Categories
Health

F.D.A. Authorizes Third Covid Shot for Immunocompromised

The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday approved the third dose of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna’s coronavirus vaccines for some people with compromised immune systems, giving doctors more leeway to protect those who have failed to respond adequately to an initial series of vaccinations .

The approval, in the form of updates to the existing emergency approvals, for the two vaccines is for people who have received solid organ transplants and others with similarly compromised immune systems, the FDA said.

The agency’s decision came a day before the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s independent advisory committee was due to review and vote on whether to recommend the move. The committee will likely give its approval, and the CDC would follow suit with its own approval of the additional doses.

“The FDA is particularly aware that immunocompromised people are at particular risk for serious illness,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting FDA commissioner, in a statement. “After a thorough review of the available data, the FDA determined that this small, vulnerable group could benefit from a third dose of the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna vaccines.”

The approval of the third dose marks a busy next stage for federal vaccine authorities – and a new phase in the country’s vaccination campaign. The agency is expected to approve Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine by early next month. This will most likely trigger a wave of vaccination requests from companies and organizations that have waited to be vaccinated until the FDA has fully cleared a vaccine.

At the same time, government scientists and regulators are wrestling over whether more Americans will need booster vaccinations, a hotly debated move that many scientists argue is not yet backed by data. Other countries like Israel and Germany have introduced booster policies.

“Other people who are fully vaccinated are adequately protected and do not currently need an additional dose of the Covid-19 vaccine,” said Dr. Woodcock in her statement on Thursday, adding that the agency is “actively engaged in a science-based, rigorous process with our federal partners to consider whether an additional dose might be required in the future.”

The United States is the youngest country to start offering a third dose to people with weaker immune systems. France has been offering extra doses of vaccine to certain people with weak immune responses since April, and Germany and Hungary have recently followed suit.

About 3 percent of Americans have weakened immune systems for a variety of reasons, from a history of cancer to taking certain medications, such as steroids.

The FDA’s decision to limit the category of immunocompromised individuals to receive the additional dose was awaited. Many scientists argue that the immunocompromised population is too diverse to consistently recommend additional shots of the coronavirus vaccine. Some, despite their conditions, can be protected by the standard vaccine dose. Others may be poorly shielded by the vaccines but may not benefit from additional vaccination.

Studies suggest that patients such as organ transplant recipients are in between – often showing a poor immune response to the standard vaccination schedule but benefiting from a third vaccination. A recent randomized, placebo-controlled study by Canadian researchers found that a third dose of the Moderna vaccine improved the immune response of the people in this group.

Categories
Politics

U.S. decide denies landlords’ request to dam CDC nationwide eviction ban

Housing advocates and New York City renters march to call on Governor Andrew Cuomo to cancel rent on October 10, 2020 amid the pandemic.

Andrew Lichtenstein | Corbis News | Getty Images

A US judge on Friday denied a motion by rental groups to block the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new eviction moratorium.

The decision of US District Judge Dabney Friedrich is a win for the Biden government.

More than 11 million Americans are left behind with their rentals, prompting the CDC to issue a new eviction ban earlier this month after the previous one expired on July 31. This protection is valid until October 3rd and for places where Covid rates remain high.

Broker groups are likely to appeal against Friedrich’s decision.

More from Personal Finance:
The federal rent subsidy is still not reaching the people
There are still six months free of federal student loan payments
Take these financial steps before you quit your job

The CDC’s eviction ban has faced numerous legal challenges and landlords have criticized it, saying they couldn’t afford to house people for free or shoulder the land’s massive arrears in rent. On Thursday the US Supreme Court lifted at least part of the eviction moratorium in New York.

Housing advocates say evictions must be banned until states distribute the $ 45 billion in rental subsidies provided by Congress. According to a recent analysis by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, only around $ 4.2 billion of that money has reached households.

“It is imperative that cities and states provide rental subsidies to vulnerable communities as soon as possible to prevent evictions and the public health impact in all of our communities,” said Emily Benfer, visiting law professor at Wake Forest University.

