Categories
Health

Jerome Kagan, Who Tied Temperament to Biology, Dies at 92

Prof. Jerome Kagan, a Harvard psychologist whose research on temperament found that shy infants often grow into anxious and anxious adults because of their biological nature and the way they were cared for, died on May 10 in Chapel Hill , NC 92.

His daughter, Jane Kagan, said he visited her for several months in North Carolina, where he had planned to move from his home in Belmont, Massachusetts, outside of Boston.

Prof. Daniel Gilbert, another Harvard psychologist and author, described Professor Kagan in an email as “one of the most influential psychologists of the 20th century”.

“His research was not only original and groundbreaking,” he added, “it was forward-looking, pointing to the impending merging of psychology and biology to connect behavior to the brain.”

Professor Kagan argued in more than two dozen books, including the widely acclaimed book The Nature of the Child (1984), that some children were genetically wired to worry and that they turned out to be more resilient than they expected one phase from passed maturity to another. He also argued that the specifics of parenting are often not as critical to a child’s future as parents think, although experience could alter the child’s natural tendencies to be shy or exuberant.

His conclusions that some children may be born predisposed to certain temperaments may have been a relief to the many parents of baby boomers who followed Dr. Benjamin Spock strictly followed, but raised a generation of rebellious teenagers in the 1960s.

Professor Kagan and his coworkers, including Howard A. Moss and Nancy C. Snidman, pioneered the reintroduction of physiology as a determinant of psychological traits that could be measured in the brain.

They derived their conclusions from lengthy studies beginning with the videotaped responses of toddlers and infants as young as 4 months of age to various stimuli – unknown objects, people, and situations – and correlated these responses with their temperament as teenagers and beyond , measured in interviews.

The cautious, those subdued, shy, and hovering around their mothers, or those agitated, flogged, and cried – about 15 percent of the total – tended to become anxious, self-conscious adults. Another 15 percent who were exuberant as infants, hugging every new toy and interviewer, turned into fearless children and teenagers.

Professor Kagan acknowledged that, as an ideological liberal, he originally believed that all individuals would be able to achieve similar goals if they had the same opportunities. “I have been so resilient to giving much influence to biology,” he wrote.

But he also concluded that properly implemented educational remedial measures are valuable because a large majority of children, regardless of race or class, apart from the small number with acute brain damage, have the ability to master the intellectual skills schools need as long as students were confident that they could succeed.

Professor Kagan reassured women who worked outside the home that daycare infants were little different from those at home with their mothers in terms of attachment, separation, cognitive function, and language.

His “The Nature of the Child” was celebrated because Professor Kagan, as the psychologist and writer Daniel Goleman wrote in the New York Times Book Review, “was one of the rare scholars who also mastered the art of the essayist.”

Jerome Kagan, a grandson of immigrants from Eastern Europe, was born in Newark on February 25, 1929 to Joseph and Myrtle (Liebermann) Kagan, who ran a shoe store in Rahway, New Jersey

“I remember being a scared kid,” he stammered during his first two years in elementary school, recalled in a 1993 oral history interview with the Society for Research in Child Development.

In those days, parents and psychologists understood the source of many fears to be experiential. That was fascinating for him.

“In the 1940s and 50s, many citizens and social scientists believed that the main cause, if not the only cause, of the problems plaguing our species were childhood experiences,” he told the Harvard Gazette in 2010.

“It followed,” he added, “that anyone who discovered the specific experiences that led to a mental illness, crime, or failure at school would be a hero doing God’s work.” Given this zeitgeist, who would not have the idea of ​​becoming a child psychologist? “

In 1950 he graduated from Rutgers University with a bachelor’s degree in biology and psychology and received his PhD in psychology from Yale in 1954, where he was hired by Prof. Frank A. Beach, a prominent psychologist, to study.

He briefly taught at Ohio State, was drafted into the army, and did research at the West Point Military Hospital. He then joined the Fels Research Institute in Yellow Springs, Ohio, where his and Dr. Moss’ work led to a book on child development, Birth to Maturity (1962).

He accepted an offer from Harvard to help set up his first human development program, and was appointed professor of psychology there in 1964. Until his retirement in 2005, he stayed at Harvard for one year of field research in Guatemala.

In 1963, Professor Kagan was awarded the Hofheimer Prize of the American Psychiatric Association. In 1995 he received the G. Stanley Hall Award from the American Psychological Association.

His other books include “The Child’s Growth: Reflections on Human Development” (1978), “Galen’s Prophecy: Temperament in Human Nature” (1994), and “A Trio of Aspirations: Mysteries in Human Development” (2021) .

In addition to his daughter Jane, a granddaughter and great-grandson survive. His wife, Cele (Katzman) Kagan, whom he married in 1951, died in 2020.

What inhibitions Professor Kagan had as a fearful child with a stutter, he apparently exceeded them.

“Every meeting with Jerry started with ‘I’ve just learned something amazing! ‘After that, he would prove he did it,’ said Harvard Professor Gilbert. “He grabbed your hand and shoulder and pulled you towards him, and he didn’t let go of anything until you agreed that this new fact, idea, or discovery was actually the most amazing thing you have ever thought about.

“And then he would say, ‘So what have you been learning lately?’ and expect you to dazzle him in return. “

Categories
Business

Republicans Reject Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal

WASHINGTON – The Biden administration sent Senate Republicans on Friday an offer for a bipartisan infrastructure deal that cut off more than $ 500 billion from the president’s original proposal. A move that White House officials hoped would fuel talks but Republicans were quick to reject.

The lack of progress encouraged Liberals in Congress to re-urge Mr Biden to abandon his hopes of compromise with a Republican conference that has labeled his $ 4 trillion economic agenda too expensive and undirected. Instead, they urged the president to begin an attempt to postpone his party line plans through the same process that spawned his economic incentive legislation earlier this year.

Mr Biden has repeatedly said that he wants to postpone his infrastructure plans with bipartisan support, which the main centrist Democrats in the Senate have also called for. But the president has insisted that Republicans spend far more than they say they are ready to spend.

He also says the bill must include a broad definition of “infrastructure” that includes investments in combating climate change and providing home health care that Republicans have termed overly expansive.

