Categories
Business

Brexit Customs Checks Make a Quiet Debut at U.Okay. Ports

LONDON – A new era began without a fuss on Friday morning at the ports and terminals on Britain’s south east coast. Ferries and trains transporting goods from Dover and Folkestone to France ran on time, and the drivers snaked their trucks unloaded into the port.

Apparently little has changed on January 1st, the country’s first day outside the internal market and customs union of the European Union. It was a public holiday, after all, and there wasn’t much to do.

For the first time in over 25 years, goods moving between the UK and the European Union can no longer move freely, and goods entering the block will be subject to customs controls.

A trade agreement signed in the UK in the early hours of December 31st, less than 24 hours before it came into force, means that the country and the European Union will trade goods without tariffs. However, businesses will continue to face significant changes that they had to prepare for even during the lockdowns, closings, and other social restrictions imposed by the government to contain a growing pandemic.

The changes are sure to bring “bumpy moments,” a senior cabinet minister predicted this week. The government estimates that new customs papers alone will cost British companies £ 7 billion (about $ 9.6 billion) a year.

The UK has at least 150,000 exporters who, according to the country’s tax authority, have never shipped their goods beyond the block and are therefore required to file customs declarations for the first time. Border controls within the European Union were abolished in 1993.

This is a change that will be felt immediately in the UK ports, particularly the port of Dover and the Eurotunnel endpoint at Folkestone, which connect the country to France. But on Friday, New Year’s Day, the trains and ferries are said to have run smoothly. Eurotunnel reported that 200 trucks had already used their shuttle train by 8 a.m.

“It seems pretty quiet,” Elizabeth De Jong, the political director of Logistics UK, a trade group, told Sky News on Friday morning.

However, she added that companies are now facing “a new, different language of customs regulations” that need to be understood. She described the next few weeks as a live test, as companies have to ensure that they have the correct documentation for themselves and the goods on board, and traffic into the region has to be controlled.

In the most extreme circumstances, or according to the government, in the worst case, between 40 and 70 percent of trucks going into the European Union may not be ready for the new border controls. This would slow the flow of goods and could result in lines of up to 7,000 trucks driving to the border and delays of up to two days, according to a government report.

Britain has only recently removed a huge backlog of trucks from the border. On late December 20, the French government suddenly closed its border for 48 hours to stop the spread of a new variant of the coronavirus from England. Thousands of trucks and their drivers were stranded for days. Once the border reopened, they had to show a negative coronavirus test before they could enter France.

The delays in the normally fast-paced port have also raised concerns about the UK’s supply of fresh food, much of which is imported from Europe in winter. A fruit supplier urgently arranged for goods to be flown into the country. British fish and shellfish exporters had to mingle to ship their goods to France unaccompanied by drivers before spoiling them.

The spectacle heightened concerns about trading after December 31, the end of the Brexit transition period. Although goods are already moving more slowly because each driver must first take a negative coronavirus test, which can take around 40 minutes to produce results, trucks are unlikely to see thousands of trucks entering France due to the quieter holiday season Wait friday.

“We would expect the persistent disruption to worsen in the first two weeks as freight demand increases,” the government report said. This could take about three months.

Goods entering the European Union from England, Scotland or Wales now require customs controls, including security declarations, and truck drivers need an entry permit for Kent, the county of Dover and Folkestone to confirm they have the necessary documents .

Truck drivers who drive in the other direction initially have to make fewer demands. The UK government has relaxed the rules for goods coming into the country from the European Union for six months.

Categories
Health

For a More healthy 2021, Maintain the Greatest Habits of a Very Unhealthy Yr

Here’s a better way to start the New Year: skip the traditional January resolutions and take time for a few New Year reflections instead.

Take a moment to look back on the last 365 days of your life. In years, when you talk about 2020, what stories will you tell? Will there be clapping for healthcare workers every night at 7 p.m.? Or maybe it’s a reminder of the months you spent most of the time at home with family members – or the pandemic bubbles that you formed and that helped make friendships stronger. Maybe you are telling the story of losing someone you loved, or remembering finding strength and resilience that you didn’t know you had.

While reliving much of 2020 sounds like a terrible idea, psychologists say it is a better way to start the new year. Looking back, you can build on what you learned and may even discover some hidden positive habits that you didn’t realize you started.

“I don’t think we’ve done ourselves enough credit,” said Kelly McGonigal, health psychologist and lecturer at Stanford University and author of The Willpower Instinct. “I don’t think we had the emotional appreciation we need and deserve for the year that many people had. The reflection needed in the moment is a real, honest, and self-compassionate look at what has been lost, who has been lost, and what you want to remember in order to remember 2020. Reflection is a way of being ready to move forward into the New Year. I say this every year, but I think this year is especially true. “

Thinking about what you achieved in 2020 – and what you missed or lost – is also a healthier path to self-improvement than the typical New Years resolution. Studies consistently show that New Year’s resolutions don’t work. By February most people left them.

The problem with many resolutions is that they are inherently self-critical and come from some sort of magical thinking that one big change – some weight loss, regular exercise, more money – changes lives. “It’s just too easy to look for behavior that you regularly criticize yourself for or that you feel guilty about,” said Dr. McGonigal. “It’s the false promise, ‘If you change this one thing, you will change everything.'”

Studies show that one of the best ways to change behavior and form a new habit is to tie it up with an existing behavior – what is known in the science of habit formation as “stacking”. This is why doctors suggest taking a new medication while you are brushing your teeth or drinking your morning coffee, for example: you are more likely to remember to take your pill if you transfer it to an existing habit. Adding steps to your daily commute is often a better way to add exercise to your day than trying to set a separate time for a daily walk.

By reflecting on the teachings of the past year, we can stack and build on the good habits we started in 2020. Maybe in doing so we had to find new ways to exercise when the gyms were closed, build friendships made by our social bubbles, and organize our homes 24-7 living and learning, learning to cook healthier meals or ourselves for those To blame caring for others.