Categories
World News

Taliban seize two key Afghan cities as U.S. evacuates embassy workers

Taliban fighters stand over a damaged police vehicle along the roadside in Kandahar on August 13, 2021.

AFP | Getty Images

The Taliban overtook two of Afghanistan’s largest cities, the latest conquests for the insurgents who are rapidly wresting control of the country just weeks before the U.S. was set to complete its withdrawal of troops there.

Islamist militants captured Kandahar, the second-most populous city in the country, as well as the third-largest city of Herat, NBC News reported Friday, citing a Taliban spokesman and local Afghan officials.

The insurgents have now seized at least half of Afghanistan’s 34 provincial capitals, taking control of roughly two-thirds of the nation and encircling Kabul, where the U.S. Embassy is preparing to evacuate all but its core diplomatic personnel.

Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

Afghan government security forces have crumpled and many civilians have fled their homes amid the Taliban’s surprisingly swift advance toward the nation’s power center.

But the White House on Friday morning said Biden stands by his decision to end the U.S. presence in Afghanistan after nearly two decades of fighting in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

“The President is firmly focused on how we can continue to execute an orderly drawdown and protect our men and women serving in Afghanistan,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement.

“You heard him earlier this week: he does not regret his decision,” Psaki said.

In addition to the deployment of three infantry battalions from the Marines and Army to Kabul, a U.S. infantry brigade will be positioned on standby in Kuwait. Another 1,000-member unit comprising Army and Air Force personnel will deploy to Qatar to help process special immigrant visas for Afghan nationals who assisted U.S. and NATO troops during the war.

US national flag is reflected on the windows of the US embassy building in Kabul on July 30, 2021.

Sajjad Hussain | AFP | Getty Images

Nevertheless, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Thursday that the U.S. still expects to fully withdraw all troops by the end of August.

Britain said Thursday it will send about 600 troops to help its citizens leave Afghanistan, where about 4,000 U.K. nationals are believed to be stationed. Canada is also deploying special forces to the country to evacuate staff in the Canadian Embassy in Kabul.

This is developing news. Please check back for updates.

— CNBC’s Amanda Macias contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

Anthony Scaramucci say his agency’s Covid vaccine mandate is about ‘freedom’

SkyBridge founder Anthony Scaramucci on Friday urged the American company to show “real leadership” with Covid vaccinations as the country battles a spate of infections linked to the highly contagious Delta variant.

“This is a personal security and freedom problem. You know, I have the freedom to move my arm, but I don’t have the freedom to close my fist and put it in someone’s face, ”Scaramucci said on“ Squawk Box. ”“ This is a freedom problem for all people. The vaccines will create more freedom, not less. “

The Wall Street veteran has ordered that his investment firm employees be vaccinated to return to the office, a decision he believes has been criticized. But he added, “I don’t really care.”

A CNBC poll in late July found sharp disagreements in the United States over whether vaccination regulations should be implemented. However, several large companies have put strict vaccination policies in place for some or all of their employees in the past few weeks, including United Airlines, Walmart, and meat packer Tyson Foods.

“There is an ideological struggle going on in the United States right now that is not based on science. It is not based on health and safety. It takes real leadership, ”said Scaramucci. “It takes corporate governance and political leadership to explain to people that we need a vaccination card, just like your children have a vaccination card at school to protect the health and safety of those around us.”

The number of US vaccinations has increased in recent weeks, especially in states badly affected by the Delta variant such as Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana and Alabama. The new surge comes after coronavirus cases dropped dramatically when vaccinations were introduced in the spring.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 59% of all Americans eligible for the Covid vaccine – ages 12 and up – are fully immunized, while 69.2% have received at least one dose.

Scaramucci, who briefly served as then-President Donald Trump’s communications director in the White House, said he understands that some Americans have lost trust in institutions and are suspicious of Covid vaccines, despite the extensive evidence showing their ability to do so Reduce risk of hospitalization and death from the disease.

“We have to rebuild that to get these people familiar with things like these vaccines,” he said. However, he added, “It’s safer to get vaccinated. Why take your family to hospital despite the struggle, God forbid? I feel very strong about it.”

