Categories
Entertainment

Charlie Watts, Bedrock Drummer for the Rolling Stones, Dies at 80

Charlie Watts, whose strong but unremarkable drums drove the Rolling Stones for over 50 years, died in London on Tuesday. He was 80.

His death in a hospital was announced by his publicist Bernard Doherty. Further details were not immediately disclosed.

The Rolling Stones announced earlier this month that Mr. Watts would not be participating in the band’s upcoming “No Filter” tour of the United States after undergoing unspecified emergency medical treatment that the band officials said was successful .

Restrained, dignified and elegant, Mr. Watts was never as extravagant, either on stage or outside, as most of his rock star colleagues, let alone the singer of the Stones, Mick Jagger. Contented himself with being one of the best rock drummers of his generation, he played with a jazzy swing that made the band’s gigantic success possible. As the Stones guitarist Keith Richards said in his 2010 autobiography “Life”, “Charlie Watts was always the bed I lay on musically.”

While some rock drummers hunted for volume and bombast, Mr. Watts defined his game with subtlety, swing and solid groove.

“As much as Mick’s voice and Keith’s guitar, Charlie Watts’ snare sound is the Rolling Stones,” wrote Bruce Springsteen in an introduction to drummer Max Weinberg’s 1991 edition of The Big Beat. “When Mick sings, ‘It’s only rock’ n ‘roll but I like it’, Charlie is in the back and shows you why!”

Charles Robert Watts was born in London on June 2, 1941. His mother, the former Lillian Charlotte Eaves, was a housewife; his father, Charles Richard Watts, was with the Royal Air Force and became a truck driver for British Railways after World War II.

Charlie’s first instrument was a banjo, but puzzled by the fingering required to play it, he removed his neck and transformed his body into a snare drum. He discovered jazz at the age of 12 and soon became a fan of Miles Davis, Duke Ellington and Charles Mingus.

In 1960 Mr. Watts graduated from the Harrow School of Art and found employment as a graphic designer with a London advertising agency. He wrote and illustrated “Ode to a Highflying Bird,” a children’s book about jazz saxophonist Charlie Parker (although it wasn’t published until 1965). In the evenings he played drums with various groups.

Most of them were jazz combos, but he was also invited to join Alexis Korner’s raw rhythm-and-blues collective Blues Incorporated. Mr Watts declined the invitation because he was leaving England to work as a graphic designer in Scandinavia, but he joined the group when he returned a few months later.

The newly formed Rolling Stones (then Rollin ‘Stones) knew they needed a good drummer but couldn’t afford Mr. Watts, who was already getting a regular salary from his various gigs. “We starved ourselves to pay for him!” Mr. Richards wrote. “Literally. We went shoplifting to get Charlie Watts.”

In early 1963, when they could finally guarantee five pounds a week, Mr. Watts joined the band, completing the canonical line-up of Mr. Richards, Mr. Jagger, guitarist Brian Jones, bassist Bill Wyman and pianist Ian Stewart. He moved in with his bandmates and immersed himself in Chicago blues records.

After the success of the Beatles, the Rolling Stones quickly rose from being an electro blues special to one of the biggest bands of the British invasion of the 1960s. While Mr. Richards ‘guitar riff defined the band’s most famous single, the 1965 chart-topping “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction,” Mr. Watts’ drum pattern was just as important. He was tireless on “Paint It Black” (No. 1 in 1966), lithe on “Ruby Tuesday” (No. 1 in 1967) and the master of a funky groove on “Honky Tonk Women” (No. 1 in 1969).

Mr. Watts was ambivalent about the fame he gained as a member of the group often referred to as “the greatest rock ‘n’ roll in the world”. As he said in the 2003 book According to the Rolling Stones, “I loved playing with Keith and the band – I still do – but I wasn’t interested in being a pop idol, Sitting there with screaming girls It’s not the world I’m from. It’s not what I wanted to be and I still think it’s silly. “

As the Stones ran over the years, Mr. Watts drew on his graphic background to help design the band’s sets, merchandise and album covers – he even put a comic strip on the back of their 1967 album “Between” for the band Buttons. “While the Stones cultivated bad boy images and indulged a collective appetite for debauchery, Mr. Watts avoided mostly sex and drugs. In 1964, he secretly married Shirley Ann Shepherd, an art student and sculptor.

On tour he went back to his hotel room alone; every night he sketched his accommodation. “Since 1967 I’ve drawn every bed I’ve slept in on tour,” he told Rolling Stone magazine in 1996. “It’s a fantastic non-book.”