Now that the vaccine distribution and the end of the pandemic are in sight, it is no longer necessary to abandon these changes and try to build on them. The first challenge is listed below. Then from Monday and every day Next week, the 7 Day Well Challenge will identify a popular quarantine habit and offer a new strategy to turn it into a healthy lifelong habit. Just sign up for the Well newsletter and you will receive a daily email reminder to take part in this day’s challenge.

Quarantined clapping has become a nightly ritual in many parts of the United States and around the world thanks to health care workers. It was both a token of community and a token of gratitude. The experience was what sociologists refer to as “collective flare”. This happens when people come together and participate in a group ritual at the same time.

Clapping for key workers had the effect of “unifying and motivating the group to work toward a common cause such as surviving the pandemic,” said Joshua W. Brown, professor in the Department of Psychology and Brain Sciences at Indiana University of Bloomington. “Group expressions of gratitude can be empowering for both those who express them and those who receive them.”

Perhaps you have shown gratitude in other ways. Have you offered delivery and restaurant workers larger tips than usual? Did you thank the food and pharmacy staff from the bottom of your heart at the checkout? Did you remind yourself and your children of all the things you were grateful for when things got tough at home? I took up a regular gratitude hand washing ritual and thought of 10 things to be grateful for – one for each finger I washed.

Why it matters: Numerous studies show that people who practice gratitude daily, consciously counting their blessings, are happier, have less stress, sleep better, and suffer less from depression. In one study, researchers recruited 300 adults, most of them students, for psychological counseling. All volunteers were given advice, but one group added a writing exercise that focused on bad experiences while another group wrote a thank you letter to a different person every week for three weeks. A month later, those who wrote thank you letters reported significantly better mental health. And the effect seems to be permanent. Three months later, the researchers scanned students’ brains while they were doing another gratitude exercise. The students who wrote thank you letters at the start of the study showed greater activation in a part of the brain called the medial prefrontal cortex, believed to be related to both reward and higher-level cognition.

Try one or more of these simple gratitude exercises this week.

Start small. Send an appreciative email or text, thank a service agent, or tell your children, spouse, or friend how they made your life better. “A good way to develop more gratitude would be to take regular small steps – an extra email or thank you letter to a colleague, or an extra personal thank you note and focus on how rewarding it is to make someone’s day more valued . Said Dr. Brown.

Create a gratitude reminder. Dr. McGonigal holds a note on her desk lamp that reads:

1. Someone
2. Something
3. You yourself

It is a daily reminder to say thank you not only for the people, events and gifts in your life, but also for your own achievements. She might be grateful for a workout, a healthy body, or a new challenge. “Gratitude is really good when you believe in your ability to create a more positive future and a willingness to trust others to help you do so,” said Dr. McGonigal. “And that feels like a really good attitude right now.”

Express your gratitude in writing. You can send emails or post feelings of gratitude on social media or in a group chat. Or think of someone in your life and write them a thank you letter. (You don’t have to mail it.) Fill out your letter with details describing how this person influenced your life and what things you appreciate about them. Or keep a daily gratitude journal.

“I think gratitude comes to its full potential when people can express gratitude in words,” said Y. Joel Wong, chairman of the counseling and educational psychology department at Indiana University. “When we can say what we are grateful for and explain why, it shifts our attention from what is negative to what is positive in our lives.”

Sign up for the Well newsletter to get the next Well challenge in your inbox.

Categories
Politics

In Trump’s Last Chapter, a Failure to Rise to the Covid-19 Second

WASHINGTON — It was a warm summer Wednesday, Election Day was looming and President Trump was even angrier than usual at the relentless focus on the coronavirus pandemic.

“You’re killing me! This whole thing is! We’ve got all the damn cases,” Mr. Trump yelled at Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser, during a gathering of top aides in the Oval Office on Aug. 19. “I want to do what Mexico does. They don’t give you a test till you get to the emergency room and you’re vomiting.”

Mexico’s record in fighting the virus was hardly one for the United States to emulate. But the president had long seen testing not as a vital way to track and contain the pandemic but as a mechanism for making him look bad by driving up the number of known cases.

And on that day he was especially furious after being informed by Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, that it would be days before the government could give emergency approval to the use of convalescent plasma as a treatment, something Mr. Trump was eager to promote as a personal victory going into the Republican National Convention the following week.

“They’re Democrats! They’re against me!” he said, convinced that the government’s top doctors and scientists were conspiring to undermine him. “They want to wait!”

Throughout late summer and fall, in the heat of a re-election campaign that he would go on to lose, and in the face of mounting evidence of a surge in infections and deaths far worse than in the spring, Mr. Trump’s management of the crisis — unsteady, unscientific and colored by politics all year — was in effect reduced to a single question: What would it mean for him?

The result, according to interviews with more than two dozen current and former administration officials and others in contact with the White House, was a lose-lose situation. Mr. Trump not only ended up soundly defeated by Joseph R. Biden Jr., but missed his chance to show that he could rise to the moment in the final chapter of his presidency and meet the defining challenge of his tenure.

Efforts by his aides to persuade him to promote mask wearing, among the simplest and most effective ways to curb the spread of the disease, were derailed by his conviction that his political base would rebel against anything that would smack of limiting their personal freedom. Even his own campaign’s polling data to the contrary could not sway him.

His explicit demand for a vaccine by Election Day — a push that came to a head in a contentious Oval Office meeting with top health aides in late September — became a misguided substitute for warning the nation that failure to adhere to social distancing and other mitigation efforts would contribute to a slow-rolling disaster this winter.

His concern? That the man he called “Sleepy Joe” Biden, who was leading him in the polls, would get credit for a vaccine, not him.

The government’s public health experts were all but silenced by the arrival in August of Dr. Scott W. Atlas, the Stanford professor of neuroradiology recruited after appearances on Fox News.

With Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the coordinator of the White House virus task force, losing influence and often on the road, Dr. Atlas became the sole doctor Mr. Trump listened to. His theories, some of which scientists viewed as bordering on the crackpot, were exactly what the president wanted to hear: The virus is overblown, the number of deaths is exaggerated, testing is overrated, lockdowns do more harm than good.

As the gap between politics and science grew, the infighting that Mr. Trump had allowed to plague the administration’s response from the beginning only intensified. Threats of firings worsened the leadership vacuum as key figures undercut each other and distanced themselves from responsibility.

The administration had some positive stories to tell. Mr. Trump’s vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, had helped drive the pharmaceutical industry’s remarkably fast progress in developing several promising approaches. By the end of the year, two highly effective vaccines would be approved for emergency use, providing hope for 2021.

The White House rejected any suggestions that the president’s response had fallen short, saying he had worked to provide adequate testing, protective equipment and hospital capacity and that the vaccine development program had succeeded in record time.

“President Trump has led the largest mobilization of the public and private sectors since WWII to defeat Covid-19 and save lives,” said Brian Morgenstern, a White House spokesman.

But Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to put aside his political self-centeredness as Americans died by the thousands each day or to embrace the steps necessary to deal with the crisis remains confounding even to some administration officials. “Making masks a culture war issue was the dumbest thing imaginable,” one former senior adviser said.

His own bout with Covid-19 in early October left him extremely ill and dependent on care and drugs not available to most Americans, including a still-experimental monoclonal antibody treatment, and he saw firsthand how the disease coursed through the White House and some of his close allies.

Yet his instinct was to treat that experience not as a learning moment or an opportunity for empathy, but as a chance to portray himself as a Superman who had vanquished the disease. His own experience to the contrary, he assured a crowd at the White House just a week after his hospitalization, “It’s going to disappear; it is disappearing.”

Weeks after his own recovery, he would still complain about the nation’s preoccupation with the pandemic.

“All you hear is Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid,” Mr. Trump said at one campaign stop, uttering the word 11 times.

In the end he could not escape it.

By late July, new cases were at record highs, defying Mr. Trump’s predictions through the spring that the virus was under control, and deaths were spiking to alarming levels. Herman Cain, a 2012 Republican presidential candidate, died from the coronavirus; the previous month he had attended a Trump rally without a mask.

With the pandemic defining the campaign despite Mr. Trump’s efforts to make it about law and order, Tony Fabrizio, the president’s main pollster, came to the Oval Office for a meeting in the middle of the summer prepared to make a surprising case: that mask wearing was acceptable even among Mr. Trump’s supporters.

Arrayed in front of the Resolute Desk, Mr. Trump’s advisers listened as Mr. Fabrizio presented the numbers. According to his research, some of which was reported by The Washington Post, voters believed the pandemic was bad and getting worse, they were more concerned about getting sick than about the virus’s effects on their personal financial situation, the president’s approval rating on handling the pandemic had hit new lows and a little more than half the country did not think he was taking the situation seriously.

But what set off debate that day was Mr. Fabrizio’s finding that more than 70 percent of voters in the states being targeted by the campaign supported mandatory mask wearing in public, at least indoors, including a majority of Republicans.

Mr. Kushner, who along with Hope Hicks, another top adviser, had been trying for months to convince Mr. Trump that masks could be portrayed as the key to regaining freedom to go safely to a restaurant or a sporting event, called embracing mask-wearing a “no-brainer.”

Mr. Kushner had some reason for optimism. Mr. Trump had agreed to wear one not long before for a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, after finding one he believed he looked good in: dark blue, with a presidential seal.

But Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff — backed up by other aides including Stephen Miller — said the politics for Mr. Trump would be devastating.

“The base will revolt,” Mr. Meadows said, adding that he was not sure Mr. Trump could legally make it happen in any case.

That was all Mr. Trump needed to hear. “I’m not doing a mask mandate,” he concluded.

Aside from when he was sick, he was rarely seen in a mask again.

The president had other opportunities to show leadership rather than put his political fortunes first.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

With distribution of a coronavirus vaccine beginning in the U.S., here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.
    • When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated? Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.
    • If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask? Yes, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This appears to be enough protection to keep the vaccinated person from getting ill. But what’s not clear is whether it’s possible for the virus to bloom in the nose — and be sneezed or breathed out to infect others — even as antibodies elsewhere in the body have mobilized to prevent the vaccinated person from getting sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether vaccinated people are protected from illness — not to find out whether they could still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccine and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to be hopeful that vaccinated people won’t spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone — even vaccinated people — will need to think of themselves as possible silent spreaders and keep wearing a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt? What are the side effects? The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection into your arm won’t feel different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects does appear higher than a flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. The side effects, which can resemble the symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and appear more likely after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest some people might need to take a day off from work because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, about half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headaches, chills and muscle pain. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is mounting a potent response to the vaccine that will provide long-lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

After he recovered from his bout with the virus, some of his top aides, including Mr. Kushner and Jason Miller, a senior campaign strategist, thought the illness offered an opportunity to demonstrate the kind of compassion and resolve about the pandemic’s toll that Mr. Trump had so far failed to show.

When Mr. Trump returned from the hospital, his communications aides, with the help of Ivanka Trump, his daughter, urged him to deliver a national address in which he would say: “I had it. It was tough, it kicked my ass, but we’re going to get through it.”

He refused, choosing instead to address a boisterous campaign rally for himself from the balcony of the White House overlooking the South Lawn.

Mr. Trump never came around to the idea that he had a responsibility to be a role model, much less that his leadership role might require him to publicly acknowledge hard truths about the virus — or even to stop insisting that the issue was not a rampaging pandemic but too much testing.