Categories
Health

El coronavirus en adultos mayores puede tener síntomas sigilosos

Entender que algo tan vago como la debilidad, la confusión o la pérdida de apetito puede ser señal de una infección por covid también puede ayudar a proteger a amigos y familiares, que pueden aislarse y hacerse las pruebas ellos mismos. “No solo ayuda al individuo, sino que también puede contener la propagación del virus”, afirma Mylonakis.

Un diagnóstico de covid también puede evitar pruebas y procedimientos innecesarios. “Podemos evitar pruebas innecesarias, pinchar y hurgar y hacer tomografías”, dijo Carney. Las tomografías son caras, engorrosas y llevan tiempo de programación y análisis; un hisopo nasal para covid es rápido, relativamente barato y ahora está ampliamente disponible.

Con la generalización de la vacunación, los síntomas de la COVID-19 en los adultos mayores pueden ser aún más sutiles. La fiebre es fácil de medir, y la dificultad para respirar enviará a cualquiera a un servicio de urgencias, señaló Carney, mientras que “no necesariamente notamos si alguien ha dejado de comer”.

Su consejo, para los pacientes de edad avanzada y sus cuidadores y médicos, es estar atentos a los cambios que se producen de manera apresurada, en cuestión de días. “Cuando hay un cambio en el comportamiento, físico o cognitivo, puede no parecer una infección, pero hay que mantener la covid en lo más alto de la lista”, recomendó.

La mujer con la hija preocupada en efecto había contraído el virus; murió en un hospital.

Pero los Bily se recuperaron y siguen viviendo en su casa de dos pisos de Oceanside. Eugene Bily tuvo muchos problemas de salud incluso antes de la pandemia. En los últimos 18 meses, fue sometido a dos operaciones de cadera y a varias otras hospitalizaciones. En junio, empezó a recibir cuidados paliativos en casa.

No obstante, Rosemary Bily se recuperó por completo del virus. A sus 86 años, va en auto al supermercado y a la farmacia, visita su peluquería cada semana, se mantiene en contacto con la familia a través del iPad y el celular y ayuda a cuidar a sus nietas.

“Le va bien”, comentó Lamanno. “Ha retomado su vida normal”.

Categories
Politics

Moderates Threaten Stalemate Over Price range Vote and Infrastructure

WASHINGTON – Nine moderate House Democrats told Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi on Friday that they will not vote for a budget decision that will pave the way for a $ 3.5 trillion social package to be passed later this year, until one dated Senate-approved infrastructure law passed the house and is legally signed.

The commitment in a letter early Friday is a major rift that threatens the carefully choreographed, two-pronged efforts of the Democrats in Congress and the Biden administration, both a trillion-dollar non-party infrastructure deal and an even more ambitious – but partisan one – To adopt the contract. social policy measure. The nine members of the House of Representatives are more than enough to block scrutiny of the draft budget in a house where Democrats have a three-seat majority.

The Senate passed the infrastructure bill on Tuesday with 69 votes, including 19 Republicans. It then approved a $ 3.5 trillion budget resolution in a party line vote early Wednesday that would allow Democrats in both houses to pass the social policy bill this fall without fear of a Republican Senate filibuster say goodbye.

To reassure more liberal Democrats who are more interested in the social policy law, Ms. Pelosi promised that she would not put the infrastructure law to the vote in the House of Representatives until the Senate passes the social policy law.

Given the 50-50 partisan split in the Senate, this may not happen well into the fall. And moderate Democrats in the House of Representatives say delaying an infrastructure vote runs the risk of unforeseen events derailing them.

“With the livelihoods of hard-working American families at stake, we simply cannot afford months of unnecessary delays and risk wasting this century’s bipartisan infrastructure package,” the letter submitted to and submitted to the New York Times reads Josh Gottheimer, Democrat of New Jersey, as lead author. “It’s time to shovel shovels in the ground and get people to work.”

Complicating the situation is that more than half of the nearly 100-strong Progressive Caucus in Congress take the opposite position, saying they won’t vote for the Infrastructure Bill until they have a sociopolitical measure that funds their priorities: climate change , Education, healthcare, family vacations, childcare and elderly care.