The sides stay wide apart. Mr Biden’s most recent offer includes spending of $ 1.7 trillion, a decrease of more than $ 500 billion from its original proposal. It includes building or repairing roads, bridges, water pipes, broadband Internet, the electrical grid, and a national network of EV charging stations, as well as investing in home care for the elderly and disabled.

The Republicans have countered with a $ 568 billion plan, though many Democrats consider that offer to be even smaller as it includes expanding some federal infrastructure spending to expected levels. In a memo to Republicans received by the New York Times on Friday, Biden administration officials rated the Republicans’ offer as no more than $ 225 billion, “above current levels that Congress has traditionally funded “.

The President’s new offer makes no effort to resolve the even more difficult problem that divides the parties: how to pay for these expenses. Mr Biden wants to levy taxes on companies that Republicans speak out against. Republicans want to use money from Mr Biden’s $ 1.9 trillion economic aid package, signed in March, for other purposes, including levying usage fees such as the president’s rejected gas tax.

Mr. Biden “fundamentally contradicts the approach of increasing the burden on working people through increased gas taxes and usage charges,” administrative officials wrote in their memo to Republican negotiators. “As you know, he has made a commitment to the American people not to levy taxes on those who earn less than $ 400,000 a year, and he intends to honor that commitment.”

Still, the new proposal shows some movement from the White House. It cuts out an important provision of Mr. Biden’s “American Jobs Plan”: hundreds of billions of dollars in advanced manufacturing, research and development efforts to enable the United States to work with China for supremacy in emerging industries such as advanced batteries to compete. Legislature has incorporated some, but not all, of the government’s proposals in these areas into non-partisan law currently going through the Senate.

Mr Biden’s counter offer would also reduce the amount he would like to spend on broadband internet as well as on highways and other road projects. He would essentially take on the Republicans’ $ 65 billion broadband offer of $ 100 billion and cut his highway spending plans by $ 40 billion to meet them halfway through. And what is known as an infrastructure bank would emerge, trying to leverage private infrastructure investments with public seed capital – and which the Republicans have been pushing for.

Updated

May 21, 2021, 6:50 p.m. ET

Republican senators, who were introduced to the offer on a conference call with administration officials on Friday, expressed disappointment despite vowing to continue the talks.

“During today’s call, the White House came back with a counteroffer that is well beyond what Congress can pass with bipartisan support,” said Kelley Moore, a spokeswoman for West Virginia Senator Shelley Moore Capito who oversees the Republican negotiations leads group.

“There are still big differences between White House Republicans and Senate Republicans when it comes to defining infrastructure, proposed spending and how they are paid,” Ms. Moore said. “After today’s meeting, the groups seem further apart after two meetings with White House staff than they did after meeting President Biden.”

The White House’s updated offer was also immediately pushed back by the progressives, showing the extent to which the forces opposed to a deal are bipartisan. Senator Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, urged his party not to waste time haggling with Republicans over details that do not share their vision for what the country needs.

“A smaller infrastructure package means fewer jobs, less justice, less climate change and less investment in America’s future,” Markey said in a press release.

Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill have been skeptical of the talks, fearing that Republicans will waste precious time on the legislative calendar and ultimately refuse to agree to a deal big enough to please Liberals. While giving the White House Senator and Republicans leeway to pursue an alternative, party leaders are increasingly under pressure from progressives to unilaterally pass a bill through the Senate budget reconciliation.

They have taken quiet steps to make this possible in case the conversations break down. Advisors to Senators Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and majority leader, and Bernie Sanders, independent of Vermont and chairman of the Budget Committee, met with the Senate MP on Thursday to discuss options for a Republican-free trial under the rules.

Biden administration officials were frustrated that Republicans failed to approach the president in a new offer they made in negotiations on Capitol Hill this week. They made it clear to Republicans on Friday that they expect a significant move in the next counteroffer and that the negotiating timetable is getting shorter and shorter, said a person familiar with the discussions.

The administration could soon negotiate with several groups of senators. Another bipartisan group plans to meet on Monday evening to discuss the amount of expenses and proposals for their payment. Members of the group – including Mitt Romney from Utah, Susan Collins from Maine, Bill Cassidy from Louisiana and Rob Portman from Ohio, all Republicans as well as Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona and Joe Manchin III from West Virginia, both Democrats – helped draft a non-partisan coronavirus Aid law in December.

Categories
Politics

White Home sees world minimal company tax as key to broader multilateral strategy

U.S. President Joe Biden will address jobs and the economy at the White House in Washington on April 7, 2021.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

The White House stressed Friday that its efforts to introduce a global minimum corporate tax are a top priority for President Joe Biden and are more than just a topic of conversation for economists around the world.

Daleep Singh, who serves as both Deputy National Security Advisor and Deputy Director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC that efforts to get allies to adopt a minimum tax are motivated by both economic and national security factors.

“It’s not just a tax issue. It’s about: How do we fund initiatives that we believe are central to our domestic renewal?” he said.

Singh stated that the Association for Economic Co-operation and Development behind the minimum tax would allow all members to compete just for their ability to promote innovation and the ingenuity of their respective workforce.

The U.S. Treasury Department has taken the lead in convincing today’s nations to introduce a global minimum tax. The department announced its 15% target on Thursday and said it was encouraged by early conversations with foreign officials over the past week.

A global minimum tax would also allow governments to better generate revenue for domestic projects that the Biden government believes are important to national security, Singh said.

“Our national security strategy is based on the renewal of the country. The kind of challenges I described earlier – the inequality we are witnessing, the tremendous importance of dealing with an existential climate crisis, people leaving the world of work – the government must play a more active role in addressing these challenges. “

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

The Treasury Department quickly realized that the 15% proposition below which some had forecast should be viewed as some kind of floor and that subsequent discussions could ultimately drive it up.

As Head of Department, Secretary Janet Yellen has repeatedly stressed the importance of stopping an international “race to the bottom” on global corporate tax rates. If a coalition of countries approves the 15% rate, it could help governments increase revenues and prevent certain jurisdictions from monopolizing the market for inclusion.

Countries with lower enterprise rates like Ireland and its 12.5% ​​rate have historically expressed doubts about efforts to garner support for a unified approach. Even some defectors of the plan could jeopardize the initiative by setting lower rates and effectively inviting companies to move there.

According to a study by the Tax Foundation 2020, the average top enterprise rate among OECD countries is 23.5%.

However, advocates of a global minimum argue that some countries routinely attract companies with much more relaxed tax regimes through various tax breaks and incentives.

When asked how the government intends to persuade low-tax countries to agree to Washington’s plans, Singh and his colleagues stressed the importance of a level playing field for tax policy.

“We are very clear: companies have been competing on the basis of [countries’] Tax rates. This is a destructive race to the bottom that makes everyone worse off. Especially employees who generate an ever larger share of our tax revenue, “he said.

“Our proposal is therefore to agree on a minimum tax rate for companies around the world. Then we will compete for our ability to innovate, the dynamism of our workforce and our technological edge,” added Singh.

That may be why the Biden government opted for a flexible benchmark: low enough not to scare skeptical countries, but open to change in the future.

The tax rate “corresponds to the minimum tax for highly profitable companies proposed by the Biden Administration, so 15% is where Biden believes the lowest corporate tax rate when all deductions are fully factored in,” said Raymond James analyst, Ed Mills in CNBC an email Thursday evening.

“This is lower than President Obama’s proposed 19% and recognizes that even 15% will be a tough task,” he added.

The Biden administration is in the midst of fierce negotiations at home, particularly over two massive laws that would fundamentally change parts of the US economy.

The infrastructural American employment plan would invest several hundred billion dollars in rebuilding hard infrastructure, but also in financing scientific innovations, paying for household help and building around 500,000 charging stations for electric vehicles.

Its parallel proposal, the American Families Plan, provides $ 1.8 trillion to fund social programs that include paid family vacations and a free community college.

The White House hopes to fund much of that expense through its Made In America tax plan, a major overhaul of the tax code designed to expand the IRS to combat tax evasion and end the reinforced base for valuation of inherited capital Profits and introduction of the global minimum tax.

The Biden team has also proposed raising the U.S. corporate rate to between 25% and 28%. He wants households making more than $ 1 million a year to pay more for capital gains and close the interest income gap.

Categories
Health

5 issues to know earlier than the inventory market opens Friday, Could 21

Here are the top news, trends, and analysis that investors need to get their trading day started:

1. Stocks bet on more profits after stopping their three-day losing streak

Traders working on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on May 19, 2021.

NYSE

US stock futures pointed to a second straight day of gains on Wall Street, the day after a rebound rally halted a three-session loss. The Nasdaq rose nearly 1.8% on Thursday, dragging the tech-heavy index into positive territory for the week. Prior to Friday’s trading, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 were still lower for the week, despite progressing more than 0.5% and 1% respectively on Thursday. Tesla, chip stocks, and other speculative names that had great success in the previous session rebounded on Thursday as bitcoin prices rebounded.

2. Bitcoin is hovering above $ 40,000 after a wild week

A representation of the virtual currency Bitcoin can be seen in this illustration from May 19, 2021 in front of a stock graph.

Given Ruvic | Reuters

Bitcoin was trading above $ 40,000 on Friday as the rebound of the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market value stabilized to a three-month low near $ 30,000 after its collapse on Wednesday. Limiting concerns about U.S. demands for stricter cryptocurrency compliance with the IRS has been a concern to keep profits under control. The Treasury Department announced steps Thursday to require that transfers of $ 10,000 or more be reported to the IRS. At this week’s lows, Bitcoin fell more than 50% from April’s all-time highs near $ 65,000.

3. The US proposes a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen speaks during a daily press conference in the James Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House on May 7th in Washington, DC.

Alex Wong | Getty Images

The Biden government is proposing a minimum global corporate tax rate of 15%. However, Treasury said Thursday that the final rate could be even higher, citing 15% a “floor”, and discussions should continue to be ambitious and increase that rate. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who was Jerome Powell’s predecessor as chairman of the Federal Reserve, said setting a global minimum rate would help halt the “race to the bottom” for tax rates around the world.

4. Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, wants to testify in the Epic Games case

CEO Tim Cook speaks at an Apple event at corporate headquarters in Cupertino, California on September 10, 2019.

Stephen Lam | Reuters

Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, will take the stand on Friday to defend the company’s app store against allegations that have become an illegal monopoly. Apple relies on Cook’s appearance to complete the company’s defense against antitrust proceedings by Fortnite manufacturer Epic Games. Epic claims Apple’s App Store has turned into a budget vehicle that earns 15% to 30% commissions from in-app transactions and prevents apps from offering other payment alternatives.

5. Tesla is raising prices for the fifth time in recent months

Tesla’s Model Y compact crossover vehicles in a showroom in Shanghai, China on Jan. 18, 2021.

VCG | Visual China Group | Getty Images

According to EV news site Electrek, Tesla has raised prices for its 3 and Y models for the fifth time in the past few months. The Model 3 Standard Range Plus and Model 3 Long Range AWD rose by $ 500 and now started at $ 39,490 and $ 48,490, respectively. The Y Long Range AWD model also rose $ 500 and now started at $ 51,490. No reason was given for the increases. The prices for the Model 3 Performance and Model Y Performance vehicles have not been increased.

– The Associated Press contributed to this report. Follow all market action like a pro on CNBC Pro. With CNBC’s coronavirus coverage, you’ll get the latest information on the pandemic.

Categories
Business

Databricks on observe for $1 billion in 2022 income: Pete Sonsini, NEA

Ali Ghodsi, Co-Founder and CEO of Databricks.

Databricks

San Francisco-based start-up Databricks quickly grew into a respected provider of cloud software for managing data on behalf of companies, doubling its annual revenue. Then came the coronavirus pandemic.

The health crisis has weighed on the film, hospitality and travel sectors of the economy. For the tech industry, however, Covid proved to be a melting pot, revealing which technologies were necessary and which were not.

“There was a bit, maybe a month or two, where everyone was frozen in time as to what was going to happen,” said Pete Sonsini, an investor at New Enterprise Associates who joined Databricks’ board in 2014.

After this first phase, according to Sonsini, companies rushed to analyze data in the cloud to unlock computing resources without having to worry about managing the infrastructure in their own data centers.

“They have definitely accelerated through the pandemic,” he said, adding that the acceleration will continue through 2021. Now the company will generate sales of at least $ 1 billion in 2022.

Databricks announced in February that it had raised $ 1 billion on a $ 28 billion valuation that included the three largest U.S. cloud infrastructure providers – Amazon, Google and Microsoft. Investors were keen to put $ 2-3 billion in Databricks during the funding round, CEO Ali Ghodsi told CNBC at the time.

Databricks is increasingly looking for companies like Snowflake that offer data warehouse products that are used by large companies to store data from various sources, Sonsini said. In September, Snowflake made a monster debut on the New York Stock Exchange, ending its first day of trading with a market cap of $ 70 billion, down from $ 12 billion seven months ago. The stock has lost some of the momentum it gained after going public, but it’s still worth more than $ 60 billion.

Snowflake’s sales growth accelerated when the pandemic first hit. Growth has slowed since then, though the company is still doubling sales every quarter, which is an obvious competitive target.

Snowflake and Databricks initially focused on different things. Engineers relied on Databricks to cleanse large amounts of data and prepare it for analysis, while data analysts often looked to Snowflake to query the data and learn more about it. But the two have gotten closer. Databricks introduced the technology in November to query data stored in its software using the popular SQL query language.

When Snowflake took over from former ServiceNow CEO Frank Slootman in 2019 to succeed Bob Muglia, former CEO of Microsoft, as CEO of Snowflake, Muglia’s separation agreement said he couldn’t work with Databricks – or with the world’s leading cloud infrastructure companies . “They were a great partner but wanted to do more of what we do,” said Mike Scarpelli, CFO of Snowflake, in a fireplace chat hosted by JMP Securities in March.

It got to the point that data science consultancy Datagrom posted a blog post in November entitled “Snowflake vs. Databricks: Where Should You Put Your Data?” Published. The picture at the top of the post was a Venn diagram showing what the two companies have in common.

Ghodsi tried to differentiate Databricks from its competitors on his CNBC appearance in February. With Databricks, clients do not have to copy data into their software in order to work with it. Instead, data can stay where it already is, such as in Amazon Web Services’ widely used S3 object storage system, and Databricks can continue to process the data, he said.

Categories
World News

Why Asian People on Wall Avenue are breaking their silence

Alex Chi, Goldman Sachs

Source: Goldman Sachs

A year after the pandemic began in New York City, something snapped in Alex Chi.

The 48-year-old Goldman Sachs banker had been inundated with articles and video clips of horrifying, seemingly random attacks on Asian Americans in his home town. Then, in late March, eight people were gunned down in the Atlanta area — most of them immigrants from Korea and China — and Chi could stand it no longer.

The barrage of attacks forced a change in Chi, a partner and 27-year Goldman veteran. He became an in-house agitator of sorts, attending protests and rallying his colleagues around a simple idea: Silence is no longer an option.

“The message I’ve clearly put out to other Asian Americans is this: You have to start speaking up for yourselves,” Chi said in a recent interview. “We have to use this moment as an opportunity to finally make ourselves heard and change the narrative around Asian Americans in this country.”

This isn’t just the story of the political awakening of a single New York banker. It’s the story of thousands of Wall Street employees who are, many for the first time in their lives, connecting with co-workers in virtual chatrooms, over Zoom and in person to commiserate about being Asian in finance, and in America.

While Asian Americans make up one of the biggest minority groups in finance, comprising roughly 15% of the employees at the six biggest U.S. banks, few have made it to the operating committees of these institutions. Just one, former Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit, has led a top-tier bank.

Chi, who became a Goldman partner a decade ago, reaching one of Wall Street’s loftiest ranks, says he is one of the first Korean Americans to do so at the 151-year-old institution.

He believes Asian Americans at Goldman and beyond are now pushing back against the stereotype —rooted in a common cultural upbringing that stresses modesty and conflict avoidance and reinforced at times by workplace discrimination — that they are quiet, docile worker bees.

For the broader community, some 23 million people, the past few months have been the first time Asian American issues have reached the national stage in decades. The last time this has happened was probably in the early 1980s, when the beating death of Vincent Chin galvanized an earlier generation to form affinity groups, according to historians.

‘China virus’

The arrival of the coronavirus last year brought a surge in bias crimes against Asian Americans, especially in New York and California. Many of the assaults have been against senior citizens and women. The violence has shattered the sense of security for many in the group, according to the Pew Research Center.

But a silver lining to the racial scapegoating that accompanied Covid-19 has been that it has unified many Americans of Asian descent, the fastest-growing minority group in the U.S. They make up a significant portion of the corporate workforce in industries including finance, technology and health care, and are an emerging force in politics.

“There’s so many differences within Asians, but you’re treated as one group,” said Joyce Chang, chair of global research at JPMorgan Chase. “Now, being targeted for hate crimes, people are saying, we are being treated like a monolith, we may as well get organized.”

Lillie Chin, mother of Vincent Chin who was clubbed to death by two white men in June 1982, breaks down as a relative (L), helps her walk while leaving Detroit’s City County Building in April, 1983.

Bettmann | Getty Images

Chang says she studied the history of anti-Asian sentiment in the U.S. while at Columbia University in the 1980s, including the vicious 1982 killing of Chin by two bat-wielding Detroit autoworkers who mistakenly assumed he was Japanese. The killers, who blamed Japan for the decline of the U.S. auto industry, were fined $3,000 and avoided prison.

Chang said the current period reminds her of that time. Both for the larger issues — in the 1980s, anxiety over Japanese economic might was common, while today the emergence of China as a global superpower has policymakers worried — as well as the response.

The first use of the phrase “China virus” by former President Donald Trump on Twitter in March 2020 led directly to an increase in online and offline anti-Asian abuse, according to a recent report in the American Journal of Public Health. Trump had nearly 90 million followers before getting booted from the platform.

A close-up of President Donald Trump’s notes shows where Corona was crossed out and replaced with Chinese Virus as he speaks during a White House briefing, March 19, 2020.

Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

Now, people are forming pan-Asian affinity groups to help keep track of the bias attacks and boost philanthropy. One such nonprofit, the Asian American Foundation, launched this month and said it has already raised $125 million for AAPI causes over the next five years. It, along with JPMorgan and other organizations, have given money to Stop AAPI Hate, a new group that began tracking bias attacks in January 2020 after a rash of incidents in California.

Initially, it was journalists in New York and San Francisco who chronicled the attacks, which began in the early days of the pandemic and ramped up this year, occurring on a daily basis at times. Then Asian American celebrities including actors and athletes amplified the coverage. Posts on social media brought home the idea that even being famous and powerful didn’t insulate people from feeling vulnerable.

The movement has extended to the finance realm. At JPMorgan, Chang says that after the Atlanta shootings, attendance at an internal forum for Asian Americans had 6,100 participants, about 10 times larger than the typical attendance before the pandemic.

The sentiment of many of those I spoke with was something akin to shock. Several had had superlative careers on Wall Street, and yet here they were, reliving some of the same trauma from their childhoods they had believed was a thing of the past.

A demonstrator during a rally in Seattle on March 13, 2021.

Jason Redmond | AFP | Getty Images

Tom Lee, co-founder of research boutique Fundstrat and a regular CNBC on-air guest, said he faced “merciless anti-Asian attacks” growing up in a small town 25 miles from Detroit. That tough childhood helped him chart his own course as one of the best-known market prognosticators in the country, he said, because he had learned to tune out noise.

“It’s been easy to feel like Asians have a bit of a bull’s-eye on their backs,” Lee said in an interview.

Mike Karp, CEO of Options Group, a recruiting firm that has placed thousands of traders and salespeople on Wall Street in the past three decades, put it a different way.

“They thought they were part of the mainstream until this ‘Chinese virus’ stuff,” Karp, who is Indian American, said of his AAPI clients. “Now there’s a building resentment that people have, and they aren’t taking it anymore.”

West Coast bias

Distress over the violence she was seeing in San Francisco and the initial lack of national media attention moved Cynthia Sugiyama, a senior vice president at Wells Fargo, to publish a highly personal piece in March.

Sugiyama says she has been overwhelmed by the response to her column, published in the San Francisco Chronicle and LinkedIn, from colleagues and others who related to her experiences being harassed as a child, and her resolve to respond to the current moment.

“I’ve never before felt this sense of community as much as now,” Sugiyama said. “What makes this moment pivotal is that the surge in anti-Asian sentiment on one side has been met with a powerful swell on the other side from Asian Americans who are finding their voices.”

Cynthia Sugiyama, head of HR communications for Wells Fargo.

Source: Cynthia Sugiyama

Sugiyama, who manages human resources communications for a company of 264,513 employees, said that Asian American employees have flocked to internal forums to share their feelings and experiences.

According to employees at some of the biggest banks, one of the main topics being discussed is the difficulty Asian Americans have climbing the corporate ladder.

Wall Street hierarchy

The Wall Street model is to take in thousands of college graduates a year, placing them on the bottom of a hierarchy where analysts and associates grind out long hours in support of merger deals or trading activity. By design, few junior bankers make it to the vice president or director level, where annual compensation typically reaches several hundred thousand dollars. Fewer still make it to managing director, where pay packages often total more than $1 million a year.

For instance, at JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, about 25,000 employees identify themselves as Asian. While roughly 1 in 4 of the bank’s professional workers are Asian, just 10% are senior managers. At the very top of the organization, the bank’s 18-person operating committee led by CEO Jamie Dimon includes just one Asian person, Sanoke Viswanathan.

Park Ji-Hwan | AFP | Getty Images

Some have had the realization that the playbook used by Asian Americans to reach a certain level of workplace achievement isn’t enough anymore.

“Every bank is happy to hire a young Asian who will work double hard and is good at math and analysis,” said a Morgan Stanley employee who asked for anonymity to speak candidly. “As time goes on however, I noticed how most of the people I knew in Wall Street never really progressed past VP level, and many were laid off when cost-cutting rounds came.”

His explanation for this phenomenon is two-fold: Parents of Asian Americans drilled a set of principles into their children — study, work hard — that gets you past the first few hurdles at an investment bank, but that doesn’t necessarily help people advance beyond that. Further, little emphasis is given to so-called soft skills like public speaking and finding mentors, things needed at higher levels, he said.

Some corners of Wall Street are friendlier for Asian Americans than others, he said.

When it comes to stock research, people only care if an analyst makes them money, he said. With mergers advice, however, the client is always right, and sometimes owners of mid-sized and small companies didn’t want to work with nonwhite bankers, he said. In wealth management, Asian Americans often don’t have the social connections to help them succeed.

And, just as with Black and Latinx employees, Asian Americans are hindered because managers are more likely to support and promote people who look like themselves, he said.

‘A bit of bragging’

Lee, the Fundstrat co-founder, said that in his 24 years on Wall Street before striking out on his own, he often saw the careers of Asian Americans stall. What hampers them from progressing is an aversion to drawing attention to themselves and the clubby nature of banking at higher levels, he said.

“I’ve seen that the most successful people are the ones who do a bit of bragging,” Lee said. “Asians aren’t really good at that, and I think that hurts us, because it’s easy to not realize someone has a lot to offer if they aren’t bragging about it.”

Tom Lee, Fundstrat Global Advisors

Scott Mlyn | CNBC

Despite the general success of the cohort in the corporate setting, Lee says, Asian Americans haven’t been involved enough in other areas of civic life, especially politics.

That may be changing, however. Kamala Harris, who is of Indian-Jamaican heritage, became the first Asian American, Black and female vice president, and former presidential candidate Andrew Yang is a front-runner for New York mayor. Asian American voters were a key constituency in the last presidential election, casting a record number of votes in states where President Joe Biden eked out narrow victories.

Still, some of the Asian Americans interviewed for this story said they felt invisible at work. Or worse, given the spike in harassment and violence, some felt like permanent foreigners despite having lived in the U.S. for decades. Most Americans can’t name a single prominent living Asian American, according to a recent survey.

A big umbrella

Part of what has hamstrung an Asian American political movement is that the construct itself has always been an imperfect solution, a term created in the late 1960s to consolidate smaller cohorts to gain leverage amid the wider Civil Rights movement.

Today, the term Asian American includes people from more than 20 countries across East and South Asia, each with their own languages, food and culture. People who have familial roots in China, India, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea and Japan make up about 85% of all Asian Americans.