While other members of the Stones battled for control of the band, Mr. Watts stayed largely out of internal politics. As he told The Weekend Australian in 2014, “I usually mumble in the background.”

Considering himself a leader, Mr. Jones was fired from the Stones in 1969 (and found dead in his swimming pool shortly afterwards). Mr. Jagger and Mr. Richards spent decades arguing, sometimes making albums without being in the studio at the same time. Mr. Watts was happy to work with one or both of them.

However, there was a time when Mr. Watts is known to be annoyed at being treated like a wage worker rather than an equal member of the group. In 1984, Mr. Jagger and Mr. Richards went out drinking for one night in Amsterdam. When they got back to their hotel around 5am, Mr. Jagger called Mr. Watts, woke him up and asked, “Where’s my drummer?” Twenty minutes later, Mr. Watts appeared in Mr. Jagger’s room, coldly angry but shaved and smartly dressed in a Savile Row suit and tie.

“Never call me your drummer again,” he said to Mr. Jagger before grabbing his lapel and hooking it up properly. Mr. Richards said he just barely saved Mr. Jagger from falling out a window into an Amsterdam canal.

“It’s not something I’m proud of and if I hadn’t been drinking I never would have,” said Watts in 2003. “The bottom line is, don’t piss me off.”

At the time, Mr. Watts was in the early stages of a midlife crisis that manifested itself as a two year tamer. Just as the other Stones got into moderation in their 40s, he became addicted to amphetamines and heroin, which nearly destroyed his marriage. After passing out in a recording studio and breaking his ankle while falling down a flight of stairs, he quit, Cold Turkey.

Mr Watts and his wife had a daughter, Seraphina, in 1968 and, after spending some time as tax exiles in France, moved to a farm in south-west England. There they bred award-winning Arabian horses and gradually expanded their stud to over 250 horses on 700 hectares of land. Information about his survivors was not immediately available. Mr Doherty, the publicist, said Mr Watts “died peacefully” in the hospital “surrounded by his family”.

The Rolling Stones made 30 studio albums, nine of them at the top of the American charts and 10 at the top of the UK charts. The band was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 1989 – a ceremony Mr. Watts skipped.

Eventually the Stones agreed to release an album every four years, followed by an extremely lucrative world tour. (They grossed over half a billion dollars on their Bigger Bang tour between 2005 and 2007.)

But Mr. Watts’ true love remained jazz, and he filled the time between those tours with jazz groups of various sizes – the Charlie Watts Quintet, the Charlie Watts Tentet, the Charlie Watts Orchestra. But soon he would be back on the road with the Stones, playing in sold-out arenas and sketching beds in empty hotel rooms.

He wasn’t slowed by age or throat cancer in 2004. In 2016, Metallica Billboard’s drummer Lars Ulrich said that since he wanted to play until his 70s, he saw Mr. Watts as his model. “The only roadmap is Charlie Watts,” he said.

Meanwhile, Mr. Watts kept the beat with a simple four-piece drum kit and anchored the Rolling Stones spectacle.

“I’ve always wanted to be a drummer,” he told Rolling Stone in 1996, adding that he envisioned a more intimate environment at arena rock shows. “I always had this illusion that I was in Blue Note or Birdland with Charlie Parker in front of me. It didn’t sound like it, but that was the illusion I had. “

Categories
Politics

Home passes funds decision, advances infrastructure invoice

The Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), comes to a meeting of the Democratic House of Representatives amid ongoing negotiations on budget and infrastructure laws in the US Capitol in Washington, USA, 24 August 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

House Democrats on Tuesday pushed President Joe Biden’s economic plans after breaking a stalemate that threatened to untangle the party’s sprawling agenda.

In a 220-212 party vote, the chamber passed a budget resolution of $ 3.5 trillion and introduced a bipartisan infrastructure bill worth $ 1 trillion. The vote allows Democrats to draft and approve a massive Republican-free spending package, and puts the Senate-approved infrastructure plan on track for final approval in the House of Representatives.

The move includes a non-binding commitment to vote by September 27 on the Infrastructure Bill, which aims to appease nine Democratic Middle Democrats who urged the House of Representatives to review the bipartisan plan before it embarked on democratic budget dissolution. The vote also advances a comprehensive voting law that the Democrats intend to pass on Tuesday.