With the promised defectors from the Progressive Caucus, it appears that Ms. Pelosi is facing a stalemate as she does not have the votes to either get the infrastructure bill to President Biden’s desk or move forward the budgetary resolution needed to bring final Republican legislation forward Protect disability.

So far, most Democrats in Congress have been optimistic that both measures will find enough support.

“This is President Biden’s agenda, this is the Democrats’ agenda, this is what we walked on and what we need to deliver,” Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Progressive Caucus leader, said of the social policy bill. “It is important for us not to miss the target and I see no conflict.”

But their moderate counterparts do. “We will not consider voting for a budget decision until the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Bill is passed by the House of Representatives and comes into effect,” they wrote.

The draft letter was signed by Mr. Gottheimer and representatives Filemon Vela from Texas, Henry Cuellar from Texas, Ed Case from Hawaii, Kurt Schrader from Oregon, Carolyn Bourdeaux from Georgia, Jared Golden from Maine, Vicente Gonzalez from Texas and Jim Costa from California.

Categories
Entertainment

Occasions Newsletters Director Pronounces Adjustments

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and gives a behind-the-scenes look at how our journalism comes together.

Newsletters have an even longer history than newspapers, and e-mail is decades older than the web. Despite this long pedigree, email newsletters have a very lively moment – and here at The New York Times we strive to bring even more depth, ambition, and size to our range.

This summer, it will be 20 years since The Times published their first newsletters. We started in 2001 with technology, books and finance, among other things. Some of these newsletters still thrive in different versions as part of a portfolio that reaches approximately 15 million people each week – a number that has grown over the past two years. Flagships such as The Morning and DealBook serve as a target for readers and as an important gateway and guide to our journalism, while offering original reporting and analysis.

As the editor-in-chief of the Times newsletter, I’ve been thinking with my colleagues about what’s next. How can we break new ground in the inbox and cover the topics that are most important to our readers in a differentiated manner?

Newsletters are already an integral part of our subscriber experience: almost half of our subscribers use a newsletter every week. This week we’re pulling the curtain back on a new breed of Times journalism: more than 15 newsletters available only to our subscribers. The aim is to further develop the inbox as a goal for our journalism and to create added value for a Times subscription.

The first batch focuses on topics that inspire our readers, is filled by journalists with in-depth specialist knowledge and offers exciting, diverse new voices. It includes newsroom favorites Well, On Tech, At Home and Away, On Soccer, and Watching, as well as columnists like Paul Krugman and Jamelle Bouie.

It also includes a new set of newsletters in Opinion (which, aside from our news operations, remains a completely separate, independent entity):

  • John McWhorter, a Columbia University linguist, will examine how race and language shape our politics and culture.

  • Kara Swisher, The moderator of the podcast “Sway” will open her notebook to follow the changing power dynamics in technology and media.

  • Tressie McMillan Cottom, Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, will offer a sociological perspective on the culture, politics and economy of our everyday lives.

  • Tish Harrison Warren, an Anglican priest, reflecting on questions of faith in private life and in public discourse.

  • Peter Coy, an experienced business journalist, will unpack the biggest headlines with his decades of expertise.

  • Jay Caspian Kang, a wide-ranging cultural critic and contributor to the New York Times Magazine, will tackle sensitive political, cultural and economic issues.

  • Jane Coaston, Hosting the podcast, The Argument, provides context and analysis on the biggest debates in sport, politics and history.

All of these subscriber-only newsletters represent a unique collection of talent and expertise in opinion and the newsroom, supported by editors, designers, developers, product managers and other specialists.

We have spent most of the last year working towards this launch and more new and revamped newsletters – including a new version of On Politics and a revamped Smarter Living focused on getting back to work – will be released in the future months will belong to this first batch.

Here you can subscribe to the Times newsletter.

Categories
Health

Unvaccinated folks face extra Covid restrictions in future

Thousands of protesters took to the streets in Toulouse against France’s mandatory health pass on July 12th 2021. More than 234,000 people demonstrated across France against the pass which will be mandatory for entry to a wide array of public venues such as cafes, theaters, concerts hall, cinemas, shopping malls, public transportation, public swimming pools, and even hospitals unless there’s a critical situation.

