication, and much-needed extra water.

The baby continued to spit up copious amounts of the milk and water he was given. Usually, this type of spitting goes away as an infant’s esophagus lengthens and stomach enlarges. But this baby would not grow at all without more food. Hanna recommended adding baby food and dry food to the milk. He had her enlarge the hole in the bottle’s nipple so the thickened liquid could flow through easily.

And then they waited. Test results trickled in. He didn’t have cystic fibrosis. His heart was perfectly normal. But even as the negative results began to roll in, the baby’s parents could see that he was doing better just because he was getting the calories and most importantly, the water he needed. Every night he got the equivalent of an 8-ounce glass of water through his G-tube. Every day he was fed every three hours to get a total of 1,300 calories. And slowly he started gaining weight – 30-40 grams per day. He stayed in the hospital for almost two weeks, and by the time he and his parents were able to go home he had gained over a pound. He needed a few more months to get back on the growth curve. Only then did they get the results of the genetic test, which confirmed what they already knew: the baby had DI

This baby is now 7 years old. He’s learning to live with his DI. He continues to take the medications that help him get rid of his sodium. He often has to go to the toilet. And he has to drink lots and lots of water to replace whatever he loses in his urine. He’s not as big as his brothers – not yet and maybe never. But he’s still growing and thriving, and that’s more than enough for his parents.

Lisa Sanders, MD, is a contributing writer for the magazine. Her latest book is Diagnosis: Solving the Most Baffling Medical Mysteries. If you have a solved case you want to share, write to her at Lisa.Sandersmdnyt@gmail.com.

Categories
Business

Most cost-effective airline tickets? How to save cash on flights and airfare

There are many ways to save money on flights.

But booking airfares on a specific day of the week is not one of them, according to data from Google Flights.

Booking midweek – and especially around midnight on Tuesdays – is often cited as the best time to buy flights. But over the past five years, U.S. airfares bought on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, or Thursdays were, on average, just 1.9% cheaper than airfares bought over the weekend, according to Google Flights.

“If your trip is just a few weeks away, don’t wait until Tuesday – book your flight now in case the price goes up,” James Byers, Google Flights Group Product Manager, wrote in a published blog post yesterday.

Strategies that work

While the day of the week travelers book doesn’t matter much, the day they fly does, according to research from Google Flights examining five years of historical flight data from August 1, 2017 to August 1, 2022 Has.

“On average, flights departing on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday were 12% cheaper than departing on the weekend,” Byers wrote. “If you exclude international destinations, the savings potential increases to 20%.”

Travelers looking to save money should avoid flying on Sundays, according to Google Flights.

Westend61 | Getty Images

Another common strategy — early booking — also works, according to the data. For domestic flights to the US, airfares were lowest between three and eight weeks before departure, with prices bottoming out 44 days in advance, according to the study.

On average, non-stop flights cost about 20% more than connecting flights, according to Google Flights, but flights with stopovers also increase the risk of disruptions.

An Instagram poll by travel insurance company World Nomads found that more than 1 in 3 respondents spent up to $250 on flights, meals or hotels due to flight delays or cancellations this summer, while 12% said they spent between $500 and $1,000 having spent US dollars.

More savings opportunities

Travelers with flexible flight days can use Google Flights’ “date grid” feature to quickly find the cheapest departure and arrival dates in a given week.

If you want to travel for a certain period of time – let’s say two weeks – but are flexible in terms of time, you can also use the “Price Graph” function to see the cheapest flight times.

Price tracking also eliminates the need to keep searching to price-check a desired route. Find the route once, click the Track Fares button and Google Flights will email you notifications of fare changes.

‘Best times’ to book

Based on its historical data, Google Flights also suggests the “best times” to book flights for peak travel and popular routes.

Travelers looking to save money on flights to Europe are advised to plan as early as possible, while summer vacationers can plan weeks in advance instead of months.