In a statement on Tuesday, House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, D-California said she is “committed to passing the bipartisan infrastructure bill by the 27th. She also stressed that she intended to pass a budget balancing bill that could pass the Senate – which means it might turn out to be smaller than the House progressives want.

The opposition of the nine negative Democrats threatened an agenda that supporters say will boost the economy and provide a lifeline to working class households. Democratic leaders have described the budget as the largest addition to the American social safety net in decades and the infrastructure bill as an overdue refresh to transportation and utilities.

“The bottom line, I believe, is that we are one step closer to truly investing in the American people, positioning our economy for long-term growth and building an America that outperforms the rest of the world,” said Biden on Tuesday after the vote . “My goal is to build a bottom-up and center-up economy, not just top-down.”

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Pelosi has pushed for the bipartisan and democratic plans to be passed simultaneously to ensure that centrists and progressives support both measures. The nine Democrats withheld their support, leaving Pelosi and her top MPs desperate to find a way to save the party’s economic plans.

All Democrats voted with their party on Tuesday. In a post-vote statement, the Democrats, led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey, said their deal with party leaders “does what we set out to do: secure a separate voice for the bipartisan infrastructure bill, it to the To send to the President’s desk, and then consider the reconciliation package separately. “

The vote on the promotion of the measures maintains the party’s hopes of pushing through massive economic proposals this year. There are still several hurdles that the Democrats have to overcome – and draft a budget that can be supported by spending centrists and progressives alike – to get the proposals through a tightly divided Congress.

To underscore the challenges ahead, House leaders are under pressure to write and pass the reconciliation plan before approving the infrastructure bill – which Pelosi promised in about a month. In a statement on Tuesday, Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., Chair of the Progressive Caucus of Congress said the two proposals were “integrally linked and we will only vote for the Infrastructure Bill after the Reconciliation Bill is passed”.

The Democrats in the Senate and House of Representatives hope to be able to write their bill to strengthen social security and invest in climate policy in the coming weeks. The budget measure calls for the expansion of Medicare, childcare and paid vacation, the expansion of the increased household tax credits passed last year, the creation of a universal Pre-K and the creation of incentives for green energy adoption.

While the resolution allows for up to $ 3.5 trillion in spending, centrists will likely seek to bring the price down.

Many Republicans have backed the bipartisan infrastructure bill, saying it will shake the economy. But they have opposed the trillion dollar spending proposed by the Democrats and the tax hikes for corporations and wealthy individuals that the Democrats hope to use on it.

The GOP has also argued that the Democratic plan would increase inflation, which White House officials have denied.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
World News

VP Kamala Harris talks South China Sea in Vietnam amid U.S.-China rivalry

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris arrived in Hanoi, Vietnam on August 24, 2021. Harris is on an official trip to Southeast Asia to gather regional allies while the US’s global leadership status is being marred by the aftermath of the aftermath in Afghanistan.

Evelyn Hockstein | AFP | Getty Images

Strategic competition between the US and China came to the fore when Vice President Kamala Harris opened the second leg of her official visit to Southeast Asia in Vietnam.

Harris told Vietnamese officials in the capital Hanoi on Wednesday that it was necessary to pressure Beijing to take action in the South China Sea. Vietnam is a vocal opponent of China’s enormous territorial claims in the strategic waterway.

“We need to find ways to put pressure and increase pressure on Beijing to comply with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and challenge its bullying and excessive maritime claims,” ​​Harris said.

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS, is an international treaty that defines the rights and obligations of nations in space. It forms the basis of how international courts, such as the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, resolve maritime disputes.

Harris’ comment followed her speech in Singapore on Tuesday in which she said Beijing had continued to “force, intimidate and make claims on the vast majority of the South China Sea.”

The South China Sea is a resource-rich waterway that is a major merchant shipping route, carrying trillions of dollars of world trade every year. China claims almost all of the sea – parts of it have has also been claimed by some Southeast Asian countries such as Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines.

In 2016, a tribunal at China’s Permanent Arbitration Court dismissed the lawsuit as legally unfounded – a ruling Beijing ignored.

In answer At Harris’ speech in Singapore, Chinese state media accused the American vice president of attempting to drive a “wedge” between China and its Southeast Asian neighbors.

Prior to arriving in Vietnam on Tuesday evening, Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh and the Chinese Ambassador to Vietnam held a previously unannounced meeting, Reuters reported. During the meeting, the Chinese ambassador pledged to donate two million doses of Covid-19 vaccine to Vietnam, according to the report.