NurPhoto | NurPhoto | Getty Images

LONDON — The divide between the vaccinated and unvaccinated when it comes to Covid-19 is likely to become even deeper, with officials in the U.S. and Europe planning, or introducing, an increasing number of restrictions on people who haven’t gotten a Covid shot.

Almost all governments around the world have so far resisted making Covid vaccination mandatory for their citizens, although many have introduced forms of Covid vaccination certificates, passes or passports that allow the immunized bearer more freedoms and work opportunities than unvaccinated people.

Aspects of daily life are increasingly complicated for anyone who is not vaccinated against Covid, and there is a rising sense of anger and injustice among those who reject the vaccine.

Vaccine fault lines

Despite protests among groups against such moves, the freedom to travel, work, socialize and engage in leisure activities is increasingly determined by our Covid vaccination status.

Nationally the U.S. has ruled out making Covid vaccination mandatory, rejecting the concept of vaccination passports back in April due to concerns over privacy and citizens’ rights. But some states are moving toward more restrictions for unvaccinated people.

Covid vaccinations are now mandatory for New York City’s municipal workers, and from mid-September proof of inoculation will be required from employees and customers of indoor eateries, gyms and entertainment centers. Meanwhile, workers in health care facilities in California will be required to provide proof that they’ve been fully vaccinated against Covid from October. On Monday, the Pentagon said it plans to make Covid vaccination mandatory for military service members no later than mid-September.

Read more: Herd immunity from Covid is ‘mythical’ with the delta variant, experts say

France, Greece and the U.K. are among European countries mandating vaccinations for health professionals or home care staff. In China, some local governments have reportedly said students will not be allowed back to school in September unless their entire family is fully vaccinated. In Australia, some states in lockdown are allowing only vaccinated people back to work and have said restrictions will be lifted only when a majority of people are immunized.

A large number of European countries now require travelers to show they are fully vaccinated, provide proof of a negative Covid test, or show that they have recovered from a recent infection. Otherwise, they must quarantine.

“I ask all those who have been vaccinated to encourage their friends, acquaintances and family members to also get vaccinated,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Tuesday, shortly after new measures were announced in that country. “This is not only a protection for us, but also for others who cannot be vaccinated — children or people with previous illnesses.”

‘Blackmail’ and ‘dictatorship’

There are many individuals who are unhappy about the trend toward differentiating between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Marco De Matteo, a young Neapolitan man who is a travel enthusiast, is angry about the situation in Italy where a “green pass” has been introduced, likening the situation to a “health and economic dictatorship.”

“Those in power are limiting, by law, individuals’ freedom and dignity,” he said. “The imposition of the green pass in the world of work, both in the public and in the private sector … is breaking society apart,” he told CNBC.

The pass is a digital or paper certificate that shows if someone has received at least one shot of a vaccine, has tested negative or has recently recovered from the coronavirus. The pass is now needed for any Italian citizen to access indoor bars and restaurants, cinemas, museums or gyms and will soon be required for travel and some jobs, such as teachers. Those who refuse will be suspended.

Members of the ‘No Vax’ take part in a demonstration against the introduction of a mandatory “green pass” in the aim to limit the spread of the Covid-19, at the Piazza del Popolo in central Rome on August 7, 2021.

ALBERTO PIZZOLI | AFP | Getty Images

De Matteo, and many others who are also concerned about encroachment on civil liberties, recognizes the need to protect the health of the community. But he says that for him “there are many doubts both about the nature of the virus and about the vaccine.” He also regrets negative stereotypes attributed to people that object to Covid vaccines.

“In Italy, many people are organizing peaceful demonstrations — people from all walks of life and economic backgrounds who care about everyone’s freedom, dignity and health — but they are labeled as conspiracy theorists,” he said.

Vaccine skepticism and outright anti-vaccination sentiment have become rife since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, coinciding with disinformation and misinformation on social media that can ultimately endanger lives. Clinical trials, peer-reviewed by international medical journals, have shown that vaccination reduces the spread of the virus and contributes to reducing deaths and severe illness.