Alex M. Azar II, the health and human services secretary, briefed the president this fall on a Japanese study documenting the effectiveness of face masks, telling him: “We have the proof. They work.” But the president resisted, criticizing Mr. Kushner for pushing them and again blaming too much testing — an area Mr. Kushner had been helping to oversee — for his problems.

“I’m going to lose,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Kushner during debate preparations. “And it’s going to be your fault, because of the testing.”

Mr. Morgenstern, the White House spokesman, said that exchange between the president and Mr. Kushner “never happened.”

Mr. Azar, who was sometimes one of the few people wearing a mask at White House events, privately bemoaned what he called a political, anti-mask culture set by Mr. Trump. At White House Christmas parties, Mr. Azar asked maskless guests to back away from him.

The decision to run the government’s response out of the West Wing was made in the early days of the pandemic. The idea was to break down barriers between disparate agencies, assemble public health expertise and encourage quick and coordinated decision-making.

It did not work out like that, and by fall the consequences were clear.

Mr. Trump had always tolerated if not encouraged clashes among subordinates, a tendency that in this case led only to policy paralysis, confusion about who was in charge and a lack of a clear, consistent message about how to reduce the risks from the pandemic.

Keeping decision-making power close to him was another Trump trait, but in this case it also elevated the myriad choices facing the administration to the presidential level, bogging the process down in infighting, raising the political stakes and encouraging aides to jockey for favor with Mr. Trump.

The result at times was a systemwide failure that extended well beyond the president.

“What we needed was a coordinated response that involved contributions from multiple agencies,” said Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who was commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration for the first two years of the Trump administration.

“Someone needed to pull that all together early,” he said. “It wasn’t the job of the White House, either. This needed to happen closer to the agencies. That didn’t happen on testing, or on a whole lot of other things.”

The relationship between Mr. Azar and Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, grew increasingly tense; by early November, they were communicating only by text and in meetings.

Dr. Birx had lost the clout she enjoyed early on in the crisis and spent much of the summer and fall on the road counseling governors and state health officials.

Mr. Meadows was at odds with almost everyone as he sought to impose the president’s will on scientists and public health professionals. In conversations with top health officials, Mr. Meadows would rail against regulatory “bureaucrats” he thought were more interested in process than outcome.

Some of the doctors on the task force, including Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Dr. Robert R. Redfield, were reluctant to show up in person at the White House, worried that the disdain there for mask wearing and social distancing would leave them at risk of infection.

Vice President Mike Pence was nominally in charge of the task force but was so cautious about getting crosswise with Mr. Trump as they battled for re-election that, in public at least, he became nearly invisible.

The debates inside the White House increasingly revolved around Dr. Atlas, who had no formal training in infectious diseases but whose views — which Mr. Trump saw him deliver on Fox News — appealed to the president’s belief that the crisis was overblown.

His arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue was itself something of a mystery. Some aides said he was discovered by Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary. Others said John McEntee, the president’s personnel chief, had been Googling for a Trump-friendly doctor who would be loyal.

Marc Short, Mr. Pence’s chief of staff, opposed hiring Dr. Atlas. But once the president and his team brought him in, Mr. Short insisted that Dr. Atlas have a seat at the task force table, hoping to avoid having him become yet another internal — and destructive — critic.

Once inside, Dr. Atlas used the perch of a West Wing office to shape the response. During a meeting in early fall, Dr. Atlas asserted that college students were at no risk from the virus. We should let them go back to school, he said. It’s not a problem.

Dr. Birx exploded. What aspect of the fact that you can be asymptomatic and still spread it do you not understand? she demanded. You might not die, but you can give it to somebody who can die from it. She was livid.

“Your strategy is literally going to cost us lives,” she yelled at Dr. Atlas. She attacked Dr. Atlas’s ideas in daily emails she sent to senior officials. And she was mindful of a pact she had made with Dr. Hahn, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Redfield even before Dr. Atlas came on board: They would stick together if one of them was fired for doing what they considered the right thing.

Health officials often had a hard time finding an audience in the upper reaches of the West Wing. In a mid-November task force meeting, they issued a dire warning to Mr. Meadows about the looming surge in cases set to devastate the country. Mr. Meadows demanded data to back up their claim.

One outcome of the meeting was a Nov. 19 news conference on the virus’s dire threat, the first in many weeks. But while Mr. Pence, who led the briefing, often urged Americans to “do their part” to slow the spread of the virus, he never directly challenged Mr. Trump’s hesitancy on masks and social distancing. At the briefing, he said that “decision making at the local level” was key, continuing a long pattern of the administration seeking to push responsibility to the states.

Mr. Azar had been cut out of key decision-making as early as February, when Mr. Pence took over the task force. Mr. Azar would complain to his associates that Mr. Pence’s staff and task force members went around him to issue orders to his subordinates.

On tenterhooks about his job status, Mr. Azar found an opening that offered a kind of redemption, steering his attention through the summer and fall to Operation Warp Speed, the government’s effort to support rapid development of a vaccine, lavishing praise on Mr. Trump and crediting him for nearly every advance.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Azar portrayed Dr. Hahn to the White House as a flailing manager — a complaint he also voiced about Dr. Redfield. In late September, he told the White House he was willing to fire Dr. Hahn, according to officials familiar with the offer.

For their part, Dr. Hahn, Dr. Redfield, Dr. Birx and other senior health officials saw Mr. Azar as crushing the morale of the agencies he oversaw as he sought to escape blame for a worsening crisis and to strengthen his own image publicly and with the White House.

Health officials on the task force several times took their complaints about Mr. Azar to Mr. Pence’s office, hoping for an intervention.

Caitlin B. Oakley, a spokeswoman for Mr. Azar, said he had “always stood up for balanced, scientific, public health information and insisted that science and data drive the decisions.”

Once eager to visit the White House, Dr. Hahn became disillusioned with what he saw as its efforts to politicize the work of the Food and Drug Administration, and he eventually shied away from task force meetings, fearing his statements there would leak.