“Biggest” geopolitical competition

While Harris was cautious about meeting Beijing, political analysts and former diplomats said there was little doubt their trip was part of US strategy to compete with China.

The rivalry between the US and China is currently the “biggest” geopolitical issue, said Kishore Mahbubani, a prominent former Singapore diplomat.

“So Vice President Kamala Harris’ visit is clearly part of the competition between the US and China,” Mahbubani, now a distinguished fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Asia Research Institute, told CNBC’s Street Signs Asia on Wednesday.

“Southeast Asia is going to be a very, very critical arena for this competition,” he said.

His opinion is shared by Curtis Chin, a former US ambassador to the Asian Development Bank. Chin said the rise of China was “a major foreign policy challenge” for the US and much of the world, even if the aftermath in Afghanistan continues.

The United States must have its eyes on Southeast Asia, and indeed much of Asia, not just the countries with which we have formal alliances.

Curtis Chin

Senior Fellow, Milken Institute

US President Joe Biden has been criticized for handling the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. The issue overshadowed Harris’ trip to Southeast Asia as reporters focused their questions on Afghanistan at the Vice President’s joint press conference with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on Monday.

“The United States needs to have its eyes on Southeast Asia, and indeed much of Asia, not just the countries we have formal alliances with,” Chin, a senior fellow at the Milken Institute, told CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia on Wednesday.

“And when I say all things considered, it’s not just diplomatic and military engagements, but real business engagements – that is what the United States needs to focus on,” he added.

Read more about developments in Afghanistan:

In her talks with Singapore’s Prime Minister, Harris discussed issues ranging from supply chains to climate change and the pandemic.

It announced in Vietnam that the US will donate an additional one million doses of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine – bringing the total US donation to the Southeast Asian country to six million doses. Harris also opened the new Southeast Asia Regional Office of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Hanoi.

The Vice President is due to end her trip to Southeast Asia on Thursday.

Categories
Politics

Navy Ramps Up Evacuations From Kabul, however Bottlenecks Persist

WASHINGTON – As the August 31 deadline for a U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan draws nearer, the Pentagon has stepped up the evacuation rate from Kabul Airport and flown 21,600 people out in 24 hours, Defense Department officials said Tuesday. But bottlenecks in the system and President Biden’s insistence that all troops leave the country by the end of the month could prevent the military from maintaining this pace.

The race against time means that the 5,800 Marines and soldiers at Hamid Karzai International Airport must try to evacuate thousands more Americans and Afghan allies, only to come out themselves over the next seven days to find the rubble of the 20 Years War in Afghanistan to eliminate somehow.

That process began on Tuesday when Pentagon spokesman John F. Kirby said several hundred headquarters, maintenance and other support forces not strictly necessary for the escalating evacuation operation had left the country.

Defense officials do not say publicly, however, which is becoming increasingly clear: some people are being left behind.

Since August 14, when Kabul fell to the Taliban, more than 70,700 people had been evacuated from Afghanistan by Tuesday evening, Biden said.

That is significantly less than the number of American citizens, foreigners and Afghan allies trying to get out. “We’re trying to get as many out as possible,” said John F. Kirby, the Pentagon’s main spokesman. He said American troops at Kabul airport “wanted to continue this pace as aggressively as possible”.

But despite all of Mr. Biden’s persistence in meeting his withdrawal deadline, neither the Department of Homeland Security nor the Department of State have been able to increase review and processing times to the extent necessary to meet demand.

A US official said it took up to 12 hours for immigration officers to screen arriving Afghans at Al Udeid Air Base outside Doha, Qatar against the National Counter Terrorism Center watch list. The official said that the verification and screening processes need to move faster to prevent the evacuation pipeline at Al Udeid, the largest base receiving Afghans, from re-clogging, as it did for several hours last week.

The Taliban have warned of “consequences” if the US military stays past the deadline. And on Tuesday, a Taliban spokesman said the group’s militants were physically preventing Afghans from going to the airport.

The Pentagon has opened military bases in Virginia, Texas, Wisconsin and New Jersey to temporarily house Afghan refugees and is likely to add more in the coming days, officials said.

Updated

Aug. 24, 2021, 9:51 p.m. ET

Kirby said US Afghan allies who fear Taliban reprisals are still being handled at Kabul airport, despite the airport gates being closed several times over the past week due to the onslaught of people.

The United States will continue to evacuate Afghans until the final days following the withdrawal of troops and equipment. Dozens of Afghan commandos – trained by the US – are also at the airport and have to be evacuated.