Medical professionals, such as Dr. Scott Gottlieb, have repeatedly spoken of the benefits of vaccination. Gottlieb, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner, also told CNBC last month that people who have previously been infected with the coronavirus would still benefit from receiving Covid vaccines.

French yoga teacher Amel Lamloum told CNBC back in January that she didn’t see the advantages of having the Covid vaccine, given her young age (30) and good health.

Read more: France’s vaccine-skepticism is making its Covid immunization drive much harder  

Speaking to CNBC again Thursday, Lamloum said she still had not received the vaccine and was even more reluctant to do so now, given what she saw as “blackmail” by the French government to do so.

“I really think society has changed and that there is no justice anymore,” she said, adding that she no longer trusted the government and had prepared herself to adjust how she lived.

“Many, many people will not get the vaccine, for sure, and we will have to live in a side society and we are ready for it, we are ready for everything.”

Why the reluctance?

For millions of people who have been happy and willing to receive a Covid vaccine, the rollout of vaccination programs has offered protection against a highly transmissible virus. It’s also allowed a return to much-missed freedoms, from seeing loved-ones and socializing to shopping and traveling.

But others across the U.S. and Europe see vaccination programs with ambivalence or worse.

Some have been critical of the speed of Covid vaccine development, distrusting clinical data on the efficacy and long-term safety credentials of Covid vaccines. Others have questioned why they need a shot when Covid can be a mild or asymptomatic illness for many people, especially the young.

Public bodies like the World Health Organization have repeatedly reaffirmed the importance of vaccinating as many people as possible against Covid to curb the spread of the disease and allow a return to a normal societal functioning. Covid vaccines have been proven in extensive clinical trials involving hundreds of thousands of people to be safe and highly effective at preventing severe illness, hospitalization and death.

What’s less certain for experts is how long immunity lasts and whether future Covid variants could undermine vaccine efficacy. Many governments are weighing up the merits of booster vaccines too but for now, the main priority is to encourage vaccine uptake among the completely unvaccinated.

Who is most vaccine resistant?

Public confidence in vaccines, or the flipside of vaccine hesitancy, differs wildly from country to country and is often informed by the public’s trust in government and health care systems. France, for example, is renowned for a high rate of vaccine hesitancy, while vaccine uptake in the U.K. has traditionally been high.

One survey showed vaccine opposition highest in Russia, followed by the U.S., according to a global poll of 15 countries carried out by data intelligence company Morning Consult in July and August. With 43,054 interviews conducted in the U.S. alone, the percentage of people unwilling or uncertain about getting a Covid vaccine stood at 30%.

Young adults have a lower vaccine rate in every country that was tracked except in China, the poll also found, although that data could also reflect the speed and breadth of vaccination programs; some young adults are yet to be fully vaccinated in a number of countries polled.

Adults in the U.S. appear to be the most consistent when it comes to vaccine skepticism; the share of vaccine skeptics in the U.S. has remained at 30% for the past four weeks, Morning Consult said, and that share has only fallen by 4 percentage points since it began tracking in mid-April.

“Over that same time period, in the other 14 countries tracked, the share of skeptics has dropped by an average of 13 points, more than triple the decline in skepticism seen in the U.S.. No other country has seen a smaller decline,” Morning Consult noted.

The top reasons given for uncertainty over vaccines were concerns over side effects and worries that clinical trials had been conducted too fast.

Europe curbs

Back in Europe, parts of the leisure sector are being affected directly by the new rules. In Belgium, for instance, some soccer clubs are opening separate spectator stands for those who are unvaccinated. In the U.K., only the fully vaccinated will soon be able to enter a nightclub.

A number of countries have gone further, introducing types of Covid vaccination “passes” or “passports” at the national level, prompting criticism from some quarters.

France has introduced a “health pass,” meaning that individuals have to prove they are fully vaccinated, recently tested negative, or have recently recovered from the virus if they want to access cafes, restaurants, cinemas, museums and theaters. The pass has proved controversial, stoking protests attracting thousands of people who say the pass restricts civil liberties.

Charleroi, one of the Belgian soccer clubs introducing separate stands for unvaccinated fans.