If there was a bureaucratic winner in this West Wing cage match, it was Dr. Atlas.

He told Mr. Trump that the right way to think about the virus was how much “excess mortality” there was above what would have been expected without a pandemic.

Mr. Trump seized on the idea, often telling aides that the real number of dead was no more than 10,000 people.

As of Thursday, 342,577 Americans had died from the pandemic.

In an Oval Office meeting with senior health officials on Sept. 24, the president made explicit what he had long implied: He wanted a vaccine before the election, according to three people who witnessed his demand.

Pfizer’s chief executive had been encouraging the belief that the company could deliver initial results by late October. But Mr. Trump’s aides tried in vain to make clear that they could not completely control the timing.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Hahn reminded West Wing officials that a company’s vaccine trial results were a “black box,” impossible to see until an independent monitoring board revealed them. A vaccine that did not go through the usual, rigorous government approval process would be a “Pyrrhic victory,” Mr. Azar told them. It would be a shot no one would take.

Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the scientific leader of Operation Warp Speed, said the president never asked him to deliver a vaccine on a specific timetable. But he said Mr. Trump sometimes complained in meetings that “it was not going to happen before the election and it will be ‘Sleepy Joe’” who would ultimately get credit.

In late October, science and regulations worked against Mr. Trump’s waning hopes for pre-Election Day good news. At the F.D.A., scientists had refined the standards for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use. And at Pfizer, executives realized that the agency was unlikely to authorize its vaccine on the basis of so few Covid-19 cases among its clinical trial volunteers.

They decided to wait for more data, a delay of up to a week.

When Pfizer announced on Nov. 9 — two days after Mr. Biden clinched his victory — that its vaccine was a stunning success, Mr. Trump was furious. He lashed out at the company, Dr. Hahn and the F.D.A., accusing “deep state regulators” of conspiring with Pfizer to slow approval until after the election.

The president’s frustration with the pace of regulatory action would continue into December, as the F.D.A. went through a time-consuming process of evaluating Pfizer’s data and then that of a second vaccine maker, Moderna.

On Dec. 11, Mr. Meadows exploded during a morning call with Dr. Hahn and Dr. Peter Marks, the agency’s top vaccine regulator. He accused Dr. Hahn of mismanagement and suggested he resign, then slammed down the phone. That night, the F.D.A. authorized the Pfizer vaccine.

In the weeks that followed, Mr. Pence, Mr. Azar, Dr. Fauci and other health officials rolled up their sleeves to be vaccinated for the cameras.

Mr. Trump, who after contracting Covid-19 had declared himself immune, has not announced plans to be vaccinated.

Michael D. Shear, Noah Weiland, Sharon LaFraniere and Mark Mazzetti reported from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York. Katie Thomas contributed reporting from Chicago.

Categories
Business

New York Inventory Trade to Delist China Cell, Amongst Others

The New York Stock Exchange announced that it would delist the three major state-owned telecommunications companies in China by order of the Trump administration in order to symbolically end the longstanding relationship between the Chinese business community and Wall Street.

The exchange said in a statement late Thursday that it would cease trading shares in China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom until Jan. 11. She cited an executive order issued in November by the Trump administration that prevented Americans from investing in companies with ties to the Chinese military.

The U.S. Department of Defense had previously listed the three companies as having significant ties to Chinese military and security forces.

The company’s Hong Kong offices did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday, New Year’s Day.

The delistings were generally expected after the executive order was issued in November. The order was part of a broader effort by American officials to weaken the broad economic ties between the United States and China, including Chinese access to money on Wall Street.

The move is likely to have little impact on China’s military or security ambitions, which are generously funded by Beijing, or on the companies themselves, which can raise money from international investors by selling shares in Hong Kong.

The delisting of the three telecommunications giants, however, reflects China’s rise in power and prosperity, as well as growing alienation between the world’s two largest economies. It also underscores the hesitation in long-standing business ties between the United States and China, built over decades as China attempted to internationalize and reform its state corporate sizes.

All three companies are under the firm control of Beijing. They are ultimately owned by a government agency, the State Assets Monitoring and Management Commission, and are often directed to pursue Beijing’s goals. China’s ruling Communist Party sometimes mixes executives between the three companies.

They are the only three companies in China allowed to provide broad telecommunications network services, which Beijing regards as a strategic industry that must remain under state control.

Such large, state-controlled corporations have long been viewed by economists and even some Chinese officials as a drag on the country’s growth.

China Mobile, the largest of the three companies, first listed its shares in New York in 1997, at a crucial time for the Chinese economy. Reform-minded officials in Beijing sought to restart economic growth after China’s crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989 deterred foreign investors and delayed overhauls officials deemed necessary.

One such overhaul had to do with bloated state-owned companies. China’s leaders forced them to lay off workers and focus on profit and productivity. Listing stocks in the United States, it was said, would make them more responsive to investors and more focused on the bottom line.

China Mobile was one of the first large Chinese state-owned companies to sell shares in New York. The other telecommunications companies followed, as did state banks, oil companies and airlines. Large private Chinese companies have also sold stocks there, including Alibaba, the online shopping giant that held the world’s largest IPO in New York in 2014.

Today, China’s need for money and expertise has diminished from Wall Street. The stock exchanges in Shanghai and Hong Kong are among the largest in the world. Alibaba underscored the shift, last year listing shares in Hong Kong, a semi-autonomous Chinese city where investors, unlike the mainland, can move money freely across its borders.

The Chinese leaders’ view of state-owned companies has also changed. Xi Jinping, China’s leading politician, spoke about making state-owned companies bigger and stronger than leaner. This has raised concerns among some economists and entrepreneurs that the Chinese government is playing a bigger role in private companies.

Categories
World News

Listed below are the highest performing shares within the S&P 500 for 2020

Traders work on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

NYSE

The S&P 500 ended 2020 up 16.26% for the year, closing at a record high on Thursday, a remarkable feat after a drastic sell-off in February and March.