Understanding the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan

Map 1 of 5

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban emerged in 1994 amid the unrest following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including flogging, amputation and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here is more about their genesis and track record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who for years have been on the run, in hiding, in prison and dodged American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to rule, including whether they will be as tolerant as they say they are.

What is happening to the women of Afghanistan? When the Taliban was last in power, they banned women and girls from most jobs or from going to school. Afghan women have gained a lot since the Taliban was overthrown, but now they fear that they are losing ground. Taliban officials are trying to reassure women that things will be different, but there are indications that they have begun to reintroduce the old order in at least some areas.

For the military, part of the problem is that so many people are being promoted so quickly and with so little notice. For example, the C-17 military aircraft, which carry 400 people per load, have one or two toilets, and the flight from Kabul to Qatar takes four hours.

Once the flights arrive at Al Udeid in Qatar and other intermediate bases in the Middle East and Europe, the evacuees will be screened by Homeland Security and State Department officials who will determine if they qualify to enter the United States.

The military takes the Taliban’s red line seriously on August 31, also because some of the group’s commanders are cooperating with the US military and giving many people access to the airport, despite harsh speeches from Taliban spokesmen. In addition, the American military and the Taliban are cooperating against the threat of attacks by the Islamic State.

But after August 31, all bets will be gone, a senior US official said.

With so many people at Kabul Airport, Doha and other bases, concerns about sanitation, food and water are growing. The C-17 planes bringing refugees from Afghanistan turn around bringing in additional dumpsters, portable hand washing stations, refrigerated trucks to keep the water cool, and food and water.

Three babies were born to evacuees in the past four days, Defense Department officials said. A woman went into labor on Saturday during a flight landing at the Ramstein air base in Germany, officials from the air force said. The aircraft commander descended to a lower altitude to increase the air pressure in the jet, a decision officials said saved the mother’s life as she had low blood pressure. When the plane landed, paramedics rushed on board and gave birth to the baby – a girl – in the hold. All three babies are in good shape, Mr. Kirby said Tuesday.

After receiving a secret briefing Monday night, Adam B. Schiff, a California Democrat who heads the House Intelligence Committee, said the August 31 deadline for US troops to withdraw from Kabul was unrealistic.

“I think it is possible, but I think it is very unlikely,” Schiff told reporters. Using the abbreviation for special immigrant visas, he added, “Given the number of Americans who have yet to be evacuated, the number of SIVs, the number of other members of the Afghan press, civil society leaders, female leaders – it’s hard me I can imagine that all of this can be achieved by the end of the month. “

Categories
Entertainment

‘Kipchoge: The Final Milestone’ Evaluate: Skipping Forward

The well-intentioned but bromide-laden first part of the film introduces us to Kipchoge the man, shown as a runner with a tireless work ethic, a contemplative attitude and a fundamental modesty. We hear about how he inspires colleagues and young athletes. There are so many slow-motion running clips, abrupt switches to black-and-white or scenes that appear staged for effect (e.g., as Kipchoge discusses how his mother instilled a sense of discipline, we see a woman awakening a boy for a morning routine) that you could cut the movie into Nike ads with minimal alteration. The director, Jake Scott, son of Ridley, has in fact made such commercials.

But the documentary’s pulse quickens when it turns its attention to Kipchoge’s efforts to beat the two-hour mark. His 1:59:40 doesn’t count as an official world record because he didn’t run it under traditional marathon strictures. The film illustrates how a wide array of collaborators optimized conditions. Various participants describe the road surfacing, how laser guidance helped set the pace and how teams of fellow runners took turns making Y formations around Kipchoge to reduce air resistance. The athleticism, physics and what one person calls the “bit of ballet” of the event are all stirring to witness.

Kipchoge: The Last Milestone
Rated PG-13 for … strenuous running? Running time: 1 hour 27 minutes. Rent or buy on Apple TV, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators.

Categories
World News

Biden Sticks to Afghan Deadline, Resisting Pleas to Lengthen Evacuation

“People will die and they will be left behind,” said McCaul.

Mr Biden has stressed that he takes the threat to American security in Kabul seriously. In a closed meeting with the leaders of the Seven Nations Group on Tuesday, the president told them the risk of a terrorist attack was “very high,” according to a senior American official.

A deadly attack by ISIS-K on American and Afghan civilians would be a catastrophe not only for the United States but also for the Taliban, who want to consolidate control over Kabul. The Taliban and the Islamic State were enemies and fought for control of parts of the country on the battlefield.