VIRGINIE LEFOUR | AFP | Getty Images

Germany looks to be heading in a similar direction, aiming to encourage vaccine uptake by ending free, government-paid Covid tests while requiring anyone who’s not fully vaccinated (excluding children) to present a negative Covid test in order to access indoor spaces and events.

“Tests are therefore becoming a prerequisite, for example, for access to hospitals, old people’s and nursing homes, indoor catering, events and celebrations, but also for visits to the hairdresser or the cosmetic studio. The same applies to indoor sports or accommodation, for example in hotels and guest houses,” the government said on Tuesday.

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC contributor and is a member of the boards of Pfizer, genetic testing start-up Tempus, health-care tech company Aetion Inc. and biotech company Illumina. He also serves as co-chair of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings’ and Royal Caribbean’s “Healthy Sail Panel.”

Categories
World News

Three extra main cities are underneath Taliban management, as the federal government’s forces close to collapse.

KABUL, Afghanistan – Three large cities in western and southern Afghanistan were confirmed to have fallen to the Taliban as the insurgent race for control of the country accelerated.

The Taliban captured Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand province, on Friday morning after a week-long battle that left parts of the city to rubble, hospitals full of wounded and dying, and residents asking what would come next under their new rulers. Hours earlier, the insurgents had captured Herat, a cultural center in the west, and Kandahar, the country’s second largest city, where the Taliban first proclaimed their so-called emirate in the 1990s.

The speed of urban collapse, combined with the announcement by American officials Thursday that they would evacuate most of the U.S. embassy, ​​has compounded panic across the country as thousands attempt to flee the Taliban’s advance.

Only three large Afghan cities – including the capital Kabul – remain under state control, one is besieged by the Taliban. With the collapse of Lashkar Gah and Kandahar, the Taliban now effectively control southern Afghanistan, a powerful symbol of their resurrection, just weeks before the United States will withdraw completely from the country.

Last week, the Taliban took over Afghan cities in a swift offensive, placing them well-positioned to attack Kabul. The government’s armed forces appear to be on the verge of complete collapse. Some American officials fear that the Afghan government will not hold out for another month.

Helmand Province is an unstable area that has been largely controlled by the Taliban since 2015. In recent months, the Afghan government has struggled to hold its own there, and recent air strikes by the United States and the Afghan Air Forces in the region have failed to halt the Taliban’s offensive.

Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand, has been on the brink of disaster for more than a decade. Helmand has long been the home of the Taliban, which after the rise of the group in neighboring Kandahar in 1994 spread into the province and earned millions there from the illegal sale of opium poppies.

The fall of Lashkar Gah is a sad coda for the American and British military missions to Helmand, which together lasted over a decade. Both countries focused much of their efforts on securing the province, losing hundreds of troops there to roadside bombs and brutal shootings.

Kandahar in particular is a huge asset to the Taliban. It is the economic center of southern Afghanistan, and it was the birthplace of the uprisings in the 1990s and served as the militant capital for part of their five-year rule. By conquering the city, the Taliban can effectively proclaim a return to power, if not complete control.

On Friday, officials from Uruzgan and Zabul, two provinces long believed to be the Taliban’s heartland, said local elders in both are negotiating a full surrender of the territory to the insurgent group.

Taimoor Shah in Kandahar contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Rand Paul’s spouse purchased shares in Covid therapy maker Gilead as virus unfold

U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) listens to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing to discuss the on-going federal response to COVID-19, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 11, 2021.

Greg Nash | Reuters

WASHINGTON — Republican Sen. Rand Paul and his wife had not bought or sold stock in an individual company in at least 10 years when Kelley Paul purchased shares of the drug company Gilead Sciences in early 2020.

The purchase came early in the novel coronavirus’ initial wave through the United States — and one day after the first U.S. clinical trial began for Gilead’s remdesivir as a treatment for Covid-19, according to records reviewed by CNBC.

That purchase and its timing made headlines Wednesday when the Kentucky senator disclosed it for the first time in a mandatory Senate filing — more than 16 months after the legal deadline for reporting it had passed.