Some of the names in the broad market index had particularly strong years: six stocks gained more than 100%.

Top S&P 500 stocks of 2020

ticker Companies Price return 2020
TSLA Tesla 743.1%
ETSY Etsy 301.6%
NVDA Nvidia 121.9%
PYPL PayPal 116.5%
LB L brands 105.5%
WHITE Albermarle Corp. 102.1%
AMD modern micro devices 99.8%
FCX Freeport McMoRan 98.6%

The rise in the S&P 500 would have been even more dramatic if the top two names on the list had started the year on the index. Both electric vehicle maker Tesla and e-commerce company Etsy were included in the S&P 500 for the last four months of the year.

These stocks also represent two of the main themes in the market this year, as stocks linked to green energy have had strong years, as have those like Etsy that were well equipped for a home-stay world .

The top 8 performers also include two semiconductor stocks in Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. It has been a strong year for the sector overall. The PHLX Semiconductor Index rose 51% and even outperformed the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite.

The S&P 500 is a market-weighted group of large-cap stocks in the United States and is the benchmark by which many professional investors measure themselves. According to the S&P Dow Jones Indices, many popular exchange-traded funds and mutual funds are compared to the S&P 500. As of December 2019, more than $ 11 trillion was tied to or compared to the index.

The constituents of the index are often mixed year-round by a committee of S&P Dow Jones Indices. The organization announced on Wednesday that Enphase Energy will be added to the index on Jan. 7, replacing Tiffany & Co., which will be acquired by LVMH.

Categories
Health

Trump officers focus on vaccine rollout as criticism mounts

[The stream is slated to start at 12:00 p.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

Department of Health and Human Services and Pentagon officials will hold a joint briefing Wednesday on the Trump administration’s Operation Trump Warp Speed ​​Covid-19 vaccination program.

The briefing comes as the government faces criticism of what appears to be a slower than expected introduction of the vaccines.

As of Monday morning, more than 11.4 million doses of Pfizer and Moderna two-dose vaccines had been distributed across the country, but only about 2.1 million doses were given to people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That’s a far cry from US health officials’ original goal of getting at least 20 million Americans their first shots before the end of the year.

However, the CDC acknowledged delays in their vaccine data from the states and jurisdictions it collects and reports to federal officials, among other things.

“A large difference between the number of doses distributed and the number of doses administered is expected at this point in the COVID vaccination program due to several factors,” the agency said.

President-elect Joe Biden and public health specialists have criticized Trump’s vaccination program in recent days for failing to deliver doses as quickly as they were being distributed.

Read CNBC’s live updates for the latest news on the Covid-19 outbreak.

Categories
Business

NBA opening week is the perfect since 2012 following Covid viewership hit

Wesley Matthews # 9 of the Los Angeles Lakers watches over Luka Doncic # 77 of the Dallas Mavericks on December 25, 2020 at the Staples Center in Los Angeles, California.

John McCoy | Getty Images

After a drop in ratings for its championship series, the National Basketball Association is celebrating its most-watched opening week since 2012, led by Christmas Day competitions.

The NBA, which started its shortened season of 72 games last week due to Covid-19, said an average of 3.4 million viewers saw their games December 22-25.

The Christmas Day game between LeBron James-led Los Angeles Lakers and Luka Doncic’s Dallas Mavericks on Disney’s ABC network topped the game with an average of 7 million viewers. On the same day, the Miami Heat-New Orleans Pelicans game averaged 3.5 million viewers, while the Los Angeles Clippers-Denver Nuggets game averaged 2.05 million viewers. These games were broadcast on Disney’s ESPN.

Although the primetime 2020 Christmas Day competition had solid ratings on ABC, it was still below last year’s Lakers-Clippers competition, which had around 8.8 million viewers on ABC and ESPN platforms.

According to the NBA, the double header had an average of 2.9 million viewers on AT & T’s TNT on December 22, making it the most-watched opening night since 2017.

Those games featured the Golden State Warriors versus the Brooklyn Nets and the Clippers versus the Lakers. The NBA said its combined viewership on TNT, ESPN and ABC for the 2020 openings grew 67% (3.4 million) compared to 2019, when the league NBA averaged 2.2 million viewers in the opening week .

The NBA told CNBC viewers that they had seen 81.5 million hours of live NBA coverage in the branches of national media partners. That’s 41.8 million hours on ESPN and TNT in the opening week of 2019.

The NBA is betting on a surge in ratings after the pandemic impacted the 2020-19 season, forcing them to return to a crowded sports TV lineup that spans the postseason of Major League Baseball, as well as the World Series and games the National Football League included. The first game of the 2020 NBA Finals received its lowest ratings since 1994, drawing 7.4 million viewers in part due to the sporting clutter.

The WarnerMedia-operated NBA television station will host national games in the next few days, with college football bowl games taking over the sports landscape. ESPN and TNT return to NBA games starting January 6th.

Categories
Business

When Enterprise as Traditional Was Turned Upside Down

A photo retrospective on how the pandemic changed the business world and destroyed the economy in 2020 – producing some winners and tragically too many losers.

Alana Celii, Crest Chapman, Brent Lewis, Renee Melides and

December 30, 2020

The state of the world economy and the workforce is easy to measure by data: 82 million people around the world have caught the coronavirus; In the United States, 20 million people were receiving unemployment benefits at the end of November. However, doing business is not all about data, capital movement and the pursuit of profit. That year, as the pandemic paralyzed the economy, photographers fanned out to document the impact the virus had on shops, restaurants, and factories, as well as the workers they depend on.

Businesses big and small start out as dreams. For every Jeff Bezos who quit his job in finance to start Amazon, there are plenty more like Hector Hsu, who did a Ph.D. while undergraduate. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Very Excellent, a Chinese restaurant opened in Bristol, NH John Tully conquered this lakeside town in April when it emerged that the pandemic was affecting people’s livelihoods beyond belief.