Understanding the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan

Map 1 of 5

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban emerged in 1994 amid the unrest following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including flogging, amputation and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here is more about their genesis and track record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who for years have been on the run, in hiding, in prison and dodged American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to rule, including whether they will be as tolerant as they say they are.

What is happening to the women of Afghanistan? When the Taliban was last in power, they banned women and girls from most jobs or from going to school. Afghan women have gained a lot since the Taliban was overthrown, but now they fear that they are losing ground. Taliban officials are trying to reassure women that things will be different, but there are indications that they have begun to reintroduce the old order in at least some areas.

ISIS-K refers to the Khorasan offshoot of the Islamic State in Afghanistan.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who chaired the meeting, tried to put the discussions on a good face and said the evacuation had been remarkably successful. He said the leaders had agreed on a roadmap for long-term dealings with the Taliban and vowed to use Afghan funds in Western banks as leverage to put pressure on the Taliban.

“Condition # 1 is that they must guarantee safe passage for those who want to get out by August 31st and beyond,” Johnson told the BBC after the meeting.

But Mr Johnson failed in his efforts to persuade Mr Biden to extend the evacuation beyond August 31, and it was not clear what other options the allies had to protect their own citizens and Afghan allies without American military power.

Chancellor Angela Merkel said there were plans to find a way to ensure that “we can still get as many local workers and vulnerable people to leave the country” afterwards. But her sober tone exposed the sense of futility Western leaders felt about Afghanistan.

“How can it be that the Afghan leader left the country so quickly?” said Mrs. Merkel. “How can it be that Afghan soldiers who we trained for so long gave up so quickly? We will have to ask ourselves these questions, but they were not the most urgent today. “

Categories
Politics

Biden sticks to Aug. 31 Afghanistan withdrawal deadline, regardless of stress to increase

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden told G-7 leaders during an emergency meeting on Tuesday that he would adhere to the pre-established timetable for the full withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan, although the US is also putting in place contingency plans if an extension proves necessary should prove.

“We are currently well on the way to being finished by August 31,” said Biden from the west wing of the White House in his third televised address on Afghanistan since the country fell to the Taliban.

“I also asked the Pentagon and the State Department for contingency plans in order to adjust the schedule should this be necessary,” said Biden.

The president faced political pressure to extend the withdrawal period from US allies in Europe, such as Britain, as well as from his own party in Washington. However, Biden made it clear on Tuesday that he believes the sooner the U.S. can complete the evacuation operation, the better.

The president warned that staying for long periods posed serious risks to Allied troops and civilians. ISIS-K, an offshoot of the terrorist group based in Afghanistan, poses a growing threat to Hamid Karzai International Airport, the president said.

“Every day we are there is another day we know that ISIS-K is trying to attack the airport and target both US and Allied forces and innocent civilians,” he said.

Biden also described US relations with the Taliban on the ground in Kabul as “poor”. The militants have worked with the US in the evacuations, the president said, but the longer the US stays, the greater the risk that fighting will break out.

According to the White House Tuesday evening, the US has evacuated or helped evacuate approximately 70,700 people from Afghanistan since August 14. The US has relocated nearly 75,900 people since the end of July.

As of Tuesday, approximately 4,000 American passport holders and their families had been flown out of Afghanistan, although several thousand Americans are believed to be awaiting evacuation.

Biden said the leaders of the world’s seven major industrial democracies, the European Union, NATO and the United Nations, have agreed to “stand together in our dealings with the Taliban.”

“We will judge them [Taliban] through their actions and we will stay in close coordination on any steps we take in response to the Taliban’s behavior, “Biden said.

In a joint statement following their virtual meeting, the G7 leaders expressed “serious concern” about human rights, especially for women, in Afghanistan and called on countries around the world to support efforts to relocate vulnerable Afghans.

A Marine from the 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit walks with the children during an evacuation at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, Aug. 24, 2021.

Sgt. Samuel Ruiz | US Marine Corps | via Reuters

The Taliban said Tuesday that the group would no longer allow Afghan nationals to leave the country on evacuation flights, nor would they accept an extension of the exit period beyond the end of the month.

“We are not in favor of allowing Afghans to leave the country,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told reporters during a press conference on Tuesday.

“She [the Americans] have the opportunity, they have all the resources, they can take all the people who belong to them with them, but we will not allow Afghans to leave and we will not extend the deadline, “he said. Evacuations by foreign forces after August .31 would be a “violation” of the Biden government’s promise to end the US military’s mission in the country, Mujahid said.