Rand Paul has been one of the leading opponents of Covid mask mandates and other preventative measures, calling for people to “resist” them. YouTube suspended his official account Tuesday over his claims that masks don’t prevent infections. Paul called the suspension a “badge of honor.”

The purchase of up to $15,000 worth of Gilead shares was made three weeks before the World Health Organization declared Covid a pandemic. On Feb. 26, 2020, the day Kelley Paul bought the shares, there were only 14 confirmed cases of Covid in the United States.

The 2012 STOCK Act requires members of Congress to disclose the purchase and sale of individual stocks, bonds and commodity futures within 45 days of the transaction.

Other assets — such as mutual funds, EIFs and T-bills — are exempt from the 45-day requirement and need to be disclosed only once a year. The different reporting schedules prioritize the disclosure of trades that could be used to profit from nonpublic information.

Since 2012, Paul has disclosed 187 transactions involving mutual funds, EIFs, trusts and government bonds in his annual reports. But he has disclosed only one transaction in an individual stock: Gilead.

Paul’s office said he filled out a disclosure form about the Gilead purchase on time in 2020, but through an oversight it was not transmitted to the Senate records office.

It is not out of the ordinary for a U.S. senator such as Paul or his spouse to buy stock in a publicly traded company like Gilead. But for Rand and Kelley Paul, Gilead is the first and only individual stock that the lawmaker has reported he or his wife buying or selling during his 10 years in the Senate.

Paul is a member of the Senate health committee, which received a private briefing in January 2020 on the threat of the coronavirus from Trump administration officials. A Paul spokesperson said the senator did not attend any Covid committee briefings.

A prominent Washington ethics lawyer, who declined to be named because his clients are both Republican and Democratic elected officials, told CNBC, “If the [Securities and Exchange Commission] were conducting an insider trading investigation of this transaction they would see the sudden purchase of individual stocks when the subject of the investigation had not purchased individual stocks before and had recently had access to market-moving information as a huge red flag.”

Last year, federal prosecutors investigated stock sales made in advance of a coronavirus-fueled market plunge by and connected to Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., then-Sen. Kelly Loeffler, R-Ga., and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.

Those probes ended without charges being filed — but the investigations and details about the controversial trades were widely publicized at the time. Loeffler was defeated in a runoff election in January.

By not disclosing the purchase, Paul avoided becoming the subject of an investigation like the ones that targeted his fellow senators last year.

Paul’s disclosure Wednesday was first reported by The Washington Post. But the fact that the Gilead shares were the couple’s one and only stock buy in the last decade has not been reported until now.

A spokeswoman for Paul said the senator and his wife “lost money” on the Gilead stock.

While it’s true that the price of Gilead is lower now than when Kelley Paul bought the shares, she has not sold the Gilead stock yet, meaning she has not realized any losses or gains from it.

CNBC asked Paul’s spokeswoman, Kelsey Cooper, if the senator or his wife had bought or sold any stocks in the year since the Gilead purchase. She did not answer.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

The price of Gilead stock has fluctuated since Kelley Paul bought shares at $74.70, climbing as high as $83.99 and falling as low as $56.56.

Gilead shares were trading at $70.65 late Thursday.

Exactly how many shares Kelley Paul owns is unclear. Senators are required to report the value of transactions by them or their spouses only within a range of dollar values. In this case, Kelley Paul bought between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of shares, Sen. Paul’s disclosure said.

Last month, Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., disclosed stock and stock option trades valued at a total of between $894,000 and $3.5 million from January through May.

Like Paul, Tuberville made his disclosure after the expiration of the deadline set by the STOCK Act.

Tuberville’s trades included a Jan. 25 sale of stock put options for Alibaba Group Holding Limited, the giant Chinese e-commerce company. Tuberville is a leading critic of China.

A Tuberville spokeswoman told CNBC last month that the senator had not even known about the individual stock and stock option trades and therefore also had not known they needed to be disclosed by the STOCK Act’s deadline.

She said Tuberville has financial advisors who handle his stock trading. She would not identify those managers when asked who they were.

Correction: This article has been updated to reflect the correct spelling of remdesivir.