As the virus spread, our photographers captured how people and companies learned to adapt. Tom Jamieson got on a plane to show cargo strapped to where passengers had plugged in headphones and drank beer on their way to their vacation. In Bernal Heights, a neighborhood in San Francisco, Cayce Clifford showed us a sale in the Bernal Bakery, a pop-up started in a one-bedroom apartment by two unemployed restaurant workers, Ryan Stagg and Daniella Banchero.

Much of what we saw in 2020 was scary – and the physical distance between subject and photographer this year contributed to that feeling. You can see it in Joseph Haeberle capturing Forrest VanTuyl, a musician in Enterprise, Ore, who was silhouetted with a horse in October for a photo essay about the virus’ impact on rural communities.

Joseph Rushmore’s image of socially distant people waiting in a large hall for help with their unemployment benefit claims is a reminder that even when faced with a similar future with many others, you can feel alone in difficult times.

As the year went on, we got used to seeing empty rooms and forgotten buildings. In March, Haruka Sakaguchi toured the boarded-up storefronts of luxury brands in New York City that had accepted the inevitable: window shopping was over for now.

And a photo of Eve Edelheit from an empty parking lot at Disney’s Hollywood Studios in Orlando, Florida requires almost no caption at all.

Photography always includes an element of trust between a photographer and the subject. But something else came into play for these images – risk. Risk of getting infected with the virus. Risk that we may overlook the nuance of a story from a distance. Instead, we saw a mixture of worry, doubt and livelihood on the precipice of collapse. We saw resilience, even hope, suggesting that all was not lost. – Ellen Joan Pollock, business editor

Among the many things that have changed due to bans and restrictions caused by viruses, perhaps most noticeable has been the change in the way we shop. In Manhattan, where the cobbled streets of SoHo came to a standstill, some sleek luxury boutiques, including Fendi, Celine, and Chanel, weren’t just closing storefronts. They had covered them with huge sheets of plywood.

In late March, a staggering 6.6 million people filed for unemployment benefits in one week when the coronavirus outbreak devastated almost every corner of the American economy. Previously in 1982 there were 695,000 unemployment figures in one week. The pandemic left nearly 10 million Americans unemployed in just two weeks, a number that far exceeded the darkest times of the last recession.

Categories
Health

What Scientists Know About How the Coronavirus Variant Spreads

A more contagious form of the coronavirus has entered the United States.

In the UK, where it was first identified, the new variant became the predominant form of the coronavirus in just three months, accelerating that nation’s rise and filling its hospitals. It could do the same thing in the United States, exacerbating an unstoppable surge in deaths and overwhelming the already strained health system, experts warned.

One variant that is spreading more easily also means that people must follow religious precautions such as social distancing, mask-wearing, hand hygiene, and improved ventilation – undesirable news for many Americans who are already scrubbing against restrictions.

“The bottom line is that everything we do to reduce transmission is reducing transmission of all variants, including this one,” said Angela Rasmussen, a Georgetown University virologist. But “it may mean that the more targeted measures that aren’t like a full lockdown aren’t as effective.”

What does it mean for this variant to be transferable? What makes this variant more contagious than previous iterations of the virus? And why should we worry about a variant that spreads more easily but doesn’t seem to make anyone sick?

We asked experts to weigh the evolving research on this new version of the coronavirus.

Many variants of the coronavirus have emerged since the beginning of the pandemic. However, all evidence so far suggests that the new mutant, named B.1.1.7, is more transmissible than previous forms. It first appeared in the UK in September, but already accounts for more than 60 percent of new cases in London and neighboring areas.

The new variant appears to infect more people than previous versions of the coronavirus, even if the environments are the same. It is not clear what gives the variant this advantage, although there is evidence that it could infect cells more efficiently.

It’s also difficult to say exactly how much more transmissible the new variant can be, as scientists haven’t yet done the necessary laboratory experiments. Most of the conclusions were drawn from epidemiological observation and “there are so many possible biases in all the data available,” warned Muge Cevik, an infectious disease expert at the University of St Andrews in Scotland and a scientific advisor to the UK government.

Scientists initially estimated that the new variant was 70 percent more transferable, but a recent model study put that number at 56 percent. Once the researchers sift through all of the data, the variant may only be 10 to 20 percent more transmissible, said Trevor Bedford, an evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Still, said Dr. Bedford, it is likely to catch on quickly and become the predominant form in the United States by March. Scientists like Dr. Bedford closely follows all known variants to determine any further changes that could change their behavior.

The new mutant virus can spread more easily, but in every other way it seems little different from its predecessors.

At least so far, the variant does not seem to make people sick or lead to more deaths. Still, there is cause for concern: a more transmissible variant increases the death toll just because it spreads faster and infects more people.

“With that in mind, it’s just a numbers game,” said Dr. Rasmussen. The effect is amplified “in countries like the US and UK where the health system is really at its breaking point”.

The routes of transmission – through large and small droplets and tiny aerosolized particles floating in crowded interiors – have not changed. This means that masks, limiting time with others, and improving indoor ventilation will all help contain the spread of the variant, as it does with other variants of the virus.

Updated

Apr. 31, 2020, 10:44 am ET

“By minimizing exposure to viruses, you reduce the risk of infection and overall transmission,” said Dr. Rasmussen.

Some preliminary evidence from the UK suggests that people infected with the new variant tend to have greater amounts of the virus in their nose and throat than people infected with previous versions.

“We’re talking in the 10-fold to 10,000-fold range,” said Michael Kidd, clinical virologist for Public Health England and clinical advisor to the UK government who has investigated the phenomenon.

There are other explanations for the finding: Dr. Kidd and his colleagues did not have access to information about when, for example, people were tested for their disease, which could affect what is known as their viral load.