Read more about developments in Afghanistan:

Although the Biden government tried to complete the evacuation by the end of the month, members of the president’s own party have expressed doubts.

House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Said Monday after a secret briefing with intelligence officials that it was “very unlikely” that the US would remove all remaining American citizens, special immigrant visa applicants and vulnerable Afghans US could evacuate land by August 31st.

A U.S. Marine provides assistance with an evacuation at Hamid Karzai International Airport, Afghanistan, Aug. 22, 2021.

US Marines | Reuters

“I am encouraged to see how many people have been evacuated, to the point where we have evacuated 11,000 people in a single day,” Schiff said.

“Still, given the logistical difficulties involved in transporting people to the airport and the limited number of workarounds, I can hardly assume that this will be fully completed by the end of the month. And I certainly believe that we have a military.” Presence as long as it is necessary to get all US people out and to honor our moral and ethical obligations to our Afghan partners. “

Crowds gather in front of the airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, 23 August 2021.

Asvaka News | via Reuters

More than 5,000 US soldiers are on site in Kabul and are helping with the evacuation efforts. Almost 200 aircraft are in some way earmarked for evacuation.

The Pentagon announced Monday that evacuees were flying from Kabul to temporary safe havens in the Middle East and Europe, including U.S. installations in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Bahrain, Italy, Spain and Germany.

To date, Afghan nationals arriving in the United States have been accommodated at either Fort McCoy, Wisconsin, Fort Lee, Virginia, Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey, or Fort Bliss, Texas.

Categories
Politics

High Pennsylvania Republican Vows to Assessment 2020 Election Outcomes

The top Republican in the Pennsylvania State Senate promised this week to carry out a broad review of the 2020 election results, a move that comes as G.O.P. lawmakers continue to sow doubts about the contest’s legitimacy by pushing to re-examine votes in battleground states like Arizona.

State Senator Jake Corman, who serves as president pro tempore of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, made the comments in an interview with a right-wing radio host, and they were first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer on Tuesday. His remarks were the strongest sign yet that Pennsylvania — which President Biden won by more than 80,000 votes — may press forward with a review of 2020 results, despite no evidence of voter fraud that would have affected the outcome.

In the interview, Mr. Corman said that he wanted to begin “almost immediately” and that hearings would begin this week. He added that he expected to use the full power of the state’s General Assembly, including subpoenas, to conduct the review, which he referred to as a “forensic investigation.”

“We can bring people in, we can put them under oath, we can subpoena records, and that’s what we need to do and that’s what we’re going to do,” Mr. Corman said. “And so we’re going to move forward.”

Previously, State Senator Doug Mastriano, a Republican and vocal proponent of former President Donald J. Trump’s falsehoods about the election, had called for a review of results in three counties.

Until recently the chair of the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee, he sent letters requesting ballots, records and machines from Philadelphia County, which encompasses the state’s largest city and which Mr. Biden won with over 80 percent of the vote; York County, south of Harrisburg, which Mr. Trump won handily; and Tioga County, in the northern part of the state, which Mr. Trump also carried with ease. All three counties refused to comply, and Mr. Mastriano’s legal authority to enforce the requests remains unclear.

Last week, Mr. Corman removed Mr. Mastriano from his position as chair of the committee and installed State Senator Cris Dush, also a Republican, to lead the panel and oversee the review.

In the interview, Mr. Corman expressed his own doubts about the election.

“I don’t necessarily have faith in the results,” he said. “I think that there were many problems in our election that we need to get to the bottom of.”

Mr. Corman’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Veronica Degraffenreid, who as the acting secretary of the commonwealth oversees Pennsylvania’s elections, has discouraged counties from participating in any election reviews, noting that any inspection of voting machines by uncredentialed third parties would result in their decertification, and that counties would have to bear the considerable costs of replacing the equipment.

“The Department of State encourages counties to refuse to participate in any sham review of past elections that would require counties to violate the trust of their voters and ignore their statutory duty to protect the chain of custody of their ballots and voting equipment,” Ms. Degraffenreid’s office said in a statement last month.

It remains unclear exactly how Mr. Corman and the Pennsylvania Senate will proceed with their review, including what they might seek in terms of equipment and records, and which counties they might focus on. Mr. Corman did say that, after talking with fellow legislators in Arizona, he was looking for a “neutral arbiter” to help carry out the review — a potential nod to how the Maricopa County review became widely ridiculed in part because the chief executive of the company carrying out the re-examination had promoted conspiracy theories about rigged voting machines costing Mr. Trump victory in the state.

“I think it’s important that we get people involved that don’t have ties to anybody, that are professional, that will do the job so that we can stand behind the results,” Mr. Corman said.

Categories
World News

Airbnb plans to briefly home 20,000 Afghan refugees

Families begin an evacuation at Hamid Karzai International Airport, Afghanistan, Jan.

Sgt. Samuel Ruiz | US Marine Corps | via Reuters

Airbnb plans to house 20,000 Afghan refugees worldwide for free, the company’s CEO Brian Chesky said Tuesday.

The refugees will be housed in accommodations listed on the Airbnb platform and the stays will be funded by Airbnb, Chesky said on Twitter, without specifying exactly how much the company plans to spend on the engagement or how long refugees will be housed.

The US announced Monday that it has evacuated around 48,000 people from Afghanistan in the past few days, while thousands are still trying to flee, fearing reprisals from the Taliban fighters now in power.

The main exit point is Kabul Airport, where huge crowds have gathered in the sweltering heat. The Taliban have set August 31 as the airlift deadline and there are concerns that many who want to leave the country will not be able to leave the country.

“The displacement and resettlement of Afghan refugees in the US and elsewhere is one of the greatest humanitarian crises of our time,” said Chesky. “We feel a responsibility to become stronger.”

He added, “I hope this inspires other business leaders to do the same. There is no time to waste.”

Chesky urged Airbnb hosts to reach out to him if they would like to host a refugee family and promised to connect them with the right people at the company.

Companies of all shapes and sizes are rushing to show their support to victims in times of great crisis; it is an opportunity to be non-profit while strengthening public relations.

Texas Medical Technology, a medical equipment supplier and distributor, told CNBC Tuesday that it plans to recruit 100 Afghan refugees at a 150,000-square-foot manufacturing facility in Houston within a year.

Airbnb, valued at around $ 92 billion, often offers to cover emergency housing costs. Since 2012, 75,000 people have found a place to stay in times of crisis.

Categories
Entertainment

Oklahoma’s Reward to Ballet: The 5 Moons Ballerinas

Balanchine, who America adored, loved her Osage legacy, she wrote in her 1997 autobiography. In the 1944 version of his “Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme”, which contained a “Danse Indienne” pas de deux, however, tense cultural characterizations prevailed. In a performance that has been sharply preserved on 16-millimeter film, Maria dances fast, stylized parallel elevations of her knees, wearing a puffy feather headdress, pompoms and a sash. (Balanchine later completely reworked the ballet, without “Danse Indienne”.) Maria later played important roles in ballets such as “Firebird” and “The Four Temperaments” and became a beacon of American dance.

Marjorie followed her sister into professional ballet, joining the Ballet Theater and then de Basils Original Ballet Russe and the Grand Ballet du Marquis de Cuevas in France. In 1956 she was appointed to the Paris Opera Ballet as the first American étoile.

Hightower also made her career primarily in Europe, eventually becoming a leading ballerina with the Grand Ballet du Marquis de Cuevas. She was so popular that when she returned to the company in 1957 after completing a tour contract with the ballet theater, the audience applauded for 15 minutes when she performed in “Piège de Lumière”.

These five excellent Native American ballerinas all came from Oklahoma within a decade. As students, they attended some of the same studios and master classes, including in Kansas City and Los Angeles, but in fleeting phases, such as they sometimes performed together in companies during their careers. In several interviews, Chouteau credited her Shawnee-Cherokee heritage as her inspiration for dancing. (As a child, she toured Oklahoma, her family insisted on the authenticity of each of her dances.) Marjorie Tallchief noted the immense impact Ballet Russe had on small towns as it traveled across the country.

Chouteau and Larkin then performed alongside the dancers whom the audience once admired them. Chouteau was a leading ballerina with the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo, which she joined at 14; and Larkin made her career with companies such as de Basils Ballet Russe and the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo.

As professionals, the Five Moon dancers would face challenges, not just because of the constant travel, but also because they needed to find their place in the culture of their companies not only as Oklahomans but also as native women. Since they were from the United States, they were perceived by the public and press as generally informal and on stage with ease. Though internationally respected, Hightower was still referred to as the “little American girl” in a feature in Dance Magazine. Chouteau remembered her fellow dancers encouraging her to pronounce her name in French rather than as she pronounced it in her family. They were American at a time when ballet wasn’t exactly American.