In fact, the presence of most Asians in the U.S. can be traced to the Civil Rights movement, which established that a race-based system of laws was unjust.

After an initial wave of immigration to the continental U.S. in the 1850s, Asians were seen as a “yellow peril” and explicitly excluded from coming to the U.S. for nearly a century by laws including the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

That changed after the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 opened up migration from Asia, Southern Europe and Africa, instead of solely favoring Western and Northern Europeans. The law would forever change the complexion of the country and happened only after the Civil Rights Act by President Lyndon Johnson.

President Lyndon Johnson signs the liberalized U.S. Immigration bill into law. Attending the ceremony on Liberty Island, (L-R) are: Vice President Hubert Humphrey; first lady Lady Bird Johnson; Mrs. Mike Mansfield (wife of the Senate Majority Leader); Muriel Humphrey; Sen. Ted Kennedy and Sen. Robert Kennedy, on October 4, 1965.

Bettmann | Getty Images

When Johnson signed the landmark immigration legislation in 1965, he was quoted as saying that the previous system “violated the basic principle of American democracy, the principle that values and rewards each man on the basis of his merit.”

Seminal moment

Back at Goldman Sachs, Chi realized he had a part to play after the horror of the Atlanta shootings, at least within the confines of his 40,300-person firm. Some managers hadn’t been aware of the violence against Asian Americans, particularly in public areas like subway platforms.

Now, amid the company’s push to encourage more employees to return to Goldman’s headquarters in lower Manhattan, workers were speaking up, telling managers that they didn’t feel safe. Employees got permission to expense rideshares for their commute, and the bank invited public safety experts to offer advice, Chi said.

“In the past, they would’ve just sucked it up and done what they needed to do,” Chi said. “Now, our Asian American community here is speaking up, and they’re going to their managers and saying, ‘I’m not comfortable. Have you seen what’s going on?'”

CEO David Solomon meets with Asian partners and senior leaders of Goldman Sachs’ Asian Network

David Solomon | Goldman Sachs

Chi also reached out directly to CEO David Solomon, who quickly set up a roundtable meeting where he listened to senior Asian American executives air their concerns. When Solomon shared a photo of the event on social media and the bank’s internal homepage, it opened up the firm to many more discussions where managers acknowledged they hadn’t known what their Asian American employees were going through, Chi said.

“When I walked out of that room with one of my partners, we turned to each other and said, ‘Wow, this is a seminal moment, because here we are with our CEO, talking very openly about Asian American issues,’ ” Chi said. “That’s never happened before.”

Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro
Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV. 
Sign up to start a free trial today.

Categories
Business

In Antitrust Trial, Tim Cook dinner Argues Apple Doesn’t Harm App Makers

Tim Cook, who testified on Friday in a lawsuit that could undermine Apple’s efforts to stave off growing control of its power, defended his company on allegations that it harmed app makers looking to increase their profits.

Mr. Cook, who took the stand for the first time as CEO of Apple, answered friendly questions from an Apple attorney and faced targeted questions from both an opposing attorney and the federal judge who will rule the case.

The results of the study could maintain or improve Apple’s dominance in the $ 100 billion app market. Epic Games, creator of the popular game Fortnite, is suing Apple, claiming the iPhone maker created a monopoly on its App Store and is using that power to take an unfair cut from other companies that rely on the App Store to Reach customers.

An epic win would enliven a growing cartel war against Apple. Federal and state regulators are scrutinizing Apple’s control over the App Store, and the European Union recently accused Apple of violating antitrust laws over its app rules and fees. Apple is facing two more federal lawsuits over its App Store fees – one from developers and one from iPhone owners – that are seeking class action lawsuit status.

Mr. Cook’s testimony came towards the end of a three-week lawsuit in federal court in Oakland, Calif., Dealing with the performance Apple gets from its App Store and 30 percent commission on the sale of most digital goods and subscriptions.

He entered the courthouse on Friday morning from an underground parking garage rather than the main entrance, which enabled him to avoid photographers gathering in front of the building. At around 7:30 am, journalists noticed he was going through security checks and shouted questions. Mr. Cook, wearing a dark gray suit, white shirt, and gray tie, held up his hand in a peace sign.

For over an hour, an Apple attorney led Mr. Cook through complaints against Apple, allowing him to explain why Apple did business in certain ways – and why it did no harm to app developers.

Mr Cook testified that Apple faced stiff competition and said commissions Apple collected from app developers helped fund better security in the App Store. “There’s a conflict between what the developer wants and what the consumer wants,” he said. He added that Apple has cut app store fees for many developers who are much smaller than Epic.

In a cross-examination, an epic attorney targeted Mr Cook’s credibility and asked why Mr Cook said he was unaware of some of the details of Apple’s business, including the App Store profit margins, which an outside expert testified on behalf of Epic said , could be up to 80 percent.

Mr. Cook said that was wrong. He said the App Store was profitable, but Apple hadn’t tried to pinpoint exactly how profitable it was, partly because it would be difficult to structure Apple’s costs.

Epic’s attorney denied this claim, showing internal Apple documents from Mr. Cook showing that the company could calculate the profitability of the App Store. Mr. Cook countered that the documents showed incomplete figures.

Epic’s attorney then moved on to an issue affecting the lawsuit, but it seemed to illustrate Apple’s hypocrisy: The way the company operates in China undermines Apple’s public enthusiasm for consumer privacy. The New York Times reported this week that Apple had compromised its Chinese users’ data and supported the Chinese government’s censorship by proactively removing apps.

While Mr Cook said Apple must obey laws in China, Epic’s attorney noted that other companies dissatisfied with Chinese policies had left the country. “I don’t know anyone in the smartphone business who doesn’t sell to China,” replied Cook.

The most worrying moment for Mr. Cook and Apple was the end of his testimony when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the US District Court for the Northern District of California participated in Mr. Cook’s questioning.

Throughout the trial, Judge Gonzalez Rogers posed specific questions to Apple and Epic witnesses, and her back and forth with Mr. Cook on Friday resulted in a particularly intense scrutiny of Apple’s arguments. Why couldn’t Apple allow iPhone owners to have more options to buy apps, she asked, especially if that meant lower prices for consumers?

“If you let people leak like this, we would essentially be giving up our total return on our intellectual property,” replied Mr. Cook.

The judge asked if Apple’s decision last year to reduce commission on app sales for developers making less than $ 1 million a year was aimed at distracting the review of Apple’s App Store policies. Mr Cook admitted that testing was a factor, but added that Apple primarily wanted to help small developers who were hit by a weak economy during the coronavirus pandemic.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers then launched a poll that found 39 percent of app developers were dissatisfied with Apple’s management of the App Store. “It doesn’t seem to me that you are again feeling any real pressure or competition to actually change the way you act to address developer concerns,” she said.

The judge’s biggest challenge in ruling the case may be to define the market that Epic and Apple are contending over.

Epic lawyers have argued that these are iPhone apps and that a game maker needs to walk through Apple’s “walled garden” to reach the more than one billion people who use the devices. This stifles innovation, Epic claims, and allows Apple to enforce strict rules and harm app developers by charging excessive fees. The company wants to host its own digital storefront within Apple.

Mr Cook said on Friday that “I am not a gamer,” but he argued that Epic distributes its games in a number of ways, including web browsers, game consoles and personal computers. Many of these platforms charge a commission similar to that of the App Store. If gaming is the market, Apple has argued, then there are a lot of competitors – like Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo – and Apple cannot have a monopoly.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers expressed frustration with the market semantics. “One side will say it’s black, the other say it’s white – usually it’s somewhere in the gray,” she said last week.

At the beginning of the study, Trystan Kosmynka, Apple’s senior director, testified that the company rejected 40 percent of all app submissions in 2020. Apple cannot effectively monitor which apps get onto iPhones when Epic has its own app store. Said Kosmynka.

Epic responded with a flurry of internal Apple emails showing times when malicious apps got past Mr. Kosmynka’s team. An app released during the summer protests against Black Lives Matter was a game that allowed users to shoot cannons at protesters.

Apple tried to show why allowing an app store on an app store can be problematic. Lawyers criticized Epic’s digital business for not keeping controls tight enough, saying companies managed to use it to sell games they described as “offensive and sexualized.”

In an attempt to tie Epic to inappropriate content, Richard Doren, an Apple attorney, brought up Peely, a comic banana in Fortnite who is sometimes wearing a tuxedo and sometimes naked. Mr Doren implied that it would have been inappropriate to show Peely in federal court without a tuxedo. Matthew Weissinger, Vice President Marketing at Epic, made it clear that Peely, naked or suitable, wasn’t scandalous.

“It’s just a banana man,” he said.

The battle between the companies began in August when Epic broke Apple’s rules by bypassing Apple’s payment system in the Fortnite app. Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, and Epic immediately sued the company and launched an advertising campaign around the suit.

On the first day of the trial, Epic’s chief executive Tim Sweeney testified that his company filed a lawsuit because he wanted to show the world the consequences of Apple’s policies. Judge Gonzalez Rogers cut him off and asked if Mr. Sweeney knew of another developer lawsuit against Apple.

Mr. Sweeney said he did.

“And you just ignored that and went alone,” replied the judge.

The trial will complete on Monday, but Judge Gonzalez Rogers said a decision would likely take months. “Hopefully before August 13th,” she said. She also said her decision would likely be challenged, meaning the process could only be the first chapter of a lengthy battle.

Categories
Entertainment

Overview: A Synergistic Duo Takes Again the Energy of ‘Gloria’

Since working together 15 years ago, Molly Lieber and Eleanor Smith have done dances dealing with trauma – slow, tender, intimate portraits of women who are alternately innocent and knowing. Some were silent, others contained text; often Lieber and Smith played naked, but it was the kind of persistent nudity that made you forget they were naked. The way their bodies locked themselves into the same vibration, rhythm, or mood was more phenomenal than their physicality.

As fluid as her body is, the focus of her work has always been the excavation of an inner landscape that takes the objectification of women into account. In their latest “Gloria”, a dance of perseverance, Lieber and Smith dance vigorously to a pop song – extended cuts from the Laura Branigan hit – on the two lowest levels of the outdoor amphitheater in the Abrons Arts Center.

As an extremely feminist work, “Gloria” adopts the idea of ​​female objectification and uses it like a weapon: What begins aerobic and lively – the dancers hop and hop with swinging arms and high knees – gradually turns into something more lascivious: legs widen. A playful jump descends in the top. The split turns into a sad, silent lament.

Seeing Dear and Smith (in person!) Felt a bit like a favorite band. They are still dancing together; They’re still as tight as ever. If anything, they are more grounded, more precise, and more precise. Sometimes their synergy is almost confusing. With a subtle touch, Lieber in a bathing suit and Smith in a mesh bodysuit – both wearing vintage shorts from the 80s – show how flexibility can overshadow strength or how the right combination of endurance and spirit can make a sexual moment seem sporty.

With increasing exhaustion, the lyrics of the song become stranger and more threatening: “You really don’t remember, was it something he said? Are the voices in your head calling, Gloria? “(I’m afraid I can’t get the song out of my head.)

The subtle shifts are creepy and even disturbing as Lieber and Smith twist themselves into images embedded in shadows of grief: Lieber flexes her chest in the crevices and throws her head and – in short – touches a chest. When a standing smith rounds over straight legs, she is doing something more than just graceful withering; it dissolves in itself. The setting changes over time as Thomas Dunn’s lighting changes from pink to ice blue. The temperature of “Gloria” changes from hot to cold.

But what really holds this world together is James Los’s gorgeous sound design that mixes chirping birds and rippling water with his reinvention of “Gloria”. In a moment it’s full and booming; in another case, it’s scratchy and low-fi – like it’s playing on a car radio three blocks away. In short, he overlays Cardi B’s “Bodak Yellow” with the familiar texts: “I don’t have to dance, I make money.”

To be honest, I was initially confused about the decision to name a duet “Gloria”. The choreographer Maria Hassabi created an often seen duet with the same title in 2007. But that’s different. It cannot be a coincidence that Branigan’s “Gloria” was playing in the background as the Trump family and their inner circle – Kimberly Guilfoyle’s dance was particularly notable – gathered to watch the January 6 riot.

Towards the end, when dusk falls, the dancers find each other again – Lieber sinks to the floor and touches Smith’s hair, fluffing her curls before they both bend forward and touch her forehead. You made it to the other side. Her “Gloria” is about taking back the song. Her “Gloria” is strong, raw and so soulful that it almost bursts as it shows how powerful the language of dance is. It’s a new “glory” for the here and now.

Gloria

See you Saturday at the Abrons Arts Center, Manhattan; abronsartscenter.org.

Categories
Health

Air flow and Testing Can Assist Maintain U.S. Faculties Open in Fall, Research Counsel

Several measures to mitigate Covid-19 – including improving ventilation, requiring adults to wear face masks, and taking frequent surveillance tests – can help keep schools open and students safe, according to two new studies.

The studies, released on Friday, come as many school districts work out their plans for the fall. They also follow guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that all schools teaching students from kindergarten through 12th grade will continue until the end of the 2020-2021 school year following the agency’s latest move to admit vaccinated people Implement guidelines for wearing masks should not use masks indoors. The agency also upheld its proposals to monitor physical distancing and test for coronavirus infections.

In one of the new studies, researchers from the CDC and the Georgia Department of Public Health surveyed 169 elementary schools in Georgia that offered face-to-face learning last fall. The group asked schools about their pandemic responses and collected data on the coronavirus cases discovered between November 16 and December 11 before vaccines were used in the United States.

The researchers found that the incidence of the virus in schools that had improved their ventilation – by opening windows or doors or using fans – was 35 percent lower than in schools that did not use these practices. In schools that combined better ventilation with air filtration – for example through the use of HEPA filters – the fall rates were 48 percent lower.

The researchers found that all teachers and staff had to wear masks to reduce the incidence of the virus by 37 percent. Schools that required students to wear masks had a 21 percent lower incidence of the virus, but that reduction was not statistically significant, the scientists found. This may be due to the fact that adults are more likely to transmit the virus than children, or simply to a small sample size.

“Since the universal and correct use of masks can reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission and is a relatively inexpensive and easy to implement strategy, the results of this report suggest that the universal and correct use of masks is an important Covid-19 -Prevention strategy in schools is a multi-component approach, ”write the researchers.

A second study, conducted by researchers from the Utah Department of Health and the University of Utah, tracked the implementation of two coronavirus screening programs in state schools. A program that ran in January 2021 allowed schools with outbreaks to conduct school-wide testing instead of switching to distance learning.

“The schools could either do what they did the fall, switching to remote control for two weeks to break the chains of transmission, or they could test all of them,” said Dr. Adam Hersh, one of the study’s authors and a pediatric infectious disease expert at the University of Utah. “And those who tested negative could return to face-to-face learning, and those who tested positive would obviously be isolated.”

In a second testing program, students had to be tested for the coronavirus every 14 days in order to participate in sports or other extracurricular activities. Both initiatives relied on rapid antigen tests, which are less sensitive but cheaper and faster than standard PCR tests.

That year, between January 4 and March 20, 28 high schools in the state reported sizeable outbreaks. Fifteen schools decided to switch to distance learning for two weeks, while the other 13 decided to run surveillance tests instead. Of the 13,809 students who were tested as part of this screening, only 0.7 percent were positive, the scientists reported. All 13 schools remained open.

“This is a huge achievement from a public health perspective,” said Kendra Babitz, coronavirus testing coordinator for the Utah Department of Health and one of the study’s authors. “Testing is and should be a mitigation strategy that schools use to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools,” she added, referring to the virus that causes Covid-19.

Over the winter, 95 percent of school sports events took place on schedule, the researchers found, although they didn’t compare that number to a control group of schools without screening programs. “This is similar to what happens in the normal season,” said Dr. Hersh. “The show could go on.”

Categories
Business

Vaccines not the one issue driving Covid circumstances down

More Americans are being vaccinated against Covid every day, but that’s not the only reason coronavirus cases continue to decline in the US, said Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Friday.

In an interview on Closing Bell, the former Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration said that additional factors contributing to a drop in infection rates are the warming weather and the fact that part of the unvaccinated population has already been infected with Covid .

Gottlieb’s comments came Friday when the country’s seven-day average of new daily coronavirus infections fell below 30,000 for the first time in nearly a year. At the end of March there were around 66,000.

The decline in cases coincided with an increase in the availability of vaccines. As of Friday, nearly 50% of the U.S. population had received at least one dose of Covid vaccine, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At the end of March that number was a little less than 30%.

However, the percentage of Americans who have some immunity to coronavirus is higher than vaccination rates, Gottlieb said, estimating that at least a third of the population is infected. The US had around 33 million confirmed Covid cases in total, but Gottlieb has repeatedly said the official record is an undercount.

“We don’t have any data on this, but I suspect that the level of infection is likely higher in the unvaccinated population because many people are likely not getting the vaccine because they knew they were previously infected,” said Gottlieb.

People who have recovered from Covid have natural antibodies, but the CDC and other experts recommend that they get the vaccine too. In fact, people who have had the disease and received the Covid shot may develop stronger protection against variants of the virus.

People who have not yet been vaccinated may have been less concerned about the virus during the pandemic and therefore spent less time at home, Gottlieb added.

So if you assume that the percentage of previous infections in the unvaccinated population is more than one third, and it probably is, and you assume that we have currently given at least one dose to about half the population “We’re getting closer to a pretty high level of immunity,” said Gottlieb, who headed the FDA in the Trump administration from 2017 to 2019. Today he is a board member of the vaccine manufacturer Pfizer.

And while states are lifting many pandemic-time restrictions such as: B. Restaurant capacity constraints, some people have not reverted to their pre-Covid behavior, which helps reduce cases.

“People are generally more cautious, although we are starting to take off masks and be on the move,” said Gottlieb. “People are more careful about their interactions, so some of it still has a downward impact on transmission.”

Gottlieb predicted the country’s case numbers will continue to decline in the coming weeks, while the pandemic is unlikely to be classified as “ended”. He added, “I think we will have a very calm summer in terms of the coronavirus spread and then have to deal with it again when we start into winter.”

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC employee and a member of the boards of directors of Pfizer, genetic testing startup Tempus, healthcare technology company Aetion, and Illumina biotech. He is also co-chair of the Healthy Sail Panel for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings and Royal Caribbean.