However, the finding offers a possible explanation for why the new variant is spreading more easily. The more viruses infected people have in their noses and throats, the more they are expelled into the air and onto surfaces when they breathe, speak, sing, cough or sneeze.

As a result, situations where people are exposed to the virus are more likely to develop new infections. Some new data suggests that people infected with the new variant spread the virus to more of their contacts.

For previous versions of the virus, contact tracing suggested that about 10 percent of those who are in close contact with an infected person – for at least 15 minutes within six feet – inhaled enough virus to become infected.

“With the variant we could expect 15 percent of it,” said Dr. Bedford. “Right now, risky activities are getting riskier.”

The variant has 23 mutations compared to the version that broke out a year ago in Wuhan, China. But 17 of those mutations appeared suddenly after the virus deviated from its youngest ancestor.

Every infected person is a melting pot that gives the virus the opportunity to mutate as it reproduces. With more than 83 million people infected worldwide, the coronavirus is accumulating mutations faster than scientists expected at the start of the pandemic.

The vast majority of mutations offer no benefit to the virus and die out. However, mutations that improve the fitness or transmissibility of the virus have a greater chance of prevailing.

At least one of the 17 new mutations in the variant contributes to their greater contagion. The mechanism is not yet known. Some data suggest that the new variant may bind more tightly to a protein on the surface of human cells and infect them more easily.

It is possible for the variant to bloom in the nose and throat of an infected person, but not, for example, in the lungs. This may explain why patients are more likely to spread it but not develop more serious diseases than from previous versions of the virus. Some influenza viruses behave similarly, experts say.

“We must view this evidence as preliminary and accumulative,” said Dr. Cevik on the growing data on the new variant.

However, the studies to date indicate that the transmission of the variant must urgently be restricted. She added: “Overall, we need to be much more careful and investigate the gaps in our mitigation efforts.”

Categories
Politics

David Perdue quarantines after Covid contact

Georgia Senator David Perdue went into quarantine after contacting someone who tested positive for Covid-19, his campaign announced on Thursday, less than a week before the Republican runoff against Democrat Jon Ossoff.

Perdue and his wife Bonnie tested negative for the coronavirus according to their campaign, which did not specify how long the 71-year-old incumbent senator would be in quarantine.

His contest against Ossoff is one of two runoff elections in Georgia on Tuesday that will determine whether Republicans or Democrats will have majority control over the US Senate starting next month.

In the other race, incumbent Senator Kelly Loeffler, Perdue’s Republican, meets Democrat Rev. Raphael Warnock. Recent polls suggest close races in any runoff election.

Perdue was due to perform with Loeffler on Thursday afternoon at a New Year’s Eve rally and concert in Gainesville.

The guidelines issued by the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention require that people exposed to a person with Covid stay at home for 14 days after their last contact with an infected person.

“This morning Senator Perdue was informed that he had come into close contact with someone in the campaign who tested positive for COVID-19,” said a statement from Perdue’s campaign.

“Both Senator Perdue and his wife tested negative today, but according to his doctor’s recommendations and CDC guidelines, they will be quarantined,” the campaign said.

“The Senator and his wife have been tested regularly throughout the campaign and the team will continue to follow CDC guidelines. More information will be provided as it becomes available.”

Ossoff later tweeted, “I hope David, Bonnie, the campaign staff and supporters stay healthy and COVID negative.”

Loeffler quarantined himself at the start of the race after receiving inconclusive Covid test results on November 21. She has not tested positive for the virus.

Senator David Perdue (R-GA) speaks during a campaign rally as he runs for re-election at the Olde Blind Dog Irish pub in Milton, Georgia on December 21, 2020.

Al Drago | Reuters

In the final days leading up to Tuesday’s runoff election, Republicans stepped up their efforts to get a vote as data shows that Democrats enjoyed an advantage in turnout.

When asked during a Fox News interview how closely she and Perdue coordinated their drainage efforts, Loeffler said, “Our campaigns have come together in a nationwide operation of 1,000 people with 40,000 volunteers and 8,000 election monitors. So we all work hard one day to get out across Georgia and work with the Georgia voters and make sure they know what this is about. They know they’ll turn out. “

“The future of the country is at stake,” said Loeffler of the runoff election.

President Donald Trump is said to be promoting Perdue and Loeffler in Georgia on Monday.

President-elect Joe Biden will travel to Atlanta on Monday, and Vice-President-elect Kamala Harris plans to visit Savannah on Sunday to surprise Ossoff and Warnock in the final push before election day.

If Perdue and Loeffler both win their runoff elections, Republicans will hold a 52-seat majority in the Senate. The Democratic caucus, made up of two independents, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and Maine’s Angus King, would have 48 seats.

If Ossoff and Warnock win, the Democratic caucus would have 50 seats. With the groundbreaking vote by Vice-President-Elect Harris, this would put the Democrats in control of the Senate. Democrats currently hold the House of Representatives and will continue to do so in 2021, despite losing a number of seats in that Chamber.

The Covid crisis was an important topic in the election campaign. Perdue, in particular, was scrutinized by the Democrats over allegations of improper stock trading at the start of the pandemic.

Ossoff and Warnock have criticized Perdue and Loeffler’s handling of the crisis, while the incumbent senators have accused the Democrats of stalling efforts to get an aid package through.

More recently, Ossoff and Perdue used Trump’s call for $ 2,000 stimulus checks as an opportunity to criticize Senate Republicans for speaking out against a larger direct payment earlier in the Covid aid negotiation process. Perdue and Loeffler, who have strongly allied themselves with Trump, later parted ways with many Senate Republicans to support the president’s call for greater direct payments.

Georgia has reported more than 647,800 cases of Covid this year, with 10,846 deaths attributable to the coronavirus in the state.

More than 2.8 million Georgians have already voted in Wednesday’s runoff elections, a record turnout for such a competition